Reader DP writes in the following<$NoAd$> …
As a trial lawyer, Edwards learned not to allow a witness to explain. Had he challenged Cheney on each lie, Cheney could have explained them away. A better trial tactic, I am not sure about a debate, is to let the falsehood sit there but point it out later to the jury or the judge. By not letting Cheney explain away the lies, he is stuck with them and the public will act as the jury.
I have no way of knowing if this is what Edwards was consciously trying to do. But it does make me wonder.
