Personalism and War: What’s Up With Trump and Iran?

The U.S. and Iran have drifted back into active combat and President Trump is on Truth Social promising again to rain destruction down on the country and now more explicitly promising the outcome which triggered this conflict in the first place: the idea that Trump would duplicate in Iran what he has, kind of amazingly, pulled off so far in Venezuela. It’s a good moment to remember what’s going on here — what we’re doing here, big picture.

This war has been going on for almost four months. But most of that time has been under one or another kind of ceasefire, albeit often honored in the breach. A friend recently compared it to the so-called “Phoney War”, the eight-month period in 1939 and 1940 when Germany, France and Britain were nominally at war, though full-scale combat didn’t begin until the invasion of France in May 1940.

Continue reading “Personalism and War: What’s Up With Trump and Iran?”

Brunson

I’m not a huge basketball fan. A casual one, mostly. But it’s become more central to my sports interests over the years. When I was a kid, baseball and football were the only sports and baseball was … well, baseball. What else was there to say? At least in our home that’s how it was. But I’ve been pulled in the same way as the whole society has by the rise of American basketball over the course of my lifetime. And I’ve been pulled hard into Knicks’ destiny run. You’ll see other commentary about last night’s game, literally the biggest comeback in NBA playoff history. But I wanted to share one moment with you, one that came after the game when Knicks captain Jalen Brunson went on ESPN’s Inside the NBA post-game show.

Continue reading “Brunson”

The Broadview Six Fallout Spreads to Other Cases

‘A Credibility Crisis’

The prosecutorial misconduct with the grand jury in the Broadview Six case is threatening otherwise unrelated cases handled by the same prosecutor, Sheri Mecklenburg.

In a move that is likely to bring even more scrutiny to U.S. Attorney Andrew Boutros’ office, U.S. District Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman of Chicago scheduled an evidentiary hearing for June 17 over alleged grand jury misconduct by Mecklenburg in a high-profile COVID-testing fraud case.

Defense lawyers allege that Mecklenburg vouched for the evidence, disclosed off-the-record negotiations with a defense attorney, and used “inflammatory characterizations of the defendants, including name-calling and folk-wisdom metaphors.”

Coleman opened the door to the defense counsel calling witnesses at the hearing, including potentially Boutros himself, the Sun-Times reports:

The judge also told [Assistant U.S. Attorney Diane MacArthur] there are “a lot of people in your sphere that I’m assuming are going to be asked to come testify, and you may want to avoid that.” The judge didn’t say out loud how MacArthur could avoid it, but she said MacArthur knows what to do.

The judge’s apparent implication was that the prosecutors would do well to dismiss the tainted case.

The Chicago Tribune put it all in a uniquely Chicago context:

If the evidentiary hearing goes forward, it would be the most significant inquiry into potential prosecutorial misconduct by the U.S. attorney’s office since the mid-1990s, when a trio of judges concluded that Assistant U.S. Attorney William Hogan and others had improperly given favors — including conjugal visits in government offices — to cooperators against leaders of the violent El Rukn street gang.

More than 30 years later, Hogan is at the center of the Broadview Six controversy after taking over the case in February when Mecklenburg left the office for a job in Washington, D.C.

By his own admission, Hogan was responsible for the misleading redactions in the grand jury transcript in the Broadview Six case that so infuriated U.S. District Judge April Perry and has her considering sanctions.

In a separate case this week, lawyers for a man serving a three-year prison sentence for bank fraud asked U.S. District Judge Mary Rowland to review the transcripts of his grand jury, which was also handled by Mecklenburg.

Judge Rowland agreed to review the transcripts, despite the man’s 2023 guilty plea: “The front office has created, as you know, a credibility crisis, and that is a real problem,” the judge told the prosecutor.

Judge Declines to Block Trump Slush Fund

U.S. District Judge Richard Leon of D.C. decided to take the Trump administration at its word (I know, but there’s at least a method to the madness) that the anti-weaponization slush fund is dead. After a brief hearing of less than 30 minutes, Leon ruled from the bench that if the slush fund is really dead then the case is moot and he has no jurisdiction to take action against it.

The ruling, while a win for the administration, came with a warning from Leon that it had now made representations to the court in writing and in arguments that he would hold it to.

After the hearing, I spoke with the lead attorney for the watchdog Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), which brought the lawsuit, and he acknowledged that one of the group’s goals was to get a ruling on mootness in order to box in the administration. After acting Attorney General Todd Blanche refused to commit in writing to Congress that the slush fund is dead, DOJ had to make that commitment in this case, and now Judge Leon can hold them to it.

Still, the biggest threat remains that the White House and DOJ will come up with a workaround, an alternative mechanism like the Federal Tort Claims Act, to pay off the Jan. 6 rioters and other Trump allies, a way of sidestepping the judge and their prior commitments not to proceed.

For more on the hearing:

David Kurtz goes live after hearing to block Trump’s slush fund by TPM

A recording from David Kurtz’s live video

Read on Substack

Quote of the Day

“Don’t play possum with this court.”—U.S. District Judge Richard Leon, warning the Trump DOJ that it better not just be pretending that the “Anti-Weaponization Fund” is dead

The Situation Room?

I struggle to get past the opening anecdote from this excerpt of the new book by NYT reporters Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan. Top administration officials used the Situation Room last summer for a meeting on containing the political fallout from the Epstein scandal — and, as if to demonstrate that the White House and Main Justice were no longer distinct entities, the upper ranks of DOJ participated in the meeting:

  • Attorney General Pam Bondi
  • FBI Director Kash Patel
  • Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche
  • Associate Attorney General Stanley Woodward Jr.
  • DOJ deputy chief of staff James Blair

Out of this meeting came Blanche’s infamous jailhouse interview of Ghislaine Maxwell.

The Retribution: The Banks

Another Trump grievance has come to forefront: Banks closing his accounts after the Jan. 6 coup attempt.

Trump signed an executive order back in August targeting the banks, and he and his family later filed suits against Capital One and JPMorgan Chase and its CEO Jamie Dimon.

Now, D.C. U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro has subpoenaed a slew of banks, including JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, and Wells Fargo, about whether they improperly closed customer accounts for political reasons, the WSJ reports.

Pirro reportedly launched her investigation on her own, without a referral from bank regulators, and is using the same two hand-picked prosecutors she assigned to the politically motivated investigation of the Federal Reserve and its then-chair Jay Powell.

The Retribution: Michigan Protestors

Trump DOJ is bringing unusual federal conspiracy charges against pro-Palestinian protestors with ties to the University of Michigan, raising the stakes in the administration’s push to criminalize dissent, opposition, and political views it disfavors.

The Corruption: Trump’s Crypto Craze

It’s tails Trump wins, and heads investors lose, according to a new analysis from Reuters:

A Reuters examination shows that the Trump family has used this template to generate at least $2.3 billion in profit from investors since Trump retook the presidency. On the other side of that cash bonanza for America’s first family: the more than a million investors whose net losses totaled $2.3 billion at the end of April, according to a Reuters analysis. 

On Morality and Voting

Brian Beutler chews over Graham Platner:

Voting, particularly in a two-party democracy, is about harm reduction. Even when candidates are inspiring and well-intentioned, voting is still about harm reduction, because politics is highly impure. Superpower politics are especially impure. Voting is utilitarian. It is not like flashing a gang sign. In a contest between a bad candidate and a worse one, voting for the bad candidate is like expressing the moral intuition that someone should amputate a gangrenous leg rather than allow the patient to die.

Boat Strikes Take an Even Darker Turn

Amanda Klasing, on last week’s revelation that targeting decisions in the lawless U.S. high-seas campaign against alleged drug-smuggling boats don’t factor in whether the boats are carrying drugs or arms:

The presence of drugs or arms on the targeted boats would not change the rights to due process and to life of people on board. It is, however, a baffling admission that this cruel and lethal program is targeting these boats based on criteria other than being in possession of the very items purported in the administration’s already unlawful and dubious justification.

Ebola Watch

Slate’s Jill Filipovic reports from Kenya: “The demise of USAID did not cause this Ebola outbreak. But it is a gift to Ebola. It likely delayed its detection and hampered efforts to deliver tests and treatment to the affected areas. It has broken down meticulously constructed networks of trust and generally slowed the response to the virus.”

Hot tips? Juicy scuttlebutt? Keen insights? Let me know. For sensitive information, use the encrypted methods here.

Trump Demonstrates His Willful Ignorance About How Basic Vote Counting Works

Trump Thinks He Is Changing Votes?

The “red mirage” has again tricked President Trump and his followers, who were already salivating for a 2026 election fraud conspiracy theory — ideally one in a blue or purple state — to catch on this midterms cycle.

