Lindell Is Really Optimistic for Someone Who Just Lost the GOP Gubernatorial Endorsement: A ‘Perfect Scenario’

Hello, and welcome back to The Franchise!

The biggest voting rights news this week is, of course, another series of devastating developments in the battle to redistrict away minority and Democratic voting power in the South. But there’s lots more to unpack today, including an exclusive convo with Franchise readers’ favorite conspiracy theorist Mike Lindell, who has some delusional spin to share on why it’s actually good news that he didn’t receive the Republican endorsement in the Minnesota gubernatorial race. We’ll get into that a bit more below, but first: 

On Tuesday, in a win for Republicans, the Supreme Court green lit the use of Alabama’s racially gerrymandered 2023 map, which removes one of the state’s two majority-Black congressional districts. 

The justices, in a 6-3 vote split along ideological lines, granted an emergency request from Alabama’s GOP state officials and lifted a lower court order that had previously blocked the 2023 map, finding that the map intentionally discriminated against Black voters in violation of the Voting Rights Act. 

But in the aftermath of Louisiana v. Callais, which gutted the Voting Rights Act and cleared a path for red states to reshape majority-Black congressional districts, the Supreme Court has now paved the way for the map to be used in the 2026 midterms elections. 

“While federal courts should not impose changes close to an election,” this week’s ruling reads, “states are free to decide for themselves whether last minute changes to an election are in their best interests.”

Justices Sonya Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented. 

“Before the Court are two paths. Down one lies an orderly election, held under a tried-and-tested congressional map that protects Black Alabamians’ right to vote and with which all voters, elections officials, and candidates alike are familiar,” the dissent reads. “Down the other lies a chaotic election, held under a never-before-used congressional map that intentionally discriminates against Black Alabamians.”

My colleague Kate Riga unpacks the ruling, and what it (ominously) foreshadows for SCOTUS holding red states accountable for gerrymandering away Black electoral power moving forward, more here

Meanwhile, in Louisiana, Republican Gov. Jeff Landry signed the state’s new gerrymandered map into existence after the state Senate approved the proposal in a 28-10 vote on Friday. The new map eliminates one of the state’s two majority-Black districts, and gives Republicans five of the state’s six congressional seats. 

In New York, Democrats are pushing forward a 2028 redistricting proposal, which could potentially allow them to flip up to four Republican congressional seats.

As always, there’s a lot more to unpack this week. Let’s dig in. 

A Check-In With Mike Lindell 

Although pillow maven and election conspiracy theorist Mike Lindell lost the GOP endorsement in the Minnesota gubernatorial race this week, he is continuing his bid for governor, with his trademark confidence and spells of conspiracy theorizing. In fact, he told me, he’s not at all worried about losing the nomination because he is “polling number one with the people of Minnesota.” Hmm. 

Last week, the state’s two main political parties, the Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party and the Republican Party held conventions for members to vote for the endorsement of a single candidate. A candidate can lose the endorsement, but still run in the state’s August 11 primary. Although he lost the endorsement after coming in third place, Lindell will continue his race and remain on the primary ballot. 

At the Minnesota GOP state convention this week, Kendall Qualls, former health care executive and army veteran, secured the Republican Party endorsement for governor.

“This GOP nomination, they’ve been doing this since 1994, and that person typically always wins,” Lindell told me. “They do always win, but that’s just, they picked them. But the problem is they lose to the Democrats for 24 years now.”

“It’s disgusting,” he added. 

Alongside Lindell, state House Speaker Lisa Demuth is also choosing to continue her race for the Republican nomination for governor, despite also losing the GOP endorsement, which according to Lindell, actually helps his cause. 

“This is the perfect scenario for me though, because these two are gonna go out and split the vote,” he said, “I’m number one.”

David Paleologos, the director of the Suffolk University Political Research Center, told TPM that at the moment Lindell is “enjoying a trajectory that places him in the top tier of Republican candidates vying for the GOP nomination.”

Demuth, Paleologos added, now becomes “Lindell’s MyPillow.”

“He believes he sleeps better at night between now and August with the cushion of knowing that his 40 percent wins in a three-way, but loses in a two-way,” he continued. 

Lindell says his focus now is campaigning against Amy Klobuchar, who secured the official Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party endorsement for governor. Paleologos also noted that Lindell is trailing Klobuchar by 20 points in general election polling. 

“I’m focusing on campaigning against Amy Klobuchar, and these numbers should take care of itself when the people vote in August,” Lindell said. 

Tina Peters Is Out of Prison. She Wasted No Time Returning to Her Old Antics

Tina Peters, former election administrator of Mesa County, Colorado who was convicted for breaching her own office’s voting equipment in an effort to find nonexistent 2020 voter fraud, was released from prison this week, thanks to Democratic Colorado Gov. Jared Polis (he caved to pressure from President Trump to commute her nine-year prison sentence). 

Only hours after her release, Peters appeared on MAGA fav Steve Bannon’s podcast to spread even more baseless conspiracy theories about voting machines magically flipping votes on behalf of Democrats. 

“I know that the Democrats are going to cheat, and no one is really addressing the problem that I spent my time in prison as retribution for,” she told Bannon, “and that was exposing the election machines that allow the votes to be flipped.” 

In a statement on Monday, following Peters’s release, Democratic Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold called Polis’s decision to commute the sentence of Peters “an affront to our democracy, the people of Colorado, and election officials across the country.”

“It sends a dangerous message about accountability for those who would attack elections,” she added. “Peters’ release also will embolden the election denial movement; since the grant of clemency, she has continued to spread election falsehoods and conspiracies.”

Newsom Moved to Get Out Ahead of Conspiracy Theorists, Potential Election Ratfuckery  

Ahead of California’s June 2 primary this week, California Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a bill into law to protect the state’s election from conspiracy theorists as well as federal meddling and overreach. 

The legislation, known as Senate Bill 73 takes effect against the backdrop of gubernatorial candidate and Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco seizing hundreds of thousands of ballots last month in an election interference campaign both against Newsom and in furtherance of Trumpian election conspiracy theories. Bianco claimed he seized the ballots from the special election that cleared the path for California Dems to redistrict before the midterms as a way to protect against voter fraud, for which there was no evidence

Newsom has not mentioned Bianco by name, but has alluded to Bianco’s actions being the motivation to expedite the measure. 

“You had a guy who’s desperate for attention and wants me to use his name today, I won’t,” Newsom said last week, per NBC4 Los Angeles, “that took 650,000 (ballots). That happened.”

Senate Bill 73, which takes effect immediately, restricts law enforcement officers from gaining access to voter rolls and voting technology, and also limits the presence of federal law enforcement near polling places. According to the language of the legislation, it specifically prohibits, among other things, a “peace officer from interfering with the administration of an election.”

“California will not allow our elections to be commandeered by political intimidation, abuse of power, or chaotic interference from extremists chasing conspiracy theories,” Newsom said in a statement. “This law protects voters, election workers, and the integrity of the democratic process from election-deniers who want to undermine democracy.”

Newsom told reporters last week that the legislation is a way to respond to the “legitimate anxiety” created by Trump’s continued efforts to interfere in the election administration process. 

“I expect the worst with Trump because he’s done the worst,” he added

In Other Election News

AJC: Georgia Election Board hires election skeptic as investigator

New Hampshire Bulletin: Ahead of midterms, federal court strikes down NH proof-of-citizenship voter registration law

CBS News: DOJ seeks judge’s recusal in Georgia election records fight tied to Fani Willis controversy

Senate GOP’s Reconciliation Bill Sets a ‘Very Bad Precedent’

Senate Republicans’ reconciliation package in its current form includes billions of dollars for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP), effectively providing funding for those agencies until the end of fiscal year 2029.

If the reconciliation package becomes law, the funding — combined with the money from last year’s One Big Beautiful Bill (OBBB) — will be enough for ICE to operate at quadruple capacity for the next three and a half years. And the funding for Border Patrol, again combined with OBBB, will be more than enough to run it for the next three and a half years.

Using the party-line reconciliation process to fund these controversial agencies sets “a very bad precedent,” experts tell TPM, threatening future appropriations negotiations and undermining congressional oversight. It is yet another example of congressional Republicans weakening their own power by trampling on Congress’ power of the purse.

Continue reading “Senate GOP’s Reconciliation Bill Sets a ‘Very Bad Precedent’”

Cue Up the Mother of All Confirmation Battles

Blanche Audition for AG Succeeds

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche’s elaborate audition to out-degenerate Pam Bondi has apparently won him President Trump’s nomination for the permanent position.

In his short time as acting AG, Blanche has re-indicted James Comey, indicted the Southern Poverty Law Center, and turbocharged the South Florida investigation into a supposed “grand conspiracy” against Trump. Under his watch, the DOJ has targeted Fani Willis, Cassidy Hutchinson, E. Jean Carroll (where Blanche did recuse himself), and reporters in leak cases.

But that’s not even the worst of it.

In the course of unwinding the Jan. 6 seditious conspiracy prosecutions, Blanche created a $1.776 billion “anti-weaponization” slush fund to be dispensed at Trump’s discretion with no transparency of accountability while improbably settling Trump’s lawsuit against the IRS by releasing Trump from some $100 million in potential IRS claims for unpaid taxes.

It’s a helluva track record for the two months since Bondi was fired as attorney general.

Blanche’s nomination sets up a potentially epic confirmation battle in an election year. Democratic senators are highly incentivized not just to block Blanche but to make the confirmation hearings a bloodbath for the Trump DOJ and White House. They’re further bolstered by a trio of GOP senators who may be out for blood after trump torpedoed their reelections.

Buckle up.

Zombie Slush Fund Not Dead Yet

While official Washington rushed to treat as credible the assurances from the White House and DOJ that the slush fund is dead, President Trump said he wasn’t sure that it’s gone for good: “I love it,” he said. “I think it’s so important.”

The Senate is considering the reconciliation bill on immigration funding today, and a small number of GOP senators want to insert language in the bill barring the slush fund, especially after Blanche declined to commit to put it in writing that the slush fund is being permanently abandoned.

Stay tuned.

MUST READ

Most of Morning Memo’s focus on the politicization of the Justice Department has been concerned with the big-picture problems like loss of independence from the White House, defiance of court orders, and purges of DOJ personnel for political reasons.

But there’s another super important dynamic that Bloomberg’s Ben Penn captures in an extraordinarily well-reported piece on Sigal Chattah, the top federal prosecutor in Nevada: The ways in which unqualified partisan prosecutors can run amok, allegedly pursuing their own vendettas, doing favors for preferred former clients and friends, and blowing off ethics concerns flagged even by the low-bar Trump DOJ.

Chattah is one of the acting U.S. attorneys whom the Justice Department has tried to install on a semi-permanent basis, bypassing Senate confirmation:

The first-time prosecutor frequently sought status updates on cases despite warnings that she was disregarding recusals signed by the deputy attorney general’s office in Washington that barred her involvement in matters where she had conflicts of interest, said several individuals.

Chattah also took calls from outside attorney acquaintances and intervened in their pending matters opposite her office—seeking favorable outcomes for their clients. …

Unlike in other offices, the Nevada disruptions are frequently disconnected from Trump’s priorities and are instead largely of Chattah’s own making, added many lawyers familiar with the office—most of whom spoke anonymously to avoid retaliation or share sensitive deliberations.

Really worth a read.

Trump DOJ Watch: Only the Best People

Lindsey Halligan was the first or at least the most prominent example of Trump inserting White House political aides directly into prosecutor roles within DOJ that are connected to his desired retributive prosecutions. It hasn’t stopped:

  • On Monday, Kurt Olsen, the White House election security czar who aided Trump’s attempt to overturn the 2020 ​election, joined the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida, where the mother of all retributive investigations is being conducted into a “grand conspiracy” against Trump, Reuters reports. While it’s not confirmed that Olsen, who has no prosecutorial experience, is on the “grand conspiracy” team, he appeared in a photo of that team posted last month by Miami U.S. Attorney Jason Reding Quinones, according to Reuters.
  • In a little-noticed report last month, CBS News confirmed that Trump ally and conservative firebrand Victoria Toensing was sworn in as a federal prosecutor in the Southern District of Florida. Toensing, a former federal prosecutor, is the wife of Joseph diGenova, who is leading the “grand conspiracy” investigation. “DiGenova declined to say whether she is working on the Brennan and grand conspiracy cases, but a source with direct knowledge confirmed she is,” CBS News reported.
  • With the prospect of judicial sanctions, several prosecutors who played a role in the Broadview Six case have hired attorneys of their own, the Chicago Tribune‘s Jason Meisner reports.

The Retribution: SPLC Edition

The Trump DOJ obtained a superseding indictment of the Southern Poverty Law Center that keeps the same counts and defendants as the original indictment but tightens up some of its loose and problematic language.

The SPLC immediately asked the judge to investigate how it came to be that a MS Word draft of the superseding indictment was distributed by Main Justice to reporters on Tuesday evening before the superseding indictment was docketed on Wednesday:

In decades of collective practice, including serving as prosecutors at DOJ, none of the SPLC’s counsel has ever seen anything remotely like what DOJ did last night—distributing what turned out not to be the actual superseding indictment returned by the grand jury and docketed today, but one that has no indication of its finality, in native Word that could be edited and reposted, and before the actual returned charges were unsealed, to a group of journalists.

The SPLC wants the judge to issue a show cause order requiring Main Justice and the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Middle District of Alabama to explain their conduct and why they should not be sanctioned.

Picking Through the SCOTUS Carnage

The Supreme Court’s historically bad decision to allow Alabama to eliminate one of its two majority-Black congressional districts in time for the midterms, turning the 14th Amendment on its ear, continued to reverberate:

  • Former Alabama U.S. Attorney Joyce Vance: “The Roberts Court’s derogation of Americans’ voting rights, starting with Shelby County v. Holder, working its way up to Callais, and now, putting the final nail in the coffin in Milligan, will go down in history as a shameful failure.”
  • Dahlia Lithwick and Mark Joseph Stern: “It is not a mere aftershock from Callais but a separate earthquake of the same or perhaps even greater magnitude.”
  • Chris Geidner: “This is truly one of the worst things the court has done — both in terms of legitimacy and in terms of the law — since I have been covering the court.”

Mullin Puts His Foot in It

In an exchange during his Senate testimony Tuesday that didn’t immediately garner much attention, DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin seemed to inadvertently open the door to sending Kilmar Abrego Garcia to his preferred destination of Costa Rica rather than to Liberia or to one of the other African countries that the administration has sought to deport him to.

“Great, if he’s willing to do that, we’ll be happy to send him,” Mullin said under questioning from Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-MD).

Abrego Garcia’s lawyers didn’t miss the exchange and immediately notified the court in his habeas case.

It appears to be an inadvertent misstep by Mullin because he also testified that he was not aware that Abrego Garcia had agreed to be removed to Costa Rica or that Costa Rica has agreed to accept him.

4 House GOPers Break With Trump on Iran

The House voted 215-208 to curtail President Trump’s military adventurism in Iran. Four Republicans crossed the aisle to form a majority with Democrats: Reps. Tom Barrett (MI), Warren Davidson (OH), Brian Fitzpatrick (PA), and Thomas Massie (KY)

IMPORTANT

WASHINGTON, DC – APRIL 16: Russell Vought, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for the second Trump administration, speaks during a Senate Committee on the Budget hearing to examine the President’s fiscal year 2027 budget proposal in Capitol Hill on April 16, 2026 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Roberto Schmidt/Getty Images)

Last Friday, the Trump administration unveiled new proposed regulations that would require the approval of political appointees for all discretionary federal grants based on tight far-right political criteria.

The proposed regs would interject political appointees into scientific and health research, limiting “the subjects that they can explore, the foreign labs with which they may collaborate and even the conferences at which they can appear,” the NYT reports.

Scientist Chanda Prescod-Weinstein called it “the end of American science as we know it.”

To catch yourself up, I’d recommend Don Moynihan’s wide-ranging piece on the proposed regs and their intended impact: “The bottom line is that Russ Vought, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, wants to move scientific decisions away from the scientists and into the hands of political appointees. I don’t mean the big picture, strategic decisions of American science, which should be political, but the micro-decisions about what is and is not good research.”

The Purges: Schedule F Edition

In a culmination of the Schedule F push that began in his first term, President Trump has removed civil service protections for some 8,000 senior federal workers and made them at-will employees.

A Sea Change in Public Monuments

ARLINGTON, TEXAS – APRIL 03: Fans walk past the controversial “One Riot, One Ranger” statue at the Texas Rangers home opener against the Cincinnati Reds at Globe Life Field on April 03, 2026 in Arlington, Texas. (Photo by Richard Rodriguez/Getty Images)

In retrospect, 2020 was the high water mark for removing public memorials to racists, traitors, European explorers, and other right-wing shibboleths. Since Trump’s reelection, the pendulum has swung in the other direction, with wink-wink re-namings of military bases, resurrected Confederate memorials, and, as the WSJ reports, the restoration of statutes that had been gathering dust in storage for the past six years.

