Why The GOP Can’t Stop Trump, A Navy Admiral’s Drunken Escapades, and Muslim Rep Receives Death Threat

Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Check out Wednesday’s newsletter!

December 9, 2015

Top Stories


Nothing’s Gonna Stop Him Now: Why The GOP Can’t Derail Donald Trump

The Gist: There’s a myth circulating in the beltway that the GOP frontrunner can be stopped with the proper application of money and willpower. But if anyone is going to kill Trump, it is Trump himself.

Trump Spokeswoman Defends Muslim Ban: ‘So What? They’re Muslim’ (VIDEO)

The Gist: After first arguing that the Trump campaign only wanted to prevent “insurgents” from entering the US, spokeswoman Katrina Pierson admitted Trump thinks all Muslims “from Arab nations” should be prevented from doing so.

Muslim Congressman Says He Received Death Threat

The Gist: Rep. Andre Carson, one of Congress’ two Muslim-American members, said he received a death threat Monday and blamed politicians “fanning the flames” for the increasingly toxic political environment.

From The Reporter’s Notebook


A handful of pollsters and pundits told TPM’s Lauren Fox that the GOP campaigns and candidates had an obligation to attempt to stop Donald Trump before Iowa. “I don’t pretend to know if it would definitely work but we are getting to the point that someone needs to try,” said Republican strategist Brian Walsh.

Agree or Disagree?


Josh Marshall: Fox News acts as Donald Trump’s Leni Riefenstahl, elevating his bigotry and weaving a tapestry of falsehoods and hysteria that creates a mental world in which his “mounting volume of racist incitement is just not at all surprising.”

Say What?!


“I think it’s a mistake to base immigration or moratoriums based on religion. But you know, I’ve called for something similar, which is a moratorium based on high risk.”

– Rand Paul disparaged Trump’s Muslim ban, but said he had a similar idea too.

BUZZING: Today in the Hive


From a TPM Prime member: “If Tony Scalia really is a literalist who thinks the Court should honor original intent, this is over-and-done with. In the debates over the Fourteenth Amendment, the idea of apportioning on the basis of eligible voters was discussed and amendments of the wording to allow such were brought forward more than twice. They were defeated every time. Congress did not intend to allow apportionment on the basis of eligible voters. Period. But beyond that, the national experts on counting (the Census Bureau) filed an amicus brief in which they said the data do not exist to allow apportionment by eligible voters and they doubt data reliable enough to be used for apportionment can be collected. So, no data exist and the experts doubt it can be collected.”

Related: SCOTUS is tip-toeing around minorities in an important voting rights case.

Have something to add? Become a Prime member and join the discussion here.

What We’re Reading


The Navy reprimanded a 2-star admiral for getting drunk and wandering around naked at a Florida hotel. (The Washington Post)

An interactive map to see how many people have been shot in your neighborhood. (Slate)

Study: Jeb Bush’s tax plan is 4 times as expensive as his brother’s tax cuts. (Vox)


Latest Daybreaker
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: