Barr Skipping House Judiciary Testimony After Contentious Senate Appearance

WASHINGTON, DC - MAY 1: U.S. Attorney General William Barr testifies before the Senate Judiciary Committee May 1, 2019 in Washington, DC. Barr testified on the Justice Department's investigation of Russian interferen... WASHINGTON, DC - MAY 1: U.S. Attorney General William Barr testifies before the Senate Judiciary Committee May 1, 2019 in Washington, DC. Barr testified on the Justice Department's investigation of Russian interference with the 2016 presidential election. (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Attorney General Bill Barr declined a request to testify before the House Judiciary Committee on Thursday, chairman Jerry Nadler (D-NY) confirmed to reporters Wednesday evening.

Barr has attempted to dictate the conditions of his appearance before the House committee, refusing to appear if he was to face questioning from staff attorneys, and not only members of Congress.

The committee — chaired by Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY) — voted on Wednesday to allow extra time during Barr’s appearance for the additional questioning.

The move has set up a showdown between House Judiciary and the Justice Department. Nadler previously threatened to subpoena Barr if he does not appear, while the Washington Post cited an unnamed DOJ official as saying that “members are the ones who do the questioning.”

In a press conference on Wednesday evening, Nadler hit the Trump administration for its “complete stonewalling” of Congress’ attempts at oversight.

“[Barr] has tried to blackmail the committee into not following what we think is the most effective means of eliciting the information we need,” Nadler said. “I hope the attorney general will think overnight and will be there as well.”

“I can understand why he is afraid of facing more effective examination,” Nadler added.

In a statement, Justice Department spokesperson Kerri Kupec said Nadler’s “insistence on having staff question the Attorney General, a Senate-confirmed Cabinet member, is inappropriate.”

“Further,” Kupec said, “in light of the fact that the majority of the House Judiciary Committee – including Chairman Nadler – are themselves attorneys, and the Chairman has the ability and authority to fashion the hearing in a way that allows for efficient and thorough questioning by the Members themselves, the Chairman’s request is also unnecessary.”

The hearing was scheduled to follow his contentious Wednesday appearance before the Senate Judiciary Committee, where Barr slammed Mueller and defended Trump against allegations of obstruction.

House Judiciary representatives did not immediately reply to requests for comment.

Latest Muckraker
214
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Barr has nothing to offer to the House; he’s too clever to perjure himself, and that’s the only thing which could be interesting. Skip Barr and move straight to Mueller.

  2. Avatar for dv01 dv01 says:

    Quelle surprise

  3. Avatar for meri meri says:

    Man, it sure is a relief to know that testifying is optional.

  4. So the DOJ gets to dictate how the House Judiciary Committee conducts its hearings?

    And do we really need to give Barr additional airspace to spew his lies? I think not.

    Let’s get Mueller in the witness chair. Fuck Barr.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

208 more replies

Participants

Avatar for lestatdelc Avatar for sandi Avatar for jootjoint Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for meri Avatar for ncsteve Avatar for cervantes Avatar for george_spiggott Avatar for squirreltown Avatar for zoester Avatar for chelsea530 Avatar for christianhankel Avatar for leftcoaster Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for georgeh Avatar for jacksonhts Avatar for greysea Avatar for rhs1963 Avatar for katscherger Avatar for thinski Avatar for skeptical Avatar for carolson Avatar for inthesedays Avatar for Volvo_Birkenstock

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: