CNN: Local Sinclair Staff Trash Must-Run ‘Propaganda’ Segments

Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Employees at local television stations owned by Sinclair Broadcast Group complained to CNN about a “must-run” script that bashed “fake” and “one-sided” news.

“It sickens me the way this company is encroaching upon trusted news brands in rural markets,” an unnamed investigative reporter at Sinclair told CNN in an article published Monday.

The must-run segment alleges that “some media outlets” publish reporting “without checking facts first.” 

Another unnamed local reporter told CNN: “I try everyday to do fair, local stories, some Trump-related, but it’s always washed out by this stuff they do at a national level.”

“As a producer who finds it unethical, I will refuse to run it,” another unnamed Sinclair employee told the network, though CNN noted it was unclear whether any of Sinclair’s stations — the company owns more stations than any other broadcaster in the United States — had actually refused to run the segment.

The stations were instructed to run the segment often, and during “news time, not commercial time,” according to internal documents reported by CNN in early March. Sinclair owns more television stations than any other broadcaster in the country. On Monday, the company could claim the support of a powerful friend: President Donald Trump, some of whose former advisers now work for Sinclair, and who tweeted in support of the broadcaster.

The Los Angeles Times’ Matt Pearce published an exchange he had with an unnamed Sinclair employee who described conditions that, in Pearce’s words, make it “so hard for TV anchors to refuse the Sinclair’s editorial edicts.”

“I feel bad because they’re seeing these people they’ve trusted for decades tell them things they know are essentially propaganda,” one unnamed anchor told CNN of the must-run segment. The person noted that fellow anchors “have all this experience in news, and now they’re being degraded like this.”

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for vonq vonq says:

    Those contracts sound like court cases waiting to happen and the local anchors will have local community support.

  2. Hurry. Up. Mueller.

  3. explains why it’s so hard for TV anchors to refuse the Sinclair’s editorial edicts. They have contracts that penalize them if they quit.

    Only in the great freedom-loving US of A is something like this legal. Anywhere else this would be considered bonded labor and would not only be illegal but whoever came up with this will be subject to criminal charges.

  4. Maybe they could report on their own shitty employer’s way of forcing them to parrot these statements, subtly ridicule the entire exercise, let viewers know it’s not actual news, and therefore not really the job of a local news anchor to spout this garbage, or find their own ways to subvert this nonsense.

  5. So not only would they not have a job in an industry that is rapidly shrinking but they would be penalized for standing up for the Constitution…free press and all that??? I betcha ‘Sinclair’ thinks they are ‘patriots’…

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

79 more replies

Participants

Avatar for valgalky23 Avatar for playitagainrowlf Avatar for sysprog Avatar for old_curmudgeon Avatar for ncsteve Avatar for mattinpa Avatar for arrrrrj Avatar for populuxecowboy Avatar for sharonsj Avatar for tomdibble Avatar for bboerner Avatar for mrf Avatar for dddinah Avatar for tena Avatar for rwdorsey Avatar for demyankee Avatar for birdford Avatar for thinski Avatar for pike_bishop Avatar for tindalos Avatar for the_loan_arranger Avatar for justruss Avatar for karlwlewis Avatar for kenga

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: