Judge Smacks Down Roger Stone’s CNN Conspiracy Theory

Roger Stone, after his release, outside the Federal Courthouse in Fort Lauderdale on Friday, Jan. 25, 2019. (Amy Beth Bennett/South Florida Sun Sentinel/TNS)
Roger Stone, after his release, outside the Federal Courthouse in Fort Lauderdale on Friday, Jan. 25, 2019. (Amy Beth Bennett/South Florida Sun Sentinel/TNS via Getty Images)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

A D.C. federal judge rejected a motion Wednesday from GOP operative Roger Stone claiming that special counsel Robert Mueller’s team tipped off CNN before his Jan. 25 morning arrest.

Stone had petitioned Judge Amy Berman Jackson to hold a hearing demanding that prosecutors “show cause” for why they were not in contempt of court for allegedly leaking a copy of the indictment to the press. A CNN news crew captured Stone’s arrest on video, after having a team stake out the spin artist’s Florida home.

But exhibits Stone provided “supplied no reason to believe that any contempt of court had occurred,” Berman Jackson wrote in the order, adding that evidence and filings he introduced into the record “demonstrate that there is no basis” to issue a contempt order.

Berman Jackson addressed the allegations around CNN directly in the filing, as well. The theory has taken root in conservative media over the past month, with former hot tub salesman and onetime acting attorney general Matthew Whitaker giving some credence to it in Feb. 8 testimony before the House Judiciary Committee.

“Defendant’s recitation of the events reflects nothing more than the fact that the reporter had the indictment in hand after the defendant was arrested, and there is no evidence that the reporter had it earlier,” the judge wrote.

Stone faces charges of obstruction, witness tampering, and lying to Congress. Berman Jackson strengthened a gag order on Stone last week after he posted a picture of her on Instagram with what appeared to be crosshairs next to her head.

In Wednesday’s order, Berman Jackson also noted that Stone’s argument had shifted from the initial allegation that prosecutors leaked a copy of the indictment to CNN.

As the dispute wound on, Stone’s attorneys began to argue instead that special counsel prosecutors released the indictment before an unsealing order came down in the case.

“The defendant misapprehends the clear purpose and the intent of the sealing order,” she wrote. “The OSC’s publication of the indictment after the defendant’s arrest was not unauthorized.”

Latest Muckraker

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for schmed schmed says:

  2. Did you spare a few moments to watch Cohen today, Rog? Because the fact that your arrest was televised is not your biggest problem right now.

  3. Avatar for sooner sooner says:

  4. Avatar for outis outis says:

    Keep striking out Stone. Try for the record.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

29 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for pluckyinky Avatar for connie_boyd Avatar for ajoguy Avatar for ncsteve Avatar for mattinpa Avatar for bojimbo26 Avatar for manhattan123 Avatar for 1daven Avatar for bluinmaine Avatar for sonsofares Avatar for 2strange Avatar for lastroth Avatar for ottnott Avatar for kitty Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for zd123 Avatar for jacksonhts Avatar for not_so_fluffy Avatar for dannydorko Avatar for spin Avatar for maximus Avatar for euglena4056 Avatar for outis

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: