It Was A Big Day In Trump Accountability World

A lot of things happened. Here are some of the things. This is TPM’s Morning Memo.

Trump’s Crumbling Defenses To The Bedminster Tape

The slow-motion release of the Bedminster tape over the past month has set multiple traps for former President Trump to make inconsistent, incomplete, contradictory, and ultimately comical statements about what the recording captured.

The timeline is simple:

May 31: CNN first reports on the existence of the audio recording.

June 8: A federal grand jury in Miami returns a sealed indictment against Trump describing the audio recording.

June 9: CNN and other news outlets obtain a transcript of the recording.

Also on June 9: The indictment is unsealed and made public.

June 26: CNN obtains and broadcasts the audio recording.

The release of the full audio recording seemed to cause a meltdown within Trump and TrumpWorld yesterday, which resulted in a round of defenses, excuse-making, and throwing up dust (scroll to the bottom) to try to obscure how damning it is.

It culminated in Trump declaring the latest truth is that he didn’t have any classified documents with him at all during the audio recording and that his real-time claims to the contrary were just “bravado.”

‘I’m A Legitimate Person’

Chris Hayes captures Trump’s decompensation well:

Everyone Is Focused On Bedminster Now

The audio tape’s release set off a new round of “What the heck happened at Bedminster?” reporting:

WaPo: It’s not just Mar-a-Lago: Trump charges highlight his New Jersey life

NYT: The Attention Was All on Mar-a-Lago. Some of the Action Was at Bedminster.

Is Nauta Being Used As Trump’s Delay Tactic?

Trump co-defendant Walt Nauta was supposed to be arraigned yesterday in south Florida, but he faced multiple flight cancellations and hasn’t yet found local counsel so the arraignment was postponed a second time, until next month.

Why hasn’t Nauta found local counsel yet? Accounts vary. The cancelled flights, according to some reports, meant Nauta didn’t make it to south Florida to interview prospective counsel. There was also a report that Nauta balked at the high price of representation, even though Trump is paying the bill.

It’s starting to smell like another delay tactic from Trump, but it’s a bit early to reach a firm conclusion.

Jack Smith Team Interviews Rudy Giuliani

A meeting between former Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani and members of Special Counsel Jack Smith’s team happened at some point in recent weeks, CNN reports. The interview grew out of Smith’s investigation of the Jan. 6 higher-ups, but no more details were available.

Note that this was a voluntary interview with investigators, not testimony to the grand jury. Read into that what you will.

Trump Flails In Manhattan Hush Money Case

Donald Trump’s effort to remove the Manhattan criminal case over his hush money payments to Stormy Daniels from state court to federal court looks like it’s going nowhere. The dilatory tactic did arguably buy Trump some additional time, but it seems to have hit a dead end after a hearing in federal court Tuesday.

While the federal judge didn’t yet issue a formal ruling, he all but shot Trump down in open court:

Judge Hellerstein said that he saw no reason that a trial in state court couldn’t provide a “measure of justice” equal to a federal proceeding. He said that while his comments weren’t his final decision, they were his “current attitudes.” The judge all but said he would order that the case should stay in state court.

This came after Trump’s legal team flailed spectacularly in the hearing (the full thread here is worth a read):

The upshot is the hush money case looks likely to stay in state court, and little time has been lost with this Trump sideshow.

Big, Big Pro-Democracy Ruling From SCOTUS

In a surprising ruling, the Supreme Court yanked the rug out from under the 2020 fake electors scheme with its significant decision yesterday in Moore v. Harper.

The high court put a decisive end to the cockamamie independent state legislature theory, which was birthed in the colossally bad Bush v. Gore decision and embraced by the slapdash Trump legal team in the aftermath of his 2020 loss.

It was the independent state legislature theory that placed outsized importance on blocking the Jan. 6 certification of the Electoral College vote, which in turn led to the attack on the Capitol.

Here’s how former Appeals Court Judge J. Michael Luttig put it:

Who’s To Blame For the Near-Decapitation In Russia?

NYT: Russian General Knew About Mercenary Chief’s Rebellion Plans, U.S. Officials Say

WSJ: After Wagner Revolt, Questions of Blame in Vladimir Putin’s Inner Circle

It’s A Clown World

The desperation is starting to show even for the Trump talking heads:

Like Morning Memo? Let us know!

Nota Bene

The Times reported overnight, based on U.S. intelligence, that one of the senior Russian generals in Ukraine, Gen. Sergei Surovikin, at least had advanced knowledge of the Wagner Mutiny and may have had some role in planning it. Surovikin is a one-time commander of Russian forces in Ukraine and remains a senior commander in the theater. You can read the details in the piece but I want to focus your attention on something different. This is another example of the Biden administration using selective disclosure of U.S. intelligence as an offensive tool in its cold conflict with Russia.

Continue reading “Nota Bene”

Help Us Get to 4,000 Contributors and $400,000

As I mentioned this morning, we’re entering the final lap in our drive. And we really need to hit our goal. Right now the $400,000 and 4,000 individual contributors milestones are coming into view. Please help us hit these critical milestones as we make our way toward hitting our critical goal for the drive. Especially if you’ve been putting it off, make today the day. Just click right here.

Late Update: Currently at $369,744, hoping we can clear $370,000 momentarily and pass $380,000 tonight. (Yes, I’m trying out for your local PBS station, I guess.)

Latter Update: Now at $372,136 and 3,900 individual TPM Readers contributing.

Where Things Stand: He’s Dealing With These Criming Tapes The Same Way He Dealt With All The Other Tapes

Donald Trump is leaning in hard on the classics to deflect responsibility for the charges against him in the Mar-a-Lago classified documents case, and especially so in the wake of new, seemingly incriminating tapes of him admitting to aspects of the charges he currently faces. His latest remarks to Fox News are a pivot back to a vintage yet reliable genre of Trumpism, using “stable genius” energy and “fake news” schoolyard bullying to shrug off the fact that the audio recording CNN published this week features him admitting he shouldn’t have the classified documents he’s flinging around for all to see.

Continue reading “Where Things Stand: He’s Dealing With These Criming Tapes The Same Way He Dealt With All The Other Tapes”

Miami Mayor And GOP 2024 Candidate Backtracks, Claims He Actually Does Know About The Uyghurs

Miami Mayor and 2024 presidential candidate Francis Suarez stumbled during a Tuesday morning interview when asked about human rights abuses against Uyghurs, a predominantly Muslim minority ethnic group in China’s western region.

Continue reading “Miami Mayor And GOP 2024 Candidate Backtracks, Claims He Actually Does Know About The Uyghurs”

Protesting Too Much

If you haven’t read it yet, I want to make sure you saw Josh Kovensky’s look at key questions surrounding the Wagner Mutiny. Josh is both a Russian speaker and worked for about three years as a reporter in Ukraine. So, as usual, he brings a wealth of contextual knowledge and insight to making sense of these developments. I wanted to add a few observations to my Sunday afternoon piece on the emerging after-action reports about the Mutiny.

First, in that post I highlighted accounts from two expert observers — Michael Kofman and Tatiana Stanovaya. Both accounts have generally been confirmed, at least in their outlines. But one point that seemed a bit off in Stanovaya’s analysis was the certainty that Prigozhin and his mercenaries would be annihilated when they arrived in Moscow. That didn’t seem quite right, or even entirely consistent with the rest of her analysis. It certainly seems like one likely outcome. But it didn’t seem to comport with the uncertainty of the situation.

Continue reading “Protesting Too Much”

Even Some Of The Court’s Independent State Legislature Theory Fans Shied Away In The End

Over the many months that Moore v. Harper, the independent state legislature case, unrolled, those guided by the paper trail the justices have left on the issue did not have much confidence that the radical theory would be rejected. 

Continue reading “Even Some Of The Court’s Independent State Legislature Theory Fans Shied Away In The End”

Please Give Me Two Minutes

We are almost three weeks into this year’s TPM Journalism Fund drive. We’ve done well so far: We’re at $363,347. But we are at the point in the drive when we need to convert “doing well so far” into actually hitting our goal. And we only have a bit more than a week left to do it. Our goal of $500,000 this year isn’t aspirational or a number pulled out of the air. It’s really necessary to keep us on track this year and into next year. Also, let me remind you that for every contribution, we create community subscriptions for readers who lack financial means or who are registered students. If you’ve been considering it, please take a moment to make a contribution today. I’m ready to get back to just posting about the news and I’m sure you are ready for me to do that too. But first we need to get to our goal to get back to doing what we do and want to do more of. Thank you. Here’s the link.

Wagner’s Mutiny Punctured Putin’s ‘Strongman’ Image And Exposed Cracks In His Rule

This article is part of TPM Cafe, TPM’s home for opinion and news analysis. It was originally published at The Conversation.

Less than 24 hours after the mutiny began, it was over.

As the rebelling Wagner column bore down on Moscow, Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko brokered a deal under which Russian President Vladimir Putin promised to drop criminal charges against the mercenary leader Yevgeny Prigozhin and allow him to seek asylum in Belarus. The departing Wagner troops were given a heroes’ send-off by some residents of Rostov-on-Don — the southern Russian town they had taken control over without firing a shot earlier in the day.

Prigozhin gambled and lost. But he lives to fight another day — for now at least.

The events of June 24, 2023, had observers searching for the right term to describe what was going on: Was this a coup attempt, a mutiny, an insurrection?

Did Prigozhin seriously think that he would be able to enter Moscow? Perhaps he genuinely believed that Putin would accede to his demand to fire Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu and Chief of General Staff Valery Gerasimov — two men that the Wagner group head has previously harshly criticized for their conduct of the war.

More radically, Prigozhin may have hoped that he would receive support from elements in the Russian military. Indeed, that seemed to be the case — his group encountered no resistance in taking over Rostov-on-Don or heading north for some 350 miles (600 kilometers) through Voronezh and Lipetsk provinces — though they were reportedly attacked by a helicopter gunship, which they shot down. Prigozhin claimed to command 25,000 troops, though the actual number may be half that figure.

A smiling man in the back seat of a car.
Head of the Wagner Group Yevgeny Prigozhin leaves Rostov-on-Don. Anadolu Agency via Getty Images)

But while the mutiny was short-lived and its goals unclear, it will have lasting effects — exposing the fragility of Putin’s grip on power and his ability to lead Russia to victory over Ukraine.

Putin’s impotence

Prigozhin’s abortive insurrection has punctured the “strongman” image of Putin, both for world leaders and for ordinary Russians.

He was unable to do anything to stop Prigozhin’s rogue military unit as it seized Rostov-on-Don — where the Russian Southern Military Command is headquartered — and then sent a column of armored vehicles up the M4 highway toward Moscow. Putin was forced to make a televised address at 10 a.m. local time on June 24 describing the revolt as a “stab in the back” and calling for harsh punishment of the mutineers. But it was the intervention of Belarus President Lukashenko that brought about an end to the mutiny, not any words or actions from Putin. Somewhat uncharacteristically, both Prigozhin and Putin exercised restraint and stepped back from the brink of civil war by agreeing on the compromise deal that allowed Prigozhin to escape punishment.

Exiled Russian political scientist Kirill Rogov has argued that the most challenging development to Russia’s leaders may not be the mutiny itself, but the rhetoric that Prigozhin used to justify his actions. In an interview released on social media a day before taking control of Rostov-on-Don, Prigozhin argued that the Ukraine war was a mistake from the beginning, launched to benefit the personal interests of Defense Minister Shoigu and an inner circle of oligarchs. Prigozhin brushed aside all the ideological claims Putin has made about the war — the need to denazify Ukraine, the threat of NATO expansion — as just cover for self-interest. “Our holy war has turned into a racket,” he said.

Prigozhin’s words and actions have exposed the vulnerability of Putin’s grip on power and the hollowness of his ideological framing of the war in Ukraine and Russia’s place in the world.

Nationalist discontent

Putin’s constant refrain is that any opposition to his rule — whether it be from the Kyiv government or from protesters at home — is part of a Western plot to weaken Russia. It is hard to imagine that his propagandists will be able to argue that Prigozhin is also a tool of the West.

Over the past 10 years, and especially since the February 2022 invasion of Ukraine, Putin has ruthlessly deployed the coercive apparatus of the state to crush any liberal opposition. At the same time, radical ultra-nationalists — not only Prigozhin but also the military bloggers and correspondents reporting from the war zone — have been given a relatively free hand.

For the most part, they were kept out of state-controlled television broadcasts, but they have reached a wider Russian audience through social media channels such as Telegram, VKontakte and YouTube.

Prigozhin, a former convict who went on to provide catering for the Kremlin before founding the Wagner group, has seen his profile and popularity in Russia rise during the war in Ukraine. In May 2023 polling, he was cited among the top 10 trusted political figures.

It is unclear why Putin was tolerating the nationalists, Prigozhin included, as they increasingly questioned Russia’s war performance. It may be because the Russian president is ideologically aligned with them, or saw them as useful in balancing the power of the generals. Perhaps, also, Putin had come to believe his own propaganda — that nobody could be more nationalist than Putin himself and that Russia and Putin were one and the same thing — echoing presidential aide Vyacheslav Volodin’s 2014 comment: “No Putin, no Russia”.

Certainly prior to the Wagner mutiny, there were growing winds of discontent among nationalists. On April 1, 2023, one group of prominent bloggers, including Igor Girkin and Pavel Gubarev, announced the formation of a “Club of Angry Patriots.” As Wagner soldiers marched toward Moscow on June 24, the club issued a statement of indirect support for Prigozhin.

Prigozhin might now be in the Belarusian capital, Minsk, where — theoretically at least — he can do less damage to Putin. But there are other discontents still in Moscow, and politically active.

Security services in Russia have begun raiding Wagner group offices, but it remains unclear what will happen to Prigozhin’s extensive business operations around the world. Wagner soldiers will be offered the chance to sign contracts with the defense ministry — if they did not take direct part in the insurrection.

A lame-duck president?

Putin has no one to blame but himself for the crisis. Prigozhin’s Wagner group was created with his blessing and promoted by the Russian president. It was a tool that Putin could use to further Russia’s military and economic objectives without direct political or legal accountability — initially in the Donbas in eastern Ukraine in 2014, then in Syria, Libya and elsewhere in Africa.

It was not until July 2022 that Wagner was officially acknowledged to be fighting in the Ukraine war. But over the past six months, they have played an increasingly prominent role and have been rewarded with praise in the Russian media.

But as his prestige grew, so too did Prigozhin’s criticism of those around Putin. Starting in December 2022, he began openly challenging Shoigu. He avoided direct criticism of Putin, though in an expletive-laced tirade on May 9 — the day Russia commemorates the end of World War II — he complained about the lack of ammunition for Wagner fighters and talked about “a happy asshole Grandfather,” in what has been taken to be a clear reference to Putin.

It remains a mystery why Putin did not move to get rid of Prigozhin before now — one of the many mysteries of Russian politics over the past century.

Prigozhin has inflicted significant damage on his once all-powerful benefactor. Exiled Russian journalist Mikhail Zygar goes so far as to argue that the failed mutiny has exposed Putin as a “lame-duck” president; likewise, sociologist Vladislav Inozemtsev asserts that “Putin is finished.”

Such definitive judgments are premature, I feel. Putin is a tough and resilient politician who has faced down the most serious challenge to his authority since he came to power in 2000. But there can be no doubt that the aborted mutiny has exposed profound structural flaws in the Russian system of rule.

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

The Conversation

McCarthy Is Betting GOP Can Hold The House In 2024 Without Santos

House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) said on Monday he doesn’t think embattled Rep. George Santos (R-NY) should run for reelection.

Continue reading “McCarthy Is Betting GOP Can Hold The House In 2024 Without Santos”