Two of the key questions of the second Trump administration could be days, if not hours, away from being answered: To what degree will the ultra-conservative Supreme Court stop Trump from doing what he wants? And will Trump flatly disregard an unfriendly court order, kicking off a five-alarm constitutional emergency?
Trump’s push to end foreign aid spending may yield answers on both fronts. A federal judge in Washington, D.C. temporarily blocked Trump’s sweeping ban, meaning that the administration should have continued sending out aid as usual in the meantime. The plaintiffs, led by the AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition, last week demanded that the restraining order be enforced and the government be held in contempt, as the administration had not turned the aid spigot back on to the extent it was supposed to. There was a flurry of back-and-forth.
Skipping ahead: The government asked Chief Justice John Roberts (in charge of the D.C. Circuit) to delay the deadline for complying with the D.C. district judge’s order. He did so Wednesday night, giving the plaintiffs a deadline of noon tomorrow to respond to the government’s attempt to pause the lower court order. This move sparked the righteous indignation of court watchers livid that aid was being blocked for even a couple more days, given that the administration was, plainly unlawfully, refusing to send money that Congress had already allocated.
Still, there are varying degrees of malice here. If Roberts granted the government a delay it doesn’t deserve, only to side with the administration tomorrow or in the next few days, it would not bode well — an early indication that the Court will not step in to block the desecration of the separation of powers that has become commonplace in Trump II, and will bless the administration’s wholesale theft of congressional power.
If, though, after a couple days, the Court affirms the lower court judge — and there are some knotty jurisdictional questions sprinkled on top of this case — even the most vehement Court critics could take a breath.
Just a shallow one, though, because such a ruling would tee up the big test for Trump: Is he willing to go further than halfhearted, foot-dragging semi-compliance with a lower court order to turn the aid back on? Would he reject a ruling from the highest court outright?
How craven is the Supreme Court? How tyrannical is Trump? These are defining questions of our time, and the next few days should shed some light on each.
The Best Of TPM Today
NEW from Emine Yücel: Congress Turns To Stopgap As GOP Tries To Spin Dems’ Separation Of Powers Request As ‘Unreasonable’
Josh and Kate are Hitting the Road
Trump Solicitor General Nom Stays Vague On Key Question Hanging Over Lawless Presidency
Yesterday’s Most Read Story
You Must Read This: Uproar Over Malicious and Disastrous Cuts at VA
What We Are Reading
Inside Kash Patel’s Whirlwind Start at the FBI
Behind the scenes, GOP senators challenge legality of Trump’s aid cuts
Very, and very. The only real question is what will the Court do to protect its own turf.
Hope they’re smarter than Congress and won’t give away their own power.
This was posted after Kate wrote her evening briefing:
Judge blocks Trump administration’s mass firings of federal workers
Archive link: https://archive.ph/AwWG4
The Court will be pissing on a lot of the lower federal courts if it sides with the felon-in-chief.
They can’t do shit about their turf, they already ceded it in Trump vs US. Roberts just need to find a way to keep the bribes and junkets coming.
Little Man, one of the semi-feral neighborhood cats our housemate Tabbi has been socializing in recent months. Mellowed enough to come inside and spend the night chilling out fairly frequently now.