Flake: I’m Encouraging GOPers To Confirm Garland If Clinton Wins

Sen. Jeff Flake, left, R-AZ, asks a question of Cochise County Sheriff Mark Dannels, right, during a field hearing of the U.S. Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee regarding troubles at the bor... Sen. Jeff Flake, left, R-AZ, asks a question of Cochise County Sheriff Mark Dannels, right, during a field hearing of the U.S. Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee regarding troubles at the border at the Arizona Capitol Monday, Nov. 23, 2015, in Phoenix. (AP Photo/Ross D. Franklin) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Sen. Jeff Flake (R-AZ) has long been signaling that Senate Republicans should confirm Merrick Garland, President Obama’s nominee to the Supreme Court, in the lame duck session if Hillary Clinton wins the election, and on Thursday he confirmed his position.

“I said if we were in a position like we were in in ’96 and we pretty much knew the outcome that we ought to move forward. But I think we passed that awhile ago,” Flake told Politico. “If Hillary Clinton is president-elect then we should move forward with hearings in the lame duck. That’s what I’m encouraging my colleagues to do.”

Flake has made similar comments before and has said that Republicans took the wrong position when they insisted that the next president should choose a nominee to replace the late Justice Antonin Scalia.

Earlier in October, he said that Republicans don’t actually believe the next president should choose the nominee and that they should have instead pushed “to confirm the most conservative justice to replace Scalia.” And if Clinton is elected, that justice would be Garland, Flake told the Daily Beast at the time.

In May, Flake suggested Republicans consider confirming Garland if Clinton wins the presidency.

“If we come to a point, I’ve said all along, where we’re going to lose the election or we lose the election in November, then we ought to approve him quickly, because I’m certain he’ll be more conservative than a Hillary Clinton nomination come January,” the Republican senator said on NBC’s “Meet the Press.”

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. Well of COURSE, you are Jeff. You won’t get ANYBODY this conservative if you screw around. But we always KNEW this. NOW you guys are just ‘showing’ everybody how hypocritical you ARE. ‘No nominee for OBAMA or the country is going to hell!!! OH SHT, SHE WON. We’d better confirm!’

  2. Garland was a peace offering from a polite and generous President.

    Killery can nominate her own and I hope you all choke on him/her.

  3. Wow, what a ballsy statement. /s

    That on-coming tidal wave got ya nervous, Jeffy Boy?

    Whatta Flake…

  4. Wow – good of you to show us your hand, there, Mr. Flake. Asshat to the core, I see. Why not confirm the man because he’s a good fit and he deserves respect as a SCOTUS nominee? Why not because it’s the right thing to do? Why not because it’s right for the nation as a whole as opposed the best option for Republicans? Seriously, dude, this is prime-time reason so many are turned off by today’s “Republicanism.”

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

134 more replies

Participants

Avatar for austin_dave Avatar for silas1898 Avatar for meri Avatar for george_spiggott Avatar for teenlaqueefa Avatar for skippykaos Avatar for storm Avatar for daveyjones64 Avatar for motopilot Avatar for fitley Avatar for geofu54 Avatar for addicted4444 Avatar for pshah Avatar for beattycat Avatar for jinnj Avatar for antisachetdethe Avatar for rwlorenz Avatar for melindaspop Avatar for akzim2015 Avatar for tiowally Avatar for dannydorko Avatar for maximus Avatar for pike_bishop Avatar for coprophagoussmile

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: