‘I Don’t Want to Be Here Anymore’: They Tried to Self-Deport, Then Got Stranded in Trump’s America

This article first appeared at Propublica, a Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative newsroom. Sign up for The Big Story newsletter to receive stories like this one in your inbox.

She desperately wanted to get out of the country.

It was mid-May and Pérez, a Venezuelan mother of two, couldn’t survive on her own in Chicago anymore. She’d been relying on charity for food and shelter ever since her partner had been detained by immigration authorities after a traffic stop earlier in the year.

Pérez, 25, thought it’d be safer to return to Venezuela with her children than to stay in the U.S. Her request for asylum was still open and she had a permit to work legally, but so did a lot of other Venezuelans getting picked up on the streets and taken into custody. Authorities were detaining immigrants regardless of whether they’d followed the rules.

She had also seen how President Donald Trump singled out her countrymen, calling them gang members and terrorists, even sending hundreds to a foreign prison. She was terrified of getting detained, deported and, worst of all, separated from her young daughter and son. They were the reason the family had come to the U.S.

Then she heard about Trump’s offer of a safe and dignified way out.

“We are making it as easy as possible for illegal aliens to leave America,” the president said in a video on social media in May announcing the launch of Project Homecoming.

He spoke about a phone app where “illegals can book a free flight to any foreign country.” And he dangled other incentives: Eligible immigrants wouldn’t be barred from returning legally to the U.S. someday, and they’d even get a $1,000 “exit bonus.” Believing the president’s words, Pérez downloaded the CBP Home app and registered to return to Venezuela with her children.

Months passed. Her partner was deported. In July, Pérez said, she got a call from someone in the CBP Home program telling her she’d be on a flight out of the country in mid-August. She began packing.

But as the departure date neared and the plane tickets hadn’t arrived, Pérez got nervous. Again and again, she called the toll-free number she’d been given. Finally, somebody called back to say there might be a delay obtaining the documents she’d need to travel to Venezuela.

Then there was silence. No further information, no plane tickets. Pérez registered on the app again in August, then a third time in September, as immigration arrests ramped up in Chicago.

Today, Pérez feels trapped in a country that doesn’t want her. She’s afraid of leaving her apartment, afraid that she will be detained and that her children will be taken away from her. “I feel so scared, always looking around in every direction,” she said. “I was trying to leave voluntarily, like the president said.”

The Trump administration’s immigration crackdown is having the intended effect of terrifying people into trying to leave. There have been some 25,000 departures of immigrants from all countries via CBP Home, according to U.S. Department of Homeland Security data obtained by ProPublica.

The data indicates that of those 25,000 people, a little more than half of them returned home with DHS assistance; nearly all the others who left the U.S. ended up returning on their own.

And it’s not just CBP Home. Applications for voluntary departures — an alternative to deportation granted to some immigrants who leave at their own expense — have skyrocketed to levels not seen since at least 2000, reaching more than 34,000 since Trump’s second administration began, immigration court data shows. (The number is higher than in years past, but nowhere near the number of immigrants the administration has deported this year.)

But for many recent arrivals from Venezuela — arguably the community most targeted by the Trump administration, and whose country is now bracing for the possibility of a U.S. invasion — leaving has not been as simple as the president has made it sound.

ProPublica spoke with more than a dozen Venezuelans who said they wanted to take the U.S. government’s offer of a safe and easy return. They signed up months ago on the CBP Home app and were given departure dates. But after those dates came and went, these immigrants said they feel betrayed by what the president told them.

Part of the problem is tied to the lack of diplomatic relations between Washington and Caracas. There are no consular services for Venezuelans in the U.S. Many of the hundreds of thousands of Venezuelans who migrated to the U.S. in recent years seeking asylum or other humanitarian relief entered without valid passports, as Pérez did. But to get on a plane for Venezuela, they’re being told they’ll need a special travel document known as a “salvoconducto,” or “safe passage,” from their government.

And relations between the two countries are getting worse. The Trump administration has pushed for regime change in Venezuela, sent warships to the Caribbean and, in recent weeks, blew up four Venezuelan boats it claimed were transporting drugs to the U.S. Bracing for an invasion, Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro has said he’s ready to declare a state of emergency to protect his country, which could make it harder for Venezuelans abroad to return home.

The Venezuelans who want to leave the U.S. described how CBP Home representatives told them that their lack of passports wouldn’t be a problem and that the U.S. government would help them obtain the travel documents they needed. Now they are being told that they’re on their own — if they get any response at all.

The Trump administration was aware of the potential challenges from the start. In his May proclamation, the president directed the State and Homeland Security departments to “take all appropriate actions to enable the rapid departure of illegal aliens from the United States who currently lack a valid travel document from their countries of citizenship or nationality.”

In a statement, a DHS spokesperson said the agency is working with the State Department “to acquire travel documents for those who lack safe passage. So far thousands of Venezuelans have already self-departed using CBP Home.” The State Department referred questions to DHS.

The internal DHS records obtained by ProPublica show nearly 3,700 departures of Venezuelans via CBP Home through late September. It’s unclear how many Venezuelans have applied. The DHS spokesperson said the agency could not confirm the numbers and would not say whether the program is meeting projections. (A congressional committee has directed DHS to include information about CBP Home departures in monthly reports the agency previously published, but has not published in this administration.)

An estimated 10,200 Venezuelans were deported between February and early October, according to deportation flight data tracked by the nonprofit Human Rights First’s ICE Flight Monitor.

Many of the Venezuelans interviewed by ProPublica are mothers of young children who say they decided to take the president’s offer after their work permits expired, their temporary protected status was canceled or their spouses were deported. Few are willing to return by land because of the dangers posed by cartel violence and kidnappings in Mexico — dangers many of them experienced when they migrated here.

Nearly all of them, like Pérez, asked not to be identified by their full names because they’re afraid of bringing unwanted attention to themselves and of the potential consequences of such attention. Interviews with Venezuelan immigrants were conducted in Spanish.

Before their departure dates came and went, they had made preparations to leave — turning over the keys to their apartments, pulling their children from school, shipping their belongings to Venezuela. And they have sunk deeper into poverty as the weeks and months pass.

Pérez applied for her family to return to Venezuela through the CBP Home app months ago but has been stuck in limbo in Chicago without a clear path forward. Credit: Jamie Kelter Davis for ProPublica

Pérez applied for her family to return to Venezuela through the CBP Home app months ago but has been stuck in limbo in Chicago without a clear path forward. Credit: Jamie Kelter Davis for ProPublica

In Los Angeles, a family of four slept in their tiny Toyota Echo for weeks to save on rent as they waited for their departure date. They sold the car and other belongings to pay for bus tickets back the way they’d come. Nearly two months after their return to Venezuela, they said they’re still waiting for the exit bonuses they’d hoped would help them start over.

In Youngstown, Pennsylvania, a mother of two said she didn’t enroll her 8-year-old son in school this fall because she assumed they would be gone by now. She recently moved into a friend’s apartment in New York City and plans to turn herself in to immigration authorities and ask to be deported.

“I don’t want to be here anymore,” the woman said, between sobs. “What am I supposed to do?”

Several immigration attorneys and advocates told ProPublica that they don’t trust the CBP Home app or the Trump administration’s promises to help immigrants self-deport. The National Immigration Law Center recently published a guide explaining some of the potential risks of using the app, such as leaving the country without closing an immigration court case and becoming ineligible for a future visa. Some lawyers said they discourage clients from using the app at all.

Emily, a Venezuelan immigrant in Columbus, Ohio, holds her phone showing an email from the CBP Home program. Credit: Maddie McGarvey for ProPublica

Ruben Garcia, director of Annunciation House, a nonprofit in El Paso that supports migrants and refugees, said in the current climate, he understands why some people might consider the administration’s offer to leave. But, he said, the offer has to be backed by action.

“If you’re going to say you’re going to do this,” Garcia added, “then you damn well better make sure that it’s truthful and that it works.”


CBP Home replaced an earlier app that the Biden administration had promoted to try to bring order to the soaring numbers of migrants attempting to enter the country. Pérez and other asylum-seekers used that earlier version, CBP One, to make appointments to approach the border. Trump, who campaigned on the promise of mass deportations, ended that option on his first day back in the White House.

In March, he reintroduced the app with the new name and function, allowing immigrants to alert the government of their intention to self-deport. It was part of a $200 million advertising blitz meant to encourage immigrants to “Stay Out and Leave Now.” Two months later, Trump unveiled Project Homecoming and the added incentives of free flights and exit payments. The administration moved State Department funds meant to aid refugees resettling in the U.S. to DHS to help pay for the flights and stipends, according to federal records and newsreports.

DHS officials have mentioned the app in dozens of press releases about policy changes and enforcement operations. For example, in the September announcement that DHS was ending temporary protected status for Venezuelans, officials also encouraged Venezuelans to leave via CBP Home. And immigrants who show up for their hearings at immigration court see posters taped on the walls about the benefits they could get if they “self-deport using CBP Home instead of being deported by ICE.”

Emily and Deybis downloaded the app in June, when it seemed as if their life in the U.S. was collapsing. They said they used the earlier CBP One app to approach the border with their two children in January 2024 and were allowed into the country with protections that were supposed to last two years. They settled in Dallas, applied for asylum and got work permits; Deybis found a job in a hotel laundry and Emily at a Chick-fil-A. Then, this spring, the Trump administration ended protections for immigrants like them and canceled their work permits.

They lost their jobs and could no longer afford their rent. On the app’s sky-blue home screen, they saw a drawing of a smiling man and woman holding hands with a child. “Let us help you easily leave the country,” another screen told them in Spanish. They agreed to share their phone’s geolocation, entered personal information and uploaded selfies.

They received an automated email from “Project Homecoming Support” explaining that they would be contacted soon by someone from a toll-free number who would help coordinate their travel. Within weeks, they got a call from an operator at that number who said she worked on behalf of DHS.

Emily said she made clear the family didn’t have Venezuelan passports but was told that wouldn’t be a problem; the U.S. government would procure any necessary documents for them. They said the operator gave them an Aug. 1 departure date and told them to expect their plane tickets by email.

Emily and Deybis share a basement apartment in Columbus, Ohio with their two children. They’re unable to work and have resorted to selling the few possessions they have to feed the family. Credit: Maddie McGarvey for ProPublica

Emily and Deybis share a basement apartment in Columbus, Ohio with their two children. They’re unable to work and have resorted to selling the few possessions they have to feed the family. Credit: Maddie McGarvey for ProPublica

Emily and Deybis sold their car and moved with their children to Columbus, Ohio, where Deybis’ nephew let them stay in his unfinished basement apartment until their departure. The plane tickets never came.

Then the nephew was detained in a traffic stop and deported. Panicked, Emily and Deybis said they called the toll-free number again and again, leaving messages that went unanswered. Emily submitted a new application and sent more emails.

In mid-September, they got an email from the “CBP Home team” telling them to contact the Venezuelan embassy in Mexico to get travel documents on their own.

“We are working very hard on your case,” the email assured.

When they called the embassy, though, the number was busy. They found travel agencies that offer to procure travel documents at a cost but said they were told the Venezuelan government requires an arrival date and proof that plane tickets have been purchased. Emily and Deybis can’t afford them.

“Thank you so much for your patience and we understand your frustration,” they heard back in another email. “Wait for new instructions from DHS.”

As they wait, they worry about how they’ll survive when winter comes. Most days, Deybis visits local food pantries and looks for discarded items in alleys and on street corners that they can resell. A few weeks ago, they sold their daughter’s bed to help pay the rent.

“We’d rather be in Venezuela with our family than suffer here,” he said.


Pérez said her daughter was the family’s main motivation to come; the girl had been born with a heart defect and needed surgery they could not find in Venezuela, where hospitals operate through power outages and have limited capacity for advanced surgeries, not to mention supplies.

“We didn’t come for the American dream, or for a house, or for some life of luxury,” said Pérez. “What we wanted is for our daughter to live.”

She and her partner made the trek to the U.S. in 2023, with her daughter, then 6, and their 4-year-old son. Pérez thought they did it “the right away” by waiting in Mexico for weeks until they got an appointment to approach the border via CBP One. After they were processed, the family headed to Chicago, a city they had heard was a sanctuary for immigrants. At first they took shelter inside a police station, as hundreds of new immigrant families were doing at the time. Pérez said medical workers who visited the station learned about her daughter’s condition and connected the family to a hospital charity care program. The following spring, the frail little girl with dark brown eyes got the operation she needed.

In late 2024, the family moved to South Florida, where Pérez’s partner found work rebuilding homes damaged by hurricanes. Then in February, he was arrested for driving without a license or registration. He spent about two months in jail before he was transferred into immigration custody.

Pérez didn’t feel safe in Florida anymore. She returned to Chicago with her children.

But as the months pass without an answer from the CBP Home program, Chicago doesn’t feel safe, either. This fall, the Trump administration zeroed in on the city for immigration enforcement, sending in the U.S. Border Patrol. Pérez recently downloaded another app that tells her whether there’ve been sightings of federal immigration agents nearby, and she watches videos of other immigrants getting arrested. One day in September, a federal agent shot and killed an immigrant in a nearby suburb. Pérez wonders if she might die, too.

On a sunny September afternoon, Pérez peered down the street outside her children’s school, scanning for suspicious vehicles. Her daughter, who is now 8, bounded down the steps first, wearing a pink bow and a broad smile. Her son, now 6, in a Spiderman shirt and a blue cast from a playground accident, appeared next.

They share their mother’s anxiety. On their walk home, Pérez’s daughter leaned over her brother and chided him for speaking Spanish in public. The girl said her teacher had warned her that federal agents might be listening.

It reminded Perez that she now needs to leave the U.S. for the same reason she came: her children. She plans to register yet again on the CBP Home app.

Pérez plays with her two children in Chicago. Her partner was deported earlier this summer, leaving her unable to support the family alone. Credit: Jamie Kelter Davis for ProPublica

Jeff Ernsthausen contributed data analysis.

One Appeals Court Gave Us a Taste of the Deference Trumpified Courts Want to Give the President

District judges, including those appointed by President Trump, have been remarkably scrupulous despite overwhelming pressure to accept the administration’s claims that various blue cities are war-torn, burning, deadly. 

Continue reading “One Appeals Court Gave Us a Taste of the Deference Trumpified Courts Want to Give the President”

‘Mass Layoffs’ Update

Here’s an update on Russ Vought’s “mass layoffs,” following through on the threats he and Trump made in advance of the shutdown. From what I can tell, this seems to be a version of what we described yesterday: a comparatively small number of layoffs aimed mainly at allowing the White House to say it followed through on its threat (call it counter-TACO praxis) and tightly focused on a few agencies or departments President Trump is personally aggrieved at. The most concrete number I’ve seen refers to 4,200 employees across seven departments and agencies. That’s a big deal for the people losing their jobs. It’s also a very small number compared to what we saw in the spring. The New York Post suggests (famous last words, I know) that as many as a third of those layoffs may come from the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), which has been a focus of Trump’s anger since 2021 when its then-director Chris Krebs disputed Trump’s claims of cyber-election hacking in the 2020 election. I’ve gotten more concrete reports that at least a quarter of these firings are at the CDC alone, focused on core public health work. STAT News reports that almost the entire staff of the CDC’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report have been fired. (That is essentially the publication that the CDC uses to communicate the latest information on disease circulation in the country.) Other targeted offices seem tied to clean energy projects and other bêtes noir. As one source put it, these are not ‘reductions in force’. They are ideological firings targeting specific offices and parts of the government Trump has long been mad at.

Continue reading “‘Mass Layoffs’ Update”

For the Trump Administration, The Enemy is Everywhere

Hello it’s the weekend. This is The Weekender ☕️

The Crisis Factory

The White House on Thursday held a roundtable that brought together the national leadership of federal law enforcement agencies with a group of right-wing Youtube streamers and social media influencers. The topic was Antifa, and the mood was a mix of aggression and paranoia.

“I’m attacked every time I do my job. When I leave my house to go to work, I’m violently assaulted,” said Cam Higby, a Turning Point USA staffer. “I’ve had guns pulled on me. I’ve been bear-sprayed. I’ve been beaten down. I’ve been almost killed.”

Higby and others spent more than an hour discussing Antifa, its origins, and its supposed encroachment on nearly every aspect of American life. What it really demonstrated was the call-and-response dynamic that exists between extremely online far-right influencers and senior administration officials. 

Pro-Trump reporter Nick Sortor recounted being briefly detained by local law enforcement in Portland; Attorney General Pam Bondi replied that she and DOJ Civil Rights Division leader Harmeet Dhillon opened a “pattern and practice investigation” into the Portland PD in response. Trump asked Higby at one point to name the cable news network that treats Antifa opponents the worst; after Higby said MSNBC, Trump remarked that Comcast CEO Brian Roberts “allows that to happen.”

That dynamic carries through to the administration’s current attempt to fulfill plans that Trump has expressed since his 2016 presidential run: maximizing federal power to use as a cudgel against political opponents, trampling over safeguards that long prevented federal law enforcement and other functions from being used for partisan ends.

It still remains largely unnoticed by the mainstream press, but civil liberties advocates increasingly point to NSPM-7, a national security directive issued last month, as one of the administration’s most aggressive moves to clamp down on political opponents to date. It tells federal law enforcement and the Treasury Department to investigate and consider charging people who contribute to groups that express such common sentiments as “anti-Americanism, anti-capitalism, and anti-Christianity.”

As many have noted, it’s very difficult to pull off this kind of power grab in the absence of a true emergency. In the world that administration officials are trying to create, Antifa is that crisis — a threat so pressing that it justifies exceptional measures that give senior officials broad sway to pursue political opponents.

And yet the whole setup, as grave a threat as it may pose to civil liberties, remains very slapstick. At one point during the roundtable, Trump was asked if he was considering whether to suspend habeas corpus “to not only deal with these insurrectionists across the nation, but also to continue rapidly deporting illegal aliens.”

“Suspending who?” he replied, before handing it off to DHS Secretary Kristi Noem. She said she hadn’t been a part of any conversations about it.

— Josh Kovensky

Here is what else we have on tap.

  • Congressional Republicans are casting a coming “No Kings” protest as a “hate America rally.”
  • As the shutdown drags on, a handful of Republicans are wondering if they should just blow up the filibuster after all.
  • What Olympian Caster Semenya taught TPM’s publisher about the perils of “common sense.”

TPM is Turning 25! 

Join us at the Metrograph Theater in Manhattan on Thursday 11/6 for a live recording of the Josh Marshall Podcast Featuring Kate Riga and an oral history of TPM with some esteemed alums.

Weekender subscribers can get 33% OFF ticket prices using discount code WEEKENDER at this link

To Republicans, All Liberal Protesters Are Terrorists Now

It’s gotten lost amid the escalation of state violence, but the Republican conflation of “protester” and “terrorist” from what was recently thought of as a more responsible wing of the party has caught my attention. 

Both Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) and Rep. Tom Emmer (R-MN) — the latter of whom never made gains in the speakership race to replace Kevin McCarthy because he condemned the Jan. 6 insurrecxtion — have referred to the No Kings protest scheduled for 10/18 as a “hate America rally.” 

Johnson said that “pro-Hamas” people and “antifa” would be in attendance, while Emmer thundered that it would appease the “terrorist wing” of the Democratic Party. 

At best, this kind of rhetoric is wildly irresponsible and a sign of how hostile to peaceful protesters the party has become. At worst, it’s an incitement of violence.

— Kate Riga

Some Republicans are Suddenly A Little Bit Anti-Filibuster

It’s day 11 of the government shutdown. There’s no resolution in sight to get Congress out of the deadlock and reopen the federal government.

On Friday federal workers received a partial paycheck for their work up until Oct. 1, when the shutdown began. Some workers, the administration promised, would be also receive notice that they had been laid off, a move one federal employees union has challenged in court. Members of the military are expected to miss their first paycheck on Oct. 15 if Republicans don’t act. 

Meanwhile, a couple of congressional Republicans — including Sen. Bernie Moreno (R-OH) and Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) — have mused this week about ending the filibuster in order to pass the continuing resolution and temporarily fund the government without needing Senate Democrats’ votes.

“My point of view would be this: We have almost all Republicans on board,” Moreno told Fox News. “Maybe it’s time to think about the filibuster. You say look, the Democrats would have done it. Let’s just vote with Republicans. We got 52 Republicans. Let’s go. And let’s open the government. It may get to that.” 

Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) shot down that idea repeatedly this week. 

“Super-majority requirement is something that makes the Senate the Senate,” Thune said at a Friday news conference. “And honestly, if we had done that, there’s a whole lot of bad things that could have been done by the other side. The 60-vote threshold has protected this country.” 

Thune added the filibuster has been “a voice for the minority.”

House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) seems to agree with that sentiment.

“Is it possible? Yes … Is it wise? A lot of people would tell you it’s not,” Johnson told reporters this week. “I mean, on the Republican side, I would be deeply concerned if the Democrats had a bare majority in the Senate right now.”

Meanwhile, congressional Democrats continue to hold the line, reiterating their main ask — that Obamacare subsidies, which are set to expire at the end of the year, be extended — on a daily basis and condemning Republicans for not coming to the negotiating table.

“Donald Trump’s strategy during this government shutdown that he has created has been to play golf and issue deepfake videos,” House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) said during his Friday press conference. “Mike Johnson’s strategy is to keep House Republicans on vacation. John Thune’s strategy is to continue to do the same partisan thing over and over and over again and expect different results. That’s legislative insanity.”

— Emine Yücel

Caster Semenya and the Illusion of Common Sense

In 2019, Olympic gold medalist Caster Semenya was banned from international track and field competitions. The ban stems from her refusal to take medicine that would artificially lower her hormone levels to those more commonly found in women. The new regulations had been announced by the International Association of Athletics Federations in April of 2018. Semenya announced in June of 2018 that she would file a legal challenge to the rules.

The ban effectively ended Semenya’s career. 

This month, in an email to the Associated Press, Semenya’s attorney said that she would be ending her legal fight. Now 34, the 2012 and 2016 Olympic gold medalist has shifted from athlete to coach. Though Semenya never got the outcome she hoped for, she goes out on something of a high note. In July, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that Semenya had not gotten a fair hearing in a previous court proceeding.

Semenya’s story is long and complicated, and I don’t have the space to chronicle the entire thing. But here are the facts: She and her family have maintained since the very beginning that she was born a woman and that her birth certificate says she is a woman. She has never identified as anything else. She has eschewed the label intersex. In a 2023 New York Times essay that I strongly encourage everyone to read, she said:

I know I look like a man. I know I sound like a man and maybe even walk like a man and dress like one, too. But I’m not a man; I’m a woman. Playing sports and having muscles and a deep voice make me less feminine, yes. I’m a different kind of woman, I know, but I’m still a woman.

Semenya says that she found out during a medical exam when she was 18 years old that she had XY chromosomes, as opposed to the typically female XX, and elevated levels of testosterone due to undescended testis that she didn’t know she had. She was told that in order to compete she could have surgery to remove the testis, or she could take estrogen pills to lower the testosterone. She took the pills for a while to compete, but upon learning of another athlete — Indian runner Dutee Chand — who had challenged the rule in court and won, Semenya threw her pills in the trash. The IAAF then came back with even more strict regulations — requiring a testosterone level even lower than the one she previously struggled to meet.

I first learned about Caster Semenya from a 2009 article in The New Yorker. In the article, Ariel Levy lays out Semenya’s story at the intersection of race and gender political issues. As a Black South African, Semenya and those close to her are no strangers to Europeans coming in and trying to explain how biology supposedly works. Apartheid-era census takers often told people they were a different race than they had previously believed themselves to be. As Levy writes: 

In 1985, according to the census, more than a thousand people somehow changed race: nineteen whites turned Colored (as South Africans call people of mixed heritage); seven hundred and two Coloreds turned white, fifty Indians turned Colored, eleven Colored turned Chinese, and so on. (No blacks turned white, or vice versa.)

This article had a profound effect on how I, then 21 years old, viewed the world. I’d never encountered anyone like Semenya before. Race as a social construct? Sure, of course. This was established. But biological sex being anything other than binary was new to me. It forced me to rethink how I organized and understood the world. It’s not as nice and neat as I thought. There’s a lot of gray. Things are fuzzy. As we learn more about how things work, the divisions that seem so obvious or common-sensical fade away and are replaced by spectrums. It’s often said there are no straight lines in nature. Well, there are also very few discrete distinctions. 

These lessons are intrinsic, too, to our politics and the way in which we organize society. Again, Semenya is not a trans person, though it’s impossible not to view the fight over trans rights as related. Both deal with a government or aspects of a government, attempting to codify biological terms according to “common sense” understandings. I think in many ways what people like Semenya and what trans people help us to consider is the possibility that our conceptual understanding of a very basic building block in our construction of society — gender and sex identity — is not terribly sound. And if that foundational pillar crumbles, what’s next?

These sorts of conceptual revolutions happen from time to time. People get pretty mad because they don’t like change. Just when you think you have a grip on things, someone comes along and says that, actually, the Earth rotates around the sun, not vice versa. Some people who illuminate these truths for the rest of us are made to suffer by those who’ve grown comfortable in the darkness. Caster Semenya is one of those people, and it makes me sad. But she changed the whole course of my life — and so the least I could do as her career as an athlete comes to a close is pass her story along.

— Joe Ragazzo

New Mass Layoffs?

You’ve probably seen that Russ Vought went on Twitter today and said “the RIFS [government speak for permanent layoffs] have begun.” Obviously, I can’t know directly what this means or what they’re doing. But since I’ve written about this a few times, I thought I should share my reaction. I remain skeptical that this is actually happening in a substantial way.

It could totally be happening. But I think the driver here is that Trump was getting hit increasingly hard for having flinched on this threat. And as of yesterday, they started backing off on the threat not to pay backpay to federal workers. So I think the press about this was getting to the White House and both angering Trump and making them look like they’re flailing. I would say I’m certain that this is why they’re doing this (reaction to that bad press). The only question is whether they’re actually going to follow through to really undo that impression.

Continue reading “New Mass Layoffs?”

Stephen Miller Has ‘Central Role’ Probing Liberal Groups

A lot of things happened. Here are some of the things. This is TPM’s Morning Memo. Sign up for the email version.

Criminalizing Political Opposition in America

White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller is “playing a central role” in the Trump administration’s lawless investigation of liberal groups and their finances, White House officials told Reuters:

Miller is taking a “hands-on” role in investigating the funding of nonprofits and educational institutions and is sharing recommendations from Attorney General Pam Bondi and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent with Trump and other top advisers, the first White House official said.

The official said Miller is Trump’s chief adviser on the issue and is receiving regular updates from the joint terrorism task force – a coalition of federal, state and local law enforcement agencies tasked with investigating terrorism.

As TPM’s Josh Kovensky reported earlier this week, the threat of baseless federal investigations under the spurious umbrella of “domestic terrorism” is already having an effect on advocacy groups exercising their First Amendment rights.

Stephen Miller’s Hit List

The White House provided Reuters with a list of “liberal groups, donors or fundraising organizations that it said helped finance or plan protests where the violent incidents occurred”:

  • George Soros’ Open Society Foundations
  • ActBlue
  • Indivisible
  • Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights
  • IfNotNow
  • Jewish Voice for Peace

One White House official “stressed that the organizations were not necessarily potential targets,” Reuters reported.

President Trump has previously targeted Soros and Reid Hoffman by name.

Bonkers Antifa Meeting at the White House

As part of targeting political opposition groups for investigation, the Trump White House held an anti-antifa themed meeting this week that really was bonkers, as the Independent captures well: “Trump just hosted an ‘Antifa roundtable’ at the White House. It was so much worse than you’re imagining”

Trump Gets His Letitia James Indictment

The lawless indictment of Letitia James was so highly anticipated that the event itself seemed anticlimactic, which is one of the challenges of our time.

After the president threatens the target for years, campaigns for re-election on exacting retribution against the target, orders an indictment of the target, ousts a prosecutor for not following orders, and installs his supine personal lawyer as prosecutor, then there’s an air of inevitability about the subsequent indictment.

But as Garrett Graff noted this week before the James indictment, that is the problem: “The fact that it’s possible to predict the next target — presidential rantings indicate that it could be John Bolton, Letitia James or Adam Schiff — shows how corrupted this usually independent process has become.”

Magistrate Judge Rejects End-Run Indictment

A remarkable ruling by Magistrate Zia Faruqui in D.C. rejected a Trump DOJ effort to do an end-run around a federal grand jury that had already declined to issue an indictment in an assault and weapons case.

Faruqui had called out DOJ attorneys immediately when they went to a D.C. Superior Court grand jury, secured an indictment there, and then tried to present it in federal court, but he ordered briefing before issuing a ruling. In the meantime, DOJ ran to Chief Judge James Boasberg and asked him to overrule Faruqui, but Boasberg declined to intervene prior to the briefing and an actual ruling from Faruqui.

Faruqui ruled Thursday, and it was a doozy:

Between the year 2005 and today, over 5,000 indictments were returned in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Last week, the government attempted—for the first time ever—to return an indictment from a D.C. Superior Court grand jury after a federal grand jury previously refused to indict. This unprecedented workaround to the normal federal grand jury process immediately raised serious questions about the legality of the government’s conduct.

From there, Faruqui conducted his legal analysis, but not without dropping a few pointed barbs at the Trump DOJ:

The unprecedented number of recent federal grand jury rejections—a trend that appears to be spreading as most recently seen in Chicago—reflects that federal grand juries want more than the government is offering.

Faruqui — who has been at the leading edge of scrutinizing Trump DOJ conduct, including overcharging criminal cases in D.C. federal court — wasn’t done yet:

Under their view, the government could take all federal indictments to D.C. Superior Court without any limitations. That outcome is something to be especially vigilant against given the recent struggles of the government to bend federal grand juries to the government’s will.

Faruqui’s conclusion was withering (emphasis his):

This litigation and the delay caused by it could have been avoided if the government had simply gone to one of the other federal grand juries. That escape hatch remains open today. At any time, the government can short circuit this dispute by taking their federal charge before a federal grand jury. The question then is why are they now afraid to do so?

DOJ is likely to appeal to Boasberg again. Stay tuned.

A Mixed Bag From Courts on National Guard Deployments

Federal courts offered conflicting signals Thursday over whether they will rein in Trump’s National Guard deployments to blue states:

  • Oregon: 9th Circuit judges reviewing Trump’s Portland deployment “enthusiastically support his ability to deploy military anywhere at any time,” TPM’s Kate Riga reports.
  • Illinois: U.S. District Judge April M. Perry issued a temporary restraining order blocking Trump’s deployment of the National Guard in the Chicago area.

Quote of the Day

“Oklahomans would lose their mind if Pritzker in Illinois sent troops down to Oklahoma during the Biden administration.” –Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Stitt, the chairman of the National Governors Association

Only The Best People

Not skeevy at all, via Politico:

In late July, Paul Ingrassia, the White House liaison for the Department of Homeland Security, arrived at a Ritz-Carlton in Orlando with a lower-ranking female colleague and others from their department. When the group reached the front desk, the woman learned she didn’t have a hotel room.

Ingrassia then informed her that she would be staying with him, according to five administration officials familiar with the episode. Eventually the woman discovered that Ingrassia had arranged ahead of time to have her hotel room canceled so she would have to stay with him, three of those officials said.

Ingrassia’s attorney confirmed the two shared a room but denied that any last-minute change was made to the hotel reservation or that any “inappropriate behavior” took place.

Making Sense of the Israel-Gaza Deal

Aaron David Miller is as astute and reliable a Middle East observer as we have, and his interview this week in the New Yorker on how and why a ceasefire deal finally came together is the best expert analysis I’ve seen.

‘Starving Children Screaming for Food’

I feel some measure of remorse for not mentioning every damn day the unfolding disaster of Trump’s lawless foreign aid cuts. Just a couple of examples from this week:

  • AP: Starving children screaming for food as US aid cuts unleash devastation and death across Myanma
  • WaPo: U.S. aid cuts are being felt across Africa. Here’s where.

Help Us Celebrate TPM’s 25th Anniversary!

Unbelievably, TPM turns 25 next month.

Born as a blog in the cauldron of the 2000 Florida recount, reinvented in the aughts as a digital news site, reimagined in the teens as a membership-based business model, and chugging through the ’20s in the best financial shape it’s ever been in, TPM has evolved together with you through an incredibly tumultuous time in U.S. politics and publishing.

It’s a lot for us to celebrate as a company, as a team, and as a community. To mark the occasion, we have a two-day extravaganza planned in NYC for Nov. 6-7. Tickets for both nights are on sale now.

I sincerely hope Morning Memo readers can join us for the big celebration. Some of you have been along for the entire 25-year ride, but a significant share of Morning Memo readers have come aboard more recently during the crucible of the Trump II presidency. To make newcomers feel more welcome and open the doors to the TPM community as widely as possible, I’m offering Morning Memo readers a special rate for tickets to the live show on Thursday, Nov. 6. Use the code “MorningMemo” at checkout and get 33% off. Click here now to get your live show tickets.

I hope to see you at either the live show or the big party the next night — or BOTH! Please say hi and let me know you’re a Morning Memo reader.

Do you like Morning Memo? Let us know!

Trump Meets a Friendly Audience in Court as He Seeks To Deploy Military Wherever He Wants

Thursday saw dueling hearings related to President Trump’s push to deploy National Guard troops in blue states that don’t want them there. 

Continue reading “Trump Meets a Friendly Audience in Court as He Seeks To Deploy Military Wherever He Wants”

War Zone Coverage

We’ve always been very cautious about doing any reporting from war zones. But here’s a report from TPM Reader TB

I am assuming (or hoping) that TPM has received reports from others here in Portland regarding the huge gulf between the way the Administration is describing things and what is happening in reality. Either way, I feel compelled to share my observations because I am completely flabbergasted that the Administration continues to so blatantly manufacture this “warzone” imagery. I’m used to the hyperbole they use, but this goes so far beyond hyperbole, I can barely find the words.

Continue reading “War Zone Coverage”

9th Circuit Trump Judges Enthusiastically Support His Ability To Deploy Military Anywhere At Any Time

9th Circuit Judge Ryan Nelson argued so vehemently Thursday that President Trump has the power to deploy the National Guard into unwilling states on very little pretext that one suspects the arguments were doubling as his Supreme Court audition. 

Continue reading “9th Circuit Trump Judges Enthusiastically Support His Ability To Deploy Military Anywhere At Any Time”