Where Things Stand: Alito’s Roe Opinion Was Filled With Language Pushed By Evangelical Group

This is your TPM evening briefing.
WASHINGTON, DC - MARCH 07: U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Samuel Alito testifies about the court's budget during a hearing of the House Appropriations Committee's Financial Services and General Government Subco... WASHINGTON, DC - MARCH 07: U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Samuel Alito testifies about the court's budget during a hearing of the House Appropriations Committee's Financial Services and General Government Subcommittee March 07, 2019 in Washington, DC. Members of the subcommittee asked the justices about court security, televising oral arguments and codes of ethics for the court. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images) MORE LESS

A former leader of a religious right activist group recently admitted on a podcast that the language that Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito used in his damning majority opinion overturning Roe v. Wade mirrored rhetoric the Christian group has been pushing on Supreme Court justices for decades.

Rev. Rob Schenck recently appeared on an episode of the State of Belief podcast to discuss his efforts as a former member of the group Faith and Action to, essentially, sway justices’ views on social issues through prayer sessions. The interview is from earlier this month, but Politico surfaced it here. It’s worth a listen if you want to get a better understanding of how these unofficial evangelical lobbying-via-prayer efforts work, but it reinforces a theme we covered earlier this summer when an official at the evangelical organization, Liberty Counsel, was caught on a hot mic bragging about secretly praying with Supreme Court justices.

In the Liberty Counsel situation, Peggy Nienaber, who is an executive director there, was heard claiming at an event celebrating Roe’s overturning that she and others associated with Liberty Counsel routinely go into the Supreme Court building to pray with justices. She claimed that her most recent prayer gathering with members of the high court had taken place as recently as the Monday after the Supreme Court overturned Roe.

The Nienaber situation presents a specific conflict of interest not only because Liberty Counsel routinely brings cases before the Supreme Court, but conservative justices even pointed to the group’s amicus brief as it struck down Roe. But more broadly, Schenck’s remarks on the podcast speak to the strategic campaign brought by evangelical and far-right Christian groups over the last several decades to get Roe overturned. In some ways, it’s another layer of the Southern Strategy and Republicans efforts to wed white evangelical voters to the Republican Party, primarily through supporting anti-abortion (aka “pro-life”) causes and policy platforms.

“I can say with a certain level of certainty I don’t think we would have gotten the decision as it is worded from Justice Alito without the work we did,” said Schenck, who was in charge of Faith and Action (now called Faith & Liberty) for almost 20 years.

Faith and Action is an activist organization that has worked for some time to unofficially try to get the ears of various SCOTUS justices, often under the guise of prayer sessions, to embolden them to be supportive of socially conservative causes. Here’s how he described the group’s tactics:

“We were careful,” he said. “You had to observe boundaries with the justices always and even in your language. So, for example, it would be a big no-no to pray something like: ‘Lord, we pray that same sex marriage will never be legalized in America.’ That, that would be too forward. It would be everything from boorish to a technical violation of their quasi-ethical rules.”

Instead the group members would say something like: “Lord, we thank you that justice so-and-so is on the bench when we must defend the sanctity of marriage and the family,” he said.

Schenck said he eventually left the group because of the its approach to influencing justices and its stance on guns. But he said in reading Alito’s opinion in the Dobbs case, he recognized some of the language and broader argument as rhetoric similar to what his group pushed for years.

“It was a polemic from our side of the movement, which startled me, took my breath away,” he said. “He was using phrases we had invented as bumper sticker slogans in a Supreme Court decision. It was breathtaking to me.”

The news comes at a time of increased scrutiny of Supreme Court justices’ various conflicts of interest, primarily due to Justice Clarence Thomas’ wife’s role in helping Trump and his allies try to overturn the 2020 election.

The Best Of TPM Today

Here’s what you should read this evening:

Check out our new tool to track where Democrats are at on supporting a filibuster carveout for abortion: Which Senate Democrats Are Blocking The Path To Abortion Rights?

Biden’s COVID Symptoms Now ‘Almost Completely Resolved,’ WH Doc Says

Jan 6 Panel Releases New Videos Showing Trump’s Reluctance

GOP Ex-Lawmaker Sentenced For Breaching Capitol Vows To Raise ‘Absolute Hell In DC’

Sign up for our voting rights newsletter, written by Matt Shuham, here: The Franchise: Could This Bill Prevent Another Jan. 6?

And our weekend newsletter here: The Weekender: Willing That Crowded Field Into Existence

Yesterday’s Most Read Story

Jan. 6 Panel Outlines New Information It Is Seeking — Summer Concepcion

What We Are Reading

Secret Service agents who tried to torpedo Hutchinson testimony lawyer up, refuse to testify: panel — Igor Derysh

Richard Glossip Has Eaten Three Last Meals on Death Row. Years Later, the State Is Still Trying to Execute Him. — Ziva Branstetter

London hit 104 degrees. That’s like 129 degrees in Phoenix. — Naema Ahmed, John Muyskens, Kevin Schaul and Jason Samenow

Dear Reader,

When we asked recently what makes TPM different from other outlets, readers cited factors like honesty, curiosity, transparency, and our vibrant community. They also pointed to our ability to report on important stories and trends long before they are picked up by mainstream outlets; our ability to contextualize information within the arc of history; and our focus on the real-world consequences of the news.

Our unique approach to reporting and presenting the news, however, wouldn’t be possible without our readers’ support. That’s not just marketing speak, it’s true: our work would literally not be possible without readers deciding to become members. Not only does member support account for more than 80% of TPM’s revenue, our members have helped us build an engaged and informed community. Many of our best stories were born from reader tips and valuable member feedback.

We do what other news outlets can’t or won’t do because our members’ support gives us real independence.

If you enjoy reading TPM and value what we do, become a member today.

Latest Edblog
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Investigations Desk:
Reporters:
Newswriters:
Director of Audience:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: