3 Revealing Moments from a Year of Trump II Legal Fights

Scenes from the Trump II Era

Over the past few months, certain moments in federal courthouses have lingered with me that I’ve been reluctant to share here because I haven’t wanted to over-personalize, or in some instances de-personalize, the stories of the Trump II presidency.

Yesterday it was Kilmar Abrego Garcia scarfing a Jimmy John’s sandwich in the hallway outside a Nashville courtroom while reporters, lawyers, and staff milled about during a break in the hearing on his claim of vindictive prosecution.

Last fall it was the pensive faces of James Comey’s wife and daughters and son-in-law stuck in the hall with a crowd of reporters and onlookers waiting for the Alexandria, Virginia courtroom to be unlocked for a hearing on his vindictive prosecution claim.

Last summer, it was Lee Gelernt, the ACLU lawyer, coming down to DC and single-handedly defending the original Alien Enemies Act detainees in a historic case that pits the executive branch against the judicial branch, before packing up his things and walking alone out of the courthouse for his return trip to NYC.

What makes each of these moments linger is their essential smallness and the basic fragility of the effort to confront the Trump II presidency. What confounds me about them is the challenge of conveying them to you without valorizing the participants or reducing them to stale archetypes. But it goes a little deeper than that.

In covering the Trump II rampage, I keep bumping up awkwardly against a comforting notion that so many of us have long harbored as a way of making sense of this complicated, dynamic, sprawling world: Someone must be taking care of that. At best, we use it to project a sense of order onto things, an order that simply does not exist. At worst, we use it to distance and excuse ourselves from unpleasantness.

Take the AEA case. I feel certain that most of you take comfort in the notion that the ACLU is out there fighting the good fight, marshaling resources, and serving as the tip of the spear against the worst civil liberties abuses of the Trump II presidency. And if not the ACLU then some other advocacy group. It’s true as far as it goes, but it just doesn’t go very far.

Like every advocacy organization, the ACLU is under-resourced and stretched thin. It’s a minor miracle that it even got into court before the AEA flights took off last March. In seeking class action status for the case, it cast a broad net to try to protect all of the potential AEA detainees, but in most instances it didn’t know who exactly these far-flung, diverse Venezuelan nationals were, and it didn’t have the means to quickly find out. After the detainees were freed from El Salvador’s CECOT and flown home to Venezuela, the ACLU then had to try to track them all down, with limited success.

You might protest: But the ACLU has someone in charge of all that. They must have a system in place. Someone must be taking care of that.

I’m not picking on the ACLU. I’ve written about Justice Connection, the advocacy group formed early last year to support current and recently exiled DOJ employees. Former DOJer Stacey Young, its founder and executive director, joined me onstage for last month’s Morning Memo Live event. I feel sure that when I write about Justice Connection and hold Young out as an expert on DOJ politicization, it conveys that someone is taking care of that. But Justice Connection, with all respect, is a threadbare, brand-new organization, with a paucity of full-time staff. They’re doing what they can, but they’re not under any illusion about their own limitations.

Another of the panelists at last month’s event was former DOJer Kyle Freeney, who works for another brand-new organization: the Washington Litigation Group, a nonprofit legal firm trying to fill the void left as Big Law pulled back on pro bono work in the most controversial Trump II cases. It didn’t just spring into being. The people involved — lawyers, former judges, funders — recognized that no one was taking care of that. So they started it up last summer.

A year ago Abrego Garcia was a union sheet metal apprentice in the Maryland suburbs of D.C. A whirlwind year later — ICE detention, deportation to prison in El Salvador, U.S. detention on criminal charges, and further ICE detention before his eventual release — he is a Trump world pariah and an internationally recognized figure. But none of what unfolded after his initial deportation would have happened the way it did without a retinue of lawyers in his immigration and criminal cases leaping in to defend him. A mix of pro bono and advocacy group intervention turned his cases into causes célèbres. No one had to take care of that but someone did.

I’ve not been able to shake the feeling that most journalism, my own included, reinforces the notion that someone is taking care of that even as so much of it endeavors to sound the alarm that no one is taking care of that. It feels especially pronounced in the Trump II era as institutions crumble and the challenge before us is laid bare. It’s just us.

ICYMI

My report from Nashville on the testimony of too-credulous federal prosecutor Robert McGuire in the vindictive prosecution hearing for Abrego Garcia and more on what went down in court here:

David Kurtz Reports from Abrego Garcia’s Vindictive Prosecution Hearing by TPM

Read on Substack

Get ‘Em While They Last!

We’re practically giving away TPM memberships to Morning Memo readers who aren’t yet members. Take advantage of a 40% discount on an annual TPM membership while it lasts. It’s a special pre-sale for you before we launch TPM’s annual membership drive next week.

I don’t think I need to tell you — but maybe I do! — that your support makes things like yesterday’s in-person coverage of the Abrego Garcia case possible. Every little bit helps. Thanks!

That’s a Wrap from Nashville

I managed to catch a little live music last night in Nashville. So let me send you into the weekend with Chapel Bell, whose sound lured me in after a very long day:

Hot tips? Juicy scuttlebutt? Keen insights? Let me know. For sensitive information, use the encrypted methods here.

Trump’s War on the Constitution

It’s a cliché and more or less true that the Constitution’s “high crimes and misdemeanors” language can mean whatever Congress wants it to mean. That is not only because in this area Congress’ decision-making is certainly un-reviewable. It is because the Constitution’s writers were intentionally expansive in their definition. They were most focused not on statutory crimes but misrule. I wanted to take a moment to note that what we have unfolding in Minnesota is really a definitional impeachable offense.

I say this with no expectation that he will be charged with it, let alone convicted and removed from office, certainly not under Republican rule. But these are precisely the kinds of abuses of power, unconstitutional actions, that are most squarely within the impeachment mechanism’s meaning.

Continue reading “Trump’s War on the Constitution”

The Epic, Mega Skydance Paramount Warner Deal: Some Thoughts

News came today that Warner Bros Discovery decided that Paramount-Skydance’s bid ($111 billion) to acquire the company was superior to that from Netflix ($82.7 billion). WBD told Netflix it had four days to up its offer. Little more than an hour later Netflix said it didn’t need four days. It was bowing out. The deal was no longer economic at the price Paramount was offering. An additional fact is that Netflix co-CEO Ted Sarandos was at the White House while these things were happening, apparently trying to see whether Netflix had the thing any major company needs for a merger in 2026: the personal approval of Donald Trump. Apparently they didn’t have it. That’s the autocracy playbook. And at the federal level, that’s the game we’re playing right now.

Continue reading “The Epic, Mega Skydance Paramount Warner Deal: Some Thoughts”

The Trump DOJ’s Defense Of The Abrego Garcia Prosecution Only Works If You Squint Real Hard

NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE–The Trump DOJ has spent the last several months constructing a narrowly focused narrative that then-acting U.S. Attorney Robert McGuire of Nashville was the sole decider in seeking a human smuggling indictment of Kilmar Abrego Garcia last May while he was still confined in El Salvador, a victim of a wrongful deportation in violation of a immigration judge’s order.

Continue reading “The Trump DOJ’s Defense Of The Abrego Garcia Prosecution Only Works If You Squint Real Hard”

Walz Calls Medicaid Freeze Out for What It Is: Another Layer Of Trump’s ‘Campaign of Retribution’

Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz rolled out a sweeping new anti-fraud package he plans to ask his state legislature to pass just one day after Vice President JD Vance announced that the Trump administration would freeze $259 million in Medicaid funding for Minnesota. During a press conference announcing the package, which he claimed the Trump administration knew about, he called Vance’s actions “totally illegal and unprecedented” and another prong of Trump’s “retribution” campaign against Minnesotans.

Continue reading “Walz Calls Medicaid Freeze Out for What It Is: Another Layer Of Trump’s ‘Campaign of Retribution’”

VIDEO: David Kurtz Reports from Abrego Garcia’s Vindictive Prosecution Hearing

TPM’s David Kurtz has been covering, in person, a hearing in Nashville in which the Trump administration sought to prove it did not pursue a vindictive prosecution against Kilmar Abrego Garcia, the man it erroneously imprisoned in El Salvador last year. Immediately upon leaving the courtroom, David sat down with me to record a Substack Live on what happened. Watch that here:

Continue reading “VIDEO: David Kurtz Reports from Abrego Garcia’s Vindictive Prosecution Hearing”

The Franchise: Trump’s (Election) Lie-Laden State of the Union

Hello! Welcome back to The Franchise, our weekly newsletter on elections, voting rights, and the (many) ways in which the Trump administration continues to interfere with election administration, the franchise and democracy overall.

We’re glad to have you back. 

There’s a lot to cover — especially after Trump’s State of the Union Address on Tuesday. We heard about widespread non-citizen voting (not a thing), the “crooked mail in ballots” (not a thing), and, non-descript “rampant” election cheating apparently being done en masse, by Dems alone! (Also not a thing.) 

This week, we’ll break down the most egregious election lies that made it into Trump’s State of the Union address, as well as his big push for the SAVE America Act. We will also cover the ways in which Democratic attorneys general are preparing for Trump’s inevitable interference in the midterm elections, and, of course, the latest in the never-ending redistricting wars.

Let’s get into it. 

Trump Spreads the Myth of Non-Citizen Voting to the Masses

On Tuