Morning Reactions to The Speech

I had some additional thoughts I wanted to share about last night’s speech.

The first seems unsurprising to me. A snap CNN poll last night found that this was the weakest reaction to a State of the Union as any president’s this century. Since presidents generally did better (less divided audience) in the past, it was probably the weakest ever. It was weaker than any of Trump’s State of the Unions. So people weren’t wowed. And remember that a State of the Union is disproportionately watched by the presidential speaker’s own partisans.

This matches my impressions. It seemed tired like Trump seems tired, literally and figuratively. It had some of the feel of a nostalgia act to me. No new material and not a lot of energy or interest in doing something new. Which, again, is really where Trump and the administration itself seems to be. It fits.

Trump CBP Accused of Contempt of Court for Coercing Minors into Self-Deporting

Psst … A Special Offer for MM Readers

Morning Memo aficionados are an important part of the TPM community so ahead of our annual membership drive next week, we’re offering you a special discount. You can get 40% off an annual TPM membership now, before the membership drive begins. That’s $42 to support TPM for a year. I do about 230 Morning Memos a year, so that works out to about 18 cents per Morning Memo. I hope you’ll take advantage of this special offer and help us get the annual drive off to a roaring start. Thanks for all your support!

SOTU-Free Zone

The State of the Union address has been bled of any civic utility, but if you’re desperate for a recap, we have you covered here.

‘Coercion, Threats, and Fear’

Attorneys who succeeded in blocking a middle-of-the-night effort to deport unaccompanied Guatemalan minors over the Labor Day weekend are now seeking a civil contempt of court ruling against the Trump administration for allegedly circumventing a judge’s order that continues to bar their deportation.

In the new filing in federal court in D.C., the lawyers alleged that Customs and Border Protection is “using misinformation, coercion, threats, and fear” to convince Guatemalan minors who arrive at the border to relinquish their rights and to self-deport before they enter the system designed to give special protections to minors.

In one of the declarations filed in support of the contempt request, the legal director of the South Texas Pro Bono Asylum Representation Project recounted several alleged examples of children being coerced to self-deport, including this one:

An indigenous Guatemalan boy at Compass Connections Harlingen told me his father is disabled and his parents cannot protect and support him. CBP agents detained him around October 14, 2025. According to the child, CBP agents shouted, cursed, and threatened the child with a dog and a stun gun. A CBP agent told him he could accept a “voluntary return” or he could remain detained for an extended period of time. The child asked if he could speak with his family before he decided, but the officer refused. The child signed the paperwork. However, an officer then told him he was being sent to a shelter. The child believes his prayers were answered.

The original injunction blocking the Labor Day deportations was issued by U.S. District Judge Sparkle Sooknanan, the emergency duty judge on call over the holiday, who raced to respond to reports that children were already being loaded aboard planes in Texas, in an echo of the swift and secretive Alien Enemies Act flights from last March.

The injunction was later extended by U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly, a Trump appointee who found that the administration’s claims about the deportations fell apart on closer examination. Kelly is now being asked to find the administration in civil contempt over the new policy, word of which began to emerge in November in a separate lawsuit and was spotted by former TPMer Matt Shuham, whose report on the policy is cited in the request for a contempt finding.

Preview: Abrego Garcia Hearing

A quick word ahead of tomorrow’s evidentiary hearing in Nashville on Kilmar Abrego Garcia’s vindictive prosecution claim, which I’ll be attending in person:

With the James Comey and Letitia James cases dismissed for now, the Abrego Garcia case has become the preeminent vindictive prosecution claim pending anywhere in the country. As you know by now, vindictive prosecution claims are notoriously hard to win. Defense attorneys throw those claims against the wall and hope they stick. They rarely do.

But U.S. District Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr., has found that Abrego Garcia has already cleared the initial hurdle in a vindictive prosecution claim: showing that there is a “realistic likelihood of vindictiveness.” That opened the door to discovery and to tomorrow’s evidentiary hearing, where the burden will be on the Trump DOJ to, in the judge’s words, “produce objective, on-the-record explanations for Abrego’s prosecution that rebuts the presumption of vindictiveness.”

If the Trump DOJ fails tomorrow to rebut the presumption now in Abrego Garcia’s favor, it loses, and Crenshaw could dismiss the indictment. The stakes are high. See you tomorrow from Nashville.

Mass Deportation Watch

  • The Trump DOJ sued to overturn New Jersey Gov. Mikie Sherrill’s executive order barring ICE from enforcing immigration laws on state property absent a judicial warrant or court order, claiming it violates the Constitution’s Supremacy Clause.
  • A group of Catholic bishops, mostly from dioceses along the southern border, called for the humane enforcement of U.S. immigration laws.
  • The top vote-getter in Chicago’s name a snowplow contest: “Abolish ICE”

Trump’s ‘Law and Order’ Facade

The capacity of the wrecked Trump DOJ is so reduced that it is now unable to prosecute some run-of-the-mill criminal cases.

A felon-in-possession case in Minnesota was dismissed by U.S. District Judge Paul A. Magnuson this week over a speedy trial violation, astonishing even the defendant’s lawyer, the NYT reports: “I’ve been practicing law for 30 years, a lot in federal court, and I’ve never had an indictment dismissed by an order of a judge,” attorney Kevin DeVore said.

In his order dismissing the indictment, the judge additionally noted that the Trump DOJ “failed to comply with the ordered briefing deadline” on the motion to dismiss. The especially beleaguered Minnesota U.S. Attorney’s Office attributed the missed filing deadline to counsel’s unexpectedly early parental leave for a medical emergency and “other issues relating to staffing turnover at the United States Attorney’s Office.”

The judge considered the government’s late response anyway and still ruled against it.

Thread of the Day

A closer look at the Trump administration’s new lawsuit against University of California system for UCLA’s handling of protests over Israel’s war against Hamas:

Well, the DOJ has done it: they have filed a lawsuit against the University of California over antisemitism.The complaint contains some falsehoods. But as someone who teaches and writes about Title VII, I'm equally struck by what the complaint doesn't say.A few thoughts— 🧵

Joey Fishkin (@fishkin.bsky.social) 2026-02-24T21:41:21.611Z

Judge Will Search Reporter’s Devices

Rebuffing the Trump DOJ, U.S. Magistrate Judge William Porter of the Eastern District of Virgina rescinded the portion of the search warrant he signed that allowed it to “open, access,
review, or otherwise examine” the electronic devices seized from WaPo reporter Hannah Natanson last month.

Porter had approved the highly controversial search warrant in a government leak case without being briefed by prosecutors on a federal law that limits seizures of reporters’ materials. In his ruling, Porter took responsibility for “that gap in its own analysis” but was still mad about the government’s failure to brief him on it: “This omission has seriously undermined the Court’s confidence in the government’s disclosures in this proceeding.”

Given that and the other circumstances of the case, Porter decided to screen Natanson’s device himself for relevant information rather than allow a DOJ filter team to do it, which he called “the equivalent of leaving the government’s fox in charge of the Washington Post’s henhouse.”

Jeffrey Epstein Watch

Following up on reporting by Roger Sollenberger and NPR, CNN has its own version of the story of documents allegedly missing from the tranche of Epstein files released by the Trump DOJ that relate to a woman who accused Donald Trump of sexually assaulting her.

Hot tips? Juicy scuttlebutt? Keen insights? Let me know. For sensitive information, use the encrypted methods here.

Five Takeaways From Trump’s Plodding, Scattered, and at Times Eerie State of the Union

President Donald Trump’s first official State of the Union back in office was previewed as “long,” and it met expectations. And though it clocked in as the longest ever, listeners will be left wondering what, exactly, warranted that length. The night was a slow plod through Trump’s take on his first year back in office, with vanishingly little grounding in fact, punctuated by moments that Trump clearly enjoyed more than the recitation of policy: introducing various guests, game show style, to laud their accomplishments or detail the horrors that were visited upon them. 

Large sections of the speech focused on these bizarre, staged displays. One involved a grimacing helicopter pilot who received a Medal of Honor for his actions during the Venezuela raid last month; another saw the U.S. Men’s Olympic Hockey team stand for a seemingly endless amount of time around the press corps.

Democratic members of Congress who were actually in the chamber during the speech refused to stand or clap or, except for a few moments, even speak out in protest. The silence seemed to get under Trump’s skin. He repeatedly chastised the group for not applauding things he felt should be applauded, like his campaign to terrorize blue cities as part of his mass deportation operation. 

The speech ended on a saccharine note. Trump read off lines about the country’s founding, the moon landing, westward expansion — all in florid language linked back to the country’s 250th anniversary this year. It was mostly devoid of the attempts to define America as belonging to an old stock of white settlers, a theme that makes its way into many other Trump administration speeches and that his administration is pursuing through its attempt to end birthright citizenship and through the continued employment and existence of Vice President JD Vance. But that was, in a way, fitting: there wasn’t one theme tonight. It was scattershot; two hours of jumping from grievance to accomplishment to applause.

Here are five takeaways from the night. 

ICE’s violent spree loomed over the night

One of the more dramatic moments of the night arrived as Trump went on an extended monologue about immigration with several complaints about the Department of Homeland Security shutdown. Democrats in attendance began to object. “You have killed Americans,” Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) shouted.

Trump didn’t acknowledge the point directly, saying only: “You should be ashamed of yourselves.”

The killings of American citizens Alex Pretti and Renee Good, both observers of his administration’s violent immigration enforcement operation in Minneapolis, Minnesota in January, hung in the background of much of the speech. Trump declared a new “War on Fraud” directed at the Minneapolis Somali community, and did not expand on why it is that DHS is shut down. Rep. Omar gave the answer.

Trundling through affordability spin

Much of the first hour of the speech was an ambling tour through a series of statements misrepresenting Trump’s record on issues of affordability, including plugging the Don Jr.-linked “TrumpRX” website

While he spouted lies about the impacts of his tariffs, Trump’s diatribe on tariffs was relatively tame compared to his reaction last week after SCOTUS blocked many of the tariffs levied under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, or IEEPA.

“We’re making a lot of money,” Trump said about the tariffs. “There was no inflation, tremendous growth.”

In fact there was inflation, and growth, especially in jobs, is gnawingly stagnant.

Trump pitted himself as superior to Nobel laureate economists, and falsely claimed tariffs are paid for by foreign countries. Several studies have found U.S. companies and consumers foot the tariff bill.

On the SCOTUS ruling, Trump had only a few minor lines. “The big story was how Donald Trump called the economy correctly,” he says, before adding: “Then just four days ago an unfortunate ruling from the United States Supreme Court just came down.”

The ‘Big Lie’ rears its head as Trump touts the SAVE Act

Parroting part of the Big Lie, Trump falsely claimed undocumented people voting in elections is “rampant.” He took the opportunity to plug the SAVE America Act. Trump called it a voter ID law, but it’s much more than that. It’s a proof of citizenship law that would, among other things, require registering voters to show a passport or valid ID along with a birth certificate.

The law actually stands to disenfranchise millions of voters across the political spectrum, with voters in middle America red states being least likely to own a passport, according to a study from the left-leaning think tank, the Center for American Progress.

Dems destroyed the country, and are still destroying it, Trump insists

If you chose to drink each time Trump name checked former President Joe Biden tonight, you would have had to check out early. Trump mentioned the former president as the source of America’s woes early and often, attempting to achieve the impossible feat of remaining the outsider-populist while holding power. 

Democrats writ large were blamed for even more. At one point, the president blamed Democrats’ shutdown of the DHS for the snow blanketing the east coast, claiming the funding lapse meant there was no money to clean it up. 

Now that peace is taken care of, war?

After telling Congress that he ended eight wars last year, Trump moved on to one that he may start: Iran.

He makes a new claim, without evidence: that Iran is working on “missiles that could reach the United States.” He says that the country is doing the unspeakable, returning to its “sinister” nuclear ambitions. (Trump claimed over the summer that last year’s strike put a permanent end to all that — what changed?)

Trump adds that he’d prefer to resolve this “through diplomacy. But one thing is certain, I will never allow the world’s number one sponsor of terror to have a nuclear weapon.”

The mixture of vague threats, unsupported claims about foreign threats, and insincere cops to diplomacy are all extremely redolent of Bush-era War on Terror speechmaking. And his ominous tone toward Iran cast in a different light the night’s focus on patriotism and the military.

Trump Wraps Plodding Speech on a Saccharine Note

President Trump gave what he promised would be a “long speech” to the nation Tuesday night amid a flurry of bad-for-Trump headlines. 

His approval rating, particularly among independent voters, has sunk to new lows; his Department of Homeland Security — the one tasked with carrying out his top campaign promise to deport undocumented immigrants en masse — is stuck in shutdown purgatory, with immigration enforcement operating on a slush fund and key TSA and FEMA services on the brink of suspension; the Supreme Court, which he stacked with his own conservative nominees, just blocked his signature tariff policy; and he is mulling taking military action in Iran, a move that is unpopular even among his supporters

Catch up on our live coverage below:

Sum Up

The first half of the speech was very low energy. Trump didn’t seem to have his heart in it. He roused to talk about tariffs and then gruesome murders by undocumented immigrants. American Carnage, Part II, basically. My overall sense is still that it was generally shambling and scattered, which is to say more or less like the administration itself at the moment. The non-standing and non-clapping by Democrats really seemed to get to him. It was kind of remarkable how much it seemed to get to him. Like, they’re the opposition. They’re really against him. Did it surprise him? On tariffs, what did he say exactly? The vibe seemed to be that they’ll continue? Or in spirit? What? I see nothing here that changes a bit of the current political trajectory. The speech writers don’t seem to have had much idea of how that could happen. It’s still full speed ahead with the same program until November, perhaps slightly warmed over. The collision is inevitable.

Josh’s Bespoke Live Blog #1

10:14 p.m.: The no clapping thing is really starting to get to him.

10:11 p.m.: There’s a weird fuzziness on the front of Trump’s pompadour. I’m wondering if there’s something fuzzy sprayed on it. Because something is different. Don’t pretend you don’t see this. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

10:08 p.m.: This is really giving me flashbacks of my earlier life as an avid Wally George watcher/ironic fan.

10: 05 p.m.: The through-line generally is clear: very, very low energy until he got to tariffs and graphic descriptions of murders by undocumented immigrants.

10:02 p.m.: The whole “angel mom,” “angel families” thing is simply the most disgusting and malevolent thing imaginable. Imagine any other group singled out like this. Hideous gutter politics from white nationalist degenerates.

9:56 p.m.: By my read, Trump’s energy level has risen a bit approaching the second hour.

9:49 p.m.: Trump seems to be saying he has an Obamacare replacement? But of course he doesn’t. We had a debate here at TPM about what what he was saying about Tariffs. He seemed to be saying that the foreign countries are so happy they’ll just voluntarily keep paying the tariffs. The whole logic of it seems to be that the tariffs will continue. In any case one of my colleagues suggested that he was talking about the “deals”, i.e., this or that country agreeing to invest a trillion or a gazillion dollars in the U.S. I’m not really clear.

9:43 p.m.: Tariffs seemed to be the first time he really got his energy back. But it seems to be subsiding.

9:28 p.m.: I get the sense that they knew this was turning out to be a total snoozer so they’re just going to do the rest about the hockey team.

9:16 p.m.: Still seems super low energy. (Don’t try to do this kind of commentary at home.)

9:13 p.m.: Honestly this seems a bit low energy. Not just the content but the energy in the room? Curious what people in the hall are seeing. But he also has that kind of sullen low energy thing.

How to View Trump’s Feral State of the Union

With Trump’s first official State of the Union of his second term upon us, I wanted to share a few previewing thoughts. First, who knows the particulars we’re going to see in this speech. We start with the degenerate unpredictability of Trump and added to it we have whatever mix of senescence or loosening we’ve seen so clearly in the last year. And there I am really open to either possibility. I think sometimes that in term two he has kind of maxed out on all his desires for power, for adulation. And getting everything we want has a way of undoing many people, at least putting a lot of slack in the inner chords that give us quickness and alacrity. In any case, we start with Trump and all the additional feralness and distention we have in this second term. So who the eff knows what to expect.

But this is the prism I think we should be looking at the speech through.

Continue reading “How to View Trump’s Feral State of the Union”

Oversight Dem Says DOJ ‘Appears to Have Illegally Withheld FBI Interviews’ Around Trump Accusation

The top Democrat on the House Oversight Committee said Tuesday that he is opening an investigation into the Justice Department potentially withholding documents about an accusation against President Trump in the Epstein files. 

Continue reading “Oversight Dem Says DOJ ‘Appears to Have Illegally Withheld FBI Interviews’ Around Trump Accusation”

Immigration Court Watchers Will Be Front and Center at Trump’s State of the Union

Rep. Dan Goldman (D-NY) has been a central figure in the ongoing efforts to resist President Donald Trump’s mass deportation push in New York City. And, when Trump delivers his State of the Union address on Tuesday evening, Goldman is making sure some of the observers who have been monitoring the masked Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents in court and helping detained immigrants win their release will be in the room. 

Goldman has invited Father Fabian Arias of Saint Peter’s Church in Manhattan and Peter Melck Kuttel as his guests for the presidential speech. The pair have worked closely with Goldman as the congressman has turned his district office into what he has dubbed a “whole triage center” for detainees and their families. 

Continue reading “Immigration Court Watchers Will Be Front and Center at Trump’s State of the Union”