McCabe Lawyer: Trump Tweets Show ‘Corrupted,’ ‘Illegitimate’ Firing Process

on December 21, 2017 in Washington, DC.
WASHINGTON, DC - DECEMBER 21: Federal Bureau of Investigation Deputy Director Andrew McCabe (C) is escorted by U.S. Capitol Police before a meeting with members of the Oversight and Government Reform and Judiciary c... WASHINGTON, DC - DECEMBER 21: Federal Bureau of Investigation Deputy Director Andrew McCabe (C) is escorted by U.S. Capitol Police before a meeting with members of the Oversight and Government Reform and Judiciary committees in the Rayburn House Office Building December 21, 2017 in Washington, DC. McCabe testified before the House Intelligence Committee for ten hours on Tuesday. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Michael Bromwich, an attorney representing ex-FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe (pictured above), said Sunday that President Donald Trump’s tweets on the matter had proven the firing process to be “illegitimate.”

Attorney General Jeff Sessions said Friday night, when McCabe was fired, that the action was the result of an Justice Department Inspector General’s Office report and a recommendation from the FBI’s Office of Professional Responsibility. Both offices, Sessions said, “concluded that Mr. McCabe had made an unauthorized disclosure to the news media and lacked candor − including under oath − on multiple occasions.”

McCabe countered by saying he was authorized to make certain media disclosures, that others including then-FBI Director James Comey had known about the disputed communications in question, and that he answered investigators’ questions “truthfully and as accurately as I could amidst the chaos that surrounded me.”

He further argued that his firing was an attempt to discredit him as a witness in special counsel Robert Mueller’s probe of Russian election meddling and other matters.

Trump, in tweets on Saturday and Sunday, tried to connect McCabe’s firing to Mueller’s probe and said the deputy director’s ouster was “great day for Democracy” [sic].

Latest Livewire
163
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. We will not be responding to each childish, defamatory, disgusting &
    false tweet by the President.

    Spoilsport.

  2. “the tweets confirm that he has corrupted the entire
    process that led to Mr. McCabe’s termination and has rendered it
    illegitimate.”

    Sadly, Trump’s corruption of the process that led to McCabe’s firing are a tiny part of all that he has corrupted and rendered illegitimate.

  3. “…argued that his firing was an attempt to discredit him as a witness in special counsel Robert Mueller’s probe of Russian election meddling and other matters.”

    Bingo.

    While the whole “pension” aspect is simply being shitty, that is almost beside the point (though of course would suck for McCabe). That Trump/Sessions are trying to establish a record they can point to to try and discredit any testimony, documents and memos about what McCabe saw or found out, is the crucial point to take away.

  4. Avatar for krux krux says:

    How many major lawsuits are headed the president’s way right now? I lose track.

    (Not sure what action McCabe’s lawyer will take, just assuming there will be legal action)

  5. Avatar for caltg caltg says:

    McCade’s firing is a clear example of obstruction of justice.

    The inspector General’s report, and the underlying FBI report, which have not been released, but which have been used as the basis to fire McCade may well reflect a conspiracy to obstruct justice.

    Trump’s tweets against the Mueller investigation are clear examples of obstruction.

    The firing of Rex Tillerman is a clear example of obstruction.

    The firing of Comey is a clear example of obstruction.

    Most everything the Trump and his mouthpiece, Sarah Hamhock says are examples of obstruction.

    Trump’s attempts to stop the investigation of Flynn is a clear example of obstruction . . . .
    . . . .and so much more.

    What in hell is Congress waiting for? Why have they not yet started impeachment hearings?

    Oh yes, there is a Repuglican majority. So much for the lie of "America First."

    Clearly our leaders are more interested in "Trump and Repugs First."

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

157 more replies

Participants

Avatar for xpurg8d Avatar for austin_dave Avatar for mattinpa Avatar for clunkertruck Avatar for cervantes Avatar for george_spiggott Avatar for rollinnolan Avatar for becca656 Avatar for zoester Avatar for thebigragu Avatar for chelsea530 Avatar for lastroth Avatar for sanni Avatar for tao Avatar for leftcoaster Avatar for darrtown Avatar for tena Avatar for junebug Avatar for spencersmom Avatar for flamingprogressive Avatar for caltg Avatar for krux Avatar for karlwlewis Avatar for rascal_crone

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: