Why Local Law Enforcement Rarely Investigates Federal Officers

This story was originally published by ProPublica. Sign up to receive their biggest stories as soon as they’re published.

Minutes after a federal agent shot and killed a Mexican immigrant in a Chicago suburb last September, a group of police officers stood on the sidewalk trying to figure out the answer to a question of protocol: Who would investigate the shooting?

“Wouldn’t it be state’s, at a minimum?” one Franklin Park officer asked, according to body camera footage.

Chief Mike Witz shook his head. “No, because it’s a federal shooting,” he said. “You’re not going to investigate a federal officer.”

His officers didn’t investigate. In their report, they didn’t even note the names of the two Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents at the scene of Silverio Villegas González’s death. Instead, they deferred to the FBI.

Local law enforcement officials also did not investigate when a Border Patrol agent shot and wounded a U.S. citizen in her car in Chicago less than a month later. Or when an ICE agent in Phoenix shot a Honduran man during a traffic stop later that month.

In fact, local police did not open investigations into six of the 12 shootings by on-duty federal agents that have led to the deaths or injuries of citizens and immigrants since September, a ProPublica analysis found. In three other shooting cases, state or local police said they have opened inquiries, which they called a routine practice in those jurisdictions. And in Minnesota, where ICE and Border Patrol shot and killed two U.S. citizens and injured a Venezuelan man last month, state police have tried to conduct independent investigations only to be thwarted by the Trump administration, which has gone so far as to block officers from a scene, even when they had a judicial warrant.

Continue reading “Why Local Law Enforcement Rarely Investigates Federal Officers”

‘Do You Speak Billionaire?’ and Other Stories From the Fall of the Washington Post

I think I can say with little fear of contradiction that I know as much as anyone else in modern American journalism about the absolute, no-excuses necessity of operating in the black. In some ways, I know more because with big corporate operations there are lots of creative ways by which you can either hide from the public or hide from yourself that you’re operating at a loss or failing as a business. At least for a while, you can convince yourself that everything is great. You’re not losing money. You’re investing in growth. You’re focusing on quality. For this reason I’ve always seen news organization layoffs at least somewhat differently from many others who believe deeply in journalism. All the merit and great stories and hard work just melts into the background when you face the absolute necessity of making payroll. It’s a brutal taskmaster.

That’s not what’s happening at The Washington Post, and not simply because, of course, Jeff Bezos could float almost limitless news organization losses forever and barely notice. What we’re seeing is something that should be familiar to any close of observer of the news over the last generation. Let’s call it the formulaic billionaire white knight press baron doom cycle.

Continue reading “‘Do You Speak Billionaire?’ and Other Stories From the Fall of the Washington Post”

The Upside Down World of the Buffoonish Ed Martin

Hoisted on His Own Petard

In the roughshod world of the Trump Justice Department, politicized prosecutions are fine, but Ed Martin apparently crossed the line when he allegedly improperly leaked grand jury materials in the bogus mortgage fraud investigation of Sen. Adam Schiff (D-CA), CNN reports.

That finding by Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche fueled what I suspect Blanche already wanted to do: sideline Martin further. Martin was removed as director of the DOJ’s Weaponization Working Group at the end of 2025.

But what’s notable is what didn’t happen: Sharing grand jury information with unauthorized persons is a criminal offense, but Martin is not facing criminal charges; and, while he’s expected to leave DOJ soon, he remains U.S. pardon attorney.

For his part, Blanche offered a lawyered public statement (note the use of the present tense): “there are no misconduct investigations into Ed Martin. Ed is doing a great job as Pardon Attorney.”

Georgia Ain’t Gabbard’s First Rodeo

A team working for DNI Tulsi Gabbard led an investigation in the spring of 2025 into cockamamie claims that Venezuela had hacked voting machines in Puerto Rico, Reuters reports: “Her team took an unspecified number of Puerto Rico’s voting machines and additional copies of data from the machines as part of its investigation, a spokesperson for Gabbard’s Office of the Director of National Intelligence said.”

Fulton Co. Wants Its Voting Records Back

Georgia’s Fulton County launched a legal effort to get its 2020 ballots and other voting records back after they were seized by the FBI last week in a politicized investigation to prop up President Trump’s baseless claims that he only lost the election because of voting fraud.

The Provocation …

Steve Bannon cranked up the midterm voter intimidation dial to an 11:

… and the Smart Way of Responding

Disinformation expert Kate Starbird offers a smart thread on how to respond to Bannon’s provocation without amplifying it and doing his voter suppression for him (click for the full thread):

MUST READ

The transcript of Tuesday’s hearing in Minnesota federal court in which one overwhelmed government attorney begged to be held in contempt so she could finally get some sleep is worth reading as a window into chaos inside the Trump administration.

A few follow-up notes:

  • The attorney, Julie Le, on loan from ICE, was sent back to ICE after the court hearing. It’s not clear if she still has a job at ICE.
  • The other government attorney in the hearing, Ana Voss, the chief of the civil division in the Minnesota U.S. Attorney’s Office, has reportedly tendered her resignation but at least as of Tuesday was still on the job.

Mass Deportation Watch: Minnesota Edition

  • Declaration of War: A great MPR piece on the work of ICE observers in the suburbs of the Twin Cities includes this Minnesota-style declaration of war by a suburban mom-turned-observer: “I don’t even care if I ruffle feathers.” 
  • ‘Softer Touch’: President Trump says he ordered the withdrawal of 700 federal agents from Minnesota as he tries a “softer touch.” That still leaves some 2,000 federal agents in the state, according to White House border czar Tom Homan.
  • ‘Bad Publicity’: President Trump dismisses the fatal shootings of Renee Good and Alex Pretti by federal agents as “bad publicity”:

I swear this clip is not edited. Trump pivots from downplaying the killing of Renee Good and Alex Pretti ("two people out of tens of thousands and you get bad publicity") to in the very next breath claiming "we've been very tough on the waters," leaving Tom Llamas baffled ("the waters?")

Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com) 2026-02-05T04:17:30.815Z

Mass Deportation Watch: Nationwide Edition

  • TEXAS: ICE is now bypassing the El Paso County medical examiner who ruled a death at the Camp East Montana detention center at Fort Bliss a homicide. After the latest detainee death at the tent facility, the autopsy was performed at Fort Bliss’ William Beaumont Army Medical Center, which doesn’t release autopsy reports to the public, the Texas Tribune reports.
  • VIRGINIA: New Gov. Abigail Spanberger (D) ordered state law enforcement agencies to dissolve any partnership agreements with federal immigration enforcement operations.
  • WEST VIRGINIA: I can’t get enough of the civics lessons that federal judges are now baking into their court orders. The latest I’ve seen comes from U.S. District Judge Thomas E. Johnston in the Southern District of West Virginia, a Bush I appointee, in a habeas cases filed by a Venezuelan national who was illegally detained after a traffic stop on Interstate 77:

The Destruction: Civil Service Edition

A new rule stripping civil service protections for some 50,000 senior government workers (an echo of Trump’s first term proposal for a “Schedule F”) is set to be unveiled today.

For Your Radar …

With the U.S. retreating from NATO, Europe is reassessing the imminence of the Russian threat:

The earlier belief in Berlin and other capitals was that Russia wouldn’t be able to threaten NATO until 2029 or so. There is now a growing consensus that such a crisis could come much sooner—before Europe, which is expanding its own investment in defense, is in a position to fight back.

“Our assessment is that Russia will be able to move large amounts of troops within one year,” the Netherlands Defense Minister Ruben Brekelmans said in an interview. “We see that they are already increasing their strategic inventories, and are expanding their presence and assets along the NATO borders.”

RIP CIA World Factbook

The CIA World Factbook, an indispensable pre-internet resource, is no longer.

J. David Bamberger, 1928-2026

He made his fortune with Church’s Fried Chicken, but J. David Bamberger will be most remembered for his conservation work in the Texas Hill Country. Inspired as a boy by Louis Bromfield’s “Pleasant Valley,” Bamberger used his fast-food fortune to buy the crappiest piece of land he could find and spent the next half a century restoring it to some semblance of ecological balance:

Hot tips? Juicy scuttlebutt? Keen insights? Let me know. For sensitive information, use the encrypted methods here.

Donald Trump Became President By Appealing to Conspiracy Theorists — Now He’s Driving Them Away

This story is part of TPM Cafe, TPM’s home for opinion and news analysis. 

Donald Trump may not have been the first president to believe in conspiracy theories, but he was definitely the first candidate whose election was fueled by pandering to those who do.

As his popularity soared among those on the fringe during his 2016 campaign, their internet presence became less about “questioning everything” and much more about blindly believing whatever Trump told them. Trump’s following on Reddit grew especially fast, and especially toxic. But while threads like r/TheDonald were unapologetically pro-Trump, the large subreddit r/conspiracy was ostensibly more non-partisan.

It claimed to hold a “question everything” ethos that would presumably include the new president alongside the old ones as part of the evil cabal supposedly ruling the world and funding all wars.

It didn’t actually work out that way. Claiming more than 856,000 active weekly users, r/conspiracy is one of the most important hubs of fringe discussion and research. And for years, the forum’s most popular posts were unabashedly pro-Trump. The forum was openly anti-vaccine and believed COVID-19 was a hoax. Users believed that Democrats were part of a vast occult trafficking ring, to the point of helping popularize the QAnon conspiracy theory. They believed that the media and political establishment were all hell-bent on destroying Trump, the same message Trump’s surrogates and spokespeople espoused every day on cable news and right-wing podcasts.

But in his second term, that blind loyalty has started to crack. Many of the influencers who helped rehabilitate Trump after his failed attempt to subvert the 2020 election are now openly questioning his actions and statements in ways that would have been unthinkable months ago.

The tipping point seems to be the administration’s deeply unconservative stance that people “can’t bring a gun to a protest,” in response to the disarming and shooting of Minnesota protester Alex Pretti by Customs and Border Patrol agents on Jan. 24, 2026.

Continue reading “Donald Trump Became President By Appealing to Conspiracy Theorists — Now He’s Driving Them Away”

Bannon Describes Vision for ICE At Polling Places That Dems Have Been Warning About

Dystopian Hypotheticals?

While he was a chief strategist during President Trump’s first term before the two had one of Trump’s classic bro breakups, podcaster and far-right influencer Steve Bannon has no official role in the Trump administration or White House this term. But his authoritarian visions so often are in lockstep with the insidious mind of Stephen Miller that he’s not not a useful narrator of Trump’s dictatorial imaginings.

In the wake of Trump’s calls to “nationalize” voting this week, congressional Republican leaders mildly observed that it is, in fact, a state’s right to administer its own elections in this country — though House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) in his own roundabout way also seemed to agree with Trump’s various fever dreams about widespread voter fraud in blue states, which Johnson thinks, someone should maybe do something about. Even the White House attempted to walk back Trump’s “nationalize” remarks, with White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt telling reporters that Trump was actually referring to the SAVE Act — an ominous-for-voting-rights piece of legislation that far-right House members were trying to get tied to a government funding package this week until Trump was able to convince them to back off with promises to get Senate Republicans to bypass the filibuster and force Democrats to use a “talking filibuster” to pass it — something that Senate Republicans do not seem to have actually agreed to do, at least not yet.

“What the president was referring to is the SAVE Act, which is a huge, common-sense piece of legislation that Republicans have supported, that President Trump is committed to signing into law during his term,” Leavitt said Tuesday.

But many of Trump’s conspiracy theory-prone allies have been running with the idea of federalizing elections ever since Trump gave them the runway for it, including a few members of Congress and Bannon.

During Tuesday’s episode of his War Room podcast, Bannon outlined his vision, which, as I alluded to above, should not necessarily be taken as literal White House policy. But it mirrors concerns that Democratic officials have been sounding the alarm about for months. Bannon suggested that the administration should send in ICE agents to “surround the polls” in the upcoming midterms, supposedly as a means to prevent the election from being stolen. He also proposed invoking the Insurrection Act and sending in the Army to monitor election administration.

“We’re going to have ICE surround the polls come November,” Bannon said. “We’re not going to sit here and allow you to steal the country again. And you can whine and cry and throw your toys out of the pram all you want, but we will never again allow an election to be stolen.”

“President Trump has to nationalize the election,” Bannon continued. “He has to put, not just, I think, ICE, but you’ve got to call up the 82nd and 101st Airborne on the Insurrection Act. You’ve got to get around every poll and make sure only people with IDs, people are actually registered to vote, and people that are United States citizens vote in this election. Full stop. We will not accept anything less.”

This is the exact set of dystopian circumstances some Democratic officials have been warning about in recent weeks.

Before the Supreme Court ruling on the National Guard deployment in Chicago, Illinois, Gov. JB Pritzker warned that Trump may try to take over elections in the upcoming midterms.

“I fear that what they’re going to do is deploy these folks eventually to polling places and say they’re protecting the vote,” he said during an interview with MSNOW in October.

In the months since the Supreme Court ruling, Democrats have raised the alarm about the Trump administration sending in ICE agents to swarm the polls, similar to how the administration flooded Minneapolis with agents under the pretext of a crackdown on fraud there, which, at the time, was actively being investigated by federal prosecutors.

“What I fear, beyond the potential for Trump to try to interfere in a major way in our elections is, one of the biggest ways he can interfere, is having these roving ICE bands show up at polling stations,” Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA) said in an interview last week. “And not just in the fall, at primary polling stations. We in Virginia may try to change our maps to deal with redistricting, they show up there, that would chase away lots of potential voters.”

Former Washington state Gov. Jay Inslee penned an op-ed this week, offering a similar warning.

“Think about the private voter suppression army he has entirely at his disposal, an organization purportedly in existence to deal with immigration, but which could be used for Trump’s best survival tool, the suppression of votes in Democratic precincts in competitive districts and states,” he wrote.

The dystopian hypotheticals as outlined by Dems and whispered into the ears of those closest to Trump are becoming less and less speculative each time Trump digs his heels in on one or another of his various authoritarian aspirations, whether it be flooding a blue city with federal agents, relitigating his 2020 loss in Atlanta, or demanding election administration, left to the state by the Constitution, be co-opted by his political allies.

— Nicole LaFond

WaPo Lays Of a Third of Staff

In a devastating blow to journalism dealt by the hands of a billionaire owner, the Washington Post laid off one-third of its staff on Wednesday, completely stamping out its sports section, as well as a chunk of its foreign desk and its books vertical in a destructive cut of reporters and personnel that has been expected for weeks. Per the Associated Press:

Bezos, who has been silent in recent weeks amid pleas from Post journalists to step in and prevent the cutbacks, had no immediate comment.

The newspaper has been bleeding subscribers in part due to decisions made by Bezos, including pulling back from an endorsement of Kamala Harris, a Democrat, during the 2024 presidential election against Donald Trump, a Republican, and directing a more conservative turn on liberal opinion pages.

— Nicole LaFond

SCOTUS Rejects GOP Challenge to New CA Maps

In a win for Democrats, the Supreme Court on Wednesday rejected a Republican challenge to California’s Democratic-favoring redistricting proposal, allowing the state’s new congressional maps to be used while litigation around them continues in lower courts. 

Last month, a panel of federal judges rejected a request by the Trump administration’s DOJ and the California Republican Party to block California’s new map. The panel rejected the Republican argument that the new maps were racially gerrymandered. 

Wednesday’s Supreme Court ruling was expected given an earlier ruling regarding Texas’ gerrymandered maps, but far from guaranteed.
As previously reported for TPM, in December, the court ruled that Texas’s maps were partisan, but not racially gerrymandered, pointing to previous opinions finding that a partisan motivation was acceptable but a racially motivated one was not. In a concurring opinion on the Texas map, Justice Sam Alito specifically mentioned California, writing, “the impetus for the adoption map (like the map subsequently adopted in California) was partisan advantage pure and simple.”

— Khaya Himmelman

In Case You Missed It

New from Layla A. Jones on Trump’s Fed chair nominee: Economic Experts Skeptical Trump Fed Chair Pick Will Be Free from Political Influence

Morning Memo: The Trump DOJ Has Collapsed And It Ain’t Pretty

Substack Live! Join Us Live for a Conversation on Trump’s Crackdown on His Political Enemies

Yesterday’s Most Read Story

Judge Incredulous as Trump Lawyer Asks Him to Create New Law for Mark Kelly Retribution Crusade

What We Are Reading

The Effects of Tariffs, One Year Into Trump’s Trade Experiment

‘They Couldn’t Break Me’: A Protester, the White House and a Doctored Photo

How Jeff Bezos Brought Down the Washington Post 

Dems Outline Their Demands for ICE As Republicans Promise to Shoot Down Basic Reforms

House Republicans barely passed a funding package on Tuesday, voting after more than a day of wrangling to approve five full-year funding bills plus a two-week continuing resolution to fund the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). Senate Democrats last month had demanded that, in exchange for their votes on funding packages, reforms and constraints be placed on Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents. That prompted a standoff over the DHS funds and a short-lived partial government shutdown, which is now over. 

But for how long?

Continue reading “Dems Outline Their Demands for ICE As Republicans Promise to Shoot Down Basic Reforms”

VIDEO: Josh Kovensky and John Light Discuss Trump’s Crackdown on His Political Enemies

The Trump administration used Charlie Kirk’s September assassination as an opportunity to declare war on the left, pledging to use the full force of the law to go after their ideological opponents. 

That’s exactly what is now happening. As Josh Kovensky and John Light discussed on Substack Live Wednesday morning, Trump’s DOJ is making novel use of “material support for terrorism” charges against Black Lives Matter and anti-ICE protesters. 

Continue reading “VIDEO: Josh Kovensky and John Light Discuss Trump’s Crackdown on His Political Enemies”

Economic Experts Skeptical Trump Fed Chair Pick Will Be Free from Political Influence

President Donald Trump last Friday announced his intent to nominate former Federal Reserve Board Governor Kevin Warsh to chair the central bank, tapping a Republican economist with industry and government street cred, but whose public displays of political obsequiousness could contribute to distrust in Fed independence.

Continue reading “Economic Experts Skeptical Trump Fed Chair Pick Will Be Free from Political Influence”

The Trump DOJ Has Utterly Collapsed and It Ain’t Pretty

The Destruction: DOJ Edition

One of the intended consequences of President Trump’s politicization of the Justice Department is to leave behind a weakened, overwhelmed, decimated organization that simply can’t do its job.

They’re hollowing out the DOJ by purging nonpartisan career attorneys, making life intolerable for those who remain, and replacing them with loyalists sucks the capacity out of the organization. It can’t handle as many cases, isn’t capable of tackling ambitious ones, and the quality of the lawyering suffers in all cases.

This is all coming home to roost in a very visible way in Minnesota, where the lawless Operation Metro Surge has produced hundreds of habeas cases filed by wrongfully detained immigrants. The chief federal judge in Minnesota, speaking for an overwhelmed judiciary, has already publicly castigated the Trump administration for not preparing for the flood of cases that its mass deportation operation in the state was bound to generate. (Chris Geidner explains the ins and outs of why we’re seeing so many cases.)

Meanwhile, the Minnesota U.S. Attorney’s Office has been crippled by mass resignations, including some of its most senior career attorneys. That has left the remaining DOJ attorneys in Minnesota inundated with more cases than they can keep up with. But I’m not sure that does justice to what’s been happening. It’s quite a bit worse than that.

The quality of lawyering has eroded to such a point that government lawyers have been unable to keep up with the court orders demanding that detainees be released. As a result, detainees have lingered in confinement even after courts have ordered their release.

Last week, as the Star Tribune first reported, Ana Voss, a career DOJer who was the chief of the civil division in the Minnesota U.S. Attorney’s Office, submitted an astonishing court filing in which she admitted that her office had not followed a judicial order to release a detainee because they hadn’t seen the email.

“I did not timely read these orders,” Voss reportedly said in the court filing. “I understand that is inexcusable.”

But it doesn’t appear to be a case of incompetence or willful disregard. As Voss explained in the filing: “It has become apparent to me that I am not able to effectively triage and review every order which is not an acceptable practice for me or the United States.”

Voss is reported to have subsequently resigned.

Numerous reports have suggested that mass resignations in the Minnesota U.S. Attorney’s Office are not due solely to the failure to investigate the fatal shootings of Renée Good and Alex Pretti. My suspicion is that the hell-on-wheels inundation of immigration cases is another contributing factor.

More evidence of that emerged yesterday, when Julie Le, an attorney for the government, essentially melted down in court, as FOX9’s Paul Blume reported :

“I wish you would just hold me in contempt of court so I can get 24 hours of sleep,” Le said. “The system sucks, this job sucks, I am trying with every breath I have to get you what I need.”

As Joyce Vance notes, Le is not a regular assistant U.S. attorney but a “special” AUSA. She is reported to have been working as a DHS attorney before being detailed to the Minnesota U.S. Attorney’s Office to help with the flood of immigration cases. Le had been assigned more than 88 cases since December.

It’s easy to see this as attorneys getting what they deserve for participating in a corrupted system, but remember it’s the detainees who are languishing despite courts ordering their release. I’ve seen defiant DOJ political appointees in court telling judges to shove it. Le does not appear to be one of those kinds of attorneys:

“I am here to make sure the agency understands how important it is to comply with court orders,” said Le, who became visibly emotional during the court hearing.

Le was removed from the U.S. Attorney’s Office after her courtroom remarks, NBC News reports.

When chief Judge Patrick J. Schiltz said last week that the Trump administration had violated 96 court orders in 78 cases since Jan. 1 in Minnesota alone, I first thought this was another Trump administration gambit to defy the judicial branch. And it may be, but it’s not as direct as the confrontations in the Alien Enemies Act and Abrego Garcia cases.

As Princeton’s Deborah Pearlstein notes:

It seems increasingly clear the rampant noncompliance with court habeas orders happening in immigration cases now is not a problem of attorney ethics. It’s a symptom of structural, institutional collapse at the Department of Justice.

The Trump administration is tearing down U.S. Attorney’s offices and undermining Main Justice so that there simply aren’t the resources to even respond to the judicial branch. A burn it all down ethos. Catch me if you can.

Keep an Eye on This One …

U.S. District Judge Paul Magnuson of Minneapolis ordered the pretrial release of two immigrants accused of assaulting an ICE agent who shot one of the men in an incident last month. But the men did not make it out of the courthouse before they were re-detained, by ICE, the Star Tribune reports.

Attorneys for Alfredo Aljorna and Julio Sosa-Celis were quickly back in court, filing a habeas petition seeking their release from ICE custody. Last night, chief Judge Patrick J. Schiltz ordered the Trump administration not to remove the men from Minnesota and, if they already had, then to return them to Minnesota immediately.

Not to get overlooked: At the pretrial hearing, the mens’ attorneys introduced into evidence photos of the shooting scene that suggest the ICE agent shot through a closed door and undermine the government’s account what happened.

Quote of the Day

“In the last few weeks, our family took some consolation thinking that perhaps Nee’s death would bring about change in our country. And it has not.”—Luke Ganger, brother of Renee Good

Judge Protects Anti-ICE Protesters

U.S. District Judge Michael Simon issued a temporary restraining order barring federal agents from using tear gas and other crowd-control weapons against peaceful protesters and journalists outside an ICE facility in Portland, Oregon.

In his order, Simon was harshly critical of the Trump administration:

  • “the repeated shooting and teargassing of nonviolent protesters at the Portland ICE Building will likely keep recurring … Defendants’ violence is in no way isolated.”
  • “statements made by DHS officials and senior federal executives show that the culture of the agency and its employees is to celebrate violent responses over fair and diplomatic ones.”
  • “Rather than reprimanding DHS violence against protesters, senior officials have publicly condoned it.”
  • “There are clear instances of excessive force, including a use of force incident recorded by ICE’s own cameras and deemed “inappropriate” and “not reasonable” by a Federal Protective Service (“FPS”) Deputy Regional Director. Yet, the agents involved were not put on leave and do not appear to have been held accountable in any way.”

Villain-in-Chief: Stephen Miller

Whenever President Trump puts on a performative display of hyper-aggressive dominance, Stephen Miller can be found lurking in the background egging him on, the WSJ documents.

Forget the Dog Whistles, Just Pure Racism

President Trump’s call for nationalizing voting in America is fundamentally racist, and in case you missed the dog whistle from two days ago, he said it loud and clear yesterday:

Take a look at Detroit…take a look at Philadelphia, take a look at Atlanta. The federal government should not allow that. The federal government should get involved. These are agents of the federal government to count the vote. If they can’t count the vote legally and honestly, then somebody else should take over.

Trump offered no evidence, just pure racist invective.

IMPORTANT

New reporting from TPM’s Josh Kovensky: In a dramatic departure from how DOJ historically used the federal material support for terrorism statute, it is upgrading what would have been routine prosecutions into terrorism cases when they involve people President Trump has cast as his political enemies.

Trump DOJ Watch: NJ Edition

The Trump administration’s reported top choice to succeed Alina Habba as U.S. attorney in New Jersey is Trump DOJ official Jordan Fox, 30, five years out of law school with no experience as a prosecutor.

President Trump is persisting in seeking an interim U.S. attorney rather than a permanent one so that he doesn’t have to submit to the Senate’s blue-slip process, in which the state’s two Democratic senators effectively have veto power over his selection. But that leaves the federal judges in the state to make the selection, so Fox is making calls to try to drum up their support.

Headline of the Day

TPM’s Kate Riga reports from federal court in D.C. on Judge Richard Leon’s deep skepticism about the legality of the Trump Pentagon’s retribution crusade against Sen. Mark Kelly (D-AZ).

Our Strange Defeat

Felicia Kornbluh revisits the work of French historian Marc Bloch, executed by the Nazis in 1944, to grapple with the question of why mainstream institutions fell so easily to Trumpism.

Hot tips? Juicy scuttlebutt? Keen insights? Let me know. For sensitive information, use the encrypted methods here.

Republicans Love Supreme Court Expansion When It Gets Them What They Want

This article is part of TPM Cafe, TPM’s home for opinion and news analysis. It was originally published at Balls and Strikes.

Over the past several years, whenever Democratic politicians have floated the possibility of expanding the U.S. Supreme Court, Republicans have reacted with a mix of indignation and fury, casting expansion as an unconscionable attack on judicial independence. 

Last year, for example, Texas Senator Ted Cruz called Court expansion “a direct assault on the design of our Constitution,” and accused Democrats of seeking to “advance policy goals they can’t accomplish electorally.” Iowa Senator Chuck Grassley said that expansion “would erase the legitimacy of the Supreme Court and destroy historic precedent.” Mississippi Senator Cindy Hyde-Smith said that “packing the Court for political leverage destabilizes the integrity of the institution and is dangerous for our country.” All three are now co-sponsors of a constitutional amendment to prevent Congress from changing the size of the Supreme Court. 

But in the deep-red states of Wyoming and Utah, Republican lawmakers are openly embracing this supposedly taboo tactic, trying to change the size of their state supreme courts in order to secure rulings they prefer.  These efforts mirror an earlier, successful campaign in Arizona under former Republican Governor Doug Ducey, in which conservatives reshaped the state’s judiciary—and its jurisprudence—simply by changing the personnel on the court. 

Continue reading “Republicans Love Supreme Court Expansion When It Gets Them What They Want”