GOP Senator: ‘Nobody Really Believes’ That Next Prez Should Get SCOTUS Pick

UNITED STATES - FEB. 23 - Sen. Jeff Flake, R-Ariz., listens to an answer for his question during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on "The Unaccompanied Children Crisis: Does the Administration Have a Plan to Stop... UNITED STATES - FEB. 23 - Sen. Jeff Flake, R-Ariz., listens to an answer for his question during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on "The Unaccompanied Children Crisis: Does the Administration Have a Plan to Stop the Border Surge and Adequately Monitor the Children?," in the Dirksen Senate Office Building, on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, Feb. 23, 2016. (Photo By Al Drago/CQ Roll Call) (CQ Roll Call via AP Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Sen. Jeff Flake (R-AZ) made admissions that could be awkward for his Republican Senate colleagues trying to block President Obama’s nomination of Merrick Garland to the Supreme Court.

In an interview published Monday, Flake conceded that nobody in the Republican Party “really believes” that late Justice Antonin Scalia’s Supreme Court seat should be left for the next president to fill.

As proof, he flipped the scenario around and envisioned a Republican president currently in the White House and nearing the end of his term.

“Our position shouldn’t be that the next president ought to decide. Nobody really believes that, because if this were the last year of a Republican presidency nobody would say that,” Flake told the Daily Beast.

He added that the Senate’s position “ought to be to confirm the most conservative justice to replace Scalia,” to maintain balance, even if that means confirming President Obama’s Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland.

“That ought to be the principle, and that would allow for us to go with Garland if the alternative is somebody more liberal,” Flake said.

In March, Flake indicated that he would consider potentially moving forward a Supreme Court nominee in a lame duck session after the election.

“If we come to a point where we’ve lost the election, and we can get a centrist like Garland in there as opposed to someone like Hillary Clinton might appoint then I’d go for it,” he said.

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for allan allan says:

    Nope. You had your chance to do the right thing, the thing that is required by law, and you chose to not do so. When Clinton wins in November President Obama should withdrawal his nominee the next day. Let President Clinton pick her own nominee, as the Republicans requested – personally, I hope she picks Obama (either one). They are going to stick around DC for at least few more years, so its not like they have anything better to do.

  2. As soon as Hillary is elected McConnell will bring the Garland nomination forward. Otherwise he is going to have to stall a more liberal judge for 4 years.

  3. Avatar for meri meri says:

    Well, someone is volunteering to get Second Amendmented in the face.

  4. emergency meeting at the RNC being called–Reince sends out text-“Flake saying things that could compromise us again! The Turd is in the punch bowl! I repeat, the turd is in the punch bowl!”

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

118 more replies

Participants

Avatar for lestatdelc Avatar for josephebacon Avatar for estamm Avatar for bryan Avatar for daddy_love Avatar for kendyzdad Avatar for leftflank Avatar for irasdad Avatar for sandyh Avatar for dont Avatar for jkrogman Avatar for stradivarius50t3 Avatar for longtimeobserver Avatar for magical_panda Avatar for fitley Avatar for serendipitoussomnambulist Avatar for ronbyers Avatar for azjude Avatar for darrtown Avatar for jinnj Avatar for 62fender Avatar for pmaroneyb Avatar for jacksonhts Avatar for jsrtheta

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: