Former special counsel Robert Mueller on Wednesday asserted his right to investigate President Trump without being able to charge him, shooting down a line used by Republican lawmakers and Attorney General Bill Barr.
During Mueller’s testimony before the House Judiciary Committee, Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner (R-WI) asked Mueller why there was “all of this investigation of President Trump” when, as per a standing Justice Department Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) opinion that prevents sitting presidents from being indicted, “you knew that you weren’t going to prosecute him.”
“Well, you don’t know where the investigation is going to lie,” Mueller replied. “And the OLC opinion itself says that you can continue the investigation.”
Mueller defends his investigation, even without ability to indict sitting President, under the OLC's own policy pic.twitter.com/1B95cfFIE3
— TPM Livewire (@TPMLiveWire) July 24, 2019
The line of argument — that since Mueller was prohibited from charging Trump under Justice Department policy — became a prominent feature of the hearing, and of GOP spin on the Mueller report’s findings.
Before Sensenbrenner, Rep. John Ratcliffe (R-TX) let loose at Mueller on the same topic, accusing the former special counsel of going beyond his remit as a prosecutor by probing the President while being unable to indict him.
Before Wednesday’s hearing, Barr made a similar point to GOP lawmakers, saying that Mueller should have steered away from probing Trump’s conduct once he realized that it may have been chargeable and that he was unable to reach a traditional prosecutorial judgment.
“That was the time to pull up,” Barr said,
As Mueller noted, the OLC policy states that presidents can face criminal investigation in order to preserve evidence for impeachment or potential future charges.
MUELLER to SENSENBRENNER:
(channeling the great @ericgarland here)
“STFU, Junior. Did you even read the whole OLC opinion?”
I can’t. He sounds like a kid that got called down to the principal’s office. His testimony so far, “I refer you to language in the report,” hasn’t been too different from Reagan’s “I don’t recall.”
This is not a court case where the witness is not allowed to “talk back” or reframe a question to answer as he sees fit.
So per Barr, ok to investigate the President, but you should stop once you find something?
Really?
I’d say sure, if that meant the OSC closed and automatically became an entity under Congress as they have jurisdiction over impeachment.
Chump did what?
I hadn’t heard this:
Nicole Lafond on the PrimeBlog:
“As part of a Wednesday morning Twitter tirade, Trump warned Mueller not to say under oath that he was not considered for the position. Mueller did. Republicans have used this apparently false presumption that Mueller was pining for the gig after Comey was fired as fodder for charges of Mueller’s alleged conflicts of interest.”
Chump is even OBSTRUCTING in the testimony about his OBSTRUCTION investigation?
It bugs me that Ds don’t do the basic work necessary.
Somebody should have looked up the ZILLIONS of Federal prosecutions conducted by the DoJ resulting in convictions of mayors (just to pick one executive office) for directing that false records be filed as obstruction of justice.
(Channelling Casey Stengel): Can’t anybody here play this game?
Like this: https://www.justice.gov/usao-edmo/pr/former-kinloch-mayor-sentenced-falsifying-halfway-house-records