Things got really weird during President Donald Trump’s big speech on “election security” Thursday night.
Continue reading “The ‘Doom’ Computer Game Was Part Of Trump’s Wild And Baseless ‘Election Security Nightmare’”A Must Read and Truly Horrifying Story
The AP has just posted a detailed investigation into the background of David Brouillette, the recently hired ICE agent who shot and killed Johan Sebastián Durán Guerrero in Maine. It’s genuinely horrifying on more levels than are easy to describe. Brouillette was hired during ICE’s recent hiring spree, as the agency attempted to rapidly staff up to manage a program of mass deportation. Brouillette has a long history of severe mental illness, a lengthy history of violence against at least two wives as well as his children, stalking, a seemingly endless list of restraining orders, violent threats against other family members and more.
Continue reading “A Must Read and Truly Horrifying Story”Trump’s Big Speech
The big announcement of a “prime-time,” “Oval Office” “address” was typical Trump, encouraging Americans to live in his world. In the end, none of what he said was new. He did make the ill-founded claims about non-citizens on voter rolls, described in that “draft press release” which was covered by Politico and which Josh noted below. He also said some stuff about China acquiring voter files that we’ve known for years. He did not even go so far as to baselessly allege votes were changed, or that the election was otherwise stolen, as so many predicted he would. He of course concluded with a demand that the Senate pass the SAVE America Act.
We’ll look through the documents his government released and share any interesting or amusing details. More soon.
How Politico’s Negligence and Ignorance Helped Float Another DHS Lie
Voting rights, voter intimidation and the politics of voting have been central themes of TPM reporting going back more than 25 years. Over a quarter century you develop a lot of institutional knowledge. Today we’re seeing some of the most egregious journalistic negligence, sloppiness and ignorance helping propel forward the Trump White House’s assault on the integrity of the 2026 midterms. The piece I want to point you to this evening is Politico’s claim that DHS found “thousands of non-citizens on voter rolls in California and three other states.”
This claim is almost certainly false for reasons I’ll explain. I want to briefly summarize the multiple levels of journalistic negligence in Politico’s reporting.
Continue reading “How Politico’s Negligence and Ignorance Helped Float Another DHS Lie”If Fetterman Were Going to Change Parties, He Might Act Like He’s Acting Now
Sen. John Fetterman (D-PA) is re-arousing suspicion that he may intend to switch parties, something he’s tepidly denied he’ll do in the past.
Continue reading “If Fetterman Were Going to Change Parties, He Might Act Like He’s Acting Now”Can the New Progressive Wave That’s Reshaping the Democratic Party Win in a Rural Red State?
As a smoke jumper, Sam Forstag fought a relentless game of inches.
The job is a hard one. Firefighters who parachute in when blazes break out deep in the forest need to build a barrier to beat back the flames. They use chainsaws and other tools to cut down to the hard mineral soil, creating a fire line with no fuel to keep feeding the inferno. It’s grueling work that can be set back in an instant by a fresh bolt of lightning. And Forstag learned all too well that, even when the forecast seems set to turn wet in a way that might help fend off the flames, you can’t rely on weather to help hold the line.
“The rains don’t always come,” Forstag explained in a conversation with TPM on Tuesday.
Now, after winning a different kind of fight and earning the Democratic Party nomination for one of Montana’s two House seats, Forstag finds himself in the center of another firestorm. The recent stretch of Democratic primary races were defined by candidates like Forstag — progressive outsiders who have challenged the party establishment.
In especially high-profile races in New York City and Denver, Colorado, candidates backed by socialist organizations defeated moderate Democrats with entrenched bases of support. Data indicates this wave was propelled by new voters who expanded the electorate. While these victories have been met with excitement in some circles, others have likened the progressive insurgency to the GOP Tea Party movement and argue it could have dire consequences.
Forstag shares some similarities with the candidates who pulled off shock wins in blue cities. He was an underdog against a former gubernatorial nominee. Forstag also drew endorsements from Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), which led to his bid being widely seen as a test for the kind of new left messaging that’s helped define this cycle for Democrats.
All of this puts Forstag at the center of some of the most interesting and crucial conversations in politics right now. And, while the new left wave has clearly scored in staunchly blue territory, Forstag’s campaign poses an interesting question: Can a progressive outsider experience similar success in a largely rural red state?
For his part, Forstag rejects the premise Montana doesn’t have the potential to swing. He cited the state’s history of union activity and more recent shifts in statewide representation.
“Montana just saw its first Republican supermajority in state history in 2023. Like, Montana is not a deep red state,” said Forstag. “I mean within the last 12 or 13 years, we had a 50-50 split in our state legislature. Two years ago we had a Democratic U.S. senator. We had a Democratic governor until, what, 2020? This is a brand new phenomenon that Democrats are being wiped out.”
Forstag blames the recent growth of the GOP in his state and more broadly on what he continually describes as a “disconnect” between Democratic politicians and voters. He is adamant that the party needs a new approach.
“The Democratic Party has really fucked everything up. We are in a position where we have no power at the federal level and all of this happened as we have one of the least popular presidents ever elected in office because we could not offer a more hopeful alternative or solution,” Forstag said. “I mean, at the end of 2024, we had a president telling us all that the economy is better than we think it is. Well, I don’t think there’s any better articulation of a disconnect between our political leaders and what life is like on the ground.”
As Forstag sees it, the party’s main mistake was failing to address the economic challenges faced by voters in rhetorical or concrete terms.
“At the end of 2024, I was making $19 bucks an hour jumping out of airplanes for the federal government in a community where you cannot find a home for less than a half million dollars — and I was seven years in,” he explained. “Some of these guys and gals are 20-plus years in making the same wage on the same job. And if that is your situation, then your life did not improve under four years of Democratic control.”
Forstag cited rising rents and private equity buying up mobile homes in his home state as “all people talk about when I go to a bar in Missoula.”
“Rent has doubled or tripled over the last 10 years in Missoula. It’s worse in … Bozeman, in my district. It’s worse in the Flathead Valley,” he said, later adding, “This is what normal people are dealing with on a day-to-day basis and it’s this fundamental disconnect, right?”

Their loss in the last presidential race has led some Democratic operatives and organizations to actively recruit candidates like Forstag who mix progressive positions with working class careers and the traditional masculinity that goes along with them. This drive had a notable setback in Maine where, after a lack of vetting, Graham Platner secured the party’s Senate nomination before withdrawing after becoming beset by a series of scandals, including an allegation of sexual assault.
Forstag is about as blunt when discussing the party’s issues with fielding working-class candidates as he was when talking with TPM about the broader messaging missteps. He blamed it on “policy failures for decades,” namely Democrats not universally and aggressively pushing through campaign finance reform despite Republican opposition.
“There’s a reason that it’s so rare to see a working person even on the ballot as a major party nominee for any federal office. It’s because the system is not designed for normal working people to be able to make it in a position of power,” Forstag explained.
Forstag has a compelling personal backstory. In addition to serving as a first responder under trying circumstances, Forstag was the vice president of his union, National Federation of Federal Employees (NFFE) Local 60, where he led a successful campaign to organize the last non-union forest in Montana. According to Forstag, he decided to run for office after seeing the dramatic impact of job cuts — from President Donald Trump and near-trillionaire Elon Musk’s DOGE initiative — on his colleagues in the federal workforce.
“What the DOGE cuts looked like in Montana for the forest service or for public lands agencies was actually the lowest paid employees that we have being just absolutely gutted and cut,” Forstag explained. “They said it was all about government efficiency. There are massive inefficiencies in the federal government, believe me, I’ve come face-to-face with them. It is not people swinging a tool in the woods for $12 bucks an hour. … And those are the people whose jobs they came after.”
In his role with the union, Forstag said he sought help from the man who currently represents Montana’s First District.
“When I called Ryan Zinke, the Republican sitting in the seat right now, I got crickets,” Forstag said. “So, I decided, if he’s going to come after all my members and my co-workers’ jobs, I’m going to come and take his.”
Forstag ultimately had to leave his position in the U.S. Forest Service to run for office. Zinke announced his decision not to seek re-election in March, leaving a wide open race. Aaron Flint, a pro-Trump veteran and local talk radio host, won the GOP primary last month.
As he approaches the general election, Forstag believes a focus on economic issues is crucial.
“There’s been a big conversation about identity that I’ve lived through, through my adult life, from the left, right? And that has in large part been healthy, but it seems like we forgot about the most important fundamental part of people’s identity, which is our economic identity,” he said. “What is the thing that is woven through every piece of existence if you’re a working person? It’s how much money do I have? Can I afford my fucking rent at the end of the month? It’s like, well, what’s that noise that my car is making? … That’s an emotional thing that you carry in your chest.”
In the wake of wins by New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani and other progressives who homed in on economic issues, “affordability” gained traction as a key talking point for many politicians. But that was also frustrating for Forstag who saw them as late adopters.
“I’ll be frank, the term ‘affordability’ kind of pisses me off,” said Forstag. “Because like six months ago this became the watchword for candidates across the country. And what that feels like on the ground is where the hell have you been living for the last 10 years?”
As much as he has clear criticism for Democratic messaging, Forstag certainly also does not appreciate how Republicans have talked about identity and the economy.
“This messaging on the right where they told you the system’s broken, but then they blamed all the wrong people and told you it’s because of poor people, or brown people, or queer people. Like, none of those people are making you poor,” Forstag said. “It’s an incredibly small slice of incredibly wealthy people who are using the wealth that they’re accumulating to keep these systems broken. … That is who our enemy is.”
Forstag thinks Democrats’ failure to address Americans’ economic situation is why this rhetoric has gained traction.
“I’ve watched a lot of the people that I work with, my friends, become the people who vote these schmucks into power. And most of the people I work with, I mean, a third of my union members or coworkers … they don’t do it because they’re racist or xenophobes. They do it because their life is getting worse,” he said.
Messaging isn’t the only thing that Forstag believes has helped him connect with voters in Montana. Forstag also believes being a union man was an essential component of his win.
“In large part, it was solidarity. We got through the primary with over a dozen unions supporting me. I mean, not just my own union. but brothers and sisters in unions across the state, some of whom, you know, probably most of their members did not vote for a Democrat last year,” Forstag said, adding, “Many of them were very excited to finally see somebody who, you know, actually can identify with what it’s like to be a union member.”
Forstag didn’t take the bait when I brought up the problems with Platner’s candidacy in Maine. However, he eagerly jumped when I asked if recruiting union leadership should be part of Democrats’ strategy as they strive to recruit working-class candidates.
“I think it damn sure better be,” he said. “The Democratic Party I grew up with was the party of the working class. We were the party of the unions. We were the party of young people. Nothing about this last election was that party.”
As Forstag sees it, the path forward for both his campaign and the party is painfully clear. He threw his hands up as he summed up the assessment.
“The frustrating thing is the formula seems so obvious,” Forstag said.
Get Ready for a Conspiracy Theory-Laced Speech From Trump Tonight
Hello, and welcome back to The Franchise!
We’re gearing up for President Trump’s address tonight, which has been billed as a speech focused on this administration’s absolute favorite topic: election security — or more specifically, Trump’s gloss on “election security.” That includes, as we know all too well, his baseless claims about how infested with fraud election administration is in parts of the country where President Trump doesn’t win elections. We’re expecting an address that does little other than flood the zone with confusing data and baseless claims about the 2020 election, all in service of giving a platform to Trump’s voter fraud conspiracy theories ahead of the midterms.
Trump is reportedly going to address the safety of voting machines (a post-2020 classic) and allege foreign interference in elections (another classic). According to MS NOW, Trump is expected to speak about declassified intelligence materials on both voting machines and alleged foreign interference efforts, likely related to the 2020 election. Reuters and other outlets are reporting that some of his claims may be about China.
The address seems to be yet another escalation in the administration’s ongoing and seemingly never-ending campaign to scare people into thinking our election system is not safe and that the 2020 election was actually stolen after all.
Acting Director of National Intelligence Bill Pulte and columnist-turned-conspiracy theorist John Solomon, are, per MS NOW, behind this effort to declassify and release these documents. For just a little bit of context, Solomon started the right-wing publication Just the News in 2020 after publishing several articles for The Hill pushing claims from Trump and his allies about a supposed corruption scheme involving Joe Biden and Ukraine — the episode that became the heart of Trump’s first impeachment. Just the News often amplifies Trump’s conspiracy theories. Solomon announced earlier this year that he had taken a temporary position in the White House where he would aid in “identifying classified or withheld documents concerning weaponization and election integrity.” Pulte, of course, has demonstrated his loyalty to any and all Trump causes by using his other post as head of a federal housing agency to launch thus-far unsuccessful criminal investigations into Trump’s political foes.
We say all that to say: the masterminds behind this grand announcement don’t exactly inspire confidence in the credibility of whatever claims Trump intends to spread this evening.
It’s no surprise that Trump will be addressing our supposedly unsafe election system and the 2020 election — topics that have been an area of fixation for Trump and his allies for years now, but have become particularly pertinent for the administration just ahead of the midterm elections that Trump has made clear he is worried about losing.
There’s a lot more to unpack this week, so let’s dig in.
Four More Losses in the DOJ’s Campaign to Seize Voter Data
Another day, another court defeat (or four) for the Trump administration’s ever-floundering campaign to seize sensitive voter data from the states.
Last week, a federal judge dismissed the DOJ’s lawsuit against New York over its refusal to hand over voter data to the federal government. And then this week, federal judges dismissed similar complaints against West Virginia, New Mexico and Virginia.
These latest defeats bring the administration’s grand total of losses to a staggering 15, with zero wins — embarrassing at this point!
The DOJ has been leaning heavily on provisions in the Help America Vote Act (HAVA), the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) and the Civil Rights Act of 1960 (CRA) to make its case for why it is entitled to voter data from 44 states and Washington D.C. The data they’re after includes Social Security and driver’s license numbers. Not a single judge has sided with the DOJ in its overreach campaign thus far.
In her ruling dismissing the DOJ’s lawsuit against New York, U.S. District Judge Mae D’Agostino, a Barack Obama appointee, noted that neither the Civil Rights Act nor the Help America Vote Act, give the DOJ authority to demand personal identifying voter information from the state.
“Pursuant to the Elections Clause of the United States Constitution, the States are empowered, in the first instance, to regulate and administer elections,” she wrote.
“For these reasons, this Court joins every district court to have addressed this issue in concluding that a voter registration list is not a record or paper that a state must produce to the Government under Title III,” she added.
And, U.S. District Judge Thomas E. Johnston, an appointee of George W. Bush, granted West Virginia’s motion to dismiss the DOJ’s lawsuit, ruling that the DOJ had no grounds to be demanding the type of information that it is demanding.
“Clearly, this demand is devoid of any factual basis,” Johnston wrote. “The demand includes no indication that West Virginia is suspected to be noncompliant with the list maintenance requirements of HAVA or the NVRA, nor does it point to any anomalies in West Virginia’s voter registration data.”
Also this week, U.S. District Judge Judith Herrera issued a similar ruling in a case against New Mexico, saying that the DOJ did not state its “basis” for requesting this information.
In Virginia, U.S. District Judge Roderick Young, a Trump appointee, wrote in his ruling that Virginia’s voter data is “outside the scope of Title III of the CRA, the Motions to Dismiss will be granted.”
Tina Peters Is, Unsurprisingly, Cozying up To Trump
Election denier and former Mesa County elections administrator Tina Peters has been doubling down on election-related conspiracy theories (both old and new) since her release from prison last month. You’d think maybe she’d want to keep a low profile and stay out of trouble, but she has, in fact, been taking the exact opposite approach: she’s gone full steam ahead on some of the very conspiracy theories that landed her in prison in the first place. And now, she’s discussing some of them with Trump. The two have discussed some of these conspiracies related to voting machines and have been talking about a “solution” to this conspiracy-fueled “problem.”
Peters was convicted for breaching her own office’s voting equipment in some misguided quest to find evidence of 2020 election fraud. The data from the breach was then leaked online. Until last month, Peters had been serving a nine-year prison sentence. But in May of this year, Democratic Colorado Gov. Jared Polis, succumbing to mounting pressure from President Trump, commuted her sentence and made her eligible for parole on June 1.
Since her release, Peters has been on a conspiracy theory press tour.
Late last month, Peters reportedly met with Trump to discuss ways to interfere in the midterm elections, per Media Matters. During a fundraiser for herself last month, Peters said that Trump had called her and that she believes that “Trump could sign an executive order to get rid of the machines.”
In several different right-wing media appearances last month Peters continually reiterated conspiracies about voting machines.
“We have to get rid of the machines,” she said on a “Faith and Freedom” appearance on June 28. “The machines don’t have any transparency; they are flipping votes.”
This month, during a livestream, Peters recounted her meeting with Trump at the White House where the two supposedly talked about voting machines and elections. “We are, right now, you know, with meeting the president yesterday, giving him a real solution to how to stop what’s happening.”
“Yesterday, when I was with the president, he talked — and I can’t get into the plan — but we talked, he basically said to his lead counsel to do what I was asking,” she added.
Of course, it’s no surprise that Peters is doubling down on election conspiracy theories. Her conspiracies are in line with the administration’s larger campaign to interfere in the midterm elections and sow seeds of doubt about the safety and security of the country’s election system.
In Other Election News:
USA Today: Trump moves to tighten federal control of elections ahead of midterms
TPM: DNI Nominee Clayton’s Answers on Election Integrity Are Too Cute by Half
CBS News: Trump endorses MyPillow’s Mike Lindell in race for Minnesota governor
ProPublica: FBI Has Looked at Using Questionable AI Tech to Review Signatures on Seized Mail-In Ballots
Georgia GOP Silent Amid Revelations About Senate Nominee’s White Nationalist Son-in-Law
GOP Senate hopeful Rep. Mike Collins’ flirtations with antisemitism now extend beyond his social media posts, past several of his former staffers and strategists, and reach directly into his immediate family, according to a new report from CNN K-File published Thursday morning. But while state and national Democratic elected officials and organizations have vehemently condemned Collins following the report, which exposed the congressman’s son-in-law as a white supremacist and neo-Nazi influencer, the Georgia Republican Party and its leaders have so far remained silent.
Collins’ son-in-law David Alan Scheer II repeatedly made overt white supremacist statements, posted antisemitic ideology on social media, and said, “There’s nothing wrong with White Nationalism,” in a YouTube comment, according to CNN.
And Scheer isn’t some far-removed family member with whom Collins doesn’t interact. The report highlighted the white supremacist’s presence on Collins’ campaign website and social media, and even found that Scheer is registered to vote at a home Collins owns and which is next to the congressman’s own house.
Per CNN, Scheer on a podcast last November advocated for “clearing our land of other people” to restore America’s white population. He has repeatedly claimed Jewish people were responsible for a number of things he views as negative, from gun control to the LGBTQ movement. He said on a podcast that “Israel and Zionist Jews” were responsible for policies that “undermine the White Christian nature of America,” and disparaged Black and Indian people. At least one antisemitic infographic Scheer posted was created by his wife, Collins’ daughter, Scheer said.
“My wife made a consolidated version of all the proof jews control our government through finance,” Scheer wrote.
Collins’ son-in-law also produced advertisements for the congressman’s trucking company.
“Rep. Collins’ lifelong support for Israel is unquestionable and backed by his consistent record in Congress of standing up for Israel and her people,” a spokesperson for Collins told CNN in a statement.
Neither the Georgia Republican Party, members of its leadership, or the National Republican Senatorial Committee immediately responded to TPM requests for comment. None of the organizations have acknowledged the report on social media or on their websites as of the time of publishing.
“Mike Collins has repeatedly proven himself to be a bigot and antisemite,” Charlie Bailey, chair of the Democratic Party of Georgia, said in a public statement. “Now Collins is funding and enabling a white nationalist who films neo-Nazi propaganda. Collins should explain himself and apologize to Georgians immediately, but no matter what bogus answer he gives, we will do everything in our power to keep him out of the U.S. Senate this November.”
Collins’ opponent, Sen. Jon Ossoff (D-GA) called Collins’ “ties to neo-Nazi ideology and notorious white supremacists” “disqualifying.”
For Jewish Georgia state rep. Esther Panitch, Collins’ legislative support for Israel is not enough.
“Being pro-Israel is not a hall pass for antisemitism,” Panitch, who is a Democrat, wrote on X. “It is not a shield you hide behind when the hatred is in your own family, on your own property, with your own name attached.”
Panitch called on the congressman and the Georgia Republican Party to condemn Scheer’s antisemitism.
Collins’ senatorial campaign has been dogged by his own offensive and at times violent social media presence. He called a Jewish Washington Post reporter a “garbage human” while interacting with an antisemitic X account and later defended that interaction. His staff choices have also been a stain on the congressman’s campaign. Collins fired campaign advisor Brandon Phillips after Phillips published a crude joke on social media about a woman who accused former television anchor Matt Lauer of rape and whose husband was working for a PAC supporting a Collins opponent. Slate reported that Collins’ chief of staff, Kip Talley, had participated in a group chat with prominent white nationalists like Richard Spencer where he attempted to help Charles Johnson, a white nationalist and Holocaust denier who had been held in contempt of court as part of a racketeering case. Last week, Talley resigned, leaving Collins to welcome his third chief of staff in one year, according to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution.
Even Republican strategists have admitted that Collins is a tough candidate to get behind, according to reporting from Politico. The party’s skittishness about Collins can be seen in his paltry fundraising numbers. Data from the Federal Elections Commission shows Collins had just over $2 million in cash on hand as of June 30, compared to Ossoff’s more than $42 million.
Where Your Dollars Go
I hope you’ve gotten a chance to read Josh Kovensky’s exclusive from yesterday. The guy DOJ has assigned to lead the task force targeting left-wing organizations/”antifa” in the U.S. was himself one of the January 6th boys. Amazing. (Of course, MAGA claims Jan. 6 was an antifa false-flag operation so perhaps prosecutor Brian W. Lynch is actually antifa? Which would be weird. But I jest…) We got a lead on this exclusive because of another exclusive Josh reported at the end of last month revealing the existence of the task force itself.
Investigative work like this is basically never economic. You sink way more hours into the work than the publication of the story can ever reap in direct terms. That’s where your dollars come in, where the TPM Journalism Fund comes in. These are the critical exclusives, revealing the details of the Trump White House’s crackdown on civic freedoms in the USA, that your contributions make possible. Want to get in on the action? We need your help in this year’s drive. Just click right here to contribute any dollar amount and help us get toward our goal of raising $500,000. This is what your dollars make possible. We appreciate your support so much.
What Happened Outside the Blanche Hearing Was More Important Than What Happened Inside
The Bizarre Todd Blanche Split Screen
Perhaps never before has a nominee for attorney general come before the Senate with as clear of a track record already doing the job as Todd Blanche.
But it turns out that GOP senators — the only ones who can block Blanche’s confirmation — don’t need to look that far back to assess his work.
An unpredicted confluence of events Wednesday produced an extraordinary split screen, with the Justice Department continuing to operate as a rogue federal law enforcement apparatus even as Blanche spent most of the day testifying before the Senate Judiciary Committee.
Each of these developments was significant news in their own right, but the timing was remarkable and accentuated the whistling-past-the graveyard approach of GOP senators to Blanche’s confirmation:
Scheming to Avoid Senate Confirmation of U.S. Attorneys
In Washington state, Blanche immediately fired the interim U.S. attorney who had just been unanimously appointed by the federal judges there less than an hour earlier. The firing of Roger Rogoff — at least the third such dismissal of judge-appointed interim U.S. attorneys — sets up the potential for the first litigation directly challenging the president’s power to fire court-appointed U.S. attorneys.
For months, there have been rumblings that the federal judges in Seattle were looking for an appointee who would be willing to file suit if fired and had gone as far as formally asking candidates about their willingness to do so. Rogoff has retained an employment law firm, and in interviews after he was fired indicated he was considering challenging his termination.
“The president gets to choose his US attorney, but only with the advice and consent of the Senate,” Rogoff told Bloomberg. “We have a situation that is untenable, not constitutional, and not legal.”
Separately, in the Eastern District of Virginia, where Blanche had previously fired a court-appointed interim U.S. attorney, he named a local attorney Theo Stamos as the new first assistant U.S. attorney, which effectively makes her the top federal prosecutor there because the U.S. attorney position remains vacant. Stamos, formerly elected county prosecutor as a Democrat, has no prior federal prosecution experience.
All of this scheming is part of the Trump administration’s effort to bypass Senate confirmation of U.S. attorneys in mostly blue states, where the Senate’s blue slip tradition gives home state senators of the opposing party an effective veto over U.S. attorney nominees. Historically, that has led to accommodations by both sides to find consensus candidates, but President Trump prizes loyalty above comity.
Running Air Force One Leak Probe Out of White House
President Trump’s freakout over the New York Times’ reports on the inadequacies of his beloved new Qatari-gifted Air Force One has inadvertently revealed the extent to which Blanche is content to let the White House run DOJ.
Not only was FBI Director Kash Patel running the investigation from the White House last Friday, as previously reported, he was doing so alongside Trump Chief of Staff Susie Wiles, CNN reports: “Patel posted up in an office next to Wiles’ for roughly seven hours, as the two established what one source referred to as a ‘war room’ in the West Wing.”
As part of the investigation, some officials were asked to turn over their phones to investigators on White House grounds, CNN reports. Investigators have even sought out Secret Service agents who accompanied Trump on the trip to the NATO summit in Turkey that exposed the aircraft’s lack of missile defense capabilities compared to its predecessors, per the NYT.
The NYT report mirrors CNN’s account in making the unprecedented revelation that Wiles is “personally” leading the investigation with Patel.
One of the first investigative steps — which Blanche personally approved, he testified at his confirmation hearing — was to subpoena four NYT reporters over two stories about the deficiencies of the aircraft. The NYT moved yesterday to quash those subpoenas in filings that remain under seal.
Blanche Direct Report and Top ‘Antifa’ Prosecutor Is a Jan. 6er
In an exclusive report, TPM’s Josh Kovensky revealed for the first time — more than five years after the fact — that an assistant U.S. attorney in a Trump 2020 baseball cap with a star-spangled face mask marched on the Capitol on Jan. 6.
The Trump DOJ confirmed that Brian W. Lynch “was present but never entered the capitol, left the grounds after a brief period, and did not commit and was never accused of any violation of law.”
One photo obtained by TPM shows Lynch in what Michael Romano, who was a deputy chief in the DOJ’s since-disbanded Capitol Siege Section, says was a restricted area around the Capitol:

Lynch was appointed earlier this year to co-lead Joint Task Force Vanguard, which is taking the lead at DOJ in targeting left-wing opponents of Trump in a sweeping administration-wide effort to inflate the threat of “antifa” and categorize political opposition, protest, and civil disobedience as “domestic terrorism.” It comes in response to Trump’s National Security Presidential Memorandum (NPSM-7) issued in September.
Lynch reports directly to Blanche.
Combined with the FBI’s apparent attempt to muddy the water in the fatal ICE shooting in Houston last week (see below), the series of developments yesterday made the Blanche confirmation hearing seem almost surreal, with Blanche assuring senators he would continue to always do the right thing even as wrongdoing was on full display outside of the committee room.
Trump Ritualistic Humiliation Syndrome
Jay Clayton is the Senate-confirmed U.S. attorney in Manhattan, a former chair of the SEC, and the president’s nominee as director of national intelligence, a role that, among many other sensitive duties, includes protecting U.S. elections from foreign interference.
In short, Clayton is a grown-ass man who should know better, but he, like so many Trump acolytes before him, willingly submits himself to the ritualistic humiliation that Trump inflicts on all his supporters: pretend that Trump won the 2020 election:
Quote of the Day
“This is a concerted effort of death by a thousand cuts. Every day is another battle, but the war that we’re fighting is to maintain our democracy.”—Ingham County, Michigan, Clerk Barb Byrum (D), on Trump’s expanding whole-of-government effort to target free and fair elections
Trump Out of the Loop on ICE Traffic Stops
After two fatal ICE shootings in two weeks, DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin and the acting director of ICE made the decision Monday evening to halt traffic stops by immigrant agents nationwide — but no one briefed President Trump on the decision, the WSJ reports: “He only caught wind of it from critical coverage on cable TV and furious outside allies, who took to social media to register their disapproval.”
That led to Trump’s social media post Wednesday morning overruling Mullin’s decision and resuming traffic stops — and Mullin’s ignoble social media post of his own last night, weakly declaring: “President Trump and I are on the same page.”
Beyond Gross
It appears that the FBI in Houston has taken unusual steps to muddy the waters around the fatal ICE shooting Monday of Lorenzo Salgado Araujo.
Claiming to have observed on the day of the shooting what appeared to be baggies of meth in the work van that Salgado Araujo was driving when he was shot, an FBI agent on Tuesday — a week after the shooting — sought a search warrant from a federal magistrate.
The search warrant application, which includes photos of the alleged meth, appears relatively normal on its face and not obviously improper (although this line jumps out: “The United States is currently gathering all facts related to this incident, including what may have caused the occupants of the vehicle to flee.”)
Where things get weird is that the search warrant application, which was filed under seal as is normal, was very quickly unsealed, which led to widespread news coverage yesterday that the FBI had found suspected drugs in the van. It’s not clear from the public docket in the case how the search warrant application came to be unsealed.
More temperate news outlets — wary of being used to try to justify the use of force, however strained — were careful to note how unusual it was for a search warrant to be unsealed so quickly at this stage of a case:
- CNN: “While not unheard of, it is unusual for an FBI search warrant to be publicly available during an active and high-profile investigation of this nature.”
- NYT: “Search warrant applications are usually kept under seal. A review of other applications in the Southern District of Texas found that they are rarely unsealed so rapidly.”
What’s tricky about writing about this — and it was obviously difficult to navigate for other news outlets yesterday — was the presence of illegal drugs would not justify (i) the initial stop (ICE agents didn’t know about the alleged drugs and were in fact targeting another immigrant who was not even present in the van); or (ii) the use of deadly force.
Taken together, these developments reinforces a point I made Monday after the fatal ICE shooting in Maine: There is a widespread misimpression that the FBI is working to get to the bottom of these ICE shootings and charge immigration agents criminally, if warranted. That’s simply not true. The FBI is not only not investigating ICE, it’s actively investigating the people ICE shot.
‘ICE Is Out of Control’
Radley Balko: “In 20 years covering policing, I’ve never seen a government agency thumb its nose at the very concept of justice, rights and the rule of law the way D.H.S. and ICE have over the last 18 months.”
Because Iran Is Going So Well?
CBS News: “Military planners have in recent weeks examined a range of options for possible action against [Cuba], including an Army-led air assault involving thousands of U.S. soldiers to be carried out by the 101st Airborne Division, the only unit trained for such a task, according to multiple U.S. officials with knowledge of the discussions.”
We’re So Cooked: U.S. Mint Edition

Despite legal restrictions on placing the visages of living people on official currency, the U.S. Mint in Philadelphia will begin producing commemorative coins with President Trump’s mug emblazoned on them that will be available as soon as this fall.
“It won’t include any gold or precious metals but will have a gold-like finish,” the WSJ reports.
News? Tips? Feedback? Please let me know. For sensitive information, use the encrypted methods here.