Jack Smith Drops Holiday Filing In Jan. 6 Case Asking That Trump Be Barred From ‘Injecting Politics’ Into Trial 

WASHINGTON, DC - AUGUST 01: Special Counsel Jack Smith delivers remarks on a recently unsealed indictment including four felony counts against former U.S. President Donald Trump on August 1, 2023 in Washington, DC. ... WASHINGTON, DC - AUGUST 01: Special Counsel Jack Smith delivers remarks on a recently unsealed indictment including four felony counts against former U.S. President Donald Trump on August 1, 2023 in Washington, DC. Trump was indicted on four felony counts for his alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election. (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Special prosecutor Jack Smith has evidently been working through the holidays, dropping a surprise December 27 filing in the January 6 insurrection case against Donald Trump.

The new document comes on the heels of a disappointment for Smith, after the Supreme Court declined to take up his request for an expedited ruling on Trump’s sweeping claims of immunity. How dramatically the Supreme Court’s move will delay the case is yet to be seen; the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals is hearing the immunity claim on an expedited basis, starting January 9. Should Trump’s immunity arguments — which have already been rejected by a federal district judge — be upheld, the entire case could be tossed.

In the meantime, the bulk of the Jan. 6 case has been put on pause while the immunity question is litigated. But Smith on Wednesday chose to file through the stay, submitting a 20-page document detailing the “evidence” Trump should not be allowed to submit, calling it both irrelevant to the case and at risk of tainting the jury.

“Following his indictment in this District, the defendant has made unsupported and politicized claims of selective and vindictive prosecution, indicated that he intends to explore irrelevant issues related to the Government’s investigation, and complained that the grand jury’s indictment and the Court’s trial date will interfere with his political activities,” Smith wrote. “None of these issues goes to the defendant’s guilt or innocence; all of them should be excluded.”

Smith cited data points including Trump’s “intention to blame the events of January 6 on the Capitol Police, National Guard, and the District’s Mayor,” his argument that foreign actors — not him — riled up the Jan. 6 rioters and his constant refrain, both publicly and in court filings, that the entire trial is a political witch hunt. 

Smith got particularly heated when detailing Trump’s attempts to shift the blame for Jan. 6 onto law enforcement.

“A bank robber cannot defend himself by blaming the bank’s security guard for failing to stop him,” he wrote. “A fraud defendant cannot claim to the jury that his victims should have known better than to fall for his scheme. And the defendant cannot argue that law enforcement should have prevented the violence he caused and obstruction he intended.”

Trump’s team may ask U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan to instruct Smith to stop filing while the case is stayed. But Smith’s move reads as a tactical one. While the filing may not move the case along — Chutkan would be expected not to read it during the stay — it conveys his eagerness to get arguments rolling on a timeline that’ll produce a pre-2024 verdict. It’s also a bit of media savvy; while Chutkan won’t read the filing, no such prohibition restrains news outlets from reporting on it. And perhaps most rankling to Trump’s lawyers, it compels them to reply or risk leaving Smith’s arguments unrebutted. 

Trump, as evidenced by a Wednesday statement, is not pleased by Smith’s move. 

“Crooked Joe Biden’s errand boy Deranged Jack Smith is so obsessed with attacking President Trump and interfering with the 2024 Presidential Election, and is so sad that the Supreme Court just unanimously rejected his desperate attempt to rush this Witch Hunt, that he is ignoring the law and clear instructions from District Court Judge Chutkan, who unequivocally stated that this ‘case’ is stayed and there should be no litigation. Period,” his statement said. 

Read Smith’s filing here: 

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. Jack Smith has a mind like a bear trap, does not shrink from his duties, is knowledgeable of the law, and is a skilled prosecutor. For that I am extremely thankful.

  2. I second that.

  3. The mere fact that Jack Smith has not gone postal on Trump and his team of “attorneys?” says much about the man’s maturity and patience. I cannot wait to hear one of these cases wherein Trump gets his fat mouth taped shut with duct tape to make him shut up.

  4. How can the lawyers for the criminal former president keep politics out of the trial, unless they are able to talk about politics? They just want to prove his innocence.

    Yeah, I know it doesn’t make any sense. But here we are.

  5. Keep the heat on, Jack, stay or no stay. Heat on tRump causes forced errors.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

46 more replies


Avatar for discobot Avatar for ajm Avatar for moodpost Avatar for becca656 Avatar for sparrowhawk Avatar for claimsadjuster Avatar for dryheat Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for darrtown Avatar for benthere Avatar for rwdorsey Avatar for edgarant Avatar for pmaroneyb Avatar for caltg Avatar for noonm Avatar for dannydorko Avatar for enn Avatar for bcgister Avatar for eaharrison Avatar for dicktater Avatar for Fire_Joni_Ernst Avatar for timbomov Avatar for ClutchCargo Avatar for Vickie48

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: