The overarching message of Sen. Rand Paul’s (R-KY) newly launched presidential campaign is that he’s “a different kind of Republican.” If you take a glance at some of the secessionists, conspiracy theorists and other people who have floated in and out of Paul’s orbit over the years, it’s clear to see there’s something to that.
National and PA Dems really, really have it in for former Rep. Joe Sestak (D-PA).
Nutball friends sometimes sink presidential candidates. But Rand Paul is a different kind of Republican. He's got at least a hundred.
With today's anniversary of Appomattox, I wanted to link back to this post from almost two years ago. I discussed a simple fact about the aftermath of the Civil War: The North, which is to say, the United States bought the South's acquiescence into reabsorption into the federal union by ceding the battle for historical memory, nostalgia and valor to the South. The Union bought a seemingly permanent regional peace by abandoning the freedmen of the South and going along with a concocted story about superior Southern valor.
Conservatives mobilize to block ABC show because Dan Savage is involved in it.
I'm not sure I'd say I'm outraged. Outrage is a cheap emotion anyway. But this is a pretty odd way for the federal government to sum up the curtain call of the Civil War at Appomattox 150 years ago.
From TPM Reader CV ...
Greetings TPM folk,Today is the 150th anniversary of Lee's surrender at Appomattox and if you go to the NPS website for the Park you find this explanation: "On Palm Sunday (April 9), 1865, Lee's surrender at Appomattox Court House, Virginia signaled the end of the Southern States attempt to create a separate nation. It set the stage for the emergence of an expanded and more powerful Federal government. In a sense the struggle over how much power the central government would hold had finally been settled."
I find that disturbing and offensive. *Thats* the nutshell takeaway from the Civil War?
If you're a TPM Prime subscriber, don't miss the second installment of our five part longform series on the rapid growth of renewable energy over just the last two or three years. It's a fascinating, encouraging story. The second installment, just published today, is on America's changing energy map.
I've had this conversation with a number of people. And just yesterday, a former TPM reporter asked me my thoughts on the GOP presidential primary. So I thought I'd share what I've been telling people.
Aurin Squire: "How to destroy a black life: A Step-By-Step Guide"
Rand Paul, like Ted Cruz, will never be president. It is highly, highly unlikely either will be nominated. No, I will not say this about each candidate who announces. But it is notable that these two - who are essentially media creations - are the first two in. The alleged coalition Paul is striving to create is deeply improbable, if not downright impossible. But quite apart from that, and many other profound liabilities, there's just one that will inevitably sink him: a long, long history of conspiracy theories which are uniformly whacky and often veer into the rantings of the militia, white supremacist and neo-confederate right. Here's one that is simply whacky that came to mind as I was reading the Paul coverage this morning.
Not sure you need more than this sentence ...
But while fellow “constitutional conservatives” like Ted Cruz imagine a winning coalition composed of GOP “base” voters psyched out of their skulls along with nonvoters who have been secretly pining for a rightwing savior, Paul’s electability argument is that his eccentric path back to the policies of the distant past will attract key elements of the other party’s base.
Read the rest here.
A white police officer has been charged with murder after video emerged showing him shooting a black motorists as he ran away. The video is shocking.
The camera was not a dash or body cam. It appears to have been shot by a bystander. But in almost every case cameras are the friend or whoever is telling the truth. And just as important, they shape behavior, probably actually preventing some tragedies from happening in the first place.
We just published this piece by Kirsten Schofield who recounts how she herself was the victim of an attempted rape at UVA and cannot forgive or accept the apology of Sabrina Erdely, the reporter on the now-notorious Rolling Stone story. You should simply read the piece rather rely on my gloss. But there is one thing that stood out to me in this piece: Schofield's description of the very different responsibilities—radical empathy and belief and scrutiny and distance of rape crisis counselors and advocates on the one hand, and journalists (and though she doesn't mention it explicitly, investigators) on the other. Here is the piece.
Mark Schmitt joins The Hive today to chat about the early reform rhetoric we are already hearing regarding 2016 (sub req), his recent paper on a new framework for democratic reform and any other topics you are interested in. Schmitt is the director of the program on political reform at the New America Foundation -- in this capacity he develops new approaches to understanding and reforming the market for political power.
A prominent writer on politics and public policy, with experience in government, philanthropy and journalism, he is also a columnist for The New Republic and a leading voice on political reform, budget and tax policy, and social policy.
Please feel free to drop in your questions at or before 2 p.m.! This chat will be moderated by TPM.
There is no shortage of hyperbolic commentary about the framework agreement on the Iranian nuclear program. But one strain of the conversation is particularly odd and deserves more attention. In what can only taken as a tacit admission that the proposed restrictions on Iran's program are quite strong, we are now hearing that the agreement needs to include restrictions on Iranian ballistic missile development, support for Hezbollah and Hamas, support for the Assad regime in Syria, support for terrorism and even more amorphously an end to destabilizing the Middle East. Perhaps most preposterously, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is demanding that Iranian recognition of Israel as a Jewish state.
It seems like we are well into the concern-troll phase of the cake-pizza-flower wars/freedom movement, which one might call either an organized retreat or a fall back to guerrilla insurgency in the all but lost battle against gay marriage. Because really, a lot of this is not that complicated. If you ask a baker to bake a cake that says "God hates gays" and they refuse, that's not an imposition on your religion - unless you're a complete moron.