“Tricked” is perhaps too generous a word here. Back in 2020, when President Trump was lying that the election had been stolen from him and riling up his supporters to spread conspiracy theories and baseless myths about rampant voter fraud in some key blue and purple parts of the country, much of Trump’s complaints about the results seemed to stem from him not understanding the “red mirage” effect common in modern elections. In 2020, Trump watched as late-counted ballots shifted his election night lead in a handful of swing states, leading Trump to believe that the counting was somehow rigged.

Studies have shown that the the counties that went for Joe Biden in 2020 tended to be urban ones, with more ballots to count and slower counting processes than counties that went for Trump. Mail-in ballots also tend to be counted later than Election Day ballots. Democratic voters tend to vote by mail more often than Republicans, who tend to vote in person on Election Day, in part because Trump has built a political brand out of claiming that mailed-in ballots are subject to fraud.

The trends create an effect where in recent elections it has appeared that Republicans are doing better early on on election night before things like mail-in ballots are tallied. Add into the mix the fact that California allows voters to vote-by-mail more extensively than other states — and has millions of votes to count — and you’ve got a normal situation ripe to be seized on by President Trump and his allies looking for a reason to begin spreading lies about midterms “fraud.”

In reality, Trump is just projecting his willfully ignorant ideas about election counting trends on to California after the primary saw Democratic socialist candidate and Los Angeles City Councilwoman Nithya Raman surpass washed up reality TV villain and Republican candidate Spencer Pratt for the number 2 spot in the LA mayoral primary race (California has a unique top-two primary system where the first and second place primary candidates advance no matter their political party).

But Trump’s online theorizing about supposed fraud in California’s mayoral and gubernatorial races exposes a fundamental misunderstanding of how counting and political trends in voting work, at best.

And his remarks in the Oval Office on Wednesday suggest something more sinister — or dumb.

Trump claimed that the reason California Republican gubernatorial candidate Steve Hilton secured enough votes to advance to the general election was because Trump started talking about his belief in rampant fraud in the state’s election.

“After a week, they determined that a kid who’s leading and had all the mojo, all of the sudden he doesn’t make the runoff, and then I hit them hard on that,” he said, referencing Pratt.

“I started talking about Steve Hilton who’s a fantastic guy and I saw them say it was going to be two weeks before they knew, and I started hitting them,” he said, “it’s going to happen to Steve Hilton.”

“And they approved Steve Hilton very quickly,” he concluded. “There was too much heat on them.”

His remarks seemed to suggest that his social media posts were in real time influencing how votes were counted. It also seemed confused about how race projections — carried out by the Associated Press and similar organizations — work.

Today’s remarks at best illustrate his delusion that all Republican losses in elections are the result of fraud … even in somewhere as blue as California. As worst, they demonstrate what we’ve had a window into since 2020: an attempt to confuse his followers about the mechanics of elections, regardless of his own beliefs, for his own personal gain.

— Nicole LaFond

SPLC Warns of Danger of Jan 6 Pardons

The Southern Poverty Law Center — the group that tracks far-right extremism and white supremacist activity in the United States and is currently being targeted by the Trump Justice Department — put out its annual Year in Hate & Extremism report this week. The group found that in the first year and a half of Trump’s second term, the Trump administration has radically shifted federal policy to “favor hard right, extremists.” The report frames Trump’s immigration enforcement and the threat it poses to minorities in America, plus his pardoning of Jan. 6 defendants and his weaponization of the Justice Department for his own political aims, as the pillars of the federal government’s shift toward extremism. Per SPLC:

The current partisan, skewed view of political violence, coupled with the promotion, normalization and mainstreaming of extremist and bigoted ideas, has led to a significant inflection point. Through its attempts to silence nonprofit organizations, ignore or downplay the very real threat of far-right and white supremacist extremist violence, and eliminate or misallocate violent extremism prevention resources, the Trump administration has created an environment that is less safe.

— Nicole LaFond

Americans Are Working More and Earning Less. But Trump ‘Love[s] the Inflation’

Americans started their day with yet another dismal economic snapshot and by lunchtime, they heard yet another flippant remark about it from the president.

The most headline grabbing news came when the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported inflation rose by more than 4% year over year for the first time since 2023. But buried in that data was the agency’s real earnings report, which showed what the headline inflation numbers actually mean. Americans earned 0.4% less money in May compared to that month last year in real average weekly earnings, defined as wage and salary inputs adjusted for inflation to reveal actual buying power. This decrease in income came after a 0.3% increase in the average workweek, which means that increasing the amount you work does not, on average, make up for the impact of inflation on your personal finances. 

Fuel oil and gasoline up a staggering 58.9% and 40.5% respectively. (Now’s a good time to issue a reminder that the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, which is causing these price spikes, had been predicted and was entirely preventable.) But it’s not like the price for other consumer goods is going down. Food was up 3.1% year over year, and, excluding energy, price inflation was up 2.9%, though by less than in March.

How did the president respond? “I love the inflation,” Trump told reporters in the Oval Office earlier today. “You know why? Because as soon as this war is over …,” Trump began before waxing poetic about an alleged U.S. scheme that he claimed removed 22 ships worth of oil from Iran, unbeknownst to Iran until that moment. 

Later, Trump finished his thought. “When the war’s over? It’s going to come down like a rock.”

— Layla A. Jones

In Case You Missed It

The latest from Kate Riga: A Beleaguered Graham Platner Retains Strength in Primary Showing

Morning Memo: What the Broadview Six Case Reveals About the Corrupt Trump DOJ

Trump Administration Killed Criminal Investigation of GOP Senator’s Coal Companies

School Officials Receive Death Threats for Standing up for Immigrants, Refuse to Back Down

ICYMI last night: Reps. Ralph Norman and Nancy Mace Lose to Trump’s Pick in South Carolina Governor Race

Josh Marshall: What Broadview Shoe Will Drop Next? (A Short Roundup of the Latest)

Yesterday’s Most Read Story

What the Pentagon’s Snub of Mormons Was Really All About

What We Are Reading

House Dems threaten to target WinRed as GOP probes ActBlue

Inside the White House Freakout Over the Epstein Files 

The right enters a post-proof era of election denial 

TPM VIDEO: David Kurtz Reports Live After Judge Declines to Block Trump Slush Fund

I attended an afternoon hearing Wednesday in D.C. federal court, where Judge Richard Leon declined to block President Trump’s $1.776 billion “Anti-Weaponization Fund” — but in a way that might actually have some teeth. I joined Executive Editor John Light on Substack Live after leaving the courtroom to talk about what went down and why it might be a pyrrhic victory for the administration.

Continue reading “TPM VIDEO: David Kurtz Reports Live After Judge Declines to Block Trump Slush Fund”

What Broadview Shoe Will Drop Next? (A Short Roundup of the Latest)

I want to share a few more thoughts about yesterday’s news out of the defunct Broadview Six case, specifically the all-but-unprecedented release of the transcript of the grand jury sessions from which the indictments came. This was always a case of wild over-charging at a minimum. And that raised the question of just how prosecutors managed to get the case through a grand jury, even with how low a bar that usually is. Well, now we know. They cheated. They wouldn’t take no for an answer.

As David Kurtz notes here, this case seemed fuzzier than most of the other Trump retribution prosecutions. While the indictments singled out a Democratic candidate and lawmaker and those closely associated with them, none of those were high-profile Trump “enemies” like Tish James or James Comey. The prosecutor who initially led the case showed no signs of being especially Trumpy. Defense attorneys tried from the beginning to pry free evidence of White House and/or DOJ interference or direction in bringing the case. But prosecutors said they looked and there was no communication about it. The judge accepted that statement at face value.

It was almost certainly false.

Continue reading “What Broadview Shoe Will Drop Next? (A Short Roundup of the Latest)”

Trump Administration Killed Criminal Investigation of GOP Senator’s Coal Companies

This article was originally published by ProPublica, a nonprofit newsroom that investigates abuses of power. Sign up to receive their biggest stories as soon as they’re published.

Trump administration officials earlier this year killed a federal criminal investigation into the coal empire owned by Sen. Jim Justice, a Republican from West Virginia and a close ally of the president’s.

The investigation examined potential criminal violations of the Clean Water Act by the multistate mining operations largely run by Justice’s son, Jay, according to current and former officials familiar with the matter.

The criminal probe was a significant escalation in the yearslong effort to police serial pollution offenses by Virginia-based Southern Coal and dozens of affiliated mining operations controlled by the family. In the past decade, Southern Coal and other Justice corporations have racked up tens of thousands of allegedviolations of the Clean Water Act and have been sued repeatedly by state and federal prosecutors over their failure to properly follow environmental laws at their mining sites.

The investigation shuttered by the Trump administration was a joint effort by prosecutors and investigators with the Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of Justice’s Environmental Crimes Section and the U.S. Attorney’s Office of the Western District of Virginia to probe whether the incessant violations of antipollution laws had risen to the level of criminal behavior, people familiar with the matter said.

Continue reading “Trump Administration Killed Criminal Investigation of GOP Senator’s Coal Companies”

So Far, a Beleaguered Graham Platner Retains Strength in Primary Showing 

While the outcome of Tuesday’s primary was never in doubt, the margin was; a mediocre showing against Maine Governor Janel Mills (D), who dropped out after running a begrudging campaign, would suggest that Democrat Graham Platner had taken on water from his recent stream of scandals.

As of Wednesday morning, with about 88% of the vote tabulated, there were no such warning signs. 

Continue reading “So Far, a Beleaguered Graham Platner Retains Strength in Primary Showing “

What the Broadview Six Case Reveals About the Corrupt Trump DOJ

A Taxonomy of Trump DOJ Corruption

Shortly after the 2024 election, I offered a framework for making sense of the coming chaos, dividing Trump’s transgressions among what I called the three horsemen of the Trump II apocalypse: retribution, corruption, and destruction.

That has proven in the subsequent months to be a durable framework, not perfect, but generally reliable. Still, I have at times over the past 18 months felt like a 19th century taxonomist trying to make sense of the natural world. Some stories defy easy categorization. Is this the same species? A subspecies? Or does it deserve to be a new species?

The Broadview Six case has been one of those that is hard to classify. Is it a Operation Midway Blitz story, fundamentally about ICE and mass deportation? Or is it a story of DOJ corruption or retribution, or both? All of the above?

With the newly released transcripts, ordered unsealed by U.S. District Judge April Perry of Chicago, we have a bit more insight into the case, and though it’s still not easy to categorize, that in and of itself ends up being illuminating:

First, the Broadview Six case has never felt like it had the hallmarks of the retributive prosecutions Morning Memo has been so focused on. With some important caveats (more on those in a moment), the case appeared to be mostly run through the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Chicago, not out of Main Justice or by political appointees parachuting in. Notably, the DOJ prosecutor who has emerged as the leading villain in the narrative was a career prosecutor (not a political appointee like Lindsey Halligan thrust in front of a grand jury) who was not obviously a Trump flunky.

Second, the problems with the Broadview Six case don’t necessarily seem new or confined to Trump II. If line prosecutors, as the transcripts seem to show, are casually violating the grand jury rules by, among other things, talking to grand jurors outside of the grand jury session, personally vouching for the evidence, failing to notify the court of no true bills, and misstating the law, then it suggests that there were problems that pre-existed Trump II and its decimation of the DOJ’s professionalism. I can hear my readers who are criminal defense attorneys crying “D’uh!” in unison.

Third, the problems that emerged in the Broadview Six case seem compounded by the Trump II takeover of the DOJ. Any pre-existing bad practices or patterns of prosecutorial misconduct seem likely to have been further exacerbated as the department’s professionalism eroded, career attorneys headed for the exits, and remaining prosecutors dealt with an increased workload, compounded by the flood of immigration cases the administration unleashed.

Fourth, the Broadview Six case came at a time of rampant DOJ chaos. U.S. attorneys were racing to respond to radically new department priorities and politically motivated demands from Main Justice, which itself was responding for the first time to direct orders from a notoriously chaotic White House. The chaos unleashed by a loose and broken chain of command, with an erratic president and freelancing White House aides at the top, would be expected to trickle all the way down to line prosecutors.

Fifth, the Broadview Six case and its aftermath suffered from a wider management breakdown at DOJ, while the administration laid siege to blue American cities. The Chicago U.S. Attorney’s Office seemed to suffer from problems similar to what we saw in Minneapolis in the aftermath of Operation Metro Surge, where the U.S. Attorney’s Office had trouble even prioritizing cases, court orders, and deadlines. That’s a sign of an overarching management problem that doesn’t neatly fit into any one bucket but that does amplify the problems under Trump II: An office in chaos is even less able to effectively fend off demands from Main Justice.

Sixth, the case morphed into a cover-up. It was amidst this department-wide chaos that some of the most egregious conduct occurred, not in the grand jury room itself, but in responding to defense counsel and Judge April Perry. DOJ lawyers weren’t candid with the court, transcripts were redacted in ways that concealed some of the worst transgressions, the truth was elided. It went from misconduct to a cover-up of the misconduct.

Now back to those important caveats I mentioned:

(i) While the Broadview Six doesn’t feel like the other retributive prosecutions, I don’t want to get too fine-grained about it. The fact that the defendants were ICE protestors and included a Democratic candidate for Congress, one of her staffers, and a Democratic committeeman always made it ripe for vindictiveness, which the defendants have aggressively pursued evidence to prove.

(ii) The extent of the involvement from Main Justice, including Todd Blanche’s aide, Associate Deputy Attorney General Aakash Singh, remains to be fully determined. New facts may yet be uncovered that nudge this case closer to some of the others we’ve seen where political appointees in D.C. were giving marching orders.

What makes the unraveling of the Broadview Six case stand out is how it shows the pervasive impact, at all levels, of the corruption of the Trump DOJ into a politicized and weaponized tool of the White House.

Quote of the Day

“I heard this case like last week and I thought it was a crock of shit then and I still think it is.”—a grand juror, in newly unsealed grand jury transcripts in the Broadview Six case

Slush Fund Watch

  • Patrick Davis, the assistant attorney general for legislative affairs, tried to recuse himself from matters relating to the $1.776 billion “Anti-Weaponization Fund” because he himself planned to make a claim for actions the Trump I DOJ took when he was a top aide to Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA), Politico reports. Current DOJ officials decided his recusal wasn’t necessary.
  • New filings in two of the civil lawsuits seeking to invalidate the “Anti-Weaponization Fund” suggest DOJ officials are still refusing to definitively commit to the fund being dead and buried.
  • Looking ahead: I’ll be in federal court late this afternoon in D.C. for a hearing in front of U.S. District Judge Richard J. Leon in one of the lawsuits challenging the “Anti-Weaponization Fund.” Stay tuned …

Blanche Confirmation Watch

If the past 16 months are any guide, Senate Republicans will find a way to cave to President Trump’s demands that they confirm Blanche as attorney general. But things have changed! you might say. Thom Tillis is retiring. Bill Cassidy and John Cornyn were defeated in GOP primaries. Perhaps. But the early indications aren’t looking great.

Here’s Cassidy with reporters yesterday: “I have to be convinced that Todd is not the president’s personal attorney who happens to be attorney general, but that Todd is the attorney general who used to be the president’s personal attorney.”

If Cassidy isn’t convinced yet, I don’t know what could convince him now.

Cornyn was similarly noncommittal with reporters: “I have no red lines right now, but we’re going to have an interesting conversation.”

No red lines …

2026 Midterms: Maine Edition

  • Maine-Senate: Graham Platner easily won the Democratic nomination to challenge five-term incumbent Sen. Susan Collins (R).
  • CA-Gov: Former Fox News host Steve Hilton (R) secured the second runoff spot over billionaire climate activist activist Tom Steyer (D) and will face former DHS Secretary Xavier Becerra (D) in the general election.
  • SC-Gov: Republican Reps. Ralph “Marshall Law!!” Norman and Nancy “I’m sick of your shit” Mace both failed to make the runoff in the GOP primary, meaning neither will hold public office any longer once their terms in Congress expire in January.

Saying the Quiet Part Out Loud

Comer: "What we're seeing especially in the blue states is there is rampant fraud, especially in the minority communities"

Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com) 2026-06-09T18:42:30.537Z

No, The Constitution Is Not Colorblind

Law professor and civil rights attorney Sherrilyn Ifill:

I will not participate in the pretense that colorblindness is a vision for our country grounded in our Constitution. It has become a weapon designed to cloak the Court’s decisions dismantling our civil rights infrastructure with a veneer of principled nobility. It represents at best, the wishful thinking of justices who have declared their sensibilities to be too delicate to concern themselves with, as Chief Justice Roberts once put it, “this sordid business” of “dividing people by race.” At worst, it is a cynical ploy designed to erase the work of activists, lawyers, and Congress who built a civil rights infrastructure to advance Black equality. Or perhaps a long game effort to tie the hands of future Congresses that might be inclined, as Congress was during the Civil Rights Movement, to respond to demands for equality and justice by passing civil rights laws.

Must Read

Sarah Posner: What the Pentagon’s Snub of Mormons Was Really All About

Thread of the Day

Hot tips? Juicy scuttlebutt? Keen insights? Let me know. For sensitive information, use the encrypted methods here.