Hot tips? Juicy scuttlebutt? Keen insights? Let me know. For sensitive information, use the encrypted methods here.

TPM Video: Chris Mathias Breaks Down What Ex-CBP Commander Greg Bovino Was Up to at a European Fascist Conference

Former U.S. Border Patrol Commander-At-Large Greg Bovino is best known for his lead role in White House’s lethal immigration sweeps across America and for his famous Nazi SS-style trench coat. So it’s not exactly a surprise that he is spending his retirement doing interviews with avowed anti-semites and attending extremist conferences.

Still, it’s worth taking a close look at who, exactly, one of the people Trump selected as a top American immigration official is rubbing shoulders with, and what these people represent. Freelance journalist and author of “To Catch a Fascist” Chris Mathias broke down Bovino’s recent attendance at the “Remigration Summit” in Portugal with TPM publisher Joe Ragazzo on Substack Live.

@letsgomathias.bsky.social: "The face of immigration raids in the U.S. has had an ongoing dialogue with one of the most famous neo-Nazis in the world, who…had a correspondence with a man who murdered Muslims in New Zealand. That’s the water Bovino is swimming in.”substack.com/@joeragazzo/…

Allegra Kirkland (@allegrak.bsky.social) 2026-06-05T16:34:11.230Z

For more from Chris, check out his full TPM piece on Bovino’s pals and an excerpt from his book that we ran earlier this year: “What an Antifa Activist Learned While Undercover With Patriot Front.”

Greg Bovino’s Retirement Plan? Go Full Fascist 

This article is part of TPM Cafe, TPM’s home for opinion and news analysis.

Greg Bovino was welcomed like a celebrity at one of the world’s pre-eminent fascist confabs this past weekend. The former U.S. Border Patrol Commander-At-Large — whose MAGA star turn came when President Donald Trump cast him as the lead in White House’s lethal immigration sweeps across America — mingled with Hitler admirers, avowed racists, and far-right politicians at the Salmanha Residence near Porto, Portugal for the “Remigration Summit 2026.” 

“The interest around him is enormous,” the event’s account on Telegram gushed, posting a photo of Bovino arriving at the hotel, giving an impromptu press conference to a gaggle of journalists outside. “I am very happy to come over and lend some expertise to the Europeans” to stop “illegal aliens destroying European culture,” he told them.

The veteran American border cop appeared to leave his famous Nazi SS-style trench coat stateside, donning a suit jacket instead. But if his attire wasn’t a nod to violent ethno-nationalism, the speech and interviews he delivered at the conference were. Bovino opened his 15-minute lecture, to a crowd of about 500 mostly white men, by calling “remigration” the “most important topic perhaps of our lifetime,” according to a video provided to Talking Points Memo by Jacopo Di Miceli, an independent Italian journalist.

“Remigration” is a euphemism for ethnic cleansing and refers to the forcible removal of non-white people from Western countries; it is the “solution” offered up by white supremacists to the “Great Replacement,” the racist conspiracy theory that global elites — and in many iterations, Jews — are orchestrating waves of immigration as part of a nefarious plot to eradicate white people from their “homelands.” 

Continue reading “Greg Bovino’s Retirement Plan? Go Full Fascist “

Iowa Didn’t Quite Work Out the Way Trump Wanted

It Turns Out Trump Endorsed a Loser in Iowa 

President Trump’s eleventh-hour endorsement not only didn’t propel Rep. Randy Feenstra (R-IA) to a win in the primary for Iowa governor, it didn’t even push him into a runoff.  

Zach Lahn, a MAHA-aligned businessman who entered the race as a complete unknown, beat Feenstra outright with 38% of the vote. 

To be fair to Trump, that endorsement had to carry a lot of dead weight; Feenstra skipped all of the debates and barely even bothered to hold in-person events. 

Lahn will face Rob Sand, the popular, Democratic state auditor, in the general election. Following last night’s results, The Center for Politics at the University of Virginia shifted the governors’ race from “leans Republican” to “toss-up.” Cook Political Report, another major election prognosticator, already ranked that race as a toss up. 

— Kate Riga

Not Out of the Woods in the Jungle Primary 

California’s jungle primary, where the top two vote-getters in either party advance to the general, has caused significant Democratic angst this cycle as it’s threatened to lock the party out of major races, leaving voters in the very blue state to choose between Republicans in November.

While the risk in the governor’s race seems averted now (it has yet to be officially called), there was a time when two Republicans were polling first and second in the California governor’s race. Trump’s strategically idiotic endorsement of Steve Hilton helped put an end to that, and at least one Democrat is all but certain to advance. 

The same dynamic has added tension to a couple of House races, one of which — the race for Rep. Kevin Kiley’s seat (I-CA) — is still playing out. 

While there are certainly benefits to the system — a think tank that studies polarization suggests that it lessens extremism and boosts primary turnout — these races underscore its weaknesses. Voters in such a Democratic state shouldn’t have to choose one of two Republican candidates simply because there were more candidates running on the left and splitting the vote. 

But on that note — Democrats, get it together! We don’t need 8 trillion people running if it means risking a Democratic lockout.

— Kate Riga

The Emptiness of the Administration’s Pro-Natalist Propaganda 

Crisis pregnancy centers, or CPCs — which are truly religious anti-abortion organizations, poorly disguised as healthcare clinics — target the most vulnerable.

Now, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services is helping to funnel people towards them. 

On Mother’s Day, the HHS launched Moms.gov, describing the website as “groundbreaking.” To be clear, the website does not offer any new resources for expectant parents. It’s a glorified Linktree for information that any chump with an internet connection could find. 

Featuring images like a headless, pregnant belly in a golden field of wheat, pink and blue baby footprints, and simple illustrations of only the wholest of foods, the messaging is clear: Make America Barefoot Again. 

Dr. Oz underlined this theme when Moms.gov was announced, explaining that “one in three Americans are under-babied,” which was not a term I learned in public health school. 

The first resource Moms.gov shares is a link to Option Line, an online directory of pregnancy crisis centers funded by the religious right. The CPC Map has identified over 2,600 CPCs in the U.S. Their use of manipulative tactics and medically inaccurate disinformation has been well-documented by journalists, late-night news satire talk shows, and even The L Word

One study of hundreds of CPCs found that only 5% offered prenatal care, only 40% provided referrals for prenatal care, and only 26% and 16% of CPCs have a registered nurse or doctor, respectively — all the while using language and imagery that implies visitors can receive medical care onsite. 

Moms.gov doesn’t stop with CPCs, also pointing visitors towards Trump Accounts for their unborn children, and TrumpRx for fertility medication. You can find links to a Focus on the Family page about adoption, tons of breastfeeding resources, and the USDA’s Dietary Guidelines for Americans. 

To be clear, these are real concerns many people deal with. And, to be fair, Moms.gov was launched alongside the bipartisan Health Moms Health Babies America campaign, which addresses critical issues like reducing maternal mortality and expanding paid family leave. But it is hard to square these initiatives with the influx of federal and state dollars to CPCs, which may actually serve to increase the risk of maternal mortality and morbidity by causing visitors to delay critical prenatal screening and care. At the same time, funding for Title X — the Nixon-era family planning program for low-income families — has remained flat, and its services are being chipped away along with its administrative staff

In reality, the administration’s pro-natalist propaganda and its actual policies are a web of contradictions. Abortion bans are associated with increased likelihood of sepsis, infant death, and pregnancy-related death, because those bans create legal uncertainty that leads to inconsistent care for high-risk pregnancies. But the biggest hit of all to pregnancy-related health may have been the 2025 budget reconciliation, or the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which slashed the single largest payer of births in the U.S.: Medicaid. By 2034, 14 million more people are expected to become uninsured, a status which is associated with poorer outcomes during pregnancy

Pregnancy is encouraged, but only for those who can afford it and its associated risks. The rest of us are on our own. 

— Farrell Brenner

In Case You Missed It

The latest in Supreme Court corruption: SCOTUS Cobbles Together Excuse to Let Alabama Discriminate Against Black Voters in New Order

The Backchannel: The Great Untethering—MAGA/GOP Edition

Also from the Editor’s Blog:

Morning Memo: The Mounting Toll and Absurdity of Trumpism

More on California: Democrats on Track to Avoid Being Locked out of Power in California Governor’s Race

More on Iowa: Running on ‘Prairie Populism,’ Turek Wins Primary as Iowa Dems Reach for US Senate Seat

A little scoop from Emine Yücel: Dems to Warn Trump He Has Run Afoul of War Powers Act With Absurd Claim That Iran War Has Been ‘Terminated’

Yesterday’s Most Read Story

Will We NEVER Learn the Lessons of Trump? — David Kurtz

What We Are Reading

Trump 2020 election denier Kurt Olsen joins Justice Department — Erin Banco and Andrew Goudsward, Reuters

Why young men are killing their sperm: The most ironic side effect of looksmaxxing. — Anna North, Vox

Who Is Nick Bilton? — Rusty Foster, Today in Tabs

Democrats on Track to Avoid Being Locked out of Power in California Governor’s Race

Democrats seem to have avoided the nightmare scenario in California: with just under 60 percent of the vote in, only one Republican is currently poised to make it to the general election. 

Continue reading “Democrats on Track to Avoid Being Locked out of Power in California Governor’s Race”

Grand Jury Corruption Watch

A few more nuggets to report out of the Chicago U.S. Attorney’s office. Yesterday the DOJ released what it referred to, rather grandiosely, as a “rare special report” about grand jury appearances. It was basically a statement and and defense by U.S. Attorney Andrew Boutros himself to charges that he was himself involved with the tainted grand jury which brought charges against the so-called Broadview Six. It’s a bit convoluted, even for someone like me who’s followed the case pretty closely. The “report” starts by arguing that one transcript reference that appears to refer to the “USA”, i.e., the US Attorney, was actually a transcription error. So, as the “report” puts it, a classic case of mistaken identity. It seems like that may be right, though it’s not clear to me that anyone was actually referring to that bit of transcript. In any case, the “report” leads with that, making it seem like any claims that Boutros has dirty hands is just wrong and there’s no there there.

I read an account of this “report” and then shortly after the pretty aggressive/smackdowny statement from Broadview Six defense attorney Chris Parente, Boutros’ current main antagonist.

Continue reading “Grand Jury Corruption Watch”

The Great Untethering—MAGA/GOP Edition

Republicans will never turn on Trump. He’s gobbled up too much power in the architecture of the Republican Party. Even as his national approval numbers have continued to tumble, Trump has upped his ritual slayings of Republican incumbents, some for lack of total loyalty and then some, like John Cornyn, just for — well, let’s just say it — for the fuck of it. So it’s not just that he has too much power. The party’s elected officials are now overwhelming his people. When you see a breakdown between the White House and Republican majorities on Capitol Hill, it doesn’t come with any fingerprints. It’s almost like a black hole. Things that were going to happen just suddenly don’t happen. Or things disappear without a really obvious explanation.

The White House’s maybe-backaway from the Trump Thug Fund is an example of that. Todd Blanche says the Trump family’s immunity stays. They might try bring the fund back at any moment. But for now they’ve shelved it or are claiming they have. And the court ruling against it isn’t a sufficient explanation. They get those all the time. They’re abandoning it because it’s simply too unpopular on Capitol Hill.

Continue reading “The Great Untethering—MAGA/GOP Edition”

The Proposed Trump NDA Is Following John Roberts’s Bad Example

This article is part of TPM Cafe, TPM’s home for opinion and news analysis.  It was originally published at Balls and Strikes.

Last week, President Donald Trump’s Office of Personnel Management published a draft of a sweeping nondisclosure agreement that the administration hopes to impose on millions of federal workers. The proposed NDA would bar employees at federal agencies from revealing any “sensitive” information that is “not currently publicly available” and “should not be disclosed” under any applicable law or “government-wide policy.” Employees would remain obligated to keep quiet for five years after they leave federal service, unless they get “written permission” to do otherwise from an authorized agency official.

The proposal’s demand for secrecy is inherently in tension with democracy’s demand for transparency. And Congress has already passed several laws that aim to strike the right balance between the government’s responsibility to safeguard some private information, and federal employees’ First Amendment right to speak out about matters of public concern. As a result, confidentiality agreements have historically played a limited role in government, primarily impacting people with access to classified national security information.

In short, the Trump administration’s proposed government-wide blanket ban on speech is a dramatic departure from democratic norms—the latest in a series of many. In OPM’s draft notice, however, the administration contends that its gag rule does have precedent: The Supreme Court has a gag rule, too. 

Continue reading “The Proposed Trump NDA Is Following John Roberts’s Bad Example”