Over a Year into Occupation, DC Fights to Get Armed National Guard Out of City

A cyclist passes members of the US National Guard ahead of US President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania Trump hosting China's President Xi Jinping and his wife Peng Liyuan at the White House in Washington, DC, on... A cyclist passes members of the US National Guard ahead of US President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania Trump hosting China's President Xi Jinping and his wife Peng Liyuan at the White House in Washington, DC, on September 24, 2026. President Xi is on a State visit to the United States from September 23 to 25. (Photo by Mandel NGAN / AFP via Getty Images) MORE LESS

More than a year after President Donald Trump deployed the National Guard into Washington D.C. on a broad crime-deterrence mission, the once unthinkable scene of armed soldiers patrolling American streets has become the daily backdrop. A panel of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals on Wednesday delved into how long that would continue. 

The lawyer for the city described “issues where the National Guard is posting troops near ballot drop boxes, issues where the National Guard is sending troops to residential neighborhoods far from any federal property or interest, dramatically altering life in the district.” 

But the panel — composed of three appointees of Democratic presidents — seemed to struggle with the district’s lessened sovereignty, as it’s long been deprived of the statehood its inhabitants want. The president and Congress have broad power over the district, though the city argued Wednesday that there are still some restraints that prevent Trump from deploying both D.C. and out-of-state Guard for a now four-year-long mission with no inciting event.

“All it takes is a request, and two of the three people who are listed as requesting are people the president controls — it’s not much of a speedbump, it just is one,” said Judge Cornelia Pillard, an Obama appointee. 

The administration resisted that characterization, as it would likely struggle to find pretext to redeploy the Guard, should the court force the current occupation to end. 

The district court ruled in November that the deployment was unlawful; the president has the authority to mobilize the Guard to protect federal property, wrote Judge Jia Cobb, but cannot unilaterally deploy the guard for general crime fighting. She stayed that order to give the administration time to appeal. 

This summer, Trump extended the Guard occupation through 2029, saddling the taxpayer with a daily price tag estimated to exceed $3 million. 

8
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Coming to a town near you.

  2. What does it take to grant the District of Columbia statehood? The U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate pass a statehood bill by a simple majority vote, and the President sign it into law.

    Democrats had opportunities to do this. Instead they left the so-called (and for good reason) Last Plantation as it is, complete with the legend “End Taxation Without Representation” on its license plates, decided to screwing District residents while screwing themselves of additional democratic voters.

    Fun Fact: Congress could grant statehood to Puerto Rico through the same legislative process.

  3. It’s costing taxpayers a $3 M+ per diem to oppress DC with a National Guard occupation. It’s insane.

  4. And yet, no matter how much they all want to do this “necessary and essential” work, they just somehow can’t bring themselves to find their spines.

  5. The Democrats need to acquire a spine. Once that occurs, statehood for DC and Puerto Rico would be simple and fast.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

2 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for progress Avatar for billymac Avatar for tiowally Avatar for cub_calloway Avatar for demosthenes59 Avatar for john_adams

Continue Discussion