At Moms for Liberty Summit, Parents Are Urged to Turn Their Grievances Into Lawsuits

This story was produced by The Hechinger Report, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news outlet focused on education.

KISSIMMEE, Fla. — It’s not a rebrand. But the Moms for Liberty group that introduced itself three years ago as a band of female “joyful warriors” shedding domestic modesty to make raucous public challenges to masks, books and curriculum, is trying to glow up.

The group’s national summit this past weekend at a convention center outside Orlando leaned into family (read: parental rights), faith — and youth. The latter appeared to be a bid to join the cool kids who are the new face of conservatism in America (hint: young, Christian, very male), as well as a recognition of the group’s “diversity,” which includes grandparents, men and kids. 

But even as the youth — including 20- and 30-something podcasters and social media influencers, as well as student members of the late Charlie Kirk’s Turning Point USA — brought a high-energy vibe, stalwart members got a new assignment. Where past Moms for Liberty attendees were urged to run for school board, this year they were encouraged to turn their grievances into legal challenges. 

Moms for Liberty CEO and co-founder Tina Descovich acknowledged that while many of them had experienced backlashes as a result of running for school board or publicly challenging books, curricula and policies, they needed to continue the fight. (The more pugnacious co-founder, Tiffany Justice, is now at Heritage Action, an arm of right-wing think tank The Heritage Foundation.) 

“You have lost family, you have lost friends, you have lost neighbors, you’ve lost jobs, you’ve lost whole careers,” she said. Yet she insisted that it was vital that they “shake off the shackles of fear and stand for truth or we are going to lose Western civilization as a whole.”

The gathering held up “the free state of Florida” as an example of Republican policies to be emulated, including around school choice and parental rights. The state’s attorney general, James Uthmeier, boasted of having created a state Office of Parental Rights last spring, describing it as “a law firm for parents.” 

He trumpeted the state’s lawsuit against Target over the “market risks” of LGBTQ+ pride-themed merchandise and encouraged parents to reach out with potential legal actions. “If you’re identifying one of these wrongs that’s violating your rights and then subjecting our kids to danger and evil, then we want to know about it,” he said. “And we’re going to bring the heat in court to shut it down.”

Tina Descovich, CEO and co-founder of Moms for Liberty, was interviewed on Real America’s Voice, a conservative news and entertainment network that set up a remote studio outside of the Sun Ballroom at the Moms for Liberty national summit. Credit: Laura Pappano for The Hechinger Report

The shifting legal landscape, not just in Florida but nationally, had speakers gushing about the opportunity to file new challenges, particularly in the wake of the Supreme Court decision in Mahmoud v. Taylor in June. It gives parents broad power to object to school materials, including with LGBTQ+ themes, and the right to remove their children from public school on days when such materials are discussed. 

“This is where we need to take that big Supreme Court victory and start fleshing it out,” said Matt Sharp, senior counsel at Alliance Defending Freedom, a Christian law firm. He added that they were “needing warriors, joyful warriors, to file cases to start putting meat on the bones of what that does.” 

The directive to file suit was not just around opt-out policies, which were the basis for the Mahmoud case. (Moms for Liberty has opt-out forms and instructions on its website.) Rather, attendees were also urged to file lawsuits in support of school prayer; against school policies that let students use different names and pronouns without parental consent (what Moms for Liberty terms “secret transitions”); and to give parents access to surveys students take at school, including around mental health.

“We need people willing to stand up legally and be, you know, named plaintiffs,” Kimberly S. Hermann, president of the Southeastern Legal Foundation, a conservative policy group, said on a panel featuring two moms who sued their school districts. Winning a lawsuit or even just bringing one in one state, said Hermann, can get other school districts and states to adopt policies, presumably to avoid lawsuits themselves. 

“One offensive litigation can have this amazing ripple effect,” she said. She and others made clear that there is staff to provide support. The legal groups will “stand with you,” said Sharp, “whether you’re passing the law or passing the local policy all the way to litigating these cases.”

Even as speakers criticized public schools particularly around LGBTQ+ issues, not as a form of inclusion but as foisting views into classrooms, they relished the chance to infuse their values into schools. 

Filing these lawsuits is more than “just fighting for your role as parents,” Sharp told parents in a breakout session. “You’re ultimately fighting for your kids’ ability to be in their schools and make a difference, to be the salt and light in those classrooms with their friends and to take our message of freedom, of faith, of justice and to really spread it all across the schools.”

Overall, this year’s Moms for Liberty event lacked the obvious drama of recent years. The flood of protesters in 2023 in Philadelphia required a large police presence and barricades around the hotel, along with warnings not to wear Moms for Liberty lanyards on the streets. 

This year, there were no protests. That was partly because the event was held in a secluded resort convention center that could accommodate 800 (larger than the 500-ish of past hotels). But the group failed to fill the venue or attract much media attention. There was on-location broadcast by Real America’s Voice, a conservative news and entertainment network, from a set outside the Sun Ballroom. (Steve Bannon interviewed Descovich on his show, “The War Room.”)

It also didn’t draw opposition because protesters had a bigger target. Saturday saw “No Kings” rallies across the country, with thousands decrying what they see as President Donald Trump’s authoritarianism. “I forgot it was happening since they’re mostly ignored these days,” state Sen. Carlos Guillermo Smith, (D-Orlando) and a senior advisor to LGBTQ+ rights group Equality Florida, said in a text message about the Moms for Liberty event. Liz Mikitarian, founder of the national group, Stop Moms for Liberty, which is based in Florida, said the moms “are still a threat” but not worth organizing a protest against. 

It was also a quieter affair than last year’s in Washington, D.C. There, Trump’s appearance fed a party atmosphere with Southern rock, sequined MAGA outfits and a cash bar. (This year, Trump appeared, but only in a prerecorded video message.)

Sequined merchandise for sale at the Moms for Liberty gathering by the company Make America Sparkle Again included tops and jackets that paid tribute to Charlie Kirk, the slain founder of Turning Point USA. Credit: Laura Pappano for The Hechinger Report

The three-day event, of course, aired familiar grievances in familiarly florid language — conservative school choice activist Corey DeAngelis railed against teacher unions over the “far-left radical agenda that they’re trying to push down children’s throats in the classroom.” Other sessions covered the expected — the alleged dangers of LGBTQ+ policies, in sports, restrooms, school curricula and books — but there was also discussion of concerns (shared on left and right) over youth screen use, online predators and artificial intelligence.

The event made room for MAHA, the Make America Healthy Again movement led by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the secretary of Health and Human Services. Descovich interviewed Dr. Joseph Ladapo, the Florida surgeon general who is working to eliminate all vaccine mandates for the state’s schoolchildren.

But the move by Moms for Liberty to attract young conservatives elevated the energy in the room. It was apparent not only in a tribute to Kirk, the slain founder of Turning Point USA, which trains young conservatives on high school and college campuses. About 40 Florida TPUSA members took the ballroom stage to accept the “Liberty Sword,” the group’s highest honor, posthumously awarded to Kirk. 

Related: Red school boards in a blue state asked Trump for help — and got it

It also showed up in a breakout session of mostly conservative social media influencers and podcasters who offered tips on using humor and handling online trolls: Lydia Shaffer (aka the Conservative Barbie 2.0), Alex Stein, Gates Garcia, Kaitlin Bennett, Angela Belcamino (known as “The Bold Lib,” who said she was surprised to have been invited), and Jayme Franklin, who in addition to her podcast is the Gen Z founder of The Conservateur, a conservative lifestyle brand that The New Yorker called “Vogue, But for Trumpers.”

They have built huge followings based on their compulsion to provoke. “We need to go back to biblical values of what it means to be a real man and what it means to be a real woman,” urged Franklin. “People want that guidance, and that needs to begin at church. We need to push people back into the pews.”

Their inclusion, like that of conservative commentator Benny Johnson, who moderated a panel, “Fathers: The Defenders of the Family,” appeared to recognize a need to expand the base — and be edgier. Johnson charged out on stage and trumpeted that “God’s first commandment to us was, ‘Go, be fruitful, multiply.’ Go make babies!!!!” He quipped that “right-wing moms, they’re happier, right?” and asked the crowd, “Any trad wife moms out there?”

The phrase is shorthand for a woman who embraces a traditional domestic role, often with an emphasis on fashion and style. Johnson — who credited Kirk for prodding him to find Jesus, get married and become a father (he has four children) — argued that Republicans, especially those in Gen Z, should embrace the traditional nuclear family identity as a winning political move.

“We are the party of parents. We are the party of children,” he said, adding that traditional values were already dominating culture and politics. “We live in a center-right country. And I’m tired of pretending that we don’t,” he said, and showed a map of red and blue votes in the 2024 presidential election. “This is the shift. You live in a red kingdom.”

Contact editor Caroline Preston at 212-870-8965, via Signal at CarolineP.83 or on email at preston@hechingerreport.org.  

This story about Moms for Liberty was produced by The Hechinger Report, a nonprofit, independent news organization focused on inequality and innovation in education. Sign up for the Hechinger newsletter.

Indiana Gov Announces Special Session to Act on Trump’s Gerrymandering Squeeze

Succumbing to mounting pressure from the Trump administration and the president’s allies, Indiana Republican Gov. Mike Braun announced on Monday that a special session focused on redistricting will convene on November 3. 

Continue reading “Indiana Gov Announces Special Session to Act on Trump’s Gerrymandering Squeeze”

In Our New Gilded Age, Everything Is for Sale

I struggled to find a unifying theme for the latest parade of depredations from late last week through the weekend. But when a Gilded Age name like Mellon is dominating the news, it’s hard to resist framing the current moment as runaway billionaire-ism.

A billionaire president freed from the restraints of the law by a Supreme Court stacked by billionaires and, in the case of at least two justices, personally rewarded by a billionaire benefactor. Billionaire tech executives circling the federal government like vultures for the opportunity to further expand and consolidate their considerable power.

The U.S. military now has its own billionaire benefactor stepping up with a line-crossing contribution to pay the troops that signals the military itself is a billionaire’s plaything.

Perhaps it is why the demolition of the the White House East Wing resonates beyond politics. It is being replaced by a stylized Gilded Age ballroom paid for by private interests where a royal court of billionaires and wannabes can gather and engage in the kind of transactional governance that is all Trump knows. Everything and everyone has a price.

The Corruption: Mellon Edition

The entire U.S. military is at risk of becoming a private military contractor after President Trump happily and extralegally accepted a $130 million donation from billionaire Timothy Mellon — yes, those Mellons — to partially pay troops during the government shutdown.

Vainglory

President Trump is likely to name the ballroom he’s constructing on the site of the demolished East Wing of the White House after himself, ABC News reported, citing, among other things, a list of those donors it was provided by the White House that referred to it as “the President Donald J. Trump Ballroom.” Trump later called this detail “fake news.”

Quote of the Day

“I’m the speaker and the president.”–President Trump, reportedly chortling privately about his domination of House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) and the GOP conference

Trigger Warning

A couple of new books offer painful new nuggets about the worst of Donald Trump’s criming:

  • Jan. 6: On the morning of Jan. 6, 2021, Vice President Mike Pence scrawled handwritten notes in his day planner from his fateful phone call with President Trump. “You’ll go down as a wimp,” according to Pence’s note, obtained by ABC News chief Washington correspondent Jonathan Karl for his new book.
  • Mar-a-Lago documents: Special Counsel Jack Smith’s decision to prosecute the classified documents case in Florida instead of D.C. is revisited in a new book by WaPo reporters Aaron Davis and Carol Leonnig. It also reveals that Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar refused to allow Smith to ask an appeals court to disqualify U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon from the case.

I want to be clear that these were difficult decisions but not necessarily the wrong decisions on the facts and the law. It’s easy to criticize decisions that resulted in bad outcomes but that doesn’t mean the decision was wrong or that a different decision would have yielded a different or better outcome.

Some Counter-Trolling in Action?

Two judges on the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals during oral arguments in a terrorism case on Friday wondered aloud if the standard the government was using for aiding and abetting a crime would have swept up President Trump’s remarks in his infamous Ellipse speech on the morning of Jan. 6, 2021, Politico reports:

“What if a large group of people, angry at Congress, gathered on the Washington Mall, some of whom have firearms, and are known to have firearms, and a leader stood in front of them, here, right in front of them, not in another country, and said, ‘Go down the street and fight like hell. I’ll be there with you,’” said Judge Stephanie Thacker, an Obama appointee on the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals.

“To me, it sounds the same. So, if what you’re advocating is a crime, then what I just said is a crime — may be a crime,” Thacker said.

Federal Judge Summons Bovino to Court

U.S. District Judge Sara Ellis has ordered Border Patrol commander Greg Bovino to appear in court Tuesday to answer for his apparent deployment of tear gas against crowd in alleged violation of her order.

Sami Hamdi Detained by ICE

The Trump administration revoked the visa of Sami Hamdi, a pro-Palestinian British commentator who was on a speaking tour of the United States, and detained him at San Francisco International Airport on Sunday morning.

On its face this looks like another example of using visa revocations to engage in viewpoint discrimination, something the Trump administration has already been blasted by judges for doing in other cases.

Abrego Garcia’s Torment Continues …

The Trump administration on Friday notified the judge in one of Kilmar Abrego Garcia’s civil cases that it is now planning to deport him to Liberia before the end of the month. He has no ties to Liberia, and the government continues to refuse to remove him to Costa Rica, which he and his lawyers have said he would not fight. The judge in the case summoned the lawyers for a virtual conference this afternoon.

The timing of the proposed removal would presumably moot the criminal case against Abrego Garcia and avoid the government having to defend his vindictive prosecution claim, where he has subpoenaed Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche to testify.

Venezuela Watch: U.S. Buildup Continues

Among the new developments:

  • Some junior U.S. officers have asked military lawyers, an increasingly marginalized group, for a “written sign-off” before taking part in the lawless strikes against alleged drug-smuggling boats but were apparently not given any such assurances, the WaPo reports.
  • The Trump Pentagon is redeploying the USS Gerald R. Ford carrier strike group from the Mediterranean to the Caribbean, where it is expected to arrive in a few days.
  • The U.S. carried out its tenth lawless strike on alleged drug-smuggling boats in the region, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced on Friday.

Trump DOJ Dispatches Election Monitors

The Justice Department has long used election monitors to help protect voting rights, particularly in jurisdictions with a history of discrimination, but the announcement by the Trump DOJ on Friday of where and why monitors are being dispatched for the 2025 elections left election experts alarmed that there’s no legal basis for the move.

Do you like Morning Memo? Let us know!

What It’s Like to Watch an Internet-Based Ideology Break Containment

I first realized the extent of the internet’s takeover of U.S. politics while standing in the lobby of a drab hotel convention center, listening to an elderly gentleman rattle off a list of fringe conspiracy forums he frequented.

Continue reading “What It’s Like to Watch an Internet-Based Ideology Break Containment”

Steve Bannon and the ‘Plan’ for a Neverending ‘Age Of Trump’

Hello, it’s the weekend. This is The Weekender ☕️

Steve Bannon, the MAGA broadcaster and once-and-future adviser to President Donald Trump, just gave an interview to The Economist where he openly discussed a potential “plan” for a third term. 

“Well, he’s going to get a third term. So, Trump ‘28,” Bannon said. “Trump is going to be president in ‘28 and people just ought to get accommodated with that.”

This isn’t the first time Bannon has mused about Trump serving for 12 years — or more. Other high-level Trump allies have also hinted at the possibility and, as we’ve already told you in this very newsletter, the official campaign store even has “TRUMP 2028” merch ready to go

Many observers have dismissed all of this out of hand given that the 22nd Amendment seemingly serves as a hard line enforcing the two term limit. There are, however, actual legal experts who think there could be loopholes to this including a technique essentially pioneered by Russia’s Vladimir Putin, where the president joins a ticket as the vice president with the tacit understanding their running mate would move aside or serve as a mere figurehead. Another potential avenue experts have raised involves challenging whether the 22nd Amendment means solely two terms or actually only two consecutive terms. 

Most experts argue these various end runs violate the clear intent of the constitutional amendment. However, if we’ve learned anything about Trump and the Supreme Court that he has increasingly made over, it’s that they are willing to push legal boundaries to serve his interests. 

In this interview, Bannon didn’t say which route Trump’s allies are focused on, but he insisted that there is a “plan” in place. 

“There’s many different alternatives. At the appropriate time, we’ll lay out what the plan is, but there’s a plan and President Trump will be the president in ‘28,” Bannon said.

Bannon also cast the effort to erode one of the core traditional curbs on presidential power in positively Biblical terms. 

“President Trump will be the president of the United States and the country needs him to be president of the United States,” he said. “We have to finish what we started and the way we finish it — through Trump … He’s a vehicle of divine providence. He’s an instrument. He’s very imperfect. He’s not churchy, not particularly religious. but he’s an instrument of divine will.”

Bannon also offered a distinctly dictatorial vision for the “endpoint” of what he termed the “Age of Trump.” He said it would include Trump allies taking “control” of both “the institutions” and the “political process” en route to establishing “an entrepreneurial capitalism paradise.”

“We have to seize the institutions, seize them and then purge them,” Bannon said. “It’s not the DOGE crap, this is serious people like Russ Vought and others that have spent years thinking this whole plan through.”

Despite all of this talk of defying term limits, taking total power, and enacting dramatic purges, Bannon insisted the whole thing somehow isn’t blatant authoritarianism.

“President Trump is nothing but a series of negotiations,” Bannon said, adding, “He’s having tradeoffs all the time.”

The refusal to fully call this what it is and the obvious questionably legal nature of all this might make it tempting to dismiss. However, Trump allies continue to send loud and clear signals that this is something they are considering. And, hasn’t the president broken so many other aspects of our traditional government? Why doubt he would try to destroy term limits when Trump has literally demolished the White House?

In the end, Bannon said one thing we can probably all agree on: Trump’s authoritarian ambitions are clear, the only question is whether the population will let him achieve them. 

“The only way President Trump wins in 2028 and continues to stay in office is by the will of the American people,” Bannon said.

— Hunter Walker

Here’s what else TPM has on tap

  • Even a handful of Republicans think it’s not the best look for Trump to be demanding a $230 million settlement from the Justice Department that he, essentially, runs out of the White House.
  • National Democrats released the findings of a poll of Maryland voters this week, in an attempt to gently nudge state Democrats in the direction of redrawing some congressional district lines before the midterms to help offset the impact of Trump’s power grab.
  • The good, the bad and the ugly: For TPM’s 25th anniversary, join us on a journey through 25 years of digital media history.
  • House Speaker Mike Johnson’s (R-LA) strategy — keeping the House out of session to compel Democrats to fold — doesn’t seem to be working.

Let’s dig in.

Even Some Senate GOPers Think It’s a Bad Look

By now, you’ve likely heard the news that President Trump is demanding that the Justice Department pay him $230 million in damages for what he claims are wrongful prosecutions damages. His former personal lawyer, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, is the person poised to sign off on the settlement.

Obviously, this is a total shitshow and a completely unprecedented action by the lawless president, who is running the Justice Department out of the White House. House Democrats have already launched an investigation into Trump’s discussions with the DOJ about the settlement. Reps. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) and Robert Garcia (D-CA), the top Dems on the House Judiciary and House Oversight Committees, respectively, called Trump’s actions a “blatantly illegal and unconstitutional effort to steal $230 million from the American people.”

But the move is so befuddling and ill-timed, it even has some members of the Senate Republican conference uncomfortable. Senate Judiciary Committee senior member Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) took issue with Blanche’s role in the whole ordeal.

“He shouldn’t decide, because he’s his former lawyer,” Graham told The Hill this week.

Retiring Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC) took issue with the timing of Trump’s request, telling reporters this week that the “optics” were bad during a shutdown.

“At the very least, it’s horrible timing, given that we’re in a shutdown,” he said. “I got a lot of optics concerns, and I just don’t know if there’s precedent for it. There doesn’t seem to be.”

Another Republican acknowledged that it might just add fuel to the fire for people who are already protesting against Trump’s lawless presidency.

“The man, woman on the street, they know Donald Trump, they elected Donald Trump. Nothing about this, I don’t think, is either surprising or concerning to them,” Sen. Kevin Cramer (R-ND) said. “That doesn’t mean it isn’t a good talking point for the No Kings crowd.”

— Nicole LaFond

25 Years of Digital Media

As you may have heard, TPM is turning 25 this year. But we know our story is far from the only one worth telling in the past 25 years of digital media. So we went out to a group of writers we admire — 25 of them, naturally — to weigh in on a moment or idea that’s shaped our strange and ever-changing online journalism ecosystem.

We’re rolling out this series, Pivots, Trolls and Blog Rolls, for the next few weeks on this lovely landing page that our design team put together. Already, you can read pieces like Elizabeth Spiers’ requiem for the early blogging years, Dave Dayen’s excellent takedown of D.C. access journalism, and our own Josh Marshall on the original sin of treating digital journalism like a tech business. We hope you like it.

— Allegra Kirkland

Poll Finds Maryland Voters Support Dem Redistricting to Level Playing Field 

Congressional Democrats are pushing the message to Democratic members of Maryland’s state legislature that redistricting that favors Democrats is needed to offset the impact of gerrymandering in Republican-led states, and to level the playing field. 

New polling by Change Research, first reported by Politico, has found that the majority of Maryland Democratic voters surveyed view redistricting efforts as necessary to counter the Trump administration’s pressure campaign on red states to change their congressional maps ahead of the midterm elections.

 The mid-cycle redistricting push by the Trump administration is part of an effort to ensure Republicans maintain control of the U.S. House. So far, states like Texas, Missouri, and North Carolina have all approved revised congressional maps that will likely flip Democratic seats. 

The polling for this research was conducted online from October 8 to 10 of this year, surveying 909 likely Maryland voters. 

According to the research, 85 percent of Democrats, 65 percent of Independents, and 23 percent of Republicans, responded that they believe that redistricting is necessary “both to provide a check on Trump and to undo some of the substantive damage being done by the Republican Congress.”

The poll also found that, after reading the arguments for redistricting on both sides, 69 percent of Democratic voters would be more likely to vote for a candidate who is supportive of redistricting.

This is one of several ways national Democrats are nudging the Democrats in Maryland’s state legislature to embrace redistricting. Earlier this month, per reporting from NBC, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jefferies (D-NY) met with Democratic Maryland Gov. Wes Moore to discuss possible redistricting plans in the state. And on Wednesday, Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD), described redistricting, in a post on X, as a “a political and ethical imperative to fight back across America, from coast to coast, from California to the Free State.” 

Similar Democrat-led redistricting counter-efforts are currently underway in California, where voters will vote on a measure next month to approve new congressional maps. And in Virginia, Democratic lawmakers have launched a campaign to redraw their congressional maps. 

— Khaya Himmelman

Johnson Won’t Bring House Back Next Week

It’s day 25 of the government shutdown.

House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) said this week he won’t bring the House back in session to vote on a bill that would help pay air traffic controllers and other essential workers during the government shutdown.

The Speaker claimed the measure “would be spiked in the Senate,” adding that bringing back the House “would take the pressure off Chuck Schumer to get his job done and open the government again.”

For the sixth week in a row, the House is expected to be out of session next week.

Tuesday will be the first paycheck air traffic controllers will miss due to the shutdown, according to Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy. And hundreds of thousands of other federal workers officially missed their paychecks on Friday.

Separate party-line bills to pay some exempted federal workers during the shutdown failed in the Senate on Thursday. The issue may come up again next week as senators involved may try to combine their bills and come up with a bipartisan measure.

Meanwhile President Donald Trump doesn’t seem to be planning to negotiate with Democrats to reopen the government any time soon. He left for an extended Asia trip on Friday. Senate Republicans have also shown no signs of negotiating with Dems, who are asking for an extension of the ACA subsidies in exchange for their votes. 

— Emine Yücel

Emil Bove Starts Judicial Career With a Sneer

One year ago, Emil Bove was a simple defense lawyer for then-presidential candidate Donald Trump. He had represented him throughout the Manhattan criminal hush money trial that led to his client’s conviction, and worked on the two federal cases against the then-former president.

Continue reading “Emil Bove Starts Judicial Career With a Sneer”

Justice Department Announces Plans to Monitor Polling Sites in New Jersey and California

In response to requests from state Republican parties, the Department of Justice announced plans on Friday to send federal election monitors to California and New Jersey ahead of November’s election. 

And although election monitors are not necessarily unusual under appropriate circumstances, election experts are raising questions about this specific announcement, including which federal law the DOJ is enforcing and about the qualifications of the observers. 

Both Democratic states are holding closely watched elections with high stakes for the MAGA coalition. California currently has a redistricting proposal on the ballot that would allow Democrats to redraw the state’s congressional map, a way to offset GOP gerrymanders in states such as Texas and North Carolina. New Jersey has an open governor’s seat and a tight race for it between Rep. Mikie Sherrill (D) and former state assemblyman and businessman Jack Ciattarelli (R). 

According to the Justice Department, the goal of this election monitoring is to “protect the votes of eligible American citizens.”

It will monitor six jurisdictions, it said, including a key swing county in northern New Jersey and five counties in southern and central California. 

“The Trump Department of Justice’s announcement that it is sending federal ‘election monitors’ to Passaic County is highly inappropriate, and DOJ has not even attempted to identify a legitimate basis for its actions,” New Jersey Attorney General Matt Platkin in a statement Friday.

New Jersey’s Republican Party had requested that the DOJ “oversee the receipt and processing of vote-by-mail ballots” and “take steps to monitor access to the Board of Elections around the clock,” according to the Associated Press. The California state GOP pointed to “reports of irregularities” in past elections. 

Among election experts, there were several things that raised eyebrows about the DOJ announcement. One, legal scholar and UCLA law professor Rick Hasen, said on social media it was a “test run for 2026.”

“They are very vague about this, but the federal laws that the Justice Department uses to monitor elections generally are the laws that protect minority and minority-language voters from any kind of discrimination in voting,” said David Becker, a former DOJ lawyer and the executive director and founder of the nonpartisan Center for Election Innovation and Research.

“I haven’t seen any allegations that any of these jurisdictions may potentially have problems with those,” Becker told TPM.

Becker pointed out several other unusual things about the announcement. Most glaringly, it does not say which federal law it specifically is seeking to ensure compliance with. 

The Justice Department has not said who will be observing these jurisdictions, Becker also noted. Typically, he said, these monitors are Department of Justice Voting Section attorneys, but because there are not many of those currently, it’s unclear who they will be. 

“There aren’t that many voting section attorneys right now, and they’re looking at several counties to monitor,” he explained. “So I think it’s appropriate for the Department of Justice to reveal who’s going to be monitoring, and if they’re not voting section attorneys, what qualifications do they have to assess compliance with any federal law.”

Becker also flagged that it’s unclear whether or not these jurisdictions have been contacted and given consent to this monitoring. 

“It may or may not be necessary, but I can tell you it was DOJ practice all the time to always contact these jurisdictions before an announcement to make sure there was a mutual understanding of the respective roles, to know who would contact whom to confirm that the people monitoring would be well-trained and not interfere in any way with voting process,” Becker added. 

The monitoring will be overseen by the Civil Rights Division and Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon, the DOJ’s announcement said. 

“Transparency at the polls translates into faith in the electoral process, and this Department of Justice is committed to upholding the highest standards of election integrity,” Attorney General Pamela Bondi said in a statement. “We will commit the resources necessary to ensure the American people get the fair, free, and transparent elections they deserve.”

Fear, Greed, Civic Virtue and the Fall of the Elites

Members of America’s founding generation had an ambivalent and evolving understanding of the role and importance of public or civic “virtue.” In the 1760s and 1770s, many of them were caught up in a kind of republican idea world which made this kind of virtue the cornerstone of any republic. The anchor of republican government wasn’t well-designed constitutions or legal accountability. It was the virtue of the free citizenry. By the late 1780s, many were developing a more pragmatic and jaded view of human nature and focused more on creating systems in which greed, the drive for power and other unlovely parts of human nature could be placed into some kind of enduring counterbalance. That was the basis of what became the federal Constitution and the driver especially for the two young ideologues, James Madison and Alexander Hamilton, both men in their thirties, who pressed the project forward.

I was thinking about this this morning when I saw a post by Leah Greenberg, the co-founder of Indivisible. She commented on the “utter moral failure of the elite of this country” when referring to a passage from an article by journalist Ed Luce who recounted talking to numerous leaders throughout the American power structure, all of whom said how critical it was for powerful public figures to set an example by speaking out and defying Donald Trump, and none of whom agreed to speak on the record.

Luce concluded by saying “it has felt like trying to report on politics in Turkey or Hungary.”

This got me thinking about the question of civic virtue.

Continue reading “Fear, Greed, Civic Virtue and the Fall of the Elites”

Trump Has Demolished the White House East Wing to Make Room for His Pricey New Ballroom (PHOTOS)

The photos truly speak for themselves. This week, workers began to demolish the White House’s East Wing to make space for President Trump’s new 90,000-square-foot ballroom that will be paid for by the likes of Amazon and Palantir. Though the administration tried to keep the destruction under wraps, images and video of the historic public building being ripped to shreds by a construction crew went viral. See for yourself below.

The newly-built East Wing in 1902

A fountain outside the newly constructed east wing of the White House. Ca. 1902. (Photo by Library of Congress/Corbis/VCG via Getty Images)

The East Wing decked out with a “We the People” theme for the 2022 holiday season

Holiday decorations are seen at the entrance of the East Wing during a media preview for the 2022 Holidays at the White House in Washington, DC, November 28, 2022. – We the People is the theme for the 2022 White House Holiday Season. (Photo by Jim WATSON / AFP) (Photo by JIM WATSON/AFP via Getty Images)

The demolished East Wing

WASHINGTON, DC – OCTOBER 23: An excavator works to clear rubble after the East Wing of the White House was demolished on October 23, 2025 in Washington, DC.(Photo by Eric Lee/Getty Images)

WASHINGTON DC, UNITED STATES – OCTOBER 22: A general view of the ongoing construction works on the White House grounds in Washington, D.C., United States, on October 22, 2025. The project, announced by US President Donald Trump, includes the construction of a new White House Ballroom and the complete modernization of the East Wing. (Photo by Celal Gunes/Anadolu via Getty Images)

WASHINGTON, DC – OCTOBER 23: The facade of the East Wing of the White House is demolished by work crews on October 23, 2025 in Washington, DC. ( (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)

WASHINGTON, DC – OCTOBER 21: Photographers and pedestrians stop to watch the facade of the East Wing of the White House being demolished by work crews on October 21, 2025 in Washington, DC. Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

WASHINGTON, DC – OCTOBER 23: An excavator works to clear rubble after the East Wing of the White House was demolished on October 23, 2025 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Eric Lee/Getty Images)

People watch along a fence line as the demolition of the East Wing of the White House continues as construction begins on President Donald Trump’s planned ballroom, in Washington, DC, on October 23, 2025. Trump told reporters at an Oval Office event that he had decided after consulting architects that “really knocking it down” was preferable to a partial demolition. (Photo by Brendan SMIALOWSKI / AFP) (Photo by BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP via Getty Images)

US President Donald Trump shows a rendition of the East Wing of the White House currently being demolished to build a ballroom as he meets with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, on October 22, 2025. (Photo by Jim WATSON / AFP) (Photo by JIM WATSON/AFP via Getty Images)

WASHINGTON DC, UNITED STATES – OCTOBER 22: A general view of the ongoing construction works on the White House grounds in Washington, D.C., United States, on October 22, 2025. (Photo by Celal Gunes/Anadolu via Getty Images)