GOP Sen.: Trump Jr. Meeting Russian For Clinton Dirt Is ‘A Great Big Nothing’

Sen. Roger Wicker, R-Miss., leaves a meeting on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, June 27, 2017. In a bruising setback, Senate Republican leaders shelved a vote on their prized health care bill Tuesday until at le... Sen. Roger Wicker, R-Miss., leaves a meeting on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, June 27, 2017. In a bruising setback, Senate Republican leaders shelved a vote on their prized health care bill Tuesday until at least next month, forced to retreat by a GOP rebellion that left them lacking enough votes to even begin debate. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Nothing to see here.

That was the reaction Monday from Sen. Roger Wicker (R-MS) to news that Donald Trump Jr., Paul Manafort and Jared Kushner met in June 2016 with a Kremlin-linked Russian lawyer who promised damaging information about Hillary Clinton.

“I do not think the American people are going to be horrified by this, and I agree with Donald Trump Jr.,” Wicker said in an interview with CNN’s Wolf Blitzer. “He was told that there was some information unfavorable to their general election opponent. He went to a meeting and it turns out there wasn’t much there and instead the Russian attorney wanted to talk about the Magnitsky Act and Russian adoptions. It was a pretty quick meeting and he concluded that it didn’t amount to much.”

“I just think that’s pretty much of a great big nothing when it comes to whether there was some sort of collusion between Russia and general election campaign organizations,” Wicker said.

Blitzer asked Wicker if he would have attended a similar meeting, with someone Donald Trump Jr. claimed was an unknown person promising dirt on a political opponent.

Wicker noted that then-candidate Donald Trump did not attend the meeting.

“I as a public official or candidate would not do that,” he said.

However, Wicker hedged, “if somebody on behalf of a campaign was told there was some information that might be of interest to the public, I just don’t think the American people are going to be up in arms that that meeting took place.”

Asked about some senators’ insistence that Donald Trump Jr. should answer their questions about the meeting, Wicker said that “if they want to ask questions, then I would listen to them, and look at the propriety of that.

“As asking a few questions, I don’t see the harm in it,” he said.

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. If these meetings were “big fat nothings” or “nothing burgers” as the GOP is prone to saying, why so much lying and hiding?

    Just curious: Does Wicker think the meeting between Bill C. and Loretta Lynch was also a “bit fat nothing”?

  2. In other words, we now need to check what info Wicker also got from the Russian intelligence/Wikileaks pipeline.

  3. Oy, the editing on this site.

    Mississippi’s state 2 letter abbreviation is MS, not MI.

  4. As I recall, Watergate was also a big fat nothing burger. Until it wasn’t.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

38 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for bikerdad Avatar for headhunter212 Avatar for arrrrrj Avatar for sniffit Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for yvonneofnc Avatar for lastroth Avatar for xpat4321 Avatar for leftcoaster Avatar for riverstreet Avatar for dickweed Avatar for bd2999 Avatar for greycardinal Avatar for benthere Avatar for cincypix Avatar for reggid Avatar for tacochuck Avatar for antisachetdethe Avatar for 62fender Avatar for coimmigrant Avatar for johnzdennis Avatar for win Avatar for lancel

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: