Zohran Mamdani Congratulates Cuomo on Trump Endorsement

Kiss of Death

President Trump acknowledged during his “60 Minutes” interview that aired on Sunday that if he had to pick between the Democratic nominee in New York City’s mayoral election this week, Zohran Mamdani, and New York’s former Democratic governor, Andrew Cuomo, he’d go with the latter.

The shrug in Cuomo’s direction is representative of the MAGA movement and the far-right in general’s interest in casting Mamdani as a new MAGA boogeyman. He does, after all, represent a number of concepts that are in regular rotation in venues such as Fox News and Republican Party social media feeds: He’s a Democratic socialist, he’s young, he’s non-white, he will soon, quite possibly, run New York City.

The disinfo wave around Mamdani reflects a confusion in both parties about exactly how to explain the 34-year-old insurgent candidate. He’s raised funds through small dollar donations and a sophisticated but simple social media presence, putting an unwavering focus on the city’s affordability crisis. He’s been aggressively opposed by wealthy interests in the city to no noticeable effect. Some see Mamdani’s rise as a potential blueprint for the Democratic Party moving forward, a reality that, unflatteringly, has chagrined and wrong-footed that party’s leaders.

Accordingly, Trump and his allies have been trying to paint Mamdani as a “communist.” At the end of September, Trump claimed that if Mamdani won the election, he would withhold federal funding from New York City (something the Trump White House started doing just hours after the shutdown began on October 1 by freezing funding for New York’s infrastructure projects, among other things).

Perhaps encouraged by political allies and donors that they both share, Trump has for awhile been hinting that he sees his former enemy, Cuomo — whom Mamdani defeated for the Democratic nomination — as a better fit for New York. During the “60 Minutes” interview that aired Sunday, Trump made it official, putting his weight behind Cuomo as the supposed lesser of two evils.

“It’s going to be hard for me as the president to give a lot of money to New York. Because if you have a communist running New York, all you’re doing is wasting the money you’re sending there,” Trump said. 

“So I don’t know that he’s won, and I’m not a fan of Cuomo one way or the other, but if it’s going to be between a bad Democrat and a communist, I’m going to pick the bad Democrat all the time, to be honest with you,” he said.

Mamdani has jumped on the Trump remarks as a final opportunity to troll Cuomo.

“Congratulations, Andrew Cuomo. I know how hard you worked for this,” Mamdani posted on Instagram.

— Nicole LaFond

Curtis Sliwa Campaigned With A COVID Quarantine Rioter

The home stretch of New York City’s mayoral race offered us yet another example of how extremist politics have become standard fare for the GOP.

With voting set to take place on Tuesday, Republican nominee Curtis Sliwa spent last Sunday morning campaigning alongside City Council candidate Heschy Tischler. Tischler, who bills himself as part of “Team Trump,” is an activist in Brooklyn’s ultraorthodox Jewish neighborhoods. Tischler gained widespread notice as a vocal part of protests against COVID quarantine measures in the community that ultimately turned violent. In 2021, he pleaded guilty to a charge of inciting a riot for his role in those demonstrations, which included an attack on a local journalist. 

Sliwa’s embrace of Tischler is all the more hypocritical since the longshot mayoral hopeful first made a name for himself as a vigilante anti-crime crusader. Time and time again, MAGA Republicans are showing us their supposed concerns about law and order don’t extend to their own political allies.

— Hunter Walker

GOP Will Soon Need a New CR

House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) said Republican leadership is discussing how to deal with the House-passed GOP continuing resolution (CR) that is set to expire on Nov. 21.

“We’re very mindful of the calendar. We’re very frustrated by that,” Johnson said during a Monday press conference, adding that GOP leaders will be discussing options.

The House, of course, has been out of session since House Republicans passed the GOP CR on Sept. 19. That was 45 days ago. Johnson will have to bring them back in order to pass any new CR.

GOP leadership is reportedly, privately discussing a new CR that would go into early 2026. Meanwhile some senators are reportedly pushing for a deal that would involve a package of appropriations bills alongside a new CR — that would reopen the government — and a vote to extend the expiring Obamacare subsidies.

Republican leadership has been insisting they won’t vote on any appropriations bills or measures to extend the subsidies without a deal to reopen the government.

— Emine Yücel

In Case You Missed It

White House Limits Media Access to West Wing Offices in Latest Indignity for the Trump Press Corps

The latest in TPM’s 25th Anniversary essay series: Early Bloggers Changed the Public’s Perception About the Iraq War

After 3-Day Trial, Trump Appointee Judge Grants Preliminary Injunction Blocking Guard from Portland

Morning Memo: Big Win For Voting Rights As Judge Blocks Trump EO

The latest from Kate Riga: Trump Admin Tells Judge It’ll Disburse Half of SNAP Benefits for Eligible Households in November, With ‘Significant’ Delays

Josh Marshall: Making Sense of That Weird Detail in the Latest Polls

Yesterday’s Most Read Story

Watching the Podcast Bubble Burst From the Inside

What We Are Reading

The Fantasy of Assassination Culture

“Regular Forces” and the Insurrection Act

CBS Cuts Trump’s Corruption Tantrum From ‘60 Minutes’ Edit

Feds Drop Case Against Man Accused of Injuring Greg Bovino’s Groin

The man who federal agents accused of dealing Greg Bovino a groin injury from which the Border Patrol commander purportedly needed two weeks to recover will no longer face charges after prosecutors on Monday moved to drop their case against him.

Continue reading “Feds Drop Case Against Man Accused of Injuring Greg Bovino’s Groin”

DHS Wants States to Hand Over Driver’s License Data for Citizenship Checks

This article first appeared at ProPublica, a nonprofit newsroom that investigates abuses of power. Sign up to receive our biggest stories as soon as they’re published. This article is co-published with The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan local newsroom that informs and engages with Texans. Sign up for The Brief Weekly to get up to speed on their essential coverage of Texas issues.

The Department of Homeland Security says it intends to add state driver’s license information to a swiftly expanding federal system envisioned as a one-stop shop for checking citizenship.

The plan, outlined in a public notice posted Thursday, is the latest step in an unprecedented Trump administration initiative to pool confidential data from varied sources that it claims will help identify noncitizens on voter rolls, tighten immigration enforcement and expose public benefit fraud.

According to emails obtained by ProPublica and The Texas Tribune, DHS approached Texas officials in June about a pilot program to add the state’s driver license data, but it’s not clear if the state participated.

Earlier this year, DHS added millions of Americans’ Social Security data to the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements, or SAVE, system, allowing officials to use the tool to conduct bulk searches of voter rolls for the first time. According to the document filed Thursday, SAVE also recently expanded to include passport and visa information.

Incorporating driver’s license information would allow election officials whose rolls don’t include voters’ Social Security numbers to conduct bulk searches by driver’s license number. Ultimately, the system would link these two crucial identifiers for the purpose of citizenship checks, said Michael Morse, a professor at the University of Pennsylvania.

“It is the key that unlocks everything,” Morse said.

State driver’s license databases often include a variety of sensitive information on drivers, including place of birth, passport number, biometrics, address, email and employment information, said Claire Jeffrey, a spokesperson for the American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators.

Beyond the privacy concerns this creates, using driver’s license numbers in SAVE could lead to citizens being wrongly flagged as noncitizens, said Rachel Orey, director of the elections project at the Bipartisan Policy Center. Driver’s license numbers are sometimes reused and people can have licenses in multiple states. Also, if SAVE isn’t linked to live versions of state driver’s license databases, the information in the system will be outdated.

“This could have far-reaching consequences for voter access and public trust if inaccurate data were used to question eligibility or citizenship,” Orey said.

DHS says in the notice that linking to driver’s license data, which it calls the most widely used form of identification, “will allow SAVE to match against other sources to verify immigration status and U.S. citizenship, which will improve accuracy and efficiency for SAVE user agencies.”

The department did not respond to questions about the expansion.

Up until this year, SAVE was mostly used to check individual immigrants’ citizenship status when they applied for public benefits. DHS has said the aim in expanding the system was to enable election officials to check voter rolls en masse. But the agency’s data-sharing agreement with the Social Security Administration as well as Thursday’s disclosure make clear that DHS and other agencies can use SAVE for other purposes, including for immigration enforcement investigations.

Information uploaded into the system by state and local election officials and other users will be saved and may be “shared with other DHS Components that have a need to know of the information to carry out their national security, law enforcement, immigration, intelligence, or other homeland security functions,” the notice explains.

Advocacy groups have sued the federal government claiming the pooling of data in SAVE violates the Privacy Act, which is meant to prevent misuse of private data. In filings, the government has said that the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 explicitly allows information sharing to verify citizenship status and that DHS would exercise caution in flagging voters as potential noncitizens.

Some privacy lawyers called DHS’ move to add driver’s license information more evidence of federal overreach. “The administration wants to get as much data as it can, however it can, whenever it can,” said Justin Levitt, a law professor at Loyola Marymount University.

The DHS notice, known as a system of records notice, allows for public comment on several aspects of SAVE’s expansion, including some already completed. Typically, such notices are filed when agencies propose changes to federal systems, and the comments are meant to inform how officials go forward. That didn’t happen in this case.

In June, email records show, DHS asked the Texas Department of Public Safety, which issues driver’s licenses and ID cards, to partner on a pilot program to add its data into SAVE.

Timothy Benz of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, the branch of DHS that oversees SAVE, wrote that the planned expansion was part of the “evolution” of SAVE into a “one-stop shop for all election agency verification needs.”

“That would require collaboration with each states’ DL agency in order for us to query those DL records in order to provide that information to the querying elections agency,” Benz wrote.

Rebekah Hibbs, a supervisor in the Texas Department of Public Safety’s driver’s license division, replied that DPS is “always happy” to support the SAVE tool and agreed to talk again with USCIS.

It’s not clear what happened next. In response to questions from ProPublica and the Tribune, DPS spokesperson Sheridan Nolen said the “department does not have any ongoing projects with USCIS related to driver record information for registered voters, nor have we been asked to provide that information.”

She did not answer questions about whether DPS has given any data to USCIS. DHS did not respond to questions about whether the partnership moved forward.

Texas Secretary of State Jane Nelson announced Oct. 20 that her office had run the state’s entire voter roll through SAVE. Alicia Pierce, Nelson’s spokesperson, said the office did the check using full Social Security numbers, which it routinely obtains from the Department of Public Safety to match with registered voters.

The results showed that around 0.015% of Texas voters, or 2,724 people, are potentially noncitizens.

At least one Texas official is concerned that those initial SAVE results may not be accurate. In a court filing submitted Wednesday as part of the Privacy Act litigation, Travis County voter registration director Christopher Davis wrote that state data shows about 25% of the voters that SAVE flagged as potential noncitizens in the county had provided proof of citizenship when registering to vote.

“I am concerned that the list Travis County received from the Secretary of State is flawed and worry about the potential for voters to be improperly cancelled from the voter rolls and possibly disenfranchised as a result,” Davis’ filing says.

Making Sense of That Weird Detail in the Latest Polls

Tomorrow we’re going to get our first widespread read on what actual voters think of the Trump presidency. Of course, Trump isn’t on the ballot. Nor is it a federal election. But, more than at any other time in our lifetimes, all political questions revolve around Trump and whether you’re for or against him. We’ll get indirect reads on how perceptions of Trump are affecting voting behavior. We’ve also just gotten a series of new national polls, timed for release just before Tuesday. They show Trump almost as unpopular as he has ever been, not only during his second presidency but at the most feral and unhinged moments of his first. FiftyPlusOne shows his average approval numbers underwater by 15 points, with approval at 40.9%. If there’s anything “new” here, it’s that his high disapprovals are breaking more ground than his low approvals. He’s wringing the final undecideds or not-paying-attentions out of the electorate.

But the picture is different on the generic ballot — the standard measure of a congressional election. There, it is a kind of choose-your-own-adventure. The FiftyPlusOne average here have Democrats up by 3.5 percentage points — 45.6 to 42.1. That’s okay for the Democrats but it’s far closer than you’d expect with a president this unpopular. The most recent numbers are fairly scattered. NBC and Verasight have the Democrats with an eight point advantage. CNN gives them a five point advantage. But Washington Post/ABC have it at two points. NewsNation (whose pollster I can’t identify) says it’s essentially even.

Continue reading “Making Sense of That Weird Detail in the Latest Polls”

Trump Admin Tells Judge It’ll Disburse Half of SNAP Benefits for Eligible Households in November, With ‘Significant’ Delays

The Trump administration told a federal judge on Monday that it plans to use the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) contingency fund to cover 50 percent of November allotments to current eligible households — but that it might take states “a few weeks to up to several months” to disburse the money.

Continue reading “Trump Admin Tells Judge It’ll Disburse Half of SNAP Benefits for Eligible Households in November, With ‘Significant’ Delays”

Big Win for Voting Rights as Judge Blocks Trump EO

‘The President Does Not Feature At All’

In a ruling Friday, U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly of D.C. permanently barred President Trump from requiring proof of citizenship on federal voter registration forms.

Trump had tried to strong-arm the Elections Assistance Commission into imposing the proof of citizenship requirement, as part of his broad executive order on voting. The president has no legal role in U.S. federal elections, and the March executive order was widely seen as Trump testing how far he could go in asserting power over election administration.

Kollar-Kotelly had already temporarily blocked the proof of citizenship provision back in April, and a federal judge in Massachusetts had likewise blocked other elements of the executive order.

In making her ban permanent, Kollar-Kotelly noted the president’s lack of a role in elections:

The Court pauses to note a conspicuous absence from the legal and historical context thus far provided. The states have initial authority to regulate elections. Congress has supervisory authority over those regulations. The President does not feature at all.

The case, which combined three lawsuits by the Democratic Party and voting rights groups, presented an early test for whether the courts would resist sweeping claims of presidential power in areas where there was no explicit legal authority or historic custom or tradition for the president to be operating.

Proof of citizenship to register to vote has been a Republican fixation for years, driven by a mix of xenophobia and political self-preservation. Trump and the GOP have wildly overstated the prevalence of illegal voting, but additional hurdles to voting — like requiring proof of citizenship — could dampen registration in immigrant communities and among marginalized potential voters. Many Americans lack ready access to proof of their own citizenship.

“The measure was designed to suppress voter participation in elections; a solution in search of a problem,” writes Joyce Vance, a former U.S. attorney in Alabama. “It’s akin to the poll taxes used in the South before the Supreme Court put an end to them.”

Quote of the Day

“Everything that they’re doing now is a relitigation of 2020. They’re trying to discredit the entire electoral system in the United States of America so that Donald Trump can finally be able to say, ‘You see, the system was corrupt. My lies were actually the truth.’ ”–Arizona Secretary of State Adrian Fontes (D) 

Good Read

WASHINGTON, DC – OCTOBER 15: U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Jeanine Pirro speaks during a press conference at the U.S. Attorney’s Office October 15, 2025 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)

The NYT’s Alan Feuer has a good rundown on why the D.C. U.S. attorney’s office is ground zero for President Trump’s politicization of the Justice Department.

Lindsey Halligan’s Signal Problem

The judge overseeing the criminal case against New York Attorney General Letitia James ordered the Justice Department to preserve all communications that might be relevant to her defense. The judge stopped short of ruling that the bewildering Signal messages sent by acting U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan to Lawfare reporter Anna Bower are discoverable (he wasn’t being asked to rule on that yet), but wants them and another communications preserved in the event that he is asked to rule on their discoverability later.

Judge Orders Emergency Funding for SNAP

U.S. District Judge John McConnell Jr of Rhode Island ordered the Trump administration to use emergency funds to sustain the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program through November. Funding of the critical anti-hunger program ran out of money at the end of October because of the government shutdown.

Judge Signals Outcome of Oregon National Guard Case

Following a three-day trial last week on the legality of President Trump’s ordered deployment of the National Guard in Oregon, U.S. District Judge Karin Immergut of Portland issued a preliminary injunction continuing to block the deployment until she issues a final ruling this Friday.

While Immergut stressed that it was a preliminary ruling as she continues to assess trial testimony and exhibits, the preliminary injunction strongly suggested she is going to rule against the administration on both the deployment and the federalization of the National Guard. Immergut had already issued a temporary injunction blocking the deployment.

Foreign Entanglements Watch

  • BREAKING: “The Trump administration has begun detailed planning for a new mission to send U.S. troops and intelligence officers into Mexico to target drug cartels, according to two U.S. officials and two former senior U.S. officials familiar with the effort,” NBC News reports.
  • The U.S. conducted its 15th strike against alleged drug-smuggling boats on Saturday, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced. Three people were killed in the attack.
  • Mexico says it has been unable to locate the survivor of one of the U.S. high seas attacks last Monday and has ended its search.
  • The Trump DOJ’s Office of Legal Counsel told some lawmakers behind close doors that the administration doesn’t consider itself to be bound by the War Powers Resolution of 1973 and will not seek congressional authorization for continuing hostilities in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific. The 60-day window that the resolution gives from the commencement of hostilities for the president to seek approval from Congress expires today.
  • Rep. Adam Smith (D-WA), the ranking Democrat on the House Armed Services Committee, is warning of the breadth of the Trump administration’s claim it can conduct lethal attacks against people merely “affiliated” with groups it has designated as “narco-terrorists:” “They did not in any way, shape, manner, or form explain what the ceiling and floor are for ‘affiliated.’ Theoretically, that could go beyond whether they’re in the actual action of moving drugs.”

The Corruption: Ballroom Edition

WASHINGTON, DC October 15: US President Donald Trump delivers remarks during a ballroom fundraising dinner in the East Room of the White House on Wednesday October 15, 2025. (Photo by Demetrius Freeman/The Washington Post via Getty Images)

While the Trump White House has put out a list of donors to his pet ballroom project and hosted many of them for a dinner, it has withheld the names of some donors and did not divulge the names of everyone in attendance at the dinner, the NYT reports.

Do you like Morning Memo? Let us know!

After 3-Day Trial, Trump Appointee Judge Grants Preliminary Injunction Blocking Guard from Portland

Judge Karin Immergut handed down a preliminary injunction late Sunday night, keeping the National Guard out of Portland. 

Continue reading “After 3-Day Trial, Trump Appointee Judge Grants Preliminary Injunction Blocking Guard from Portland”

Early Bloggers Changed the Public’s Perception About the Iraq War

War is an accelerant of change, not least in the media. In the last century, every major war has helped a new medium prove itself as essential for communication. The popular experience of the Second World War was shaped by radio (famously Edward R. Murrow’s live dispatches from the Blitz in London), Vietnam by television (with Walter Cronkite’s dismay at the Tet offensive being a pivot point), and the first Iraq War by cable news (CNN becoming addictive for its 24-7 coverage). 

For me — and not for me alone — the second Iraq War was the age of blogs. The first “web log” (an online diary accessible by search engines) was created in 1994 by a Swarthmore College student Justin Hall, who coded the HTML by hand. Even before 9/11, the new medium (now shortened to “blog”) was rising in popularity thanks to the development of easy-to-use hosting systems such as LiveJournal and Blogger. Most weren’t political, but rather digital daybooks revolving around personal concerns (parenting blogs) or obsessions (such as beloved celebrities). Talking Points Memo, created by Joshua Micah Marshall in 2000, was an early pioneer, notably for a bracing skepticism towards Republican Party propaganda.

Political blogs found their purpose once George W. Bush and his administration decided to use the justifiable outrage at the 9/11 attacks as a pretext for an ambitious remaking of the Middle East by military means. The run-up to the Iraq War and subsequent failure of Bush’s larger political project was enormously polarizing. Blogs became the perfect medium whereby this debate played out, especially important because much of the mainstream media had been cowed by nationalist fervor into going along with White House propaganda. 

Continue reading “Early Bloggers Changed the Public’s Perception About the Iraq War”

Rob Ford Was Back at the World Series 

Hello, it’s the weekend. This is The Weekender ☕️

This is a TPM deep cut.

As some of you may know, TPM has a long and illustrious history with the late former mayor of Toronto, Rob Ford. Back in 2013, Ford gained international infamy after he was filmed smoking crack. That revelation led to a series of cascading scandals including super racist rants, drunken misconduct and more crack videos — and that’s a partial summary.

Continue reading “Rob Ford Was Back at the World Series “

White House Limits Media Access to West Wing Offices in Latest Indignity for the Trump Press Corps

On Friday evening, White House Communications Director Steven Cheung and Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt sent out a memo announcing a new restriction on press access in the West Wing. According to the memo, members of the White House press corps will now be restricted from accessing the area known as “upper press” without an appointment. 

The move comes amid extensive changes to the Washington press corps under President Trump. At the White House, the Trump administration has taken the unprecedented steps of choosing partisan, right-wing organizations to fill seats in the briefing room for daily press conferences and to join the pool reporters who accompany the president to events. Those tasks had long been the domain of the White House Correspondents Association. Some of the reporters who are not part of the hand-picked, partisan element have been subject to insults from top White House staffers. 

The changes echo others at the Pentagon, where recent restrictions on the press have been even more dramatic. Reporters there were asked to sign a pledge vowing not to gather information that has not been authorized for release. That move led several news organizations — including prominent conservative news outlets — to vacate the facility. They were summarily replaced by a slew of hand-selected media figures that include conspiracy theorists and extremists

One White House correspondent who spoke to TPM on Friday said the new restrictions in upper press were a sign of worse things to come in the West Wing.

“They already kicked all the legitimate news organizations out of the Pentagon. Now they want to do the same thing here,” said the correspondent, who requested anonymity to offer a candid assessment.

Traditionally, White House press pass holders have been able to have relatively free access to several areas of the complex, including the press workspaces adjoining the briefing room, the briefing room itself, and the North Lawn, where TV networks film standups and reporters often question officials as they enter the building. Along with these areas, reporters with hard passes can enter an area behind the briefing room podium known as “lower press” as well as “upper press,” which is located one floor above. While lower press contains the offices of relatively junior press aides, upper press includes the offices of the press secretary and communications director. Reporters stake out upper press when they are seeking to speak to these more senior aides. 

Accessing upper press requires going by a Secret Service checkpoint where your hard pass must be displayed. Often, after major breaking news events, reporters will come into the hallway outside the press secretary’s office seeking a comment. Other officials — including Cabinet members and, very rarely, the president — sometimes pass through upper press and speak with reporters there. 

The memo from Cheung and Leavitt attributed the new restrictions to “recent structural changes to the National Security Council.”

“The White House is now responsible for directing all communications, including on all national security matters,” the memo said. “In this capacity, members of the White House Communications Staff are routinely engaging with sensitive material.”

The memo said the new limits would “ensure adherence to best practices pertaining to access to sensitive material.” It also noted reporters will “continue to freely engage with White House Press Aides in the Lower Press Area outside of the Briefing Room.” 

Cheung did not respond to an email from TPM inquiring whether there had ever been a specific national security disclosure issue related to upper press. He also did not address questions about the pattern of insults, indignities, and increased partisanship in the White House press shop.