A Key Jan. 6 Figure Pleads Guilty, Saying She Urged Oath Keepers To Delete Texts

This is your TPM evening briefing.
WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 06: A pro-Trump mob storms the U.S. Capitol following a rally with President Donald Trump on January 6, 2021 in Washington, DC. Trump supporters gathered in the nation's capital today to prot... WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 06: A pro-Trump mob storms the U.S. Capitol following a rally with President Donald Trump on January 6, 2021 in Washington, DC. Trump supporters gathered in the nation's capital today to protest the ratification of President-elect Joe Biden's Electoral College victory over President Trump in the 2020 election. (Photo by Samuel Corum/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

You can divide people who took Donald Trump’s claims that he actually won the 2020 election into roughly two camps: those who were in the know, and the true believers.

If less charitably inclined, you might call this a divide between the con artists and those who they duped. On one side are politicians, conservative movement insiders, activists, and others who played and continue to play along with the farce that the election was stolen; on the other are legions of people who took them at their word, and believed them. It’s an appeal, directed from the top downwards, to the paranoid style in American politics.

The Oath Keepers, the anti-government militia whose leadership was convicted of seditious conspiracy over its role in the Capitol breach, present an interesting example of this. On the one hand, you have a figure like Oath Keepers founder Stewart Rhodes. It’s clear from Rhodes’ statements before the election, his actions, and virtually everything about him that he was committed to demolishing the American state in its current form. Trump’s bogus election fraud claims may have been a vehicle to that end, but Rhodes was on a mission that was his own.

Then, on the other hand, you have Kellye SoRelle, the Oath Keepers’ former general counsel. SoRelle popped up at key moments around Jan. 6: she was present at a brief, parking garage meeting between Rhodes and Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio; she was described in court records as a go-between for the two. After Jan. 6, she urged Oath Keepers members to delete text messages from the planning phase.

There’s a lot about SoRelle that suggests she’s much more of a true believer than in the know. Her X account is full of bizarre, hard-to-track conspiracy theories.

SoRelle herself was found incompetent to stand trial last year, and was held in federal custody for mental health treatment. The judge later found that she had recovered, paving the way for what happened on Wednesday: SoRelle pleaded guilty to two charges. Unlike Rhodes, she never faced seditious conspiracy allegations; rather, on Wednesday, she pleaded guilty to a felony count of obstruction of justice and a misdemeanor count of trespassing.

The Best Of TPM Today

The Obamas Fire Up Dem Convention With Penis Joke And Real Talk

Follow our live coverage of Night Three of the DNC here: DNC Night 3 Will Focus On Walz And Retaining Rights Stripped Away By Republicans

Yesterday’s Most Read Story

Obama: America Is ‘Ready For A Better Story’

What We Are Reading

The video game console that explains Tim Walz

Texas AG Ken Paxton executes search warrants in major Democratic county in election fraud probe

DeSantis takeover of Florida school boards has big setback

Latest Where Things Stand

Notable Replies

  1. The office said the case was referred by state District Attorney Audrey Louis, a conservative Republican whose district abuts Bexar.

    How in hell does this MAGA lawyer know there’s election fraud in the next county? Something smells really bad here.

  2. " Patriots" who don’t even believe in America and what America means.

  3. You can divide people who took Donald Trump’s claims that he actually won the 2020 election into roughly two camps: those who were in the know, and the true believers.

    If less charitably inclined, you might call this a divide between the con artists and those who they duped.

    If you wanted to be honest and with no charity, you would call it the divide between “the dumb and the evil”. But even that is letting “the dumb” off the hook for being evil.

    That is many of “the dumb” believed Trump won not because he got more votes but because he got more White or “real American” votes. Many of “the dumb” also thought that by being assholes they were able to steal the 2000 election so being assholes should work in 2020.

    That is in my view there really is no distinction between those who tried to overthrow the Government in 2020 to keep Trump in power after losing the election. Anyone who supported the BIG LIE is by definition a BIG LIAR which by definition makes them all evil.

    The only real differences within the group of BIG LIARS is not how evil are they but how stupid are they. .

  4. They believe in America like Vidkun Quisling believed in Norway.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

23 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for jw1 Avatar for srfromgr Avatar for tigersharktoo Avatar for chelsea530 Avatar for joelopines Avatar for lastroth Avatar for dangoodbar Avatar for commanderogg Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for brian512 Avatar for dannydorko Avatar for eaharrison Avatar for txlawyer Avatar for rascal_crone Avatar for kwb Avatar for timbomov

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: