Cohen’s Lawyers Poke Holes In Avenatti Doc, But Say He Identified Cohen Clients

Attorney for Stormy Daniels, Michael Avenatti leaves after US President Donald Trump's personal lawyer Michael Cohen left the US Courthouse in New York on April 26, 2018. - US President Donald Trump acknowledged on T... Attorney for Stormy Daniels, Michael Avenatti leaves after US President Donald Trump's personal lawyer Michael Cohen left the US Courthouse in New York on April 26, 2018. - US President Donald Trump acknowledged on Thursday that his personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, represented him in a "deal" involving porn star Stormy Daniels. Trump had previously denied knowledge of a $130,000 payment Cohen made to Daniels that she claims was to prevent her from talking about their alleged 2006 affair.Trump, in a wide-ranging telephone interview with "Fox and Friends," admitted for the first time that Cohen represented him in a "deal" with Daniels, who has filed a lawsuit seeking to have the "hush agreement" negotiated by Cohen thrown out. (Photo by HECTOR RETAMAL / AFP) (Photo credit should read HECTOR RETAMAL/AFP/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Lawyers for Michael Cohen on Wednesday disputed several claims made by Stormy Daniels’ lawyer Michael Avenatti in an unsourced document Tuesday, but admitted some of Avenatti’s information appeared to be accurate.

Avenatti alleged in the document Tuesday that the shell company Cohen had established to pay Daniels $130,000 in hush money, Essential Consultants, had received millions of dollars from a variety of entities. Several large companies, including AT&T and drugmaker Novartis, confirmed that they had had agreements with Cohen.

“While Mr. Avenatti has published numerous incorrect statements regarding Mr. Cohen, he appears to be in possession of some information from Mr. Cohen’s actual bank records,” Cohen’s lawyers said in the filing, naming AT&T and Novartis specifically. (Read the full filing below.)

“If Mr. Avenatti wishes to be admitted pro hac vice before this Court, he should be required to explain to this Court how he came to possess and release this information,” they added.

The filing also pointed to several of what it identified as mistakes in Avenatti’s filing, such as two instances where it claimed Avenatti incorrectly identified other Michael Cohens — namely, one Michael Cohen in Toronto and one in Israel — as their client.

“We are not going to list every incorrect statement” contained in Avenatti’s document, they say at one point.

The letter concluded by naming the Russian oligarch at the center of the much of the attention paid to Avenatti’s document, Viktor Vekselberg. Though the American affililate, Columbus Nova, of Vekselberg’s company Renova did confirm the payments Avenatti identified, both Columbus Nova and Renova have denied any involvement from Vekselberg.

“Avenatti has also deliberately distorted information from the records which appear to be in his possession for the purpose of creating a toxic mix of misinformation,” Cohen’s lawyers said in the filing.

“For example,” they added later, “Mr. Avenatti stated that ‘Mr. [Viktor] Vekselberg and his cousin Mr. Andrew Intrater routed eight payments to Mr. Cohen through a company named Columbus Nova LLC (‘Columbus’) beginning in January 2017 and continuing until at least August 2017.’ Ex. A at 3. Mr. Avenatti’s statements are incorrect, as can be seen from the public response of Columbus Nova” denying Vekselberg’s involvement.

Avenatti, responding to the filing, said Cohen’s lawyers “fail to address, let alone contradict, 99% of the statements in what we released.”

Read the Cohen’s lawyers’ filing below:

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for danny danny says:

    Surely it’s Mr. Cohen who is the professional hack on behalf of vice.

  2. I bet these guys are more adept than Jiuliani…

  3. Jeeze, I’d LOL if this weren’t so serious.

  4. It’s the dossier all over again. If anything in it, no matter how irrelevant to the fundamental claims, can be found to be at all shaky, then the implication is the whole thing can be dismissed. It’s ridiculous and they know it’s ridiculous. It’s playing to the crowd when it’s the court they have to worry about. But like Josh says, pounding the table is really all they have. The essential conspiracy is effectively standing there, on stage, in the spotlight, with its pants around its ankles, looking pretty foolish.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

88 more replies

Participants

Avatar for valgalky23 Avatar for david_e_brown Avatar for lestatdelc Avatar for george_spiggott Avatar for squirreltown Avatar for rollinnolan Avatar for teenlaqueefa Avatar for zoester Avatar for chelsea530 Avatar for sparrowhawk Avatar for danny Avatar for geofu54 Avatar for karlsgems Avatar for nemo Avatar for dlnyc Avatar for serendipitoussomnambulist Avatar for dickweed Avatar for darrtown Avatar for reggid Avatar for pmaroneyb Avatar for demyankee Avatar for asturcot Avatar for katscherger Avatar for kenga

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: