JD Vance Says the Midterms Will Determine the Future of Birthright Citizenship

Vance Just Wants to Close a Constitutional ‘Loophole’

Vice President JD Vance went on Laura Ingraham’s Fox News show last night to chart a path forward for the nativist movement in the U.S. following Tuesday’s too-close-for-comfort Supreme Court ruling on birthright citizenship. 

It’s what you might call a rich text. 

He first described “birthright citizenship,” an idea enshrined in the Constitution, as “a loophole that now exists in our immigration system.” 

He spoke of “congressional or statutory changes” to “make it harder for people to actually take advantage of” said “loophole” — before acknowledging that five justices on the Supreme Court were willing to affirm reality: the Constitution forbids such changes. (A sixth justice, Brett Kavanaugh, upheld birthright citizenship but suggested Congress could take steps to end it.)

Because even some right-wing justices ruled that birthright citizenship is part of the constitutional foundation of our country, there’s little Congress can do about it — at least without amending the Constitution. 

This all brought Vance to the midterms. 

“This drives home, Laura, why the midterms are so important, because it’s the senators who ultimately vote on those Supreme Court justices. Imagine if one of the five justices who made a bad call today, if they left the Supreme Court — we want to make sure we get somebody good on there in the future.”

It demonstrates at this late moment how emboldened the far-right is in its crusade to change what it means to be an American. 

“This was only a 5-4 decision, Laura,” Vance said. “How many times do we hear people say this was going to go 8-1 against the administration?”

On that, he’s right. 

Vance says the midterms are big because Republicans are one SCOTUS seat from ending birthright citizenship

Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com) 2026-06-30T23:26:29.327Z

SAVE Act Thrusts Congress Into Chaos, Pt. 348

The House left town for July 4 early after it found itself paralyzed by a right-wing effort to pair the SAVE Act, a sweeping voter suppression bill, with the National Defense Authorization Act, which Congress regards as “must pass” legislation. 

Some of the most outspoken right-wingers in the House voted with Democrats to tank that effort, arguing it would be too easy for the Senate to decouple the two pieces of legislation once the bill reached that chamber. Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL), one of the leaders of an effort to grind the House to a halt until the SAVE Act is passed, wants to attach voter ID directly to the NDAA instead. 

So, the House is stuck. Members went home.

The Senate, meanwhile, is still attempting to pass something that it calls the “SAVE Act” through budget reconciliation, which, because of reconciliation’s rules, would probably result in legislation that looks nothing like the SAVE Act. As we’ve often noted at TPM, that gambit looks more like a Senate attempt to trick Trump and get him off legislators’ backs. 

Colorado results

  • As Josh Marshall has been chronicling, this primary saw three high-profile incumbents confronted by insurgent challengers, some of whom weren’t much different on policy but questioned why the incumbents hadn’t done more to “fight” Trump. Votes are still being counted, but the outcomes are clear. Here’s where things stand this morning.
  • Phil Weiser, the current attorney general, beat Senator Michael Bennet to become the party’s nominee for governor 56% to 44%. Weiser had questioned why Bennet hadn’t done more to oppose Trump from Congress, and pointed to his own record of litigation against the administration.
  • DSA-endorsed 29-year-old lawyer Melat Kiros defeated longtime Rep. Diana DeGette 51% to 41% to represent a congressional district that includes Denver.
  • Incumbent Senator John Hickenlooper held on against challenger Julie Gonzales 55% to 45%.

Woman of the Hour

It’s election-denying former county clerk Tina Peters, who showed up at the White House yesterday so Trump could take credit for getting her out of prison. Congratulations to outgoing Democratic Colorado governor Jared Polis for creating this situation!

White House photograph

Tabs

Perry Bacon in the New Republic: Democratic Centrists Need to Stop Saying “Both Sides” Have “Extremes”

Silver Lining

A University of Tennessee anthropology professor who was fired after writing in a private Facebook post that the “world is better off without” Charlie Kirk reached a $1.9 million settlement after suing for wrongful termination.

Colorado Results

10:39 p.m.: Kiros now appears to be pulling ahead with Election Day votes. Currently only up five points with 73% in but this looks like it’s going to keep going in Kiros’ direction. Too early to call but the direction looks clear.

9:47 p.m.: Hickenlooper survives, various network calls. By ordinary standards it’s a healthy margin — 57%. But for someone so established in Colorado Democratic politics, Gonzales’ 43% is very impressive. Bennet looks like he’s toast but no calls yet. DeGette-Kiros still neck and neck.

9:35 p.m.: It seems like John Hickenlooper is probably going to pull through. 50% of the votes in and he’s at 58% to Julie Gonzales’ 42%. That’s a big margin. But it’s still a pretty big showing for a challenger. Sen. Michael Bennet looks to be in the process of losing by a similar margin to Phil Weiser, whose candidacy is almost all based on “fight.” Kiros-DeGette is neck-and-neck. Kiros 47% to DeGette’s 45% with about 2/3rds of the votes in. The people I talked to in Colorado broadly predicted these results. Hickenlooper survives, Bennet loses and probably DeGette too. That’s about where we are, though the DeGette race is far too close to call. I’m trying to get a read now on where remaining votes are.

TPM Readers on Colorado #3

From TPM Reader LD

Decades-long reader/member, and I wanted to say that Josh’s take on Hickenlooper’s run is spot-on. I have voted for Hickenlooper (and Dianne Degette, the incumbent House member for Denver who is in a tight race as well), but I’m more than ready for those who will push for top-to-bottom reform. My husband and I actually ran into Hick in our neighborhood on Saturday night and we told him to fight the good fight. He thought we meant the primary, not the fight for our democracy.

TPM Readers on Colorado #2

From TPM Reader EH

I’ve really enjoyed your recent posts (and reader emails) processing the recent New York primary elections. I strongly agree with the point you’ve emphasized that “left/right” is less salient than “fighter/non-fighter” in the current roiling within the broad left-of-center coalition. And I’d take it a step further and argue that anyone coded as “establishment” carries a strong presumption of belonging to the “non-fighter” camp. 

Continue reading “TPM Readers on Colorado #2”

TPM Readers on Colorado #1

We’ll know these results a bit later this evening. But I wanted to share a couple emails from TPM Readers. I was struck that most or all of the emails we received on these primaries were from longtime supporters of the incumbents in danger tonight, sometimes knowing them personally. They almost uniformly want them booted.

From TPM Reader DC

Super interested to read your thoughts on the “earthquake” of the potential that Sen. Hickenlooper could lose his primary.

I’m a longtime Denver resident. I live a block away from Sen. Hickenlooper. I have hosted fundraisers for him for Mayor and Governor. But I voted against him in the primary. I thought of it as a “protest” vote—i.e., he’s likely to win, but I need to send the message anyway that just being a Democrat with huge name recognition is not enough. 

Continue reading “TPM Readers on Colorado #1”

Johnson Follows Kavanaugh’s Lead, Says Congress Will ‘Deal With’ Birthright Citizenship

Johnson Acknowledged That Kavanaugh Did Not Have Majority With Him

House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) agreed to try to find a congressional path forward for the right-wing’s fever dream of ending birthright citizenship after a divided Supreme Court on Tuesday blocked President Donald Trump’s attempt to do so by executive order. Supreme Court Justices Brett Kavanaugh, in particular, left open the door for Congress to act in his concurrence — and Johnson suggested he would, before he even had a chance to read it.

Continue reading “Johnson Follows Kavanaugh’s Lead, Says Congress Will ‘Deal With’ Birthright Citizenship”

Will GOPers Just Expand the Court Too? Probably. And That’s Okay.

One of the most encouraging things I have seen recently are complaints from the right, as well as what we might call the supercilious center, bewailing, whining about, or just generally objecting to adding new Justices to the Court. They’re talking because they see it coming. I’m not saying it’s a certainty. Obviously they want to forestall it. But this isn’t just something folks like me, or others, are talking about. We have their attention. We clearly have the Justices’ attention. That shows we are moving in the right direction.

I’m writing today because I want to address one of the most common and one of the best (although still insufficient) opposing arguments. That is this: if you expand the Court, won’t Republicans come right back and expand it even more? And then don’t you just have an on-going war of tit-for-tat expansions?

My short answer is, yes. And that’s okay.

Let me give you the slightly longer answer.

Continue reading “Will GOPers Just Expand the Court Too? Probably. And That’s Okay.”

Vought Claims OMB Won’t Try to Force Congress to Approve More Rescissions This Year — But Leaves Door Open

House Democrats grilled Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Director Russell Vought about his refusal to release appropriated funds in a timely manner during his Tuesday morning testimony in front of the House Appropriations Committee’s Financial Services and General Government Subcommittee.

“Have you released all appropriated funding to each intended agency through the apportionment process?” House Appropriations Committee Ranking Member Rosa DeLauro (D-CT) asked Vought during the hearing.

Continue reading “Vought Claims OMB Won’t Try to Force Congress to Approve More Rescissions This Year — But Leaves Door Open”

The Birthright Citizenship Decision Is More Evidence for Court Reform

As you’ve seen, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of birthright citizenship by a 6 — or perhaps 5 1/2 — vote margin. See Kate Riga’s report on the majority decision and Josh Kovensky’s piece on the dissenters’ goal of doing away with birthright citizenship. I repeat my point from yesterday which is that the occasional non-corrupt decision doesn’t make the Court any less corrupt or in need of reform. In this case, in a sane world, the dissents from Neil Gorsuch, Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas would on their own be sufficient basis for impeachment and removal from office. One might as well believe or pretend to believe that the federal senate is unconstitutional despite its being unambiguously written into the structure of the document itself. The level of abuse of power that is the basis of these dissents can only be seen as criminal in nature and grows from the culture of corruption and impunity that now reigns on the Court.

A 29-Year-Old Democratic Socialist Takes on Colorado’s Most Senior Member of Congress

This story was originally reported by Grace Panetta of The 19th. Meet Grace and read more of their reporting on gender, politics and policy.

Melat Kiros was born in 1997, the year her representative in the U.S. House, Democrat Diana DeGette, took office. On Tuesday, Kiros hopes to unseat her.  

The next frontier of the fight for the Democratic Party is in Denver, where DeGette, a 15-term incumbent and longtime progressive, is facing her most serious primary challenge yet from Kiros, a 29-year-old democratic socialist and first-time candidate. 

Continue reading “A 29-Year-Old Democratic Socialist Takes on Colorado’s Most Senior Member of Congress”