SCOTUS Freezes Alien Enemy Removals In Rare, Urgent, Late-Night Order

UNITED STATES - MARCH 4: President Donald Trump greets Chief Justice John Roberts before Trump delivered his address to a joint session of Congress in the House Chamber of the U.S. Capitol on Tuesday, March 4, 2025. ... UNITED STATES - MARCH 4: President Donald Trump greets Chief Justice John Roberts before Trump delivered his address to a joint session of Congress in the House Chamber of the U.S. Capitol on Tuesday, March 4, 2025. (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

A majority of Supreme Court justices temporarily blocked the Trump administration from removing a group of Venezuelans under the Alien Enemies Act in an order issued in the early hours of Saturday. The order came at lighting speed for the high court, and signals a staggering level of urgency as the Trump administration continues to seek to use a dubiously invoked wartime power to remove Venezuelans to an El Salvador detention camp without any semblance of due process.

The court directed the government “not to remove any member of the putative class of detainees from the United States until further order of this Court.”

The order, which was unsigned, said that Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas dissented.

The Supreme Court issued the order only hours after attorneys for the ACLU filed an emergency application to halt the removals of a group of Venezuelans that, it said, had received notices from ICE informing them that they were to be imminently removed from the United States under the Alien Enemies Act.

The speed with which the court acted is itself a signal of the gravity of the situation. The Trump administration has spent the month since it removed more than 200 people to an El Salvador detention camp claiming both that once people have been removed from U.S. territory, there is nothing the courts can do to retrieve them, and that the President’s foreign policy powers are so broad as to block the judiciary from being able to conduct any kind of inquiry.

The Supreme Court’s Saturday morning order is extraordinary in part for its speed. But as several legal observers noted, it’s also unusual because it came before Justice Alito could finish writing his dissent. The order stated that Alito’s dissent would “follow.”

Separately, as legal commentator Steve Vladeck noted, the order also suggested that the Trump administration’s pattern of blatant misrepresentations in the Alien Enemies cases may be causing the court to act more aggressively. Earlier on Friday evening, Deputy Assistant Attorney General Drew Ensign told D.C. Chief Judge James Boasberg in an emergency hearing over the removals that “no planes” were expected to leave on Friday or Saturday. While those statements were not before the Supreme Court, the justices acted with such speed as to suggest that, if they were aware of them, they were not taking them at face value — the justices immediately froze removals until further action by the high court.

The latest showdown over the Trump administration’s Alien Enemies removals had been escalating throughout Friday.

The last round of removals under the wartime power caused a series of massive scandals that strike at the heart of constitutional governance. In one case, the administration admitted that it accidentally removed an El Salvador citizen — Kilmar Abrego Garcia — contra an immigration court order saying he could not be removed to El Salvador due to the danger he might face there. In spite of admitting its error, the Trump administration then argued that the courts could not direct it to remedy the error. After the Supreme Court directed the administration to “facilitate” Abrego Garcia’s release from custody in El Salvador and be ready to update the courts on its efforts, the Trump administration declined to provide meaningful information to a lower court and refused to ask the Salvadoran government for Abrego Garcia’s release.

It all fed into the burgeoning impression that the administration is committed to flouting the judiciary so that it can remove people from the country and then refuse to retrieve them, while claiming that the courts are powerless to do anything about it.

On Thursday, rumors began to spread that the Trump administration was set to conduct another round of Alien Enemies Act removals. One immigration attorney told TPM that day that a group of Venezuelans had been moved to Bluebonnet Detention Center in northern Texas.

In court filings throughout Friday, the ACLU alleged that the Venezuelans at Bluebonnet had been given notices of removal under the Alien Enemies Act, and had been told by ICE officials that the papers “were coming from the President.” Per one copy of the notice obtained by the ACLU, the Venezuelans were told in English that they had the opportunity to make a phone call.

The ACLU first filed an emergency motion on Friday in the Northern District of Texas before Judge James Wesley Hendrix, seeking to halt what they described as “imminent” removals. At least some of the Venezuelans were purportedly moved from the Southern District of Texas, where there’s a standing court order that freezes Alien Enemies Act removals, to the Northern District of Texas, where no such order exists.

After Hendrix did not rule, the ACLU made an emergency appeal to the 5th Circuit on Friday afternoon. The group then appealed to the Supreme Court via its emergency docket, and also asked D.C. Chief Judge James Boasberg in a separate case to issue a 30-day nationwide injunction barring further Alien Enemies Act removals.

Boasberg declined to issue that hold after a quickly arranged phone hearing on Friday evening. At the hearing, ACLU attorney Lee Gelernt said that he was prepared to sue in each of the country’s more than 90 judicial districts to prevent further removals.

Hours later, around 2 a.m., the Supreme Court ordered a halt to the removals, for now.

Latest News
110
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. F’n Thomas and Alito don’t give a sh*t about the Constitution, morality, or reality.

    You know that Alito was trying to delay the order with his dissent until after the plane left.

  2. Roberts pulled rank and issued the injunction leaving Alito to write his dissent after the fact. The Supreme Court -at least a majority- seems to be paying attention to Trump and Stephen Miller getting around the Court’s order of habeas being provided to all those in danger of being disappeared.

  3. I suppose the Leopard Eats Faces Party could eat the face of Alito and Thomas and they would not even notice, and support its eating their face for that reason.

  4. One might ask: Which party (or parties) is (are) a greater threat to the United States? Kilmar Abrego Garcia and/or the other group of Venezuelans who have been deprived of due process or Donald J. Trump, who has had the benefit of due process and was found guilty of committing 34 felonies (plus all of the other pending abuses of power)?

  5. That basically never happens! Again—majority seems pissed.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

104 more replies

Participants

Avatar for heart Avatar for sandi Avatar for playitagainrowlf Avatar for irasdad Avatar for lastroth Avatar for darcy Avatar for leftcoaster Avatar for califdemdreamer Avatar for ronbyers Avatar for travelingprincess Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for darrtown Avatar for jonney_5 Avatar for ozziecat Avatar for pmaroneyb Avatar for brian512 Avatar for davidn Avatar for carolson Avatar for capeksghost Avatar for godwit Avatar for bcgister Avatar for trustywoods Avatar for Scoutmom Avatar for Citizen1

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor-at-Large:
Contributing Editor:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher & Digital Producer:
Senior Developer:
Senior Designer: