Scientific American Editor: Fox Told Me I Couldn’t Talk About Climate Change

Scientific American Editor: Fox Told Me I Couldn't Talk About Climate Change
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

An editor with Scientific American magazine said Wednesday he was shot down by a Fox News producer when he said he wanted to talk about the impacts of climate change.

Michael Moyer appeared on “Fox & Friends” on Wednesday morning to talk about tech trends for the next decade. He tweeted that he suggested the number one trend for the future would be climate change impact but was told to choose another topic instead.

A recent study by the Union of Concerned Scientists found that while misinformation about climate change was more or less common among cable news channels, Fox News led the pack by airing misleading coverage 72 percent of the time. The network’s denial of global warming has been a subject of late night mockery, from Jon Stewart to “Saturday Night Live.”

The rest of Moyer’s tweets from behind-the-scenes at “Fox & Friends” described an uncomfortable experience, including an assistant who told him the missing Malaysia Airlines jet was hidden on a military base somewhere:

TPM has reached out to Fox News for comment.

Image via Fox News

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for jsfox jsfox says:

    Fox News where the truth goes to die.

  2. He shouldn’t have participated. By agreeing to censorship he legitimizes Fox News propaganda. What do scientists at Scientific American think are future trends? Well, climate change isn’t something the smart guys are thinking about so why should you? This guy should take a shower for having agreed to that.

  3. Why would Fox care about anything that happens in the future since they all believe everything great about America happened 60 years ago?

  4. Avatar for dont dont says:

    perhaps what he should have done was bring up climate change anyway. Is this gab fest live, 5 second delay or taped? If it’s either of the first two the worst that could have happened is that he would never be invited back. Like that’s a bad thing. If it’s taped he could say it was edited out. He’s with S A a very well respected mag. They’re fux spews.

  5. Avatar for dont dont says:

    30 +/- years ago, when St Ronnie walked the white house

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

54 more replies

Participants

Avatar for valgalky23 Avatar for doremus_jessup Avatar for pac Avatar for jonathang Avatar for lew Avatar for sundancer Avatar for sergeant2 Avatar for tcinla Avatar for red_cabbage Avatar for mothermachree Avatar for lio Avatar for lamonth Avatar for dont Avatar for chuck_voellinger Avatar for weatherservo9 Avatar for proudatheist Avatar for hoshismom Avatar for richardnixonhuberthumphrey Avatar for motopilot Avatar for scarshapedstar Avatar for suicide_arsonist Avatar for denny Avatar for lisztman Avatar for emilianoelmexicano

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: