Trump’s Wars of Whim, And How He Loses Them

There’s been a blizzard of commentary about the breakdown of U.S.-Canadian trade talks. Friend of TPM Paul Krugman has a good rundown of just how dependent the U.S. is on key Canadian exports — oil, lumber, hydropower electricity in addition to many other commodities. Of course, the U.S. is a net exporter of oil. But that’s in aggregate. As Paul explains, the details aren’t that simple. The upper Midwest gets most of its oil from Canada while a lot of oil produced in Texas, Louisiana and the Gulf Coast gets exported. These patterns could only be changed over many years and then at great expense. There are similar embedded dependencies on lumber and electricity. Then there are things like potash (for agriculture and some industrial production) where the U.S. gets almost all of its supply from Canada.

Of course, so far this is all hypothetical. Canada isn’t pulling these levers. The U.S. is conspicuously avoiding placing tariffs on these supplies on which it has a critical dependence. But that only highlights U.S. vulnerability. Nothing is stopping Canada from pulling those levers as Trump’s trade war of whim heats up.

Darline Graham’s Big Blunder Creates an Opening for a Far-Right Congressman

Sen. Darline Graham (R-SC) and Rep. Ralph Norman (R-SC) are set to face off in Tuesday’s runoff election for the South Carolina Senate seat. Though Graham led the pack in the primary election with more than 32% of the votes, her recent confession on the debate stage may create some problems for the newly minted senator in the upcoming runoff.

Continue reading “Darline Graham’s Big Blunder Creates an Opening for a Far-Right Congressman”

Canada Sits the United States Down for an Intervention

What Your Friends Say About You

Saturday’s extraordinary speech by Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney was ostensibly about the collapse of U.S. trade talks, but it was really about the collapse of the United States as a beacon of economic freedom, a worthy partner, a trusted ally, and a reliable neighbor.

As you would expect, the speech was written for a domestic political audience, with laundry lists of things already done and still to be done to protect Canada from the sudden emergence of an erratic aggressor on its southern border. But sprinkled among the reassurances to Canadians were blistering indictments of the United States under President Trump as a untrustworthy, deceitful, and calculating former (and hopefully future) friend.

This speech was more direct and explicit than Carney’s January address in Davos that received so much attention. “You’re at war when you’re attacked, and we got attacked,” Carney said after pulling Canadian negotiators from the trade talks late Friday.

I grew up in Cajun south Louisiana, so I was particularly struck by Carney’s account of the Trump administration’s attack on Canadian cultural policies that protect French language and culture, via the NYT:

On Saturday, he said that American negotiators “asked too much and offered too little.” Among other things, Mr. Carney said that American negotiators pushed to roll back Canada’s efforts to promote Canadian and French language content in online streaming services, subsidies for industries like publishing and film production and even mandatory labeling in French, an official language in Canada, as well as English on packaging.

“We were close to reaching a comprehensive agreement with the U.S., but they made changes, including threats on French language and culture and Canadian culture that would never be acceptable for that reason,” Mr. Carney said in French. “That marked the end of that stage of negotiations.”

When Carney talks about U.S. threats to Canadian sovereignty, as he did Saturday, he doesn’t seem to be referring as much to Trump’s preposterous chest-thumping about making Canada the 51st state — though that looms heavily over U.S.-Canada relations — but rather to a steady stream of demands and expected concessions that chip away at Canadian autonomy in ways that would over time subordinate it to the United States. But it’s all of the same piece: a relentless Trump administration effort to demean, denigrate, and demote Canada to American sidekick status.

Lawless Boat Strike Campaign Resumes

After a two-month pause, the Trump administration’s lawless campaign against alleged drug-smuggling boats resumed Sunday with a strike in the eastern Pacific that killed two people.

Sayanora, Ed!

Ed Martin — who variously served as acting D.C. U.S. attorney, U.S. pardon attorney, special attorney, and head of the Weaponization Working Group — is leaving the Justice Department “to go outside to fight Legal Battles for the upcoming Midterm Election, and the Presidential Election of 2028,” President Trump said.

Trump US Attorney Scheme Blocked Again

The 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Friday that John A. Sarcone III was unlawfully appointed as acting U.S. attorney for the Northern District of New York.

The 2-1 decision aligned with a key decision earlier in the week by the 9th Circuit that a vacant U.S. attorney position can only be filed by a first assistant U.S. attorney who was already in place at the time of the vacancy. In a workaround designed to bypass Senate confirmation, Sarcone was installed as first assistant attorney after the vacancy created when federal judges declined to extend his term as acting U.S. attorney.

Trump’s interpretation “would turn the FVRA’s common-sense framework on its head,” the 2nd Circuit ruled. “Under that reading, the President could install virtually anyone as the acting officer simply by naming that person First Assistant, regardless of whether they possessed any of the qualifications Congress required for the Executive to depart from the default.”

The Corruption: Live Nation Edition

Many DOJ officials regard President Trump’s direct and personal political interference in the Live Nation antitrust case “extreme” even for him, the WSJ reports. The settlement in March while the trial was underway came after Live Nation hired new lawyers from Sullivan & Cromwell, the NYC firm that represents Trump personally.

Roberts Allows Ballroom Project For Now

Chief Justice John Roberts issued a temporary administrative stay of lower court orders that would have halted construction of Trump’s White House ballroom on Saturday. Instead, construction will continue for now as the Supreme Court considers how to proceed on Trump’s emergency appeal.

In related news: The White House already has a nuclear-proof facility buried deep underground that was completed in secret during the Obama presidency which undercuts Trump’s claims in his ballroom lawsuit, the Washington Post reports.

The Purges: Stars and Stripes

The publisher of Stars and Stripes (who had already announced his retirement), along with the military newspaper’s editor in chief and a reporter, were all fired by Pentagon, which has tried to assert control over the venerable publication that has long had editorial independence.

Trump Threatens to Sue Think Tank

President Trump is absurdly threatening the Center for American Progress with a $5 billion defamation lawsuit unless it retracts a report it published last month titled: “The Trump Administration’s $1.7 Billion National Guard Deployments Fail To Reduce Urban Crime.” CAP called the threatened lawsuit “baseless” and “a transparent attempt to silence us.”

Completely Normal

TPM’s Hunter Walker: Colorado GOP Gov Nominee Claims to Have Battled ‘Demons’ With ‘Reptilian’ Eyes

History Repeats Itself With a Vengeance

Exterior of the Bauhaus school, Dessau, Germany, 1928. The school, a center of artistic and design experimentation, existed from 1919 to 1933 and in this building from 1925 to 1932. The architects Walter Gropius, Hannes Meyer, and Ludwig Mies van der Rohe were its three directors. (Photo by E. O. Hoppe/Hulton Archive/Getty Images)

With Alternative for Germany poised to become next month the first far-right party to come to power in a German state since World War II, it has been targeting the Bauhaus in strikingly similar ways to the Nazis nearly 100 years ago, the WSJ reports.

Quote of the Day

“Whether and how things intensify, or whether it turns out like in 1932, no one knows.”—Barbara Steiner, the Austrian-born director of the Bauhaus Dessau Foundation

News? Tips? Feedback? Please let me know. For sensitive information, use the encrypted methods here.

The Pending Supreme Court Decision Hanging Over the Midterms

Good morning! I hope this morning dispatch, focused on the latest updates about ongoing TPM storylines, has been useful. Starting this week, TPM members will be able to recieve it as an email. If you’re not a member, consider becoming one!

The Administration Makes Plans as the Justices’ Silence Continues

This morning dispatch seeks to round up some of the things we’re following coming into the day. But for weeks, there’s something we’ve been following about which there hasn’t been much new to write: the Supreme Court’s pending decision on a Trump executive order that seeks to restrict mail-in ballots in elections.

Trump’s various efforts to interfere with how America votes have not been terribly successful. Attempts by allies and conspiracy theorists to dredge up new allegations to undermine Americans’ faith in elections have amounted to little; the SAVE Act never had a real chance in the Senate. That’s why the fate of this executive order is so important. The order seeks to force states to submit their voter lists to the federal government, and for the postal service to only send ballots to voters on a list maintained by the Department of Homeland Security and the Social Security Administration. If the Supreme Court allows it to go forward, it would be a sweeping seizure of federal power over elections — the kind long understood to be unconstitutional — and a clearcut win for Trump on this topic, with drastic implications for future elections. This case may not decide that issue fully — all that is immediately before the Court right now is the question of whether a district court injunction on the order is appropriate. But the Court has been silent on that narrow question for far longer than experts expected it to be.

Over the weekend, there was a flurry of developments in this fight from outside the Court. The U.S. Postal Service published to the federal register a draft rule that it says will go into effect if the Supreme Court clears the way: The rule, true to the EO, would block the postal service from sending mail ballots to voters “unless compliance with the rule’s new standards has been verified.” Plaintiffs in one of the suits challenging the rule over the weekend asked the district court judge to block the postal service from finalizing its draft, arguing that drafting the rule violated her preliminary injunction.

Legal back and forth aside, the bottom line is that this is a case that contemplates whether the administration will be able to assert control over how and who states mail ballots to — assert control, in other words, over how and whether specific individuals vote. The Supreme Court has been mulling it for a curiously long time, leading experts to speculate that a justice or multiple justices are writing a lengthy dissent. Of course, which justices find themselves in a place to dissent — and which justices are in the majority — is the question we’re all asking.

Mike Collins’ White Nationalism-Posting Son-in-Law Continues to Cause Trouble

JACKSON, GEORGIA – JUNE 16: U.S. Senate Republican candidate, U.S. Rep. Mike Collins (R-GA) cheers after his nomination acceptance speech during a runoff election-night party on June 16, 2026 in Jackson, Georgia. (Photo by Jessica McGowan/Getty Images)

Even as Georgia Senate candidate and member of Congress Mike Collins (R-GA) has sought to dodge questions about his daughter’s husband’s extreme internet activity, his son-in-law continues said activity, dogging Collins’ campaign against Sen. Jon Ossoff (D-GA).

  • The Atlanta Journal-Constitution reported on Friday that David Alan Scheer II said in a recent online exchange that he “absolutely” believes that there should only be one vote per household and that women should not be allowed to vote.
  • CNN reported in July that Scheer had a history of supporting the group white nationalist Patriot Front and of making pro-white, antisemitic and anti-Muslim statements online.
  • The story hit hard because Collins has had a series of these kinds of issues: Just a week before the CNN story, Collins replaced a chief of staff who Slate had reported was in a group chat with white nationalists in which he promised to help get a Holocaust denier released from prison. An earlier chief of staff had a history of violent threats, and came under House Ethics Committee investigation for misusing funds. Collins himself likes to make jokes about his political enemies that nod to far-right, extrajudicial murders in South America.
  • Collins has avoided talking about Scheer, even though some of his videos appear to be shot on a property Collins owns. At one point, Collins scrambled to end a press conference after being asked about the topic.

Tabs

  • Natalie Harp posted extensively on January 6 — more than 150 times — in many cases urging support for Trump, CNN reports.
  • The Washington Post has been ordered by an arbitrator to rehire Karen Attiah, who was fired in September after posts about Charlie Kirk.

Woman of the Hour

KITTERY, MAINE – AUGUST 14: U.S. Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) greets supporters outside the Kittery Trading Post, the first stop of a weekend re-election campaign bus tour of the state of Maine, on August 14, 2026 in Kittery, Maine. (Photo by CJ Gunther/Getty Images)

It’s Susan Collins, who, amid a tough fight for reelection in Maine, has been strongly, publicly concerned with greater frequency. The latest example came over the weekend, when she put out a statement on flailing U.S.-Canada trade relations that garnered her some attention, urging  “both sides” to continue negotiating. “The Administration must consider the negative impact tariffs would have on Maine businesses,” it read.

Are We at War?

Trade war!

The US-Canada Trainwreck and the Limits of American Power

A few more thoughts on the collapse of U.S.-Canadian trade negotiations and the over-the-top U.S. predation that led to it. (See my earlier post here.) Here’s a portion of an analysis piece from the Toronto Star …

Doing a deal under the conditions Carney described would clearly have undermined Canada’s pivot to new markets by putting Carney firmly under the thumb of the U.S.

As the prime minister described it, he was faced with a trade agreement that was suddenly transformed into an attack on Canadian sovereignty, an attempted psychological annexation that could have turned Canada into an American client state, a sort of North American Belarus.

It does, however, jive with Trump’s repeated 51st state taunts when he returned to the White House.

And Trump’s National Security Strategy said of America’s neighbours in the Western Hemisphere: “We want other nations to see us as their partner of first choice, and we will (through various means) discourage their collaboration with others.”

As Donald Trump not so much dismantles the U.S.-backed global order as dynamites it, that destruction coupled with the rise of a more vocal and electorally prominent U.S. left has renewed the discussion of just what that U.S.-backed global order was. This passage and this whole U.S.-Canada breakdown illustrates a lot of it.

Continue reading “The US-Canada Trainwreck and the Limits of American Power”

What Did Trump Do That Made Carney Walk Away?

You’ve probably seen that Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney has walked away from trade talks with the U.S. That has led the U.S. to impose staggeringly large (and certainly illegal) tariffs on Canada, and Canada is responding in kind. It’s not clear precisely what demands the U.S. made that prompted Carney to do this. Given the pain this will cause Canada, at least in the near-term far more than the U.S., they must have been not only unacceptable but an affront to Canada’s sovereignty and national dignity.

As I understand it, negotiations appeared to be going well and productively. They began as an attempt to find an agreement to forestall Trump’s original threat of a new round of draconian and illegal tariffs. Indeed, they appeared to be so near completion that an article I saw mid-week referred to Mexico eyeing and looking to negotiate a deal with comparable contours. Point being, it was a measure not only of how well the negotiations appeared to be going but how close they seemed to completion. The broad outlines were known to other interested countries.

Then Carney abruptly ended them in response to new demands.

Continue reading “What Did Trump Do That Made Carney Walk Away?”

Why the Right Is Going All-in on Stoking the WNBA Culture Wars

[Essay]

They Only Have One Bit

It’s been clear for weeks that right-wing media — eager to distract from its leader’s woeful unpopularity and resulting fears about November’s midterms — struck gold with its anti-trans, anti-WNBA crusade.

Indiana Fever guard Sophie Cunningham (who put up an impressive triple zero statline in 14 minutes played during Thursday’s loss to the Dallas Wings) proved her worth to the movement by characterizing trans women as male predators infiltrating “girls’” locker rooms, and refusing to back down. Since then, small “pro-Cunningham” protests have been organized before Fever games, and women wearing similar shirts from an anti-trans athleticwear company have made themselves conspicuous at games. 

The t-shirt wearing provocateurs learned from a Seattle Storm game last month that fans of the famously LGBTQ-friendly league would react badly to the display, producing useful footage for Fox News and its ilk. At last Sunday’s game against the Fever, Atlanta Dream security allegedly asked a woman and her daughter to cover up their anti-trans shirts, prompting the team to apologize. The women lost no time getting in front of a camera to bemoan their treatment. 

Washed-up NBA players, too, have gotten in on the action, with Enes Kanter Freedom and Royce White proclaiming themselves women, pretending to declare their intent for the 2027 WNBA draft. In a particularly dark twist, Freedom claims that other ex-NBA players will follow his lead for the financial incentive of playing in the W — a league that only recently started paying its athletes a living wage as a result of the enormous efforts of the players’ union. 

“We will approach these important conversations thoughtfully and in alignment with the values of our league,” the league said in a statement earlier this month. “There are no immediate eligibility matters affecting the WNBA, and we strongly denounce the bad-faith efforts to use these topics to demean or marginalize others.”

There are no trans women playing in the WNBA.

In the meantime, Republican politicians have also returned to their favorite well of feigned outrage over certain white players being fouled by Black ones, spinning a news cycle out of Cunningham being fouled by Chicago Sky guard DiJonai Carrington a few games ago. Carrington, who majored in African and African-American studies at Stanford, posted “WHITE PRIVILEGE” on social media after she was ejected from the game for receiving a “flagrant 2” foul. 

“The WNBA knows better than to play games down here in Florida, because I’ll be charging people with assault,” tweeted Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier (R) in response to the foul. 

Florida does not have a WNBA team, so the league does not play there. 

Fever Coach Stephanie White said after the game that she didn’t think Carrington’s foul was intentional, prompting the Fever crowd (made up of many newer fans who came into the league with guard Caitlin Clark) to boo her at the next game. 

“This is the last of the woke era,” intoned Fox News host Bret Baier. “This is why this is so much bigger than a gender story. This is the DEI story. This is the tear-down — America is a flawed country — tear-down-the-statues story. Put your pronouns at the bottom of emails story.”

As Baier spells out, the right’s intentions are not particularly subtle. In cycle after cycle, its leaders cash in on targeting minority populations to blame for the “risk” they present to white people’s social standing and prosperity. It’s been the unifying theme of Republican politics for decades — “welfare queens,” “criminal aliens,” “intercity gangs” — and has become so unmasked in the Trump era as to extend to decorated military officers and career civil servants. Republicans have been candid that “anti-DEI” means no minorities or women in public life. 

Cunningham, white and willing, has been the protagonist the right needed to unfurl its narrative. But the anti-trans campaign, the grousing about professional basketball players being fouled, it’s all in service of a grander mission. In the white Christian nationalist nation the Trump administration is openly trying to foist on the American public, a sports league where Black, gay players are celebrated and (recently, to a degree) paid well is a distinct danger. 

The right’s endless grievance about threats to its vision of a white, retrograde America has never been about freedom to live that way, as its members insist. It’s about punishing and immiserating Americans who defy that worldview — infiltrating their league with bigots and condemning their beloved players as violent thugs. 

[Essay]

The Future Is Filming Everyone

This week, MacRumors surfaced a video providing the first look at Apple’s camera-equipped AI AirPods, codenamed B970. The video was discovered in a Mac OS update package typically provided to developers. That Apple has been developing the AirPods as a foray into wearable AI is no secret. When they will be released and how they will work, however, has been subject to much speculation. As the premier brand in wearable technology, Apple’s decisions regarding the use of cameras and AI in its products could have a profound impact on the technology’s adoption. With public sentiment not exactly rallying behind the promise of AI (or the ubiquity of cameras), a popular consumer product could, in theory, start to sway opinion. Obtaining video evidence of what Apple is planning, then, seems like a big deal. But having now watched the video more times than I’d like to admit, what it seems to offer is less a key to Apple’s AI ambitions than a knowing wink that it would be found and analyzed. 

The video opens with the camera unblurring to show a man in his apartment as a new-and-improved AI Siri announces that, “With Visual Intelligence, your world becomes savable.” The man, in profile with one white AirPod hanging from his ear, picks up a book from a kitchen counter and studies its cover while Siri — presumably speaking into the man’s ear — says, “See something you like? Just ask me to save it for later.” The video ends with the man standing alone in his kitchen nodding to himself as the camera again blurs. The whole thing is only 13 seconds long and is sterile and uncanny in the way all simulations of using AI consumer products seem to be. 

On first viewing, I was ready to dismiss it as a bizarre and not particularly insightful demo of a product I would likely never buy. I wasn’t even sure what the product did. Watching again, the scenario in which the man would apparently benefit from using his camera-equipped AI AirPods was even more baffling. Here was a man, seemingly alone in an apartment, who walks into a kitchen with a single book on the counter top, and, evidently seeing “something he likes,” picks the book up and holds it up to his face so that camera(s) and AI in his ear(s) can remember it for later. Either this man has suffered some tragic, Memento-type memory loss* or he is not in his own apartment — and yet alone. Regardless, it’s troubling that the idea Apple came up with to demonstrate the awesome power of this technology is being able to later recall a book you spotted in a kitchen. That is unless the point is for us to focus on the book.

The book is titled, “Could Should Might Don’t: How We Think About the Future,” and it was written by Nick Foster, the former Head of Design at Google X — the “moonshot factory” that birthed Google Glass. I have not read the book, but I’m a dutiful enough correspondent to have done some research on Foster. One way to describe him might be an AI centrist (as opposed to an accelerationist or doomer) who markets himself to companies as someone who can sharpen their thinking about the future. He coined the phrase “the future mundane” to explain that evolutions in technology don’t lead to extreme outcomes (utopia/dystopia) but tend to manifest in nearly imperceptible changes in ordinary routines. In a 2025 interview with the New York Times, he described tech companies as being too “glibly positive” explaining that, “If you say, ‘This is the future — it’s going to be great,’ no one believes you. No one thinks that you’re being serious. No one thinks you’re responsible.” Bolstering his resume as someone who understands technology’s transformational power is the biographically convenient detail that he was born in Derby, England, home of the industrial revolution. 

It is possible, of course, that Foster’s book only appears in the video because it happened to be what a production assistant was reading. But for a company as particular about its image as Apple, this seems unlikely. This is the company that literally smashed onto the personal computing scene with a “1984”-inspired Super Bowl ad directed by Ridley Scott. A private product demo is a long way from a Super Bowl commercial and Apple is not the same sledgehammer-wielding upstart it was in the ‘80s or even the ‘90s and early 2000s. Yet, for it to be a coincidence that this book appears in a demo that is only 13 seconds, and otherwise includes almost no detail about what the product does, beggars belief. So what is it doing there?

To understand what Apple might be thinking ahead of the release of the AirPods, it might help to consider the controversy surrounding Meta’s camera-equipped AI glasses. 

Memorably described by the writer Ryan Broderick as “a Cybertruck for your face,” Meta Glasses aren’t just painfully uncool, their ability to clandestinely record video is creeping people out and raising serious privacy issues. As Business Insider reported, Instagram (Meta’s own company) had to ban a certain type of video that was proliferating on the platform where men, wearing Meta Glasses, secretly recorded women as they responded to often offensive pickup lines. Undeterred, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg is fully committed to the glasses. In his recent manifesto, The Future is For Everyone, Zuckerberg suggests — with the facile optimism Foster scoffs at — that the world would be a more equitable place if everyone had access to portable superintelligence. 

With Meta being Apple’s closest competitor in this market, it’s possible that the presence of Foster’s book in Apple’s video is just a subtle nod that they are the more serious company — a signal that they understand both the dangers and benefits of their technology and will take a more considered approach. A darker reading might be that Apple is endorsing Foster’s belief that a hugely disruptive technology like AI is more likely to bring mundane change than out-and-out dystopia and, therefore, introducing a device that could potentially be used for AI-assisted surveillance isn’t that big a deal. 

But even if dystopia doesn’t come all at once, are we sure we aren’t at least edging toward it? The proliferation of surveillance systems like Flock, which combine surreptitious cameras with AI software capable of capturing and analyzing massive amounts of personal data, has more than a whiff of Big Brother. And giving even a fraction of that power to individuals to wear on their faces seems like a recipe for mass surveillance beyond what even Orwell described. While I’m not naive enough to expect one of the richest and most powerful companies in the world to lead the crusade against surveillance, all they really have to do is demonstrate they recognize there is a problem and not do anything to make it worse. In this way, as the video says, the world becomes savable.

*It’s possible that some additional context for the video is missing and the man is suffering from a true disability the AirPods are helping him overcome. If this is the case, I apologize.

[Product Review]

Nostalgic for Racism

One of my passions in life is wasting money on Cleveland sports merchandise. It would be a mistake to say “memorabilia” because I’m not focused on asset appreciation here. It’s just that about half my wardrobe says Cleveland and I’m bald so I wear a lot of hats. So I was surprised to see the sports apparel company New Era offering this hat in particular. The team that is now the Cleveland Guardians and was formerly the “Cleveland Indians” before the 2022 MLB season never in the history of the team wore a hat during games that said “Indians.” So, why is this hat on sale now?

“Maybe this is not actually a Cleveland hat,” I thought to myself. Maybe it’s some other team I never heard of? The description of the hat only raises more questions: “The Major League White 59FIFTY Fitted Cap features an embroidered Major League Indians wordmark at the front panels with stripes at each side.” The Major League Indians, eh? That is not a team, just a vaguely sounding racist arrangement of words!

Now here’s the thing. My understanding is the Cleveland Guardians still own the rights to “Cleveland Indians.” So, is this the franchise trying to be sneaky and drop the “Cleveland?” or is it New Era trying to get around the licensing rights by not including “Cleveland”? Some other shenanigans? Either way, it seems obvious that what is going on here is someone trying to ensure the racist money faucet doesn’t entirely shut off. Shame on them. At least put your name on it.

[Good Posts]

We’re All Thriving

Natalie Harp. Locker room. Catering truck. Territory of Hormuz. Love notes. THAADs empty. Trump Jesus. Pool vandals. Bombing of Oman. Laura Loomer pro-Ukraine. Pete Hegseth Presidential run.

James (@gravitysra1nbow.bsky.social) 2026-08-19T00:49:22.294Z

[TPM Trivia]

How Much of This Week’s News Do You Remember?

  1. Who is the latest member of Congress being investigated by the House Ethics Committee for alleged sexual misconduct? 
  2. President Trump appeared on a podcast run by this former close ally turned antagonist with whom he has apparently since made up. 
  3. Which former Republican congressman is now the Democratic nominee for governor in Florida? 

Answers below

[This Effing Woman]

Nancy Mace Thinks We’re Too Fussed About Her Tattoos to Be Sufficiently Islamophobic 

In her pivot from congresswoman to failed gubernatorial candidate to now, apparently, podcaster, Nancy Mace has stayed true to her core identity: troll. The former South Carolina lawmaker went viral this week after displaying some extremely midlife crisis-style tattoos during the soft launch of her new YouTube show. Despite all appearances to the contrary, they aren’t AI or Photoshop; instead, as Mace told Politico in a February profile, she got them in “rapid succession” after losing or firing the majority of her congressional staff in 2024.” Doing so provided, she said, “The pain that I need to feel.” As Texas Chron reporter Gwen Howerton put it, it looks like “nancy mace went to the tattoo shop and just said ‘give me tattoos.’”

The always-desperate-for-attention Mace acted astonished at the attention to her ink, using it as fodder for a promo reel for her new show, which is called Get Maced, because of course it is. In the clip, set to a generic classic rock riff, the title of the show repeatedly flashes on screen in Barbie-pink font alongside clips of Mace surfing, shooting an automatic weapon, and walking through the halls of the Capitol. The accompanying text: “If my tattoos trigger you more than the Islamic invasion, your priorities are as broken as the Biden-Harris border.”

The show seems to consist of Mace monologuing in a studio about the topics she thinks need more attention, like the impending Islamic invasion of the U.S. and tax dollars’ allegedly going towards paying for the surgery of trans inmates. She promises it will also involve cursing and is sure to annoy people. We are sure of that too.

[Galaxy Brain]

Fair Deal?

CBS News reported this week that the U.S. Army has offered a unit of active duty soldiers in Georgia a four-day pass to play the new Grand Theft Auto VI as an incentive to reenlist for at least two more years of service. Twenty of the 130 soldiers eligible for the offer have apparently already accepted. It’s been 13 years since the last GTA was released, and we can certainly appreciate the hype, but trading four days off to play a video game for two more years of service doesn’t exactly send the message that you value human life. 

Trivia answers: 1) Rep. Jimmy Gomez (D-CA) 2) Michael Cohen 3) Rep. David Jolly (R-FL) 

Colorado GOP Gov Nominee Claims to Have Battled ‘Demons’ With ‘Reptilian’ Eyes

Victor Marx was deep in the jungle and crippled by a fever when he was attacked. 

The self-described “high-risk missionary” and Republican gubernatorial nominee in Colorado claims he traveled to Myanmar to train “warriors” involved in secretive unspecified relief operations. Before accepting his teachings, Marx said the group wanted to assess his skills. Without warning, they swarmed him. 

But those soldiers apparently didn’t know who they were messing with. Marx’s 2024 book, “The Dangerous Gentleman: A Call for Men to be Courageous in a Culture of Fear,” opens with this tale of being tested in war-torn Myanmar. According to Marx, when the soldiers charged him, he was able to handily defeat “more than ten” men at once armed only with a “trainer blade” made of “thick plastic.”

Along with this story of a wild skirmish in the jungle, “Dangerous Gentleman” contains multiple tales of Marx doing battle with “demons” who had taken control of people. His detailed descriptions include claims that one man “transformed” in front of him, developing “pointy” ears and “superhuman strength.” In another episode, Marx said a “demonized” teenage girl “turned reptilian” before his eyes. 

Improbable stories are a foundational element of Marx’s career as a Christian Nationalist Evangelist preacher and podcaster. Marx, a Marine veteran, claims to hold multiple high-level black belts stemming from his stepfather’s creation of a martial arts system, “Keichu-Do” or “Cajun Karate.” At points, Marx has suggested that he’s used these deadly skills to rescue tens of thousands of women and children from hot zones around the world. 

Marx brought his questionable tales of war zone heroics and feats of strength into the political realm when he announced a run for governor late last year. In June, Marx secured the Republican nomination after defeating three other candidates in the party’s primary. As the campaign has progressed, Marx has faced questions about his extraordinary claims of saving thousands of lives and even his martial arts expertise. His answers in multiple tough interviews have not been convincing. Yet the stories of black belts and daring rescues may not even be the most unbelievable parts of Marx’s personal narrative. 

“Dangerous Gentleman’s” first supernatural tale comes in its second chapter where Marx describes encountering a captured “ISIS commander” while doing “humanitarian operations” in Iraq in 2017. According to Marx, the man had been captured by Iraqi forces that he was working with “informally.” Marx claimed the alleged ISIS fighter was seemingly set to be executed. As a result, Marx hoped to pray with him and make him “a brother in Christ while he still had the chance.” It did not go as planned.

“His face became contorted, morphing into a hardened, angular mask within seconds. Holy corn flakes, I thought. What is happening here?” Marx wrote, adding, “I and those around me watched as that man transformed in front of our eyes. Muscles bulged out of his forehead. His eyes narrowed. Stranger still, his ears … got pointy.”

Incredibly, Marx said someone on his team captured direct evidence of the very moment the man’s “ears started sticking out from his head and looking sharp, like a troll’s.”

“Somebody else in the courtyard caught photos of the transformation, and it’s all there in living color from start to finish,” Marx wrote. 

Marx did not respond to multiple queries from TPM about the claims in his book, including a request to view this purported photographic evidence. 

Marx’s descriptions of performing what might be commonly understood as exorcisms have generated questions and concerns during his gubernatorial bid. 

Kyle Clark, a reporter with the Denver NBC affiliate 9News, has done extensive reporting on Marx and his various stories. During an incredible interview with Marx in late May, Clark pressed Marx, who refused to provide specific numbers of people he has rescued. In his book and various speeches, Marx has consistently suggested he may have killed people in the various combat zones he has visited. During their conversation, Clark also asked Marx if this was true, and the candidate would not provide a direct answer. After reviewing many of the candidate’s sermons and podcasts, Clark also noted Marx has described himself as a “reluctant exorcist” while detailing specific rituals he has supposedly performed to cast demons out of people. Marx quibbled with that terminology. 

“That’s a joke the way I say that,” Marx responded. “But as a follower of Christ and someone who’s very familiar with evil … I believe the word of God that I can pray for people and see people set free from, whether it’s demonic oppression — I never call it possession — I believe there’s levels of demonization where people are suffering because of evil.”

While Marx seemingly tried to downplay his prior tales of “demonization” during the conversation with Clark, in his book, the incidents he recounts are graphic and unmistakably supernatural. 

Along with the story of the “ISIS commander,” Marx wrote about encountering a teenage girl in a youth prison who began “growling” and engaging in other shocking behavior as he attempted to pray with her. Marx made it clear he felt her actions were inhuman. Along with describing her as a “demon” and a “creature,” he claimed the girl was “tearing at her own flesh and making otherworldly—or under-worldly—noises.”

“She looked up at me, her eyes mostly rolled back into her head, and an unnatural voice came out of her: ‘I guess you’re going to say I’m possessed,’” Marx wrote of the girl, adding, “Believe it or not, I could actually smell sulfur and rotten eggs, to the point where I thought I would throw up.”

Marx did not respond to specific questions about this alleged encounter and whether he had any evidence it had taken place. 

Currently, Marx is seen as a longshot against his Democratic Party rival, Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser. While the race for the Colorado governor’s mansion is an open one since the current occupant, Democrat Jared Polis, is term limited, Cook Political Report rates the contest a “solid D.” Marx has also proved to be divisive within his own party and among other Evangelicals. On Wednesday, Clark and 9News reported the vice chair of the Denver Republican Party resigned to avoid facing a removal vote after he refused to back Marx. Clark has also noted Marx’s claims about exorcisms have “caused rifts with other Christian leaders.”

While all of this might make Marx seem like a fringe figure, he is evidence of a larger and unquestionably alarming phenomenon. 

Rhetoric about “demon” possession has become increasingly common among the religious right. The former Fox News host Tucker Carlson, who has tens of millions of viewers and has been touted as a potential presidential candidate in 2028, has claimed he was “attacked” by a “demon.” Carlson has also conducted interviews about possession with an alleged exorcist on his podcast. The late influential right-wing activist Charlie Kirk, whose group raised hundreds of millions of dollars for conservative causes, has said “demon possession is real.” Kirk also penned a foreword for “Dangerous Gentleman” wherein he lauded Marx for “confronting demons” and described the book as “a beacon of clarity, virtue, and inspiration.”

Brad Onishi is a former Evangelical minister and research associate at UC Berkeley who has written multiple books about Christian Nationalism. In a conversation with TPM on Thursday, Onishi said the concept of exorcisms or “spiritual warfare” is “extremely trendy right now” on the right in conjunction with the rise of President Donald Trump’s MAGA movement. 

“It is no longer fringe. I would point you as evidence to the fact that … Paula White-Cain is the White House faith advisor. She has an office in the White House and she is somebody who prays to cast out demons. She speaks in tongues. And so, she has been the enduring faith representative of Trump and his administration going back to 2016,” Onishi explained. “So, if we start with her, we see a mainstreaming of this kind of religiosity going back a decade into Trump’s political life.”

As further evidence these beliefs are gaining traction in right-wing politics, Onishi also pointed to Carlson’s alleged “demon” encounter, GOP House Speaker Mike Johnson’s ties to the far right New Apostolic Reformation, and broadcaster Alex Jones’ past comments alleging prominent Democrats are demons who smell like “sulfur.”  

“It’s one of those things where the fringe has become the fabric. There’s no way to examine American Christianity right now without seeing that the extremist elements have come right into the center,” Onishi said. 

Onishi also described Marx and his various extraordinary claims as evidence of a new type of religious leadership gaining ground.

“I think what I would call him is a kind of a feature of the modern ecosystem of the religious right. One of the things that you find in independent charismatic spaces from which Victor Marx comes is an emphasis on prophecy and authority in individuals who’ve been given those gifts by God,” Onishi explained. “And what that means is, rather than having a denominational authority, or a pastoral authority, or an ordination that gives you the right to speak for the community, if you claim that you have the right gifts from God — prophecy, dreams, exorcism — then you can attract a following by dint of the gifts you are claiming to hold. And so, Victor Marx fits very well into that system.”

Onishi also detailed how the core tenets of Christian Nationalism — and particularly claims around demons — are inherently undemocratic and extreme. He characterized the belief system as one that argues right wing Christians should get “more of the country than others” and that they are engaged in “a spiritual battle against those who are blinded by the forces of the devil and by the demons who inhabit them.” Onishi further outlined the goals of leaders who espouse this type of rhetoric. 

“It’s not democratic victory with the help of God and the gospel. [The] goal is conquering … to drive out the enemies of God,” Onishi said. 

Indeed, the central message of Marx’s book is that men must become “dangerous” to take on nefarious forces in society, including “woke” institutions and the LGBT community.

“Too often, if a kid is raised only by a woman, he picks up effeminate qualities and gives up on the idea of masculinity,” Marx wrote. “The culture throws all these metrosexual, nonbinary lunatics at them, and kids follow that example. It’s sick, sad, and deranged, but it’s happening because men aren’t standing in their proper place.”

Marx repeatedly encourages men to rise up against “moral filth.” Onishi pointed out this type of rhetoric, particularly the dehumanization and literal demonization of political rivals, can easily encourage violence. 

“It’s one step from spiritual warfare to actual physical warfare. Because you are saying … that the people across from you are not simply your political opponents who have different policy ideas than you,” Onishi said. “These are not people who disagree with you on what to do as a democratic community. These are people who are demons. They smell like sulfur. They are inhabited by the devil. They are not like us.” 

In his book, Marx was clear that he sees “demons” all around us and hopes to encourage people to rise against them.

“If the secular institutions and the demonic forces controlling them are finally calling us dangerous, then why not just go ahead and be dangerous?” he asked.

How Trump’s Corruption Makes Everything DOJ Does Suspect

No One Is Safe

One of the most pernicious effects of corrupting federal law enforcement is that it undermines public confidence — as it should — in everything the Justice Department does.

You can’t have a Justice Department or FBI doing corrupt work with one hand and normal aboveboard work with the other and expect anyone — from citizens to lawyers to judges — to decipher which is which in any given case.

At it’s core, that is what losing the “presumption of regularity” is all about. It casts doubt on everything.

For defenders of the old DOJ, reformers, watchdogs, and journalists, one of the pitfalls of the descent into endemic DOJ corruption is that they themselves take on the onus of figuring which cases are legit and which aren’t. It’s an impossible task. Given the limited access and visibility that outsiders have into federal cases — criminal and civil — there’s no real way to assess on a case-by-case basis where impure motives, retribution, and bad acts are involved.

It’s only because Trump is such a uncontained raving moron that many of the early vindictive prosecutions are so obviously driven by his desire for retribution. He could have picked less sympathetic characters, people who had less obvious reasons for being in his crosshairs than Letitia James or James Comey.

Even then, if I had a penny for every time I’ve been told that Comey deserves what he’s getting because of his heavy-handed role in the closing days of the 2016 campaign, I’d have retired by now. The notion that Comey had it coming so totally misses the heart of the matter that I’ve given up trying to correct people on this point.

If Trump were less impulsive and more calculating, he would have begun by targeting unpopular, unsavory, dubious characters where the corruption could be more easily camouflaged.

The news yesterday that former Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-CA) is now under federal criminal investigation related to the sexual misconduct allegations against him is case in point. We could fall into the trap of trying to figure out whether this is a legit prosecution given Swalwell’s contemptible conduct. We could try to parse which parts of the investigation are legit and which aren’t. But it’s a crazy-making undertaking. You can’t possibly separate out Trump’s repeated threats against Swalwell and the prior investigation of him and Trump’s eagerness to target political foes like Swalwell from the possibility that there’s a valid legal and factual predicate to justify the feds looking into him.

The onus must remain firmly on the Trump DOJ to be aboveboard at all times, and the presumption that it is corruptly proceeding should remain firmly against it as long as it has a corrupt leadership. I don’t mean Bondi or Blanche or Patel or whoever else becomes titular head of federal law enforcement. I mean Trump.

While Morning Memo is mostly focused on the politically oriented vindictive prosecutions, there’s a vast range of other DOJ cases, investigations, and regulatory actions that have come under suspicion for obvious reasons. These are far-flung examples because the problem itself is so all-encompassing:

  • Corporate fraudsters are being let off the hook right and left. Who gets let off and who doesn’t prompts endless but justified speculation about what it takes to receive such dispensation.
  • In one particularly concerning case, a career federal prosecutor in Miami fired for years-old anti-Trump blog posts he wrote before joining the department has sued the Trump DOJ, claiming that he was terminated immediately before he was scheduled to try a major fraud case — and not-so-subtly suggesting that the only way MAGA influencer Natalie Winters could have been tipped off to the old blog posts was by “one of the parties,” the implication being that it was all a bid to delay the upcoming fraud trial. Defense counsel have “vigorously denied” having anything to do with unearthing the fired prosecutor’s writings.
  • Trump son-in-law Jared Kushner’s brother Joshua’s fire-sale purchase (along with Bob Iger) of the NBA’s Los Angeles Lakers while the previous owner Mark Walter is fighting off a federal investigation has prompted insidious but understandable speculation that law enforcement scrutiny was a tool to force the sale.

The suspicion, rumor, and conjecture — some of it more grounded in fact, some of it less so — arising from the Trump DOJ’s now-presumed corruption is in the darkest sense the fruit of that corruption. It’s everyone getting the message that the Trump DOJ is open for business. The perverse pressures that puts on honest lawyers inside DOJ and outside lawyers who have cases against the department is enormous and irreconcilable.

The threat of a corrupt federal law enforcement apparatus run amok in America is a threat to everyone. No one is spared the risk, even if not everyone is eventually targeted. The arbitrary and capricious nature of corrupt justice creates an oppressive atmosphere of fear, doubt, and suspicion. It erodes civic life. It incentivizes people to stay in the good graces of the regime. It encourages ambitious scoundrels in and out of government to use the corrupt system to their own advantage and to the disadvantage of their foes, whether in politics, business, or their personal lives.

What Will California Do About Tina Peters?

California’s two Democratic senators have written to the state’s top election official expressing “grave concerns” about the prospect of convicted election denier Tina Peters being hired as an election administrator in Shasta County.

Oops …

The DHS recent claim that massive numbers of noncitizens are registered to vote in Nevada has already collapsed under the weight of its own bogosity.

Important Read

TPM’s Josh Kovensky contextualizes some of the latest filings by the defendants in the “Minneapolis 15” case:

  • HSI’s expansion of the use of certified undercover (CUC) operations from infiltrating drug cartels and international money launderers to targeting domestic protesters;
  • the tantalizing reference to “Op Keyhole,” which suggests the (unconfirmed) existence of a DHS operation targeting domestic protesters;
  • how this all may fit together with the Trump DOJ’s Joint Task Force Vanguard, which seeks to treat anti-Trump protests as domestic terrorism; and
  • a related legal fight over whether HSI’s bumbling undercover surveillance of protesters in Minnesota violated a court-ordered injunction against immigration enforcement in churches.

Midterms Watch

The Cook Political Report has moved the Senate races in Texas and Iowa in Democrats’ favor, from “Lean Republican” to “Toss Up.”

See Ya Monday

Morning Memo playlists at Spotify and YouTube.

News? Tips? Feedback? Please let me know. For sensitive information, use the encrypted methods here.

Trump Administration to Support ‘Independent Journalism’ in Europe With Anti-Immigrant Focus

This piece was originally published at The Redoubt, a reader-supported publication based in Vienna, Austria. If you appreciate this reporting, consider a paid subscription or one-time donation.

The U.S. State Department is seeking to build out a consortium for “independent journalism” that will produce critical reporting on public policies in European countries, with a particular focus on immigration, “civilizational values” and “the state of sovereignty.”

President Donald Trump has not tried to hide his disdain for most European governments. “Your countries are going to hell,” he declared in a September 2025 speech at the United Nations, stating that Europe’s “open borders” — a claim at odds with Europe’s highly visible efforts to dissuade and deport immigrants — are leading to societal collapse. Vice President J.D. Vance has also openly campaigned for right-wing opposition parties across the continent, including the neo-fascist Alternative für Deutschland.

Now the Trump administration is seeking to bolster its critique of Europe under the guise of journalism.

Continue reading “Trump Administration to Support ‘Independent Journalism’ in Europe With Anti-Immigrant Focus”