The Atlantic Publishes Campaign-Era Messages Between Wikileaks, Roger Stone

FILE - In this March 30, 2017, file photo, Roger Stone talks to reporters outside a courtroom in New York. The House intelligence panel will interview two of President Donald Trump’s associates behind closed doors ... FILE - In this March 30, 2017, file photo, Roger Stone talks to reporters outside a courtroom in New York. The House intelligence panel will interview two of President Donald Trump’s associates behind closed doors this week as congressional committees step up their investigations into Russian meddling in the 2016 election. Longtime Trump associate Roger Stone and former staffer Boris Epshteyn will talk to the House panel. Stone will be interviewed on Sept. 26. (AP Photo/Seth Wenig, File) MORE LESS

Trump confidante Roger Stone was in contact with Wikileaks during the 2016 presidential campaign, Twitter messages obtained by the Atlantic and published Tuesday show.

The messages mark the latest in a series of developments regarding Stone’s relationship with Wikileaks, which published caches of hacked Democratic emails during the 2016 election.

In August 2016, Stone claimed to be in contact with Wikileaks’ founder, Julian Assange, only to later revise his comment, after Wikileaks’ objection, by saying they had communicated through an intermediary. Later that month, Stone tweeted “Trust me, it will soon the Podesta’s time in the barrel,” which was eventually seen — including by the Clinton campaign — as an informed prediction of Wikileaks’ release of Podesta’s hacked emails.

On Oct. 13, just hours after after Wikileaks repeated that it had never been in contact with Roger Stone, it was in contact with Stone, according to the Atlantic.

Stone reportedly wrote to the Wikileaks account on Oct. 13, in a private message:

Since I was all over national TV, cable and print defending wikileaks and assange against the claim that you are Russian agents and debunking the false charges of sexual assault as trumped up bs you may want to rexamine the strategy of attacking me- cordially R.

And Wikileaks responded an hour later, according to the Atlantic:

We appreciate that. However, the false claims of association are being used by the democrats to undermine the impact of our publications. Don’t go there if you don’t want us to correct you.

Stone replied on Oct. 15, according to the report: 

“Ha! The more you ‘correct’ me the more people think you’re lying. Your operation leaks like a sieve. You need to figure out who your friends are.”

Wikileaks wrote to Stone again the morning after Trump’s electoral victory, according to the Atlantic:

Happy?

We are now more free to communicate.

Months later, in March 2017, the Atlantic noted, Wikileaks again asserted that neither it nor its founder had never communicated with Stone:

In September, the publication noted, Stone told the House Intelligence Committee in a prepared statement that “my communication with WikiLeaks was through the aforementioned journalist,” referring, he later acknowledged, to the radio host Randy Credico. (Credico said regarding that claim: “There was no backchannel to Roger Stone.)

The magazine said Stone confirmed the authenticity of the Twitter messages, but also that called them“ridiculously out of context” and “a paste up.” Stone told the magazine that he’d provided the exchange to the House Intelligence Committee, but the Atlantic said he didn’t provide it with his copy of the exchange.

In addition to Wikileaks, Stone also communicated with Guccifer 2.0, the hacker persona identified by the intelligence community as being involved in the actual theft of Democrats’ emails. 

Donald Trump Jr. was in contact with Wikileaks during the campaign, according to messages previously published by the Atlantic. So was Cambridge Analytica, a data firm founded by Trump donor Robert Mercer and hired by the Trump campaign. The firm’s CEO acknowledged in November of last year that it had reached out to Wikileaks during the campaign in hopes of obtaining Clinton’s emails.

Dear Reader,

When we asked recently what makes TPM different from other outlets, readers cited factors like honesty, curiosity, transparency, and our vibrant community. They also pointed to our ability to report on important stories and trends long before they are picked up by mainstream outlets; our ability to contextualize information within the arc of history; and our focus on the real-world consequences of the news.

Our unique approach to reporting and presenting the news, however, wouldn’t be possible without our readers’ support. That’s not just marketing speak, it’s true: our work would literally not be possible without readers deciding to become members. Not only does member support account for more than 80% of TPM’s revenue, our members have helped us build an engaged and informed community. Many of our best stories were born from reader tips and valuable member feedback.

We do what other news outlets can’t or won’t do because our members’ support gives us real independence.

If you enjoy reading TPM and value what we do, become a member today.

Latest Livewire
Comments
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Investigations Desk:
Reporters:
Newswriters:
Director of Audience:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: