Dem Rep Switches Districts After Georgia Legislature Demolishes Hers

This is your TPM evening briefing.
UNITED STATES - JANUARY 17: Rep. Lucy McBath, D-Ga., conducts a news conference at the House Triangle to introduce a financial relief bill for federal workers effected by the partial government shutdown at the on Thursday, January 17, 2019. (Photo By Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call)
UNITED STATES - JANUARY 17: Rep. Lucy McBath, D-Ga., conducts a news conference at the House Triangle to introduce a financial relief bill for federal workers effected by the partial government shutdown on Thursday, ... UNITED STATES - JANUARY 17: Rep. Lucy McBath, D-Ga., conducts a news conference at the House Triangle to introduce a financial relief bill for federal workers effected by the partial government shutdown on Thursday, January 17, 2019. (Photo By Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

A federal judge has ruled in a closely watched redistricting case out of Georgia, preserving a Republican gerrymander that dismantled the district represented by Rep. Lucy McBath (D).

McBath said shortly after the decision that she would run in a new district. The Atlanta Journal Constitution reported that the maps would likely remain in place through at least Election Day 2024.

The maps, approved by the Georgia legislature and signed into law by Governor Brian Kemp (R) earlier this month, maintain Republicans’ 9-5 advantage in the state’s congressional representation. They protect Republican members of Congress who may have faced a challenging reelection, and show the impact of years of efforts by the Supreme Court to carve away chunks of the Voting Rights Act.

U.S. District Judge Steven Jones, who issued today’s ruling, had ordered the legislature to draw new maps earlier this year after finding that its 2021 redistricting diluted the strength of Black voters.

In response to his order, Georgia’s Republican-controlled legislature created an obvious partisan gerrymander, Jones wrote. But it was not a racial gerrymander, he found, and the Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled that such aggressive partisan gerrymanders are allowed.

“[T]he committee and floor debate transcripts make clear that the General Assembly
created the 2023 Remedial Congressional Plan in a manner that politically
protected the majority party (i.e., the Republican Party) as much as possible,” wrote Jones, an Obama appointee. “However, redistricting decisions by a legislative body with an eye toward securing partisan advantage does not alone violate Section 2,” he wrote, citing Rucho v. Common Cause, a recent Supreme Court ruling on Section 2.

“[T]he Supreme Court has expressly stated that federal judges have no license to reallocate political power between the two major political parties, given the lack of constitutional authority and the absence of legal standards to direct such decisions,” Jones wrote.

The decision was largely silent on a key issue that both friends and foes of the VRA have been watching closely: whether a district in which white voters are a minority, but in which no group is a majority, constitutes a protected, majority-minority district under the law. One such district was McBath’s, which was controlled by a minority coalition of Black, Latino and Asian voters.

Jones sidestepped that question, saying it was not a part of the dispute at hand.

“From its onset, however, this case has been about Black voters,” Jones’ wrote, adding in a footnote that question of how coalitions of multiple minority groups should be handled would be “better suited for a separate case.”

Civil rights groups may appeal Jones’ ruling.

Meanwhile, a separate case out of Galveston County, Texas is winding its way through federal court, seeking an answer to a similar set of questions about coalition districts. Kate Riga wrote about that suit in her roundup of attacks on the VRA yesterday.

The Best Of TPM Today

Fellow Republicans Criticize Lauren Boebert For ‘Desperate Stunt’ After District Switch

Nikki Haley Dodges Slavery As The Cause Of The Civil War

Yesterday’s Most-Read Story

Jack Smith Drops Holiday Filing In Jan. 6 Case Asking That Trump Be Barred From ‘Injecting Politics’ Into Trial 

What We Are Reading

2024 may be the hottest year in recorded history — Axios

The Year Millennials Aged Out of the Internet — New York Times

The Factors That Made Evangelicals Ready for Trump — New York Times

Latest Where Things Stand
32
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Another case of Republicans stacking the deck thanks to Boris Manchin and Natasha Sinema refusing to kill the filibuster and pass the John Lewis Voting Rights Act.

  2. Why isn’t TPM talking about the trials and tribulations of Ronna McDaniel. A failure as GOP chair by all normal measures she remains secure in her position. In fact why are Democrats at all worried about the GOP in 2024. Fundraising is down. Membership is down. The Republicans are simply falling apart, yet the Democrats live in fear of the Republican party winning across the board next November.

  3. We’re Democrats. We’re decent, mostly. We’re bright enough to know we should worry so we worry.

  4. I would say she doesn’t get top billing because she’s more of a grain of sand in the sandstorm that is Donald Trump. Fundraising and membership are down because Trump has chased half the Party out of the Party and absconded with the other half. It’s hard (and largely irrelevant) to judge Ronna Romney McDaniel’s performance because it’s been completely overshadowed by Trump’s total eclipse of the Party’s operations.

  5. After the Columbine shooting one question was absolutely unasked by all commentators: Where did they get the money?

    The GOP never runs out of money to pay people to make bad faith arguments. Nobody wonders for a minute how deep it goes.

    Money ~ immutable innocence.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

26 more replies

Participants

Avatar for discobot Avatar for bdtex Avatar for ajm Avatar for josephebacon Avatar for globalguy Avatar for brutus1910 Avatar for progress Avatar for dont Avatar for mikebnews Avatar for sparrowhawk Avatar for thebishop Avatar for billymac Avatar for ronbyers Avatar for darrtown Avatar for isakindamagic Avatar for albesure Avatar for noonm Avatar for michaelryerson Avatar for brian512 Avatar for enn Avatar for majesticunicorn Avatar for nydan516 Avatar for Hatmama

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: