Nadler: DOJ Told Me They ‘Will Not Comply’ With Subpoena For Mueller Report

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY) attends a news conference on April 9, 2019. (Photo by Zach Gibson/Getty Images)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

In addition to confirming that the Attorney General Bill Barr would not show up to his scheduled testimony on Thursday, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler (D-NY) said Wednesday that the Department of Justice had also rejected the committee’s subpoena for an un-redacted version of special counsel Robert Mueller’s final report.

“The Department of Justice has also told us that they will not comply with our subpoena for the full un-redacted Mueller report, a subpoena that was returnable today,” Nadler told reporters.

He continued: “I will continue to work with the attorney general to reach a reasonable accommodation on access to the full report and the underlying evidence, but not for much longer. Compliance with congressional subpoenas is not optional, and if good faith negotiations don’t result in a pledge of compliance in the next day or two, the next step is seeking a contempt citation against the attorney general.”

Nadler’s committee subpoenaed the Department of Justice for the un-redacted report on April 19.

In a statement, Justice Department spokesperson Kerri Kupec said that Barr “voluntarily released the Special Counsel’s confidential report with minimal redactions to Congress and the public, made an even-less redacted report available to Chairman Nadler and congressional leadership (which they have refused to review), and made himself available to the Committee by volunteering to testify this week.”

Democratic leadership has refused to view that less-redacted version because they’ve asserted the conditions for viewing it are too restrictive, and that the less-redacted version should be available to more of Congress.

Latest News
49
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Almost like it has exonerating, I mean, incriminating information.

  2. another one for the supremely corrupt court. will the fascist five go on record with constitution crushing jurisprudence? hey roberts, about that legacy…

  3. “I will continue to work with the attorney general to reach a reasonable accommodation on access to the full report and the underlying evidence, but not for much longer. Compliance with congressional subpoenas is not optional, and if good faith negotiations don’t result in a pledge of compliance in the next day or two, the next step is seeking a contempt citation against the attorney general.”

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yd85ozj0p8o
  4. Mayday! Mayday! Mayday!

  5. Can we get the Canadian Supreme Court to take over this mess?

    They would rule firmly, but nicely, against all of Trump’s tricks…

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

43 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for mattinpa Avatar for wordtoyamamma Avatar for clemmers Avatar for enon Avatar for voluntarycurmudgeon Avatar for cd Avatar for ignoreland Avatar for iamwil Avatar for darrtown Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for georgeh Avatar for swampcritter Avatar for just_observing Avatar for formerchild Avatar for maximus Avatar for pike_bishop Avatar for gatesfl Avatar for iceape Avatar for justruss Avatar for quickq Avatar for zenicetus Avatar for kovie Avatar for Volvo_Birkenstock

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: