Trump’s Pick For Ambassador To South Africa Actively Opposed Fight To End Apartheid

As Black activists in South Africa fought against their country’s racist apartheid government decades ago, some on the American right felt they took it too far. One of those people who stepped up and spoke out against their fight was L. Brent Bozell III, the right-wing activist that President Trump tapped this week to serve as America’s ambassador to South Africa.

According to the congressional website, Bozell’s nomination was received by the Senate Foreign Relations committee on Monday. Trump had previously picked Bozell to be head of the U.S. Agency for Global Media, but that nomination was withdrawn. 

Bozell has been a prominent right-wing activist for decades. He is the founder and president of the Media Research Center, a self-described “watchdog” dedicated to exposing alleged liberal bias. In the late 1990s he founded the Parents Television Council, which opposed what it saw as indecent content on the airwaves. Bozell’s son, L. Brent Bozell IV or “Zeeker,” was among the people who were sentenced for their role in the January 6 attack before being pardoned by Trump earlier this year. 

While Bozell’s career in American issues has been high-profile, his past foray into South African politics is less well known. 

Yet documents surfaced by TPM show that Bozell once weighed in on the fight against South Africa’s apartheid government. While that regime brutally enforced minority white rule and legal segregation with violence that included the killing and torture of activists, Bozell was concerned with aggressive action taken by the Black opposition. 

In 1987, Bozell was president of the National Conservative Political Action Committee. On January 28 of that year, he wrote a letter to his counterpart at The Conservative Caucus, a right-wing policy group, declaring that his organization was “proud to become a member of the Coalition Against ANC Terrorism.” The group was opposed to the militancy of the African National Congress (ANC), which was the largest Black nationalist organization dedicated to ending the apartheid regime. 

Bozell and the White House did not respond to requests for comment on this story. 

Specifically, the coalition Bozell’s organization joined, which included at least 34 different right-wing groups, formed to discourage President Ronald Reagan’s secretary of state, George Shultz, from a planned meeting with ANC president Oliver Tambo. Despite this pressure campaign, Shultz met with Tambo on the same day Bozell’s letter was sent.  

The ANC’s armed wing, Umkhonto we Sizwe or MK, which means “spear of the nation,” was founded in 1961 by a group that included the late legendary anti-apartheid activist Nelson Mandela. The organization conducted bombings and guerilla attacks, some of which were deadly. Mandela, who is now widely seen as a heroic figure, spent 27 years in prison for his role in MK. A modern political party has adopted the MK name, but they are not a continuation of the original paramilitary group. 

Ahead of his meeting with Shultz, Tambo addressed criticism of the ANC’s militancy. He described it as a necessary evil in light of the brutality of the apartheid regime, which committed extensive atrocities including the murder of peaceful protesters. 

“We tried nonviolence for nearly 50 years, until 1961,” Tambo told the Washington Post at the time. “Then we decided we had to do what other people do — to embark on armed struggle.”

As part of its opposition to the meeting between Tambo and Shultz, the “Coalition Against ANC Terrorism” produced a publication that highlighted the ANC’s Soviet and communist ties. The group also held hearings in the weeks before Tambo’s visit that were presided over by the late U.S. Sen. Jesse Helms (R-NC), who was a prominent advocate for segregation here in the United States. Speakers at the coalition’s hearings included John Gogotya, a Black South African politician who led a moderate group that was later revealed to have been backed by the apartheid regime’s military intelligence operation. 

While Bozell’s coalition and others on the right were opposed to the ANC, Mandela and the group ultimately received extensive international support that helped end apartheid. In 1990, in response to widespread civil unrest and global sanctions, South Africa’s ruling white National Party released Mandela and other jailed ANC leaders. South Africa held its first democratic elections in 1994 and Mandela became president. He held that position for five years, but the ANC has remained the country’s leading political party.   

Mandela died in December 2013. In the days after his passing, Bozell posted on the site formerly known as Twitter to criticize television anchor Brian Williams for engaging in coverage that, as Bozell put it, “mythologizes” Mandela, noting that Williams hosted what Bozell saw as more critical broadcasts about the death of conservative British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher earlier that same year. 

Bozell’s nomination comes as relations between the U.S. and South Africa have hit a low point. In December 2023, South Africa filed a case with the United Nations’ International Court of Justice accusing Israel of “genocidal acts” in its ongoing war in the Gaza Strip. Bozell has been a vocal supporter of the Israeli government. 

In recent weeks, Trump and his ally, billionaire Elon Musk, have repeatedly criticized the South African government for its treatment of the white minority. Musk, who is from South Africa, has amplified conspiracy theories suggesting white farmers have been killed en masse. On Feb. 7, 2025, Trump issued an executive order halting all foreign aid to South Africa and offering refugee status to the country’s Afrikaner population, the white minority that ruled during apartheid. Two days later, Trump took to his Truth Social platform and issued a warning to South Africa’s leaders about their alleged mistreatment of “certain classes of people.” 

“A massive Human Rights VIOLATION is happening, for all to see,” Trump wrote. “The United States won’t stand for it – We will act.”

NPR Forced To Apologize For Not Letting James Comer Be An Assignment Editor

The CEOs of NPR and PBS were dragged before Marjorie Taylor Greene’s (R-GA) DOGE subcommittee on Wednesday for a hearing that mostly served as an opportunity for House Republicans on the panel to gloat about how badly they hope to defund public media organizations. Trump opened the floodgates with his recent executive action attempting to shutter Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, Voice of America and Radio Free Asia. He also said just yesterday that he would “love” to see both NPR and PBS defunded.

]

Notes on Trump II, Month 3. How Long Do We Have to Keep Lifting? So Long.

A few days ago a friend told me that Chuck Schumer thinks he’s a minority leader but he’s actually an opposition leader. Or rather that’s the position into which history has placed him — and he doesn’t realize it or he doesn’t grasp the difference or he’s simply not able to be the latter thing. There are lots of ways to explain the disconnect or incapacity. But I thought this was a pretty good one.

Last night, in this vein, I suddenly realized there’s a backed-up line of incapacity, a traffic jam of it.

I watched the reaction to President Trump’s latest salvo, an executive order purporting to upend key elements of election administration in the United States. People have to prove citizenship to register to vote, it says. No states can accept votes by mail after Election Day — and much more. The country’s most prestigious news organizations rushed to report these as fait accomplis. The Times announced that, henceforth, Americans would have to provide proof of citizenship to vote. The Post was more or less the same.

Continue reading “Notes on Trump II, Month 3. How Long Do We Have to Keep Lifting? So Long.”

Under Threat Of Contempt, Trump DOJ Tells Judge To Pound Sand

A lot of things happened. Here are some of the things. This is TPM’s Morning Memo. Sign up for the email version.

A Constitutional Collision In Slow Motion

With a defiant new filing last night from the Trump DOJ, the stage is now set for what is shaping up to be the most direct constitutional confrontation yet between President Trump and the judicial branch.

It comes in the Alien Enemies Act case before U.S. District Judge James Boasberg in Washington, D.C., where the issue is whether the Trump administration violated his order blocking deportations under the act. But it’s critical to understand that whether the administration complied with the judge’s order is a separate issue from the extent of the powers of the president under the Alien Enemies Act, the deportations themselves, and whether any of the president’s conduct in this regard is subject to judicial review.

Where things now stand is that Judge Boasberg has been trying to ascertain whether the Trump administration violated his order. The Trump DOJ has gone to extraordinary lengths to foil that inquiry:

  • It has sent junior lawyers into court with insufficient factual information.
  • It has delayed, stalled, and deflected answering the judge’s questions.
  • It has rebuked the judge for having the temerity to ask for more details.
  • It has suggested the judge, a former FISA judge with deep experience in national security matters, can’t be trusted with the answers to his questions.
  • It has invoked the state secrets privilege to shield itself from his inquiries.

Along the way the Trump DOJ has taken a sneering tone with the judge, made absurd arguments – verbal orders from the bench don’t count! – and given the court the runaround in various other ways. To be clear, the administration insists it didn’t violate the judge’s order, but it is persisting in refusing to answer his questions so that he can make his own determination as to what happened and when and whether the failure to turn around airplanes loaded with detainees before they reached El Salvador was a violation of his order.

I can’t emphasize enough that this is all happening not in the context of the Alien Enemies Act itself but in a contempt of court proceeding, where the court’s inherent authority to enforce its own orders, sanction lawyers for misconduct and misbehavior, and ensure the integrity and orderliness of its own proceedings is at stake. That’s what heightens this constitutional clash and sets it apart from what we might think of as “normal” line-drawing exercises between executive and judicial authority.

It’s also important to keep in mind that, as TPM’s Josh Kovensky groundbreaking reporting yesterday showed, the administration’s use of the Alien Enemies Act was designed and implemented in the dark to avoid judicial oversight. The ACLU managed to suss out enough of what was going on to get into court before the operation was entirely complete, but that was precisely what the administration was trying avoid. Under those circumstances, a violation of the judge’s emergency order is even more pungent.

The next step in this matter isn’t exactly clear to me. The ball is now in Boasberg’s court, with the administration adamant that there are no grounds to hold it in contempt while refusing to recognize the judge’s authority to inquire into the matter. Something’s got to give.

Judge Blocks Deportation of Columbia Student

U.S. District Judge Naomi Buchwald blocked the Trump administration from arresting and deporting a Columbia University student Yunseo Chung, a legal permanent resident of the United States who had participated in pro-Palestinian protests.

Trump Says Jump, Columbia Asks How High

At the insistence of the Trump administration, Columbia University publicly reiterated that it is still complying with the agreement it reached to try to get some $400 million in federal funding reinstated.

Trump Targets Another Law Firm

President Trump issued a new executive order targeting Jenner and Block, a major law firm that used to employ Andrew Weissmann, a former prosecutor on Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s team who became an outspoken Trump critic. “He’s a bad guy,” Trump said after signing the order.

The executive order mirrored the ones Trump has used to target other major law firms, which has now resulted in some of them declining to represent Trump targets and pulling back on their pro bono work for the advocacy groups leading the charge to challenge the Trump administration in court, the WaPo reports.

Meanwhile, some major law firms have seized on Trump’s attacks on their competitors to try to poach lawyers at the weakened firms, the NYT reports.

The Retribution: 2020 Election Version

  • IMPORTANT: President Trump issued what election law expert Rick Hasen is calling a “dangerous” executive order purporting to impose a wide range of new regulations on the conduct of federal elections, including citizenship requirements, prosecuting the GOP’s great white whale of election fraud, and prohibiting the counting of mail-in ballots received after Election Day. Most alarmingly, it gives DOGE a role in policing voter registration rolls.
  • Jan. 6 Reparations: President Trump floated the possibility of financial compensation for the Jan. 6 rioters who were prosecuted, Politico reports.
  • Rewards And Inducements: “President Trump signed a full and unconditional pardon on Tuesday for Devon Archer, a former business partner of Hunter Biden whose congressional testimony two years ago helped fuel House Republicans’ investigation into the Biden family,” the NYT reports.

Will Trump DOJ Bury The Signal Fiasco?

The question may answer itself. But before we give way to cynicism, a close look at the legal implications of using Signal for planning U.S. military attacks:

  • Just Security: The Criminal Law Precedents That Are Most Relevant
  • Politico: The Potential Legal Fallout of the Signal Group Chat Leak
  • NYT: Signal Chat Disclosure Poses Early Test for F.B.I. and Justice Dept.

Signal Fiasco Is A Complete Shitshow

From the Hill to the White House, the Trump administration flailed in it response to the revelation that top officials – including the vice president, secretary of defense, national security adviser, DNI, and CIA director, among others – were using a commercial app to engage in war-planning. The accidental addition of The Atlantic executive editor Jeffrey Goldberg to the group chat was just the cherry on top of the shit sundae.

Of note: One watchdog group filed a lawsuit to try to enforce the Federal Records Act, which the use of Signal suggests the Trump administration is evading, though to what extent, who knows?

Trump II Clown Show

  • President Trump will nominate conservative firebrand L. Brent Bozell III as U.S. ambassador to South Africa after withdrawing his nomination to lead the now partially dismantled U.S. Agency for Global Media.
  • DHS has hired David Geier, a vaccine skeptic who has long promoted false claims about the connection between immunizations and autism, to conduct a critical study of possible links between the two, the WaPo reports.

The Purges

  • Bloomberg: Treasury Plans ‘Substantial’ Layoffs as Part of Musk’s DOGE Push
  • Inside Higher Ed: Education Department Reeling After Layoffs

The Destruction

  • EPA: Trump officials knew their legal justification for terminating dozens of Environmental Protection Agency grants was flawed, according to documents and internal emails reviewed by The Washington Post.
  • RFE/RL: In a new ruling, U.S. District Judge Royce C. Lamberth of Washington, D.C., temporarily blocked President Trump’s push to close down Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty.

Trump’s Anti-DEI Crusade Claims New Victims

  • The Trump administration is threatening to use a review of the DEI efforts by groups like Planned Parenthood to freeze tens of millions of dollars in federal funding for family planning, the WSJ reports.
  • Corporate America is retreating from providing financial support for pride events in the face of Trump’s anti-DEI rampage.

For Your Radar …

In response to Greenland’s ire over visits this week by high-level Trump administration figures, including second lady Usha Vance, Vice President JD Vance has escalated the situation by announcing he will now join and lead the U.S. delegation.

Do you like Morning Memo? Let us know!

Rising

Democrat James Malone just pulled off a narrow victory in a Pennsylvania state Senate special election in a bright red district where Trump won resoundingly with 57% of the vote last November. The 36th district hasn’t elected a Democrat since it moved from Philadelphia to Lancaster County in 1979, according to Lancaster Online. Malone made Musk and recent events in Washington, DC a central part of his campaign.

In An Escalation, House GOP Talks Of Defunding The Judiciary And Eliminating Courts

We began hearing talk last week that House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan’s (R-OH) upcoming hearings on supposed “abuses” of judicial authority might serve as a placeholder for House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) actually entertaining the idea of judicial impeachments (which he doesn’t have the votes for) before the House passes its big, beautiful budget bill next month.

Continue reading “In An Escalation, House GOP Talks Of Defunding The Judiciary And Eliminating Courts”

House Dems Tear Into Johnson’s ‘Outrageous’ Suggestion That Congress Could ‘Eliminate’ Some Fed Courts

House Democrats who spoke to TPM on Tuesday were stunned and floored by House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) raising the possibility of Congress eliminating some federal courts as part of House Republicans’ ongoing interest in punishing judges who dare to rule against the Trump administration. 

Continue reading “House Dems Tear Into Johnson’s ‘Outrageous’ Suggestion That Congress Could ‘Eliminate’ Some Fed Courts”