Another Day, Another Empty Display Of Support For IVF From Republicans

This is your TPM evening briefing.
WASHINGTON, DC - NOVEMBER 02: Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) departs a House Republican Conference meeting at the U.S. Capitol on November 2, 2023 in Washington, DC. House Republicans held a conference meeting to discuss the... WASHINGTON, DC - NOVEMBER 02: Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) departs a House Republican Conference meeting at the U.S. Capitol on November 2, 2023 in Washington, DC. House Republicans held a conference meeting to discuss the party agenda. (Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Democratic Sens. Tammy Duckworth (IL) and Patty Murray (WA) plan to bring up a vote under unanimous consent on Wednesday on a bill they first introduced in 2022 that would put federal safeguards on IVF treatment. The legislation, the Access to Family Building Act, would give federal protections to in-vitro fertilization treatment and override any limits imposed on the practice by individual states (cough, cough Alabama).

Since the Democrats plan to bring it up via unanimous consent, just one lawmaker could block the bill from going to a vote. Back in 2022, before it became the issue that Republicans are scrambling to loudly support, they did just that. During a press conference announcing their plans Tuesday, Duckworth dared her Republican colleagues to block the bill from advancing to a vote again.

“Donald Trump suddenly supports IVF after crowing and claiming and taking credit for the fall of Roe v. Wade. You can’t do both,” Duckworth said. “And so let’s find out tomorrow if any Republicans show up to block the unanimous consent.”

While declaring their support for IVF very strongly this past week, Republicans haven’t yet figured out how to talk about what exactly they support, as they profess to hold the seemingly competing beliefs that embryos are “babies” but also that everyone should have access to the procedure who wants it. I unpacked this wobbliness yesterday, but Sen. Marco Rubio’s (R-FL) latest remarks on the treatment illustrate the * ~ confusion ~ * well, and signal that Republican senators will likely block the bill from going to vote Wednesday:

“That’s really at the crux of the ethics of it,” Rubio told reporters Tuesday. “How do our laws recognize the dignity of human life but also understand that the procedure that it enables is a life-creating procedure?”

“No one has IVF to destroy life, they have IVF to create life,” he added. “Unfortunately, you have to create multiple embryos, and some of those are not used, then you’re now in a quandary.”

On the other side of the Capitol, Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) announced she’d put forward a resolution that would shield her fellow Republicans from having to weigh in seriously on that “quandary” — just one of many complex health care issues unrelated to abortion that were left in an open field for anti-abortion activists to attack in Dobbs‘ wake.

Mace is sending around a non-binding resolution that she has asked her colleagues to consider cosponsoring by the end of the day Thursday. The resolution would have no impact on federal laws if it passed and would primarily just declare support for IVF and call on elected officials “at all levels of government” to “proactively pass legislation to protect access to fertility care and assisted reproductive technology, including in vitro fertilization,” according to Business Insider, which obtained a copy of the resolution.

The resolution does note that the Alabama Supreme Court ruling on embryos’ status as children has endangered access to the procedure in the state, but in terms of tangibly protecting IVF, it’s toothless. Which means Republicans will likely point to it as their preferred form of legislation as cover when they vote against the Duckworth/Murray bill this week.

The Best Of TPM Today

The latest from Hunter Walker: Who Paid For Sarah Sanders’ Six Figure Super Bowl Extravaganza?

Yesterday’s Most Read Story

Republicans Increasingly Reveal They Barely Know Where Babies Come From — Nicole Lafond

What We Are Reading

In leaked audio, Supreme Court Justice John Devine railed against “brainwashed” GOP colleagues — The Texas Tribune

Tennessee House advances bill to ban reappointing lawmakers booted for behavior — NBC

Trump Has a Hilarious New Excuse for Why He Can’t Put Up Bond — The New Republic

Latest Where Things Stand

Notable Replies

  1. It is delightful watching Republicans deal with consequences.

  2. Mace is sending around a non-binding resolution that she has asked her colleagues to consider cosponsoring by the end of the day Thursday. The resolution would have no impact on federal laws if it passed and would primarily just declare support for IVF and call on elected officials “at all levels of government” to “proactively pass legislation to protect access to fertility care and assisted reproductive technology, including in vitro fertilization,” according to Business Insider, which obtained a copy of the resolution.

    Another issue on which the reactionaries hope to get away with offering ‘thoughts and prayers?’

  3. The resolution does note that the Alabama Supreme Court ruling on embryos’ status as children has endangered access to the procedure in the state,

    This leads me to ask, are the frozen embryos covered by the Endangered Species Act?

  4. Nancy Mace is the perfect face of GOP-IVF-BS.

    More vapid than most of her Republican House colleagues.

    And that’s really vapidiful.

  5. These far-right men continue to show that they’re just complete fucking weirdos. He’s been tweeting about this for the past day.

    Do you think it’s weird for a grown man to go stand in line and get an ice cream cone completely by himself? (No kids, no wife, no girlfriend, no friend group, no purchase for others, just a cone for himself.)

    — Clay Travis (@ClayTravis) February 27, 2024

    Guess who decided to chime in!

    The most normal dudes, thinking about normal stuff pic.twitter.com/TgHcLuGkon

    — Justin Baragona (@justinbaragona) February 27, 2024

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

82 more replies

Participants

Avatar for playitagainrowlf Avatar for jeffgee1 Avatar for progress Avatar for dont Avatar for arrendis Avatar for tacoma Avatar for lastroth Avatar for stradivarius50t3 Avatar for left_in_washington_state Avatar for moreyampersand Avatar for ronbyers Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for darrtown Avatar for jinnj Avatar for jonney_5 Avatar for birdford Avatar for coimmigrant Avatar for counterlife Avatar for bcgister Avatar for jackofalltirades Avatar for atreat Avatar for rogerhead Avatar for carpe_diem Avatar for john_adams

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: