Adams Leaving Ain’t Enough to Make NYC Mayor a Race

This is a brief update on the New York City mayoral election. There’s not a lot of good reason why this should be big news or a big story outside of the tristate area. But since politically obsessed people are pretty obsessed with it, I wanted to discuss a couple specific points about Mayor Eric Adams’ announcement that he’s leaving the race.

Continue reading “Adams Leaving Ain’t Enough to Make NYC Mayor a Race”

DOJ Keeps Escalating Its Attempts to Get Ahold of States’ Voter Rolls

A series of attempts by President Trump’s Justice Department to access voter roll information is prompting increasing alarm from election administrators, who warn that the federal government may be laying the groundwork to attempt to strongarm states over how they conduct their elections. 

Continue reading “DOJ Keeps Escalating Its Attempts to Get Ahold of States’ Voter Rolls”

Portland Begins Its Own Fight Against Trump’s National Guard Occupations, Joining DC and LA

Portland, Oregon has become President Trump’s newest target for National Guard invasion and blood-drenched hyperbole, as the administration deployed a couple hundred troops over the governor’s resistance this weekend. 

Continue reading “Portland Begins Its Own Fight Against Trump’s National Guard Occupations, Joining DC and LA”

New Purges Continue to Hollow Out the Trump DOJ

A lot of things happened. Here are some of the things. This is TPM’s Morning Memo. Sign up for the email version.

Removing the Few Remaining Guardrails

While the Trump DOJ has been hijacked to target Donald Trump’s perceived foes with criminal investigation and prosecution, it continues to undergo a slow-motion purge of career professionals that is flying a little bit under the radar.

The purge of career people — in many cases in violation of laws and procedures meant to protect them from untoward political influence — is important in its own right. But it also contributes to the larger scheme of removing roadblocks and guardrails that might prevent or slow down even more radical abuses of office by Trump and the political appointees at the Justice Department.

Among the latest purge developments we’ve learned over the past few days:

  • DC: A group of agents photographed kneeling with protestors in D.C. during the June 2020 Black Lives Matter protests over the police killing of George Floyd have been fired en masse. It’s not clear how many agent were fired, but it could be as many as 20. Some of them had already been reassigned earlier this year in what amounted to demotions.
  • Miami: Attorney General Pam Bondi summarily fired an up-and-coming assistant U.S. attorney in Miami reportedly over blog posts critical of President Trump written during his first term, before the AUSA joined the Justice Department. Will Rosenzweig was fired via email from Bondi while he was observing Rosh Hashanah; he didn’t notice anything was amiss until the next day when his office-issued mobile phone wasn’t working.
  • Sacramento: The acting U.S. attorney in Sacramento says she was fired by President Trump shortly after warning Border Patrol honcho Gregory Bovino that a court order prevented him from arresting people without probable cause in the Eastern District of California. Michele Beckwith was fired July 15 less than six hours after her warning to Bovino, according to documents reviewed by the NYT.

Trump’s Fave Border Patrol Guy Admits to Racial Profiling

BROADVIEW, ILLINOIS – SEPTEMBER 27: Border Patrol Chief Gregory Bovino of the El Centro Sector stands amid a protest outside an ICE facility in Broadview on September 27, 2025. Bovino, who recently spearheaded controversial immigration crackdowns in Los Angeles and Chicago, faces demonstrators voicing opposition to immigration policies. (Photo by Jacek Boczarski/Anadolu via Getty Images)

Gregory Bovino, the Border Patrol commander who is now running the Trump administration’s mass deportation operation in Chicago, admitted during an interview to detaining people on the basis of how they look, the Sun-Times reports:

“You know, there’s many different factors that go into something like that,” Bovino said. “It would be agent experience, intelligence that indicates there’s illegal aliens in a particular place or location.

“Then, obviously, the particular characteristics of an individual, how they look. How do they look compared to, say, you?” he said to the reporter, a tall, middle-aged man of Anglo descent.

You’ll recall that Justice Brett Kavanaugh in one of the Supreme Court’s recent emergency docket rulings earlier this month condoned using apparent ethnicity and race as a factor in deciding which people to stop.

