Former Obama Chief Of Staff: McConnell ‘Watered Down’ 2016 Letter On Russia

on December 11, 2014 in Washington, DC.
WASHINGTON, DC - DECEMBER 11: White House Chief of Staff Denis McDonough arrives at a House Democratic Caucus meeting December 11, 2014 on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC. Both houses of Congress are working to avoid... WASHINGTON, DC - DECEMBER 11: White House Chief of Staff Denis McDonough arrives at a House Democratic Caucus meeting December 11, 2014 on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC. Both houses of Congress are working to avoid a government shutdown at midnight this evening as Republican efforts to pass an omnibus funding bill stalled earlier this afternoon. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Former President Barack Obama’s last White House chief of staff, Denis McDonough, said Sunday that Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) insisted in 2016 that a bipartisan statement on Russian election meddling — released fewer than two months before the election — be “watered down.”

“The President asked the four leaders in a bipartisan meeting in the Oval Office to join him in asking the states to work with us on this question,” McDonough told NBC’s Chuck Todd, referring to a late September 2016 letter from the majority and minority leaders in both chambers to the National Association of State Election Directors.

“It took over three weeks to get that statement worked out,” McDonough continued. “It was dramatically watered down. You can ask Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi–”

“And it was watered down on the insistence of Mitch McConnell?” Todd interjected.

“Yes,” McDonough replied.

“And nobody else?” Todd asked.

“Yes,” McDonough confirmed.

The Obama chief of staff said he didn’t know why McConnell had insisted on watering down the letter.

McDonough’s story matched post-election reporting in the Washington Post, which cited several unnamed officials, that McConnell “raised doubts about the underlying intelligence and made clear to the administration that he would consider any effort by the White House to challenge the Russians publicly an act of partisan politics,” in the paper’s words.

And Former Vice President Joe Biden said in January of this year that McConnell “wanted no part of having a bipartisan commitment saying, essentially, ‘Russia’s doing this. Stop.’”

McConnell’s office responded to Biden’s remark at the time by pointing to the September letter to the National Association of State Election Directors, according to Politico. However, as Politico noted, that letter made no specific mention of Russia nor any other attempts at influencing the election beyond “malefactors … seeking to use cyberattacks to disrupt the administration of our elections.” 

McConnell’s communications director, David Popp, referred TPM in an email to his response to NBC News: He pointed the outlet to a July 2017 op-ed in the Post by McDonough, in which the former chief of staff wrote “This bipartisan outreach was harder and more time-consuming than it needed to be, but it was ultimately successful.”

“The White House asked for a letter about election security — not Russia,” Popp added in an email to NBC News. “And McDonough said he even asked DEMOCRATS not to do a public statement about Russia during this same time period. Give me a break.”

McDonough told Todd separately on Sunday, referring to the “Gang of Eight,” constituted of the majority and minority leaders of both congressional chambers, and of both chambers’ intelligence committees: “The intelligence committee approached the entire leadership of the Congress in early August 2016. Several members of that group did not take the briefing until early September 2016. Indication number one of a lack of urgency.”

Watch below via NBC:

Latest Livewire
187
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Because McConnell is part of the Russian conspiracy, McDonough.

  2. Does this surprise anyone? Not me, at all. This is what you would do when you have something to hide.

    What surprises me is “And nobody else?” “Yes" because I believe Ryan had reasons he wanted to water it down, too.

  3. When 40% (ish) of the body of government is actively working against the truth and against the national interest, I am not sure what exactly you’re supposed to do.

    The framers of the Constitution likely did not consider this specific failure mode.

    Thanks, Yertle. Great work.

  4. McConnell did this because he needed Trump to be elected. If Hillary won, and nominated a SCT justice more liberal than Merrick Garland, McConnell would look like a complete idiot for having blocked Garland’s nomination. This was pure self-interest.

  5. Sure they did …

    It’s called TREASON ! …

    and there is more than just one in this Congress that knew ahead of time what was going on …

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

181 more replies

Participants

Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for clunkertruck Avatar for blandsten Avatar for wordtoyamamma Avatar for eggrollian Avatar for teenlaqueefa Avatar for sandyh Avatar for bluinmaine Avatar for Lacuna-Synecdoche Avatar for inversion Avatar for dont Avatar for joelopines Avatar for geofu54 Avatar for tena Avatar for junebug Avatar for georgeh Avatar for tsp Avatar for timbo Avatar for cub_calloway Avatar for pike_bishop Avatar for kumquat16 Avatar for clare Avatar for bcgister Avatar for kenga

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: