Grifters, Ring-Kissers and Supporting Hatchet Men: It’s Time To Vote for 2025’s Golden Dukes

To all of you readers who submitted noxious nominations for the 17th annual Golden Duke awards, we thank you for your service. It’s not easy to sift back through the grime that’s caked atop the first year of President Trump’s second term to elevate and celebrate the scandals and the creeps who remind us of the real reason for the season (honoring depravity).

Continue reading “Grifters, Ring-Kissers and Supporting Hatchet Men: It’s Time To Vote for 2025’s Golden Dukes”

Trump Has Never Been Clearer About What an Immigration Judge’s Real Job Is

This article is part of TPM Cafe, TPM’s home for opinion and news analysis. It was originally published at Balls and Strikes.

On Monday, December 1, the Trump administration fired eight immigration judges in New York City without warning or explanation. With these latest terminations, President Donald Trump has now fired over 100 immigration judges—about 1 in 7 of all immigration judges nationwide—since reentering the White House in January. The administration has involuntarily transferred or otherwise pushed out dozens more.

Continue reading “Trump Has Never Been Clearer About What an Immigration Judge’s Real Job Is”

Trump’s Lawless Rampage Is Only Accelerating

The Unrelenting Boundlessness of Trump II

In the past few weeks, Democrats’ performance in the off-year election and the dismissals of the indictments of James Comey and Letitia James bred a general sense that perhaps a corner has been turned in the Trump II presidency. But the long-held pattern is holding true that when Trump is boxed in or thwarted on one front, he lurches wildly in different directions, continuing to violate laws, boundaries, and norms, often with even greater fervor.

Trump long ago turned upside down the notion we still cling to that defeat, rejection, and official rebuke chasten the violator or at least offer a measure of future deterrence. Not so with Trump. Despite the recent comeuppances, the sheer volume of transgressions does not seem to have ebbed at all, as the next few items show …

New Letitia James Indictment Coming

A new indictment of New York Attorney General Letitia James on bogus mortgage fraud charges is expected as soon as today in the Eastern District of Virginia, where the original indictment was dismissed last week because interim U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan was not validly appointed. Assistant U.S. Attorney Roger Keller, based in Missouri, is expected to present the case to a grand jury, according to MS NOW.

Because He Can’t Have the Nobel Peace Prize?

WASHINGTON, DC – DECEMBER 03: U.S. President Donald Trump’s name is seen recently placed on the outside of the United States Institute of Peace (USIP) building headquarters on December 03, 2025 in Washington, DC. This addition was made ahead of the Trump administration hosting a deal-signing between the leaders of Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo. (Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

President Trump has renamed the U.S. Institute of Peace … for himself.

The Corruption: Pardon Edition

  • President Trump’s pardon of convicted former Honduran President Juan Orlando Hernández — a notorious drug trafficker — even as the Trump administration purports to target drug cartels in lawless high seas attacks came about in part through the intervention of a cast of characters that includes Roger Stone and Matt Gaetz.
  • Trump pardoned stadium developer Timothy Leiweke of charges brought by his own Justice Department in July.
  • Trump pardoned Democratic Rep. Henry Cuellar (TX) and his wife while charges against them of accepting nearly $600,000 in foreign bribes were still pending.

Trump’s Seditious Conspiracy Payback

FBI headquarters is pressuring agents in the field to investigate Democratic lawmakers for seditious conspiracy after they released a video urging military and intel personnel to follow the law and not abide by unlawful orders, Bloomberg reports. But the push to investigate is running into resistance because of the lack of a case:

Career leaders at the bureau’s Washington Field Office have thus far pushed back on the request for a formal investigation, which would follow President Donald Trump’s call for a trial into the Democrats’ “seditious behavior,” the people familiar said. The Washington office supervisors cited a lack of legal and factual basis to initiate a criminal case …

Seditious conspiracy was the most serious charge that some Oath Keepers and Proud Boys were convicted of in the Jan. 6 attack. Trump later commuted their sentences.

Trump Thwarts Jan. 6 Lawsuit

President Trump is asserting executive privilege to protect himself in a years-old civil lawsuit against him by police officers injured in the Jan. 6 attack. The new invocation of executive privilege is an attempt to block a 2024 subpoena to the National Archives and Records Administration for White House records from Trump’s first term.

BREAKING: Pipe Bomb Suspect Arrested

Very few details at this hour, but the FBI has reportedly taken into custody this morning a man in Virginia who is a suspect in placing the two pipe bombs at the DNC and RNC headquarters within a short walk of the Capitol on the eve of the Jan. 6, 2021 attack on Congress. The suspect’s identity and the charges against him have not yet been made public.

Jack Smith Subpoenaed by House GOP

After refusing to testify voluntarily to the House House Judiciary Committee unless he could so publicly, former Special Counsel Jack Smith was slapped with a subpoena to appear before the committee behind closed doors.

Meanwhile, the Trump DOJ is encouraging U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon never to release the sealed Volume II of Smith’s final report, which involves the Mar-a-Lago documents case.

High Seas Murder Watch

WASHINGTON, DC – DECEMBER 4: Navy Adm. Frank Bradley (C) arrives for a closed door classified meeting with lawmakers on Capitol Hill on December 4, 2025 in Washington, DC. Members of the Senate and House Armed Services committees meet with Bradley about the strikes on suspected drug boats out of Venezuela ordered by the Trump Administration. (Photo by Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)
  • Adm. Frank “Mitch” Bradley will give a classified briefing to members of Congress today, where the defense to killing survivors of a lawless attack on an alleged drug-smuggling boat will reportedly be that that they were radioing for help, which itself was deemed a hostile act. I’ll just let you sit with that.
  • Adm. Alvin Holsey, who as top commander of Southern Command has overseen the U.S. force buildup in the Caribbean, didn’t voluntarily retire early but was asked to resign by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth after being “concerned about murky legal authority for the boat strike campaign,” according to the WSJ.
  • CNN and the WaPo each have ticktocks on shifting explanations the Trump administration has offered on the double-tap strike and the lethal boat strike campaign more generally.

Libraries FTW

All of the library grants cancelled by President Trump have been restored by the Institute of Museum and Library Services following last month’s court ruling that his executive order gutting the small agency was unlawful.

The Harshest of Bottom Lines

President Trump’s unlawful dismantling of the United States Agency for International Development has contributed to the first rise in global child mortality since at least 1990, according to a new report from the Gates Foundation. Nearly a quarter of a million more children under 5 are projected to die worldwide in 2025 than in 2024.

Hot tips? Juicy scuttlebutt? Keen insights? Let me know. For sensitive information, use the encrypted methods here.

It Sure Looks Like the Trump Admin Is Prepping for SCOTUS To Demolish Its Tariff Policy

President Donald Trump’s foreign trade policy has been marked by contradiction from the beginning of his second term. He says he’s using tariffs to help close the U.S. budget deficit while increasing that deficit by $2.4 trillion with his signature tax cuts and defense spending package. He ran as a populist promising to decrease inflation, but made inflationary tariffs his signature economic policy. He has cited national security threats to justify his emergency tariffs, but then applied sharp levies to Brazilian grocery goods after the country convicted and sentenced its former president, a Trump ally, to prison time for an attempted self-coup. 

That topsy-turvy approach was on full display during last month’s oral arguments before the Supreme Court, when the administration’s top attorney assured justices that Trump’s tariffs were regulatory, not revenue raising, despite Trump’s claims that tariffs made the U.S. into “a rich nation” and his allies publicly lauding the billions of dollars collected in tariff revenue. Justices sounded deeply skeptical, and, soon after, Trump announced a flurry of modifications to his tariffs on certain foreign imports levied using the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). At the same time, the administration continued stacking up tariffs on more specific goods under a different statute.

Whether those pivots are more about SCOTUS’ likely, imminent decision overturning Trump’s emergency tariffs, or about addressing affordability for voters, depends on who you ask. At the same time, Trump administration officials are now openly sharing their plans to work around an unfavorable SCOTUS decision by transferring IEEPA tariffs to other statutes.

In late November, Bloomberg cited anonymous administration officials to report that the Trump administration was analyzing ways to replace IEEPA tariffs with other statutes, including Section 301 and Section 122 of the Trade Act, which provide unilateral presidential tariffing authority but with more limits. Section 122 only allows a 15% tariff for 150 days, for example.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Wednesday said the administration would increase its reliance on the already-in-use Section 232 tariff statute in the event of a losing SCOTUS decision. 

“We can re-create the exact tariff structure with 301s, with 232s, with the — I think — a 122,” Bessent reportedly said during the New York Times DealBook Summit Wednesday.

The White House did not respond to a request for comment.

Reached via email, a spokesperson for U.S. Customs and Border Protection, which helps regulate foreign commerce, said the agency does not comment on pending litigation.

“CBP continues to implement and enforce tariffs as directed by Executive Order and Proclamation,” the spokesperson said.

Since oral arguments on Nov. 5, Trump has removed or otherwise modified IEEPA tariffs for myriad goods imported from at least seven  countries. Coffee and beef from Brazil, pharmaceutical products, aerospace equipment, and key commodities from Malaysia, and textiles and apparel from El Salvador are all coming into the U.S. at a 0% tariff, for instance. 

It appears Trump is rushing to close deals in case the administration’s tariffs leverage is taken off the table by the Supreme Court, Inu Manak, senior fellow for international trade at the Council on Foreign Relations, told TPM.

“We’ve seen a focus on the conclusion of negotiations that were sort of started because of the imposition of tariffs,” said Manak. “And I think part of the reason for that has been the fear that if the tariffs go away, that there’s gonna be no incentive for each country to sit down and negotiate with the United States.”

Manak noted Trump’s trade deal frameworks have evolved over the course of his term, from detail-free, two-page documents to more specific policy-centered commitments that benefit the U.S. That evolution reflects a “choose your own adventure” kind of foreign trade policy strategy from the administration, where, through individual negotiations, officials have been gradually learning what they can extract from trading partners, Manak said.

Since the beginning of November, the administration has also applied product-specific tariffs on imports including medium and heavy-duty trucks and buses under Section 232. Those shifts weren’t so much to hedge against a negative Supreme Court decision as to broker deal frameworks with trading partners and tackle affordability issues, Alex Durante, senior economist at the right-leaning Tax Foundation, told TPM.

“I think this was sort of always something that he was intending to do,” said Durante about Trump, “which is, impose the tariffs and then see if we can extract certain concessions and then in exchange for that, we’ll lower some of the duties we’re imposing on them.” 

Durante said he doesn’t believe Trump will ever want a “zero-tariff world” but is using the drastic levies as a negotiating tool for trading partners. In return for commitments to purchase more U.S. products and invest in the country, the administration will modify — though usually not eliminate — tariffs on a nation’s imports. In that way, the administration’s contradictory approach to this trade mechanism persists, said Durante.

“That’s been the general theme for a lot of these deals is that there’s an announcement that so and so is going to purchase X billion dollars of whatever product.
And I think when people critically look under the hood, they reach the conclusion that these seem unrealistic based on what we know about those markets,” he said.

During Trump’s first term, for example, China pledged billions in U.S. product purchases during a so-called phase one deal but much of that investment never materialized. From the onset, experts noted China’s commitment exceeded the nation’s demand for U.S. trade.

“So this strategy is clearly not really working out the way that the president has intended,” said Durante. 

The Supreme Court usually releases decisions in June, but the tariffs case is on an expedited timeline: international trade law firms expect the Court to issue a decision on this case as soon as this month, or early next year.

SignalGate Report Heads to Congress At Moment When GOP Is Feeling Not-So-Great About Our Secretary of War

Expressing Distress

This week, Republicans in Congress are furrowing their brows very strongly about the Department of War’s approach to menacing Venezuela, including reporting from the Washington Post that found Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth reportedly gave a verbal order to “kill everybody” aboard a vessel that the Trump administration attacked in September. Whether he spoke those words or not remains the subject of some mystery, but it is also largely beside the point. What is clear is that the boat was struck multiple times in almost-certain violation of international law amid a broader campaign that is an almost-certain violation of international law. Hegseth shifted blame to the admiral in charge.

Continue reading “SignalGate Report Heads to Congress At Moment When GOP Is Feeling Not-So-Great About Our Secretary of War”

Steve Bannon’s Surprisingly Key Role in the Epstein Scandal

We seem to be in another Epstein hiatus before the story and obsession again explodes into the center of the political news ecosystem. Presumably the next episode will come when the White House releases the heavily redacted and/or cooked version of the “Epstein files” that Congress ordered the administration to release. But I wanted to note this very weird oddity right smack in the center of the story that continues to be almost entirely ignored. I was reminded of it last night by this story in The Bulwark by Mona Charen. I first heard about in those interviews Sid Blumenthal and Sean Wilentz did with Michael Wolff about Jeff Epstein, which I wrote about back in September. Wolff discussed something that I had never heard before: that Steve Bannon, basically right up to the time Epstein died, was working with him on a combo rebrand/crisis comms effort to rehabilitate Epstein’s reputation. Yes! Bannon was working as Epstein’s image rehab specialist. The man at the center of all the anti-“elite”, anti-“globalist” pedophiles was tight with Epstein and trying to help him come in from the sex offender cold. He’d actually done hours of video interviews with Epstein as prep for either a 60 Minutes or 60 Minutes-style interview to revive his reputation.

Continue reading “Steve Bannon’s Surprisingly Key Role in the Epstein Scandal”

Don’t Overcomplicate the Scandal of Trump’s Lawless High Seas Attacks

What Else Is There to Know, Really?

As I was describing yesterday the Trump administration’s emerging line of defense to the unlawful strike on the survivors of the already-unlawful high seas attack, I came perilously close to falling into one of the traps of the Trump era.

Unlike political scandals of the past, where the drip, drip, drip of previously hidden facts eventually becomes an overwhelming torrent, Trump era scandals are right out in the open, not just admitted to but often bragged about. The smoking gun is bandied about like a trophy.

If investigators, especially reporters and editors, play by the old rules, they end up setting the bar impossibly high for themselves. The evidence of bad acts is right there in front of us. The traditional paradigm of digging deeper or waiting for the other shoe to drop comes under some tension when the culprits have no shame or fear. It can create a silly dynamic, like looking for a smokier gun.

In this case, the president has talked for years about summarily executing drug traffickers. His defense secretary made his whole post-military career about defending those accused of war crimes and reanimating a tired old myth that military lawyers and weak-kneed politicians forced America’s warriors to fight with one-hand tied behind their backs.

With that as context, they initiated a lawless campaign of lethal strikes at sea against alleged drug-smuggling boats that violated U.S. and international law but which they publicized, touted, and defended on the flimsiest of pretexts. They created a spectacle of U.S. military might, releasing aerial footage of the strikes on social media for maximum virality, and proudly thumped their chests.

But they also re-created a patented element of the Trump reality TV presidency: a spectacle without transparency.

How do they know the boats under attack are smuggling drugs? How do they know those aboard are complicit in the alleged drug smuggling? How do they know what drugs are aboard? How do they know the boats are destined for the United States?

The administration has offered little to nothing in the way of advance intelligence or post-action assessments to justify the attack. Instead, they offer wild and shifting factual claims. It was fentanyl or maybe cocaine. The boats were headed for the U.S. or maybe Trinidad.

As for its legal rationale, the administration could not offer any transparency there for weeks, either. It couldn’t explain to Congress or the American public the legal basis for the attacks, and when it eventually came up with one — a self-serving Office of Legal Counsel memo — it kept the document secret.

Against this backdrop of a clearly unlawful high seas campaign came the WaPo story last Friday that survivors of a Sept 2. attack had been killed in a second strike. Even this wasn’t entirely new. The Intercept reported on the attack a week later, on Sept. 10, in a story very clearly headlined “U.S. Attacked Boat Near Venezuela Multiple Times to Kill Survivors.” But the WaPo story breathed fresh life into the scandal because, although it didn’t say so, it left the impression with many readers that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth had issued a second order specifically to kill the survivors.

Killing survivors at sea is egregiously lawless conduct. It was enough finally to nudge some Hill Republicans out of their Trump torpor. The who, what, when, where, why, and how still matter. But the antiquated notion that this is a cover-up of a crime that will eventually be revealed for all to see doesn’t grapple with how things work in the Trump era.

There’s been quite a bit of speculation that the Democratic members of Congress who released a video last month urging service members to follow the law and not abide by unlawful military orders must have gotten wind of the double tap strike, which prompted them to go public. Perhaps.

“A very small number of Senate and House staffers separately received highly classified briefings about the attack on Tuesday,” The Intercept reported at the time. “No senators or House members were in attendance, people familiar with the briefings told The Intercept.”

But by the time the Democrats’ video was released, the unlawful campaign was more than two months old and was by itself — independent of the double tap strike — an obvious example of illegal military orders. The OLC memo as much as acknowledged this by reportedly offering service members involved in the campaign sweeping immunity from future prosecution.

Given all of the context above, it sets the bar needlessly high to withhold judgment or to wait and see or turn the story into a kind of fox chase by getting hyper-focused on whether it was Hegseth or Adm. Frank M. Bradley who issued the key orders, whether Hegseth watched the real-time video of the second strike, and whether there is some arcane justification by which the wrecked ship with survivors clinging to it might still have posed a threat.

Again, the whole campaign is unlawful. The initial strike was unlawful. The subsequent strike was unlawful.

To say, as I am here, that we already know enough to make strong judgments about who is culpable and for what, isn’t to say that we should eschew new facts or information that provides more transparency into what has happened in the Caribbean and Eastern Pacific since this summer. But it is to say we should be confident in exercising those judgments and not fall into the trap of becoming so focused on the remaining unknowns that the intentional lack of transparency becomes an obstacle that we are helpless to see through.

Trump surely isn’t waiting around. He said he would “start doing strikes on land, too.”

Quote of the Day

“Tonight is a sign that 2026 is going to be a bitch of an election cycle. Republicans can survive if we play team and the Trump administration officials play smart. Neither is certain.”–an anonymous House Republican, after the GOP won the TN-07 special election by a much narrower margin than Trump won the district in 2024

For the Record …

Hot tips? Juicy scuttlebutt? Keen insights? Let me know. For sensitive information, use the encrypted methods here.

When To Accommodate, and When To Fight? NY Officials Agonize and Prepare for Federal Escalation

Jackie Bray has been thinking about how quickly things could spiral out of control.

Bray is the New York state emergency leader whom Gov. Kathy Hochul tasked with averting a Chicago or Los Angeles-style surge of immigration agents and National Guard troops. At the core of the job is a dilemma that the Trump administration has imposed on blue cities and states around the country: How can the state respond to aggressive, spectacle-driven immigration operations without triggering the showdown with federal agents that the administration is trying to provoke?

Continue reading “When To Accommodate, and When To Fight? NY Officials Agonize and Prepare for Federal Escalation”

Another Blue State Effort to Crack Down on Crisis Pregnancy Centers Heads for Likely Demise

Crisis pregnancy centers, including the one at the heart of the case the Supreme Court heard Tuesday, operate on deception.

Continue reading “Another Blue State Effort to Crack Down on Crisis Pregnancy Centers Heads for Likely Demise”