Trump Atty: Pardons ‘Not On The Table’ Because ‘There’s Nothing To Pardon’

Jay Sekulow, Chief Counsel of the American Center for Law and Justice, introduces Republican presidential candidate former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush during a Presidential candidate forum with Rev. Pat Robertson, right, ... Jay Sekulow, Chief Counsel of the American Center for Law and Justice, introduces Republican presidential candidate former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush during a Presidential candidate forum with Rev. Pat Robertson, right, at Regent University in Virginia Beach, Va., Friday, Oct. 23, 2015. (AP Photo/Steve Helber) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

A member of President Donald Trump’s legal team on Sunday said pardons are not on the table for Trump and his associates, despite reports that the President has inquired into his power to grant them, because “there’s nothing to pardon from.”

“We have not, and continue to not, have conversations with the President of the United States regarding pardons. Pardons have not been discussed, and pardons are not on the table,” Jay Sekulow, an attorney on Trump’s outside legal team, said on ABC News’ “This Week.”

He said Trump’s tweet on Sunday declaring his ability to grant pardons was “rather unremarkable.”

Trump’s declaration of his “complete power to pardon” came amid reports that his aides are looking for ways to undermine special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election.

“With regard to the issue of a President pardoning himself, there’s a big academic discussion going on right now,” Sekulow said. “Let me tell you what the legal team is not doing. We’re not researching the issue, because the issue of pardons is not on the table. There’s nothing to pardon from.”

He said whether Trump could pardon himself would “ultimately” be a question for the Supreme Court, since there is no precedent.

“Clearly the Constitution does vest a plenary pardon power within the presidency. Whether it would apply to the President himself I think ultimately would be a matter for a court to decide,” Sekulow said. “It’s a question that ultimately, if put in place, would have to be adjudicated by the Supreme Court to determine constitutionality.”

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for zsak zsak says:

    Pardons have not been discussed, and pardons are not on the table

    Trump says differently

  2. I think Trump’s tweet regarding pardons was more a signal to anyone who might be thinking of testifying against him.

  3. Poor Sucksatlaw - throwing him own self under the bus.

  4. The President’s lawyer might well argue that they have had and continue to have not-conversations about pardons because there’s—drumroll please—ta da! Nothing to pardon! Everything’s ju-ust fi-ine in legal jeopardy terms. No problemo. We cool. But I wonder.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=20CsCKYg998
  5. Would make sense if written in non Twitter style: “…@jaketapper “somebody” called him yesterday, doubting…”

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

74 more replies

Participants

Avatar for paulw Avatar for lockheedkeynesian Avatar for dr_coyote Avatar for dave_adams Avatar for sandyh Avatar for mantan Avatar for daveyjones64 Avatar for mike_in_houston Avatar for theghostofeustacetilley Avatar for dddinah Avatar for darrtown Avatar for dommyluc Avatar for antisachetdethe Avatar for maricaibo Avatar for lizzymom Avatar for tiowally Avatar for brian512 Avatar for coimmigrant Avatar for timbo Avatar for centralasiaexpat Avatar for zsak Avatar for libthinker Avatar for coprophagoussmile Avatar for edgewise

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: