‘They Are the Party of Data Centers’
Sen. Jon Husted (R-OH) has some major data center skeletons in his closet from his time as lieutenant governor of Ohio.
He knows it, his Democratic challenger — the longtime Ohio elected official Sherrod Brown — knows it, his colleagues in the Senate know it, voters back home are well aware (thanks to an ad blitz from Brown’s campaign in recent months). For the past several weeks, Husted has been trying to convince his Democratic and Republican colleagues in the Senate to pass a piece of legislation that functions as little more than a press release to state utility regulators; I’ll get into that more below. The bill would, essentially encourage our nation’s Big Tech oligarchs to cover the cost of rising utility expenses tied to data centers and AI model training.
I wrote about the dramatic saga surrounding Husted’s legislative push as a remedy for his past fervent support for data center development in Ohio extensively here if you’d like to catch up. The TL;DR is that after years of championing new data center construction in the state as Ohio’s lieutenant governor, Husted is now calling for regulations to be placed on who foots the electric bill for data center-related spikes in energy prices in local communities. He is also joining Ohio Republican Gov. Mike DeWine in supporting a pause on sales and tax breaks for tech companies that want to build new facilities in Ohio. (It’s not just Republicans and it’s not just Ohio; several other states and even blue cities are passing new regulations or have placed temporary moratoriums on data center construction in their areas.)
Husted’s long-shot bid to try to pass the bill, called the Ratepayer Protection Act, was blocked by Senate Democrats this afternoon. While Sens. Jon Ossoff (D-GA), Raphael Warnock (D-GA), Maggie Hassan (D-NH), and Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) voted with Republicans today, it wasn’t enough to overcome the 60 vote filibuster in the upper chamber and Senate Dems were able to block it on a procedural vote, 57-43.
While the bill passed the House 417-3 earlier this month, Senate Democrats (besides the four who voted with Republicans) have been roundly criticizing the legislation as nothing more than a show pony for Husted to use during the waning days of his campaign to combat Brown’s relentless attacks.
Also, the bill is simply limp. It requires that state utility regulators consider implementing the new federal standards that direct Big Tech companies to cover the cost of rising electric bills and grid updates needed to run their data centers — within two years of the bill’s passage. Republicans like Husted have argued that the legislation would compel state utility regulators to act on the new federal standard. But even some Senate Republicans have joined Democrats in saying the bill is little more than a suggestion. Per MS NOW:
“Would I like to do more? Yeah,” Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., said. “But on the other hand, is it better than nothing? Yeah.”
Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., agreed that the bill doesn’t accomplish much, noting that most utilities are “managed through local and state decision making.”
But he also agreed that it “probably would help” Husted in his re-election efforts.
My colleague Emine Yücel was up on the Hill this afternoon as senators headed in to vote on the legislation. She was able to catch up with Sens. Chris Murphy (D-CT) and Mark Warner (D-VA), who each slammed the measure and the GOP’s last-minute attempts to do clean up on its past position on accelerating nationwide AI development.
“Donald Trump is going to tweet 10 times between now and the election how much he loves data centers. Their position is clear. They are the party of data centers. They are the party of fealty to the AI industry and this fakery that they are putting on the floor right now isn’t going to fool anybody. So they’re desperate,” Murphy told reporters including TPM.
Murphy continued, going off on the Trump administration and President Trump personally for his role in encouraging the Big Tech oligarchy:
The data center conversation is a proxy for corruption. You know, people see that there is a deep integration between these big billion dollar tech companies and the Trump administration, and they don’t like it, and the proliferation of data centers is a sign to people that the only thing that matters in this administration is money and billionaire corporate power … Yes, sometimes this is about water use and land use, but it’s really a question of corruption and the data centers are an avatar for a corrupt relationship between the technology companies and the Trump administration. That’s why, that’s why the last bill they’re doing is an attempt to change two years of this corruption story. It’s going to laughably not work.
Warner put his opposition to the legislation quite frankly.
“The American public does not like data centers, capital data centers. They’re concerned about job dislocation, and they’re now concerned about safety,” he said. “And we are ignoring not just the CEOs, but frankly, you talk to the banks, you talk to corporate America … they need the safety assurance as well.”
— Nicole LaFond
SAVE Act Tries to Enter the Chat, Fails
Senate Democrats blocked voter ID requirements — including some that are a part of the infamous SAVE America Act — that were tacked on to a bill that would restrict members of Congress and their spouses from buying and selling stocks from advancing on the Senate floor.
Senators voted 53-47 on the House-passed Stop Insider Trading Act, blocking it from reaching the 60 votes it needed to advance in the upper chamber.
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) called the bill “toothless” during a Wednesday floor speech, adding it was “as ineffective as a screen door on a submarine.”
“The bill has no reform, no accountability, no substance,” Schumer said.
Senate Democrats also pushed back on Republicans trying to sneak in Trump-backed voter ID provisions into an unrelated bill.
“It’s obviously a sign that they don’t take seriously the issue of insider trading,” Murphy told reporters on Wednesday when asked about Republicans tacking on a voter ID provision into the stock trading bill. “If you wanted to get a stock ban done, you would put a stock ban on the floor.”
Sen. Alex Padilla (D-CA) called the provision a “poison pill” during a Wednesday floor speech.
— Emine Yücel
A Disturbing Message From Trump’s AI
On Tuesday, ahead of his meeting with AI titans including Anthropic’s Dario Amodei and Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg, President Trump unveiled a new AI website, America.gov. Ostensibly, the site, which was powered by Elon Musk’s Grok and Google Gemini, is meant to answer basic queries about the government. On social media, people quickly noticed that, if you asked the America.gov AI to “play Minecraft” things get … really weird.
That prompt caused the site to launch into a nearly 2,000 word spiel that was linguistically somewhere between a poem and freeform jazz. Over on TikTok and Instagram, TPM has a dramatic reading of some of the strangest excerpts. They are much weirder than you could possibly imagine. The whole thing was a disturbing mix of AI slop, philosophy, and spirituality expressed in the voice of “the Republic.” Aficionados soon noticed the wild screed also appeared to be a remix of the “end poem” from the Minecraft game blended with government overtones and odd AI inputs. It all seems to have been placed there by a rogue coder. It doesn’t exactly generate confidence in the security and oversight of an operation that is imminently expected to begin handling business with sensitive personal data like passport and federal job applications.
— Hunter Walker
Read This From TPM
Emine Yücel has the latest on congressional Dem appropriators’ attempts to shut down the $810 million “pocket rescission” the Trump White House sent over to Congress last week to try to shove down their throats before the end of the fiscal year. More here: Senate Dems Will Attempt to Stop Trump White House’s Latest Illegal Pocket Rescission
Yesterday’s Top Story
New Evidence Shows Just How Badly One Republican Senator Beclowned Himself in the Jack Smith Hearing
What I’m Reading
How Meta Uses A.I. Data Centers to Avoid Billions in Federal Taxes
In Texas, Something Seismic Is Happening—and It’s All Trump’s Fault
Watchdog finds no criminality in Fed renovation that drew Trump’s scrutiny
I found it interesting that you described Zuckerberg as the Facebook founder, but didn’t mention him as the Meta CEO. That mention would have more clearly connected him to another TPM story about Meta using tax loopholes to avoid $4B in taxes. I know TPM readers make this connection, but as these stories go wider, a clear connection helps those less-political junkies get it and spread it more easily. And Thanks! for what you guys do.
At this point, anyone buying the lies and corruption of the MAGA party is a lost cause forever.
I agree with you. At this point, some people just want to be lied to. And they can’t give up on their dream of DJT being Jesus.
I dislike AI. My dislike of huge data centers is intense.