Quote of the Day

“I spoke to the governor, she was very nice. But I said, ‘Well wait a minute, am I watching things on television that are different from what’s happening? My people tell me different.’ They are literally attacking and there are fires all over the place … it looks like terrible.”–a befuddled President Trump, feebly trying to square the difference between the real world reports from Orgeon’s governor on a peaceful Portland and the propaganda he’d been fed before announcing a plan to send troops to the city he described as “War ravaged”

Picking Through The Comey Indictment

A few new tidbits:

  • WSJ: “Tensions over the case came to a head … after some administration officials, including Ed Martin, a Justice Department official pursuing cases of interest to Trump, privately told the president that the Justice Department was slow-walking cases against Trump critics, people familiar with the discussions said.”
  • Acting U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan, with no prior experience as a prosecutor, stumbled through securing the Comey indictment, the NYT reports: “At one point, she entered the wrong courtroom. When she found the right one, she stood on the wrong side of the judge, then appeared confused about the paperwork she just had signed.”
  • Politico: “[T]he case against the former FBI director and longtime Trump nemesis may quickly end in disappointment — and even humiliation — for the prosecutor who was conscripted by the president to bring the charges.”

New Trump Targets Alert

With President Trump making threats to broaden the abuse of the Justice Department to target his political enemies with criminal investigation and prosecutions, two new targets stand out:

  • President Trump has turned his ire on former FBI Director Christopher Wray, his own appointee to the post who resigned immediately before Trump took office for a second term. In a Sunday phone call with NBC News, Trump sicced the Justice Department on Wray: “I would imagine. I would certainly imagine. I would think they are doing that,” Trump said when he was asked whether DOJ should investigate him. Trump connected his complaint about Wray to a bogus conspiracy theory that the FBI instigated Trump supporters to attack the capitol on Jan. 6.
  • In a social media post over the weekend, President Trump threatened the private sector job of former Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco, who is now a top executive at Microsoft. The president said Microsoft “should immediately terminate” her employment. Monaco oversaw the two criminal investigations of Trump while she wa No. 2 at DOJ during the Biden administration. She has already been a named target of a Trump executive order stripping security clearances from people he perceived as enemies.

The Never Ending Jan. 6 Revisionism: False Flag Edition

In a weekend social media post, President Trump embraced and reiterated the bogus claim that the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol was fomented by the FBI.

Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R-LA) apparently got the memo and spewed the baseless conspiracy theory Sunday on national TV:

MIKE JOHNSON: We have to ensure that the rule of law applies to everyoneTAPPER: Does the rule of law apply to people who stormed the Capitol on January 6?JOHNSON: Apparently there were 274 FBI agents in the crowdTAPPER: They were sent there to do crowd control. It wasn't a false flag operation

Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com) 2025-09-28T13:20:12.467Z

Johnson’s comment comes as he has created a revisionist Jan. 6 committee to rewrite the history of the attack, saying in the same TV interview that it’s “a committee investigating the previous committee.”

SCOTUS Hands Trump Huge Win on Lawless Rescission

In a stunning win for President Trump, the Supreme Court on Friday used its emergency docket to clear the way for him to continue to withhold billions of dollars in foreign aid despite congressional authorization of the monies. The decision implicitly ratified the president’s use of a pocket rescission, the refusal to spend the money before it expires tomorrow at the end of the fiscal year.

In the second fiery-for-her dissent of the week, Justice Elena Kagan noted that the court’s decision meant the foreign aid monies will now never reach the intended recipients and castigated the administration’s position that it would suffer irreparable harm by … following the law:

[T]hat is just the price of living under a Constitution that gives Congress the power to make spending decisions through the enactment of appropriations laws. If those laws require obligation of the money, and if Congress has not by rescission or other action relieved the Executive of that duty, then the Executive must comply. It cannot be heard to complain, as it does here, that the laws clash with the President’s differing view of “American values” and “American interests.” That inconsistency, in other words, is not a cognizable harm, to be weighed in the equitable balance. It is merely a frustration any President must bear.

Against Hopium and Doomerism

Thomas Zimmer:

Binary categories of “Winning/losing” – or “weak/strong” – are just not very helpful right now. They tend to reproduce mood swings more than they help generate plausible analysis. Every Trumpian embarrassment (remember the “Liberation Day” tariff debacle?) is destined to cause a new round of “Trump is weak, he is losing” pieces; every authoritarian escalation is accompanied by a chorus of “Democracy is dead, Trump won” post-mortems. My point is not merely to say that the truth lies “in the middle” (it might be far closer to one end of the spectrum than to the other) – but to remind us all that we must consider the bigger picture and how the many different actions and reactions are connected.

New Banned Words

The Energy Department’s Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy has added “climate change,” “green” and “decarbonization” to its “list of words to avoid,” according to a Friday email obtained by Politico.

Do you like Morning Memo? Let us know!

The Corrupt Supreme Court Must Be Reformed: Dems Must Champion It

Going into 2026 and 2028 it’s time for — essential for — Democrats to make clear that the current Supreme Court will have to reformed (expanded in number, reformed in structure) to allow popular government to continue in the United States. This is not so much a litmus test (though it should be that too) as a precondition for any other promise to be credible.

Continue reading “The Corrupt Supreme Court Must Be Reformed: Dems Must Champion It”

25th Anniversary Event Update

We’ve noted this in the emails members have received, but since we’ve gotten a lot of questions about it: tickets for individual nights will go on sale this coming week. We know a lot of people can’t make it in for both nights (Thursday and Friday). So for those who just want to attend the show Thursday evening or the anniversary party Friday evening, those tickets will go on sale this coming week.

I also want to take a moment to thank everyone who came out to our event with STAT News Thursday night in Cambridge (Boston). I loved the venue and it was a chance for me to finally meet a lot of longtime readers from Boston and the greater New England region. A bunch of members from Vermont, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, etc. were there. (There may have been some from Maine. But no one told me they were from Maine.) The venue was really great, I thought, and I had a great mini-discussion with Rick Berke, co-founder and executive editor of STAT News. (That was the “content” for this event before we got on to the happy hour proper.) Let me thank especially Allegra Kirkland and Christine Frapech as well as the rest of our team for putting the Boston event together.

We’ll update you when tickets for each individual night of the anniversary celebration go on sale.

It’s Completely Trump’s Supreme Court Now, And He Knows It

President Trump notched a startling legal win Friday evening, as the Supreme Court gave an early stamp of approval to a legal theory so outlandish that experts at one point predicted to TPM it wouldn’t “get a single vote.” 

Continue reading “It’s Completely Trump’s Supreme Court Now, And He Knows It”

Sinclair Backs Down

As I’ve written a few times, we can’t over-read any single move in the broad contest over big societal institutions obeying or resisting Trump administration diktats. But Sinclair Broadcasting just announced they’re ending their “preemption” of the Jimmy Kimmel show. Even their own statement seems to make clear that while they asked for concessions from ABC/Disney they didn’t get any.

Continue reading “Sinclair Backs Down”

Beware the (Purported) Iron Laws of Shutdowns

As we hurtle toward an almost inevitable government shutdown, I want to note one part of the discussion I’ve seen among commentators. This is a bit in the weeds but I think it’s worth discussing. Some writers say that it’s actually a mistake for Democrats to make any policy demands in the budget standoff. So health care, pushing back on ICE, standing up for democracy … regardless of the specific demand, it’s a mistake. I noticed Bill Scher making this argument today in The Washington Monthly. I’ve seen TPM alum Brian Beutler in his Off Message substack newsletter. And these are only a couple of examples.

The argument goes like this.

These shutdown standoffs are technical budgetary questions. The side that is making policy demands is basically taking the budget hostage to extract extraneous policy concessions. Based on the evidence of the last 20-30 years of history, that side is the one who gets blamed for the shutdown because they’re “taking the budget hostage” or introducing extraneous demands even if those demands are good ones on the merits or even supported by the public. Beutler focuses on the “hostage taking” metaphor. Scher puts it this way:

Every past attempt to use government shutdowns to extract policy concessions has failed, even when the policy demands are politically popular, because shutdowns make people forget what you have to say. Public attention shifts to how shutdowns hurt average Americans and how one political party is willing to harm constituents to play political games. Once public opinion quickly turns, the shutdown agitators invariably realize the shutdown failed to provide negotiating leverage and eventually cave.

Continue reading “Beware the (Purported) Iron Laws of Shutdowns”