A MAGA Warrior Is Rifling Through Your Mortgage Paperwork

I’m by no means the first one to note this. But it’s so important that I want to make sure it’s at the top of your mind. Have you noticed that out of the blue all of Donald Trump’s enemies seem to be getting investigated for mortgage fraud? Letitia James, Adam Schiff and now Fed Board member Lisa Cook; and it’s the pretext for her purported firing by President Trump?

Well, it turns out there’s a reason. Bill Pulte is Trump’s Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, an agency created as part of the Global Financial Crisis reforms. From that post he finagled his way into being the head of Fannie Mae and Sallie Mae, the quasi public institutions which back a huge percentage of American home and student loans.

Continue reading “A MAGA Warrior Is Rifling Through Your Mortgage Paperwork”

It’s Not Enough But It’s Something: DC Tenuously Holds The Line Against Trump

A lot of things happened. Here are some of the things. This is TPM’s Morning Memo. Sign up for the email version.

More The Exception Than The Rule

Examples of capitulation and surrender to Trump’s authoritarianism continue to outpace those of defiance and resistance. But over the last few days in the District of Columbia, which Trump is pretending to occupy, we’ve seen a few instances of holding the line against the worst of his transgressions. They’re relatively small and by themselves, they’re not enough. But two examples in particular stand out:

You Will Deny Me Three Times

Three different federal grand juries in D.C. refused to indict a woman on felony charges that she assaulted an FBI agent during an immigration protest in July. U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro’s office finally conceded Monday and knocked it down to a misdemeanor, which doesn’t require a grand jury to charge.

It is relatively unusual for a grand jury to return a no-true bill.

It is highly unusual for three grand juries to return no-true bills in the same case.

It is questionable, to say the least, for prosecutors to persist in pursuing a felony indictment with a third grand jury.

Sidney Lori Reid, a protestor, was accused by prosecutors of injuring an FBI agent near the D.C. jail during the transfer of alleged gang members.

The Trump DOJ does not seemed chastened by the debacle of this case, the NYT reports (emphasis mine):

Addressing the criticism that the U.S. attorney’s office has received for its crackdown in recent days, Akaash M. Singh, a high-ranking official at the Justice Department, met with federal prosecutors on Monday, telling them that they should not be cowed by news articles, according to two people familiar with the matter. Mr. Singh also told prosecutors that if sitting grand jurors rejected their efforts to bring serious charges, they should simply impanel new grand juries, the people said.

You may recall that federal prosecutors in Los Angeles have also struggled to secure grand jury indictments of ICE protestors.

‘Absolutely Maddening’

In another case arising out of the Trumpian occupation of D.C., U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro’s office moved to dismiss a firearms charge that was the product of an unlawful search — but not before U.S. Magistrate Judge Zia M. Faruqui of Washington, D.C., savaged the government for its misconduct, HuffPost reports.

Torez Riley, a Black man on his way into a Trader Joe’s, was charged with unlawful possession of a firearm after he was searched by local law enforcement backed by federal agents.

Calling the case “absolutely maddening,” Faruqui said from the bench that there was no basis to search Riley other than the color of his skin.

“The Sixth Amendment doesn’t get thrown out the window because the government has decided to make a show of arresting people,” Faruqui said, in apparent reference to Trump’s federal operation in D.C.

As the HuffPost’s Dave Jamieson reports:

[Faruqui] said evidence from illegal searches has been suppressed in several of the cases he has overseen since Trump’s takeover. He described the mentality of the U.S. attorney’s office as “charge first, ask questions later.” And he noted that it all seemed to be for spectacle — “some big celebration” — that was “fundamentally damaging to our city.”

“Lawlessness cannot come from the government,” said Faruqui, who was himself a prosecutor for 12 years. “We’re pushing the boundaries here. We’re beyond the boundaries and something is going to have to break.”

The Riley case was among those highlighted by the NYT in a Sunday story on the weak and overcharged cases that have been charged in D.C. since Trump’s big show of force began.

Standing Up to the Dictator-in-Chief

Jonathan Bernstein assesses the current moment: “Trump’s buffoonery make[s] him very possible to defeat … but … if enough people surrender to him, he could wind up fully destroying the republic, incompetence and all. And the history of autocracy is full of those who regretted failing to stand up and fight when they still could.”

Federal Judge Threatens Kari Lake With Contempt

As a last step before a contempt trial, U.S. District Judge Royce C. Lamberth of Washington, D.C., ordered the deposition of Kari Lake. Lamberth is seeking to enforce his order restoring programming at Voice of America, whose dismantling Lake has presided over.

Trump Wants Black University President To Grovel

The Trump Department of Education is demanding a personal apology from George Mason University President Gregory Washington for his DEI policies as part of a settlement of its trumped-up claims that the Virginia public university violated civil rights law. Washington is refusing to apologize.

Trump Purports To Fire The Fed’s Lisa Cook

In a Constitution-shaking move that could have long-term adverse consequences for the rule of law and the U.S. economy, President Trump announced he was firing Federal Reserve Board member Lisa Cook for cause. Cook said she would fight her purported termination.

Judge Xinis Blocks Deportation of Abrego Garcia

U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis has blocked for now the deportation of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, including to Uganda. Her decision came after an emergency phone hearing Monday.

The Trump DHS continued to treat the case with a casual callousness that shocks the conscience:

They’re making fun of the media referring to Kilmar Abrego Garcia as a Maryland man as they threaten to send him to Uganda, a country where he’s never lived.They’re simply fucking vile.

Matt Novak (@paleofuture.bsky.social) 2025-08-26T02:19:00.870Z

TPM Exclusive

The University of Michigan hospital system confirmed to TPM’s Josh Kovensky and Kate Riga that it’s discontinuing gender-affirming care for those under 19 after receiving a subpoena from the Trump administration.

Oopsie!

The Department of Homeland Security hasn’t kept text message data among top officials since early April, it told a watchdog group in response to a FOIA request. That would appear to be a violation of the Federal Records Act.

Quote of the Day

“I don’t want to be defense only. We want offense too.” –President Donald Trump, who wants to rename the Department of Defense the Department of War

Have We Already Crossed The Line Into Fascism?

Garrett Graff argues we’re already there:

The United States, just months before its 250th birthday as the world’s leading democracy, has tipped over the edge into authoritarianism and fascism. In the end, faster than I imagined possible, it did happen here. The precise moment when and where in recent weeks America crossed that invisible line from democracy into authoritarianism can and will be debated by future historians, but it’s clear that the line itself has been crossed.

Do you like Morning Memo? Let us know!

Trump Outlines Vision for Next Power Grab Over Blue State and City Officials

President Trump doubled down on his vision to make Chicago the next city his administration’s targets as it attempts to use crime as a cover for occupying and exerting control over the Democratic elected officials of blue cities and states around the nation.

Continue reading “Trump Outlines Vision for Next Power Grab Over Blue State and City Officials”

Exclusive: The University of Michigan Will End Gender-Affirming Care for Minors Amid Trump Admin Legal Onslaught

The Trump administration has strong-armed the University of Michigan’s statewide hospital system over its provision of transgender health care services for minors, sending a subpoena in recent weeks to University of Michigan Health, TPM has learned.

Continue reading “Exclusive: The University of Michigan Will End Gender-Affirming Care for Minors Amid Trump Admin Legal Onslaught”

No Kings, No Occupations — Toward a Democratic Opposition Politics

We’re seeing lots of news today about the occupation of Washington, D.C. and the president’s takeover of the Metropolitan (D.C.) Police Department, as well as clear signals that he plans to expand this program to other big blue-state cities. I want to step back from the particulars to try to see the situation as a whole and consider the political ways to react to it. This builds on the point that grew out of my conservation with a TPM Reader a week and a half ago which is that the narrow issues of legality are mostly beside the point — not irrelevant, but at best secondary. The president views states and municipalities controlled by political opponents as something akin to conquered territories which must be bent to his will by force. This includes budgetary coercion and as close as he can get to military occupation. This is un-American, outside the constitutional order and, not least in importance, unpopular.

He has done this by exploiting various loopholes, taking advantage of a compliant and corrupt Supreme Court and resorting to expedients in which his power is most un-reviewable despite his actions clearly violating the plain intention of the laws in question. None of these technicalities change the fact that these are all violations of the liberties Americans are entitled to.

Continue reading “No Kings, No Occupations — Toward a Democratic Opposition Politics”

Trump’s Problematic Pick to Lead BLS Expected to Face Senate Hearing After All

E.J. Antoni, President Donald Trump’s problematic pick to lead the Bureau of Labor and Statistics, is expected to face a hearing before the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions, or the HELP Committee, according to two people familiar with committee proceedings.

Continue reading “Trump’s Problematic Pick to Lead BLS Expected to Face Senate Hearing After All”

Trump’s Brutalization Of Abrego Garcia Now Involves Uganda

A lot of things happened. Here are some of the things. This is TPM’s Morning Memo. Sign up for the email version.

Lawless Retaliation and Abuse

Kilmar Abrego Garcia’s dark journey through the lawless Trump immigration system took another grievous turn Monday morning when he was detained by ICE in Baltimore only three days after being freed from criminal custody in Nashville.

After his unlawful removal to El Salvador, his imprisonment there for months, a White House-led smear campaign targeting him, and the Trump administration’s retaliatory criminal case against him, Abrego Garcia now faces the threat of removal to a third country: Uganda.

In a filing Saturday, Abrego Garcia’s attorneys alerted the federal court overseeing the criminal case in Tennessee that the administration had tried to leverage him Thursday into pleading guilty to the trumped-up human smuggling charges against him by offering to send him to Costa Rica after he served his U.S. jail sentence on the smuggling charges. But after Abrego Garcia was released on bail Friday without agreeing to plead guilty, the administration notified his lawyers that it would deport him to Uganda and ordered him to report to the ICE office in Baltimore this morning.

“[T]he government took further coercive actions that leave little doubt that the entire federal government is engaged in a coordinated effort to punish Mr. Abrego for fighting back against its unlawful conduct,” his attorneys wrote in the filing.

The rapid series of events over the weekend is exactly the scenario his lawyers have been warning about for weeks and which U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis of Maryland had tried to forestall long enough to allow the judicial branch to weigh in before Abrego Garcia was spirited abroad again, outside of the jurisdiction of U.S. courts.

Trump’s brutalization of Abrego Garcia for having the temerity to challenge his wrongful removal to El Salvador — which the administration has conceded was a mistake — is a cruel face-saving move and a grotesque flex of executive power. Abrego Garica initial removal in March was in violation of an immigration judge’s order that specifically barred him from being deported to El Salvador. Since then the administration has done everything in and even beyond its power to avoid correcting its error; instead, it has piled on Abrego Garcia with more indignities and ever-greater punitive measures.

From the outset, the case was a measure of whether the federal judiciary would hold the line against Trump’s executive excesses. Time and again, the administration defied court orders, slow-rolled the case, acted in bad faith, and set the courts up to look like chumps. Judge Xinis was the target of most of the administration’s misconduct, and after being initially wrong-footed, rallied and stopped giving the administration or its lawyers the benefit of any doubt.

Ultimately, Xinis barred Abrego Garcia’s removal to a third country without notice and chance for his lawyers to challenge it. Xinis took that step only after the administration spent three days in court across a week in July making the preposterous argument that it had no idea what it would do with Abrego Garcia if he was released from criminal custody.

As Lawfare’s Anna Bower reminds us, the administration kept insisting to Xinis in court that it would handle the Abrego Garcia case like any other detention case and wouldn’t even begin to make decisions until he was detained. And even then, it would be handled by a lowly case officer. I don’t think I’ve ever seen a judge or courthouse onlookers more unconvinced by an argument.

The events of the past few days have confirmed what Xinis and everyone else expected. The administration would find a way to retaliate against Abrego Garcia again and it would be anything but a normal case. After Abrego Garcia was detained this morning, the Department of Homeland Security renewed the smear campaign against him, recycling venomous allegations against him, some of which courts have already rejected.

Thread of the Day

It's worth reiterating that the administration has never wavered from the position that it sent Kilmar Abrego Garcia to an El Salvador prison by accident. Everything they've done since is calculated to obscure that and punish him for existing as an example of their own stupidity and callousness.

Evan Bernick, a finite mode with a smol hooman and a scary floof (@evanbernick.bsky.social) 2025-08-23T19:50:39.546Z

Good Point

Former Obama White House Counsel Bob Bauer observes that Trump’s wild ambitions to end mail-in voting and replace voting machines in favor of paper ballots may exceed his power as president but seem to be a new litmus test of party loyalty for GOP election administrators:

What is especially striking is Trump’s statements in his tweet and again at the Oval Office press conference that he is working toward these goals along with the “Republican party.” This is almost certainly a move to make participation in this plan for “honest elections,” at his direction, a test of party loyalty. Republicans at all levels of election administration will have the choice to be either with him or against him in defending against losing control of the House in 2026.

Hegseth’s Pentagon Purge Continues

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth fired Lt. Gen. Jeffrey Kruse as head of the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency and removed two other generals as part of an ongoing political purge of the Pentagon. No reasons were given for their terminations.

Only the Best People

President Trump is nominating Sergio Gor, White House personnel chief who has overseen the purges of government workers, to be U.S. ambassador to India.

Trump’s Brain Broke Sometime Around 1989

New York, N.Y.: Donald Trump looks up from a podium where he discusses the Trump Shuttle at his hotel, the Plaza Hotel in New York City on June 7,1989. (Photo by Ari Mintz/Newsday RM via Getty Images)

John Ganz, on the out-of-date luxury of Donald Trump:

As Trump redecorates the White House in faux rococo style, perhaps something like what Balzac is talking about accounts for the continued public fascination with the dated ’80s glitz and glamor that Trump represents. And it’s back, baby! This new generation seems intent on recapitulating the crass materialism, as well as the casual homophobia, misogyny, and racism of the 1980s.

Do you like Morning Memo? Let us know!

Finding God in a Cracker Barrel

Hello it’s the weekend. This is The Weekender ☕️

One of the major features of the modern MAGA movement — along with blind loyalty to President Trump and unbridled glee at the prospect of crackdowns led by masked federal troops — is constantly feeling aggrieved and angry about change. 

Targets of this ire have included museums and colleges that are seen as supposed bastions of “woke” culture, but also brands. The latest business to inspire a right wing meltdown is the restaurant chain Cracker Barrel — and no one freaked out harder than Republican Florida congressman and gubernatorial candidate Byron Donalds. 

You see, Donalds, whose statehouse bid has Trump’s signature “Complete and Total Endorsement,” claims he found God in the homestyle restaurant’s parking lot. That righteous experience meant Donalds was extra angry when the chain changed their logo to remove the image of a seated man and barrel. 

On (of course) X.com, Donalds alluded to his religious experience as he blasted the redesign.

“In college, I worked at @CrackerBarrel in Tallahassee. I even gave my life to Christ in their parking lot,” Donalds wrote. “Their logo was iconic and their unique restaurants were a fixture of American culture. No one asked for this woke rebrand. It’s time to Make Cracker Barrel Great Again.”

Donalds and the other right wingers who are raging about the logo haven’t exactly explained what is remotely political about the change. The restaurant has actually updated its branding multiple times in its history. However, in past interviews, Donalds has actually explained the other part of his outburst and revealed how Cracker Barrel brought him to Jesus in 2001.

In an interview with the Christian Broadcasting Network that aired in May, Donalds said the epiphany came as he was arranging silverware after serving a church group.

“The Lord spoke to me and was like, ‘Stop running from me.’ And so, like, it just it knocked me back,” Donalds said. Donalds ran out into the parking lot where the churchgoers were piling into their van. One asked if he was all right.

“No ma’am,” Donalds said. “I’m not OK.”

He went on to explain that “the Lord’s telling me to stop running” and the group prayed with him right there on the asphalt. “I still get emotional about it,” Donalds said. 

CBN broadcaster David Brody was moved by the story.  “You got saved in a Cracker Barrel!” he exclaimed to Donalds. 

Now, with the light in his life, Donalds has the strength, courage and platform to absolutely lose it for no discernible reason over a chain restaurant’s advertising campaign. 

Praise God (and pass the country combos and classics)! 

— Hunter Walker

Here’s what else TPM has on tap this weekend:

  • California Gov. Gavin Newsom trolls President Trump in a way that is sure to get under his skin like nothing else can: he’s stealing Trump’s grift game.
  • With a government shutdown on the horizon, some Democrats are demanding that Republicans’ sweeping Medicaid cuts be rescinded in exchange for their support in keeping the government open.
  • Opponents of “Alligator Alcatraz” scored a win in court on Thursday when Miami federal district court Judge Kathleen M. Williams issued an order that no more immigrants should be sent to the detention camp in the Everglades.

Let’s dig in.

Enter: Newsom the Troll

Newsom is making it clearer by the second that he is likely to launch a 2028 bid, as evidenced by his justifiably aggressive response to Trump’s nationwide gerrymandering bid to rig the midterms and the new online persona he’s rolled out to publicize his plans.

Some of it is cringe, like the all caps Trump Truth style tweets where Newsom — “YOUR FAVORITE GOVERNOR” — copied Trump’s voice in announcing his plans to redraw some congressional maps in California. Some of it is effective (Trump and his toadies make it easy). Some of it will get under Trump’s skin in a way that little else can: he’s stealing Trump’s grift. On Friday Newsom tweeted an image of new merchandise he supposedly intends to sell (more than likely its just another layer of his ongoing troll).

In some sense, whatever, go off. In another sense, beyond all the silly attention-grabbing pranks, Newsom is taking concrete steps to counter this White House. In moving quickly to redraw California’s maps and push back against Republicans’ redistricting power grab, he’s doing something that Democrats have struggled to do in fighting Trump for the past decade. He’s abandoning the higher ground and joining the no-holds-barred fight to stop Trump’s midterms ratfuckery.

—Nicole Lafond

Medicaid Cuts May Become a Sticking Point in Looming Gov’t Funding Fight

When congressional lawmakers return from their lengthy August recess, the talk of the town will be focused on how and if Congress will be able to pass a measure — either a continuing resolution or appropriations bills — to fund the government and avoid a government shutdown. The fiscal year ends on Sept. 30.

Republicans will need Senate Democrats’ help in order to do that since legislation to fund the government is subject to the filibuster and requires 60 votes.

Some Senate Democrats are already demanding their caucus do nothing to help Republicans unless there are guarantees in place that President Donald Trump will use funds as appropriated — without illegally clawing back funds or attempting to send Congress constitutionally backwards rescissions packages.

Meanwhile others, especially appropriators, are pushing for a bipartisan appropriations process in order to fund the government. Though there are differing views among the Democratic caucus on how to proceed, healthcare is also becoming an issue Dems may leverage in their negotiations.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) is already drawing a line in the sand, per Punchbowl, saying that Dems shouldn’t vote for any funding bills unless the Medicaid cuts Republicans stuffed into the so-called “big, beautiful” bill are rescinded.

“If Republicans want Senate Democrats to provide votes to fund the Trump administration, they can start by restoring the health care that they ripped away to finance more tax handouts for billionaires,” Warren told Punchbowl. “This government funding fight is about saving health care and lowering costs for millions of Americans.”

Sen. Elissa Slotkin (D-MI) has also said that it’ll be “tough” to get her vote on budget-related issues without action on Medicaid.

— Emine Yücel

Florida Judge Orders Temporary Shutdown of ‘Alligator Alcatraz’ Detention Camp

Opponents of “Alligator Alcatraz” scored a win in court on Thursday when Miami federal district court Judge Kathleen M. Williams issued an order that no more immigrants should be sent to the detention camp in the Everglades.

Williams’ order came after a suit was filed by environmental groups and the Miccosukee Tribe, whose members have a reservation and a traditional camp located next to the facility. Along with stopping further migrants from being held there, Williams called for state and federal officials to remove current detainees within 60 days. The judge also ordered the dismantling of parts of the facility and a stop to new construction.

However, the fight over the detention camp, which has been spearheaded by Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis as part of his efforts to support President Trump’s mass deportation agenda, will not be over. Attorneys for the state immediately filed a notice indicating they plan to appeal.

“Alligator Alcatraz” has been mired in controversy since DeSantis and his allies announced it in late June. Attorneys and advocates have raised concerns about humanitarian conditions at the camp as well as legal issues, including detainees’ access to lawyers. Political opponents have also raised alarms about the nine-figure annual cost of the facility, which Florida is initially paying ahead of a supposed federal reimbursement. 

TPM has been chronicling the story with reports on the rushed construction, which included diverted disaster resources, and on the legal battle, which has been focused on environmental concerns. While the state has insisted the camp will have no environmental impact on the protected wetlands, evidence from environmental groups and the contracts analyzed by TPM indicated there were plans for paving at the site. We also talked with a tribal leader who described the Miccosukee’s concerns and called the project “an abomination to the whole concept of sovereignty.”

Both the Miccosukee and the environmental groups argued in court that the camp was built without environmental assessments and impact statements that are required for projects involving federal action. Government lawyers countered that the facility is not subject to federal law since it is being built and run by the state. 

Williams was evidently not swayed by that rationale. Along with declaring that the project would do “irreparable harm” to the surrounding environment, Williams described federal immigration enforcement as the “key driver” of the camp. Because of that, she found it was subject to federal regulations and standards. 

“If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and looks like a duck, then it’s a duck,” the judge wrote. 

— Hunter Walker

Some Trump Supporters Regret Their 2024 Votes Over Trump’s Handling of Epstein Files, Per New Poll   

This article is part of TPM Cafe, TPM’s home for opinion and news analysis. It was originally published at The Conversation.

Has President Donald Trump survived the latest and most serious firestorm of controversy over the Epstein scandal? Or has the Trump administration’s handling of the release of information concerning the prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein, a convicted child sex trafficker and Trump’s former friend, hurt the president?

A number of journalists, pointing to recent public opinion polls, have claimed that the scandal has hurt TrumpOthers have argued that the public has largely moved on and the Epstein controversy no longer presents a political liability for Trump.

But both of these conclusions are based on limited polling about the Epstein controversy and thus may be premature.

Our recent University of Massachusetts Amherst national poll includes particularly detailed questions about the Epstein controversy and attitudes toward Trump, and thus provides fresh insights on how the controversy has affected public support for Trump.

We find that Trump’s handling of the Epstein controversy has done significant damage to his standing, particularly among his core supporters.

Trump ‘fumbling the matter’

Americans are paying close attention to the prolonged Epstein controversy. Our polling finds that 3 in 4 respondents have heard, read or seen “a lot” or “some” about Epstein.

Moreover, most believe that Trump is fumbling the matter.

Seven in 10 Americans believe that Trump is handling the matter “not well.” This includes pluralities of Trump’s most loyal supporters, 43% of Republicans, 43% of conservatives, and 47% of those who voted for him in 2024.

When we drill down on the 47% of 2024 Trump voters who disapprove of Trump’s handling of the Epstein controversy, we find significant cracks in the MAGA facade. Among members of this group, 28% now disapprove of Trump as president.

When we take demographics, ideology, partisanship and assessments of the economy into account, disapproval of Trump’s handling of the release of the Epstein files is still associated with an increase in disapproval of Trump.

Voter regret

Even more significantly, we find that among 2024 Trump voters, negative views of Trump’s handling of the Epstein files are associated with an increased desire to make a different choice if the 2024 election could be rerun.

More specifically, among Trump voters who believe that the president has mishandled the release of the Epstein files, more than one quarter – 26% – indicate that they would not vote for Trump if they had the opportunity to vote again in the 2024 election.

While there are no election do-overs, it is clear that the Epstein scandal has hurt Trump among his base of voters.

Much can happen between now and the midterm elections in November 2026, of course.

But if Trump fails to satisfy his political base, perceptions among Trump voters that he has mishandled the controversy could reduce enthusiasm and participation in the elections. Even if the share of Republicans alienated by the Epstein controversy is relatively small, this could hurt Republicans in close contests.

With over a year to go, the facts on the ground will likely change. But as of today, the controversy over the release of the Epstein files remains relevant. Whether the president responds in a manner that satisfies his voters is a question that could have important political consequences.

Let the Race Begin!

California Governor Gavin Newsom is plowing ahead with plans to gerrymander California’s congressional map to match the partisan gerrymander speeding to passage in Texas. He’s also been on a nonstop crusade going back a couple weeks — one half elaborate parody, one half frontal assault — using memes, all-caps, and boffo trash talk to attack Donald Trump. Not everyone likes Gavin Newsom. Personally, I’ve never been strongly in the fan or hater camp. But Newsom is doing exactly what we should be expecting of every Democratic politician today, especially those in executive office at the state level and especially those looking for promotions or to remain in office.

Continue reading “Let the Race Begin!”