Lawsuit Alleges White House Link To Fox News’ Bogus Seth Rich Conspiracy Story

White House Press secretary Sean Spicer speaks to the media during the daily briefing in the Brady Press Briefing Room of the White House, Friday, March 24, 2017. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)
White House Press secretary Sean Spicer speaks to the media during the daily briefing in the Brady Press Briefing Room of the White House, Friday, March 24, 2017. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

A lawsuit filed Tuesday by a Fox News contributor alleges that the White House, and possibly President Donald Trump himself, were involved in pushing for a Fox News story on a conspiracy theory surrounding the murder of Seth Rich that the network was forced to retract.

The lawsuit obtained by NPR was filed by Rod Wheeler, a Fox contributor and former detective recruited by Ed Butowsky, an investor and ally of President Donald Trump, to help with his effort to investigate the murder. Wheeler alleged that Butowsky worked with him and a reporter at Fox News to publish a story reporting that Rich, who was a staffer at the Democratic National Committee, had been in contact with Wikileaks.

Butowsky and Wheeler met with White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer to brief him on their findings about a month before the story went up, the lawsuit alleged. Spicer acknowledged to NPR that he met with Butowsky and Wheeler, but said they were “just informing me” about the story.

About a week before the story ran, Butowsky told Wheeler that the White House had seen the story and that the President wanted it published, according to the lawsuit. Wheeler alleges Butowsky did this to pressure him into helping. Butowsky told NPR that he was just joking with Wheeler, and that he never shared the story draft with Trump.

In the lawsuit, Wheeler also alleged that the Fox News reporter on the story, Malia Zimmerman, made up quotes from him, and that Butowsky coached him to tout the story on television and push the narrative that Russians did not hack the DNC.

Fox News told NPR that it looked into whether Wheeler was misquoted in the story and did not find “concrete evidence” that he was misquoted.

The network retracted the story on Rich, which also cited an unnamed FBI official, shortly after it went up, but did not say why the story did not meet its editorial standards at the time.

In a statement Tuesday, Jay Wallace, the president of news at Fox News, said that the lawsuit’s allegation that Fox News pushed the story as a distraction from coverage of the Russia probes is “erroneous.”

“The accusation that FoxNews.com published Malia Zimmerman’s story to help detract from coverage of the Russia collusion issue is completely erroneous. The retraction of this story is still being investigated internally and we have no evidence that Rod Wheeler was misquoted by Zimmerman. Additionally, FOX News vehemently denies the race discrimination claims in the lawsuit — the dispute between Zimmerman and Rod Wheeler has nothing to do with race,” Wallace said in a statement.

Fox News played a big role in pushing the conspiracy theory about Rich, who was murdered in Washington, D.C. in July 2016. Host Sean Hannity in particular pushed the bogus narrative, and his obsession was fueled by the bogus story published in May. Following the retraction and pleas from Rich’s family, Hannity pledged to stop talking about the DNC staffer, though he’s mentioned the conspiracy theory at least once more since then.

Read NPR’s full report here.

This post has been updated.

Latest Livewire
33
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Like one big human centipede of misinformation.

  2. Okay, forgive me for asking, but how does a news outlet “obtain exclusive access” to a lawsuit that’s already been filed? Once it’s filed, it’s a public record. You can either look it up online or, if the county where it’s filed is still in the Mayberry mode of operation, go down to the courthouse and ask to see it.

    Presumably, the plaintiff’s lawyer put them onto it, but it’s not like they were given a major leak of private info.

  3. Did you catch the part in the NPR piece about how Butowsky is responsible for “most of what we know about Benghazi”?

    Seems like something our dastardly “liberal media” should pursue, no?

    Edit - here it is: “Behind the scenes, I do a lot of work, (unpaid) helping to uncover certain stories,” Butowsky writes, as recounted in the suit.

    “[M]y biggest work was revealing most of what we know today about Benghazi.”

  4. “concrete evidence”

    Yes, current spin seemingly posits with their signature passive aggression that ‘out of deference to the Trump’s sacred regard for veracity, they are owed that extra measure of truth’.
    Yikes, concrete and will-o’-the-wisps never mix…

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

27 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for rob_beatty_walters Avatar for kendyzdad Avatar for ncsteve Avatar for clunkertruck Avatar for leftflank Avatar for epicurus Avatar for dweb Avatar for irasdad Avatar for juliagrey Avatar for afisher Avatar for mantan Avatar for christianhankel Avatar for sickneffintired Avatar for ottnott Avatar for nymund Avatar for jaybeeraybee Avatar for pshah Avatar for georgeh Avatar for pareedave Avatar for erratum Avatar for centralasiaexpat Avatar for jakebarnes Avatar for bluefalcon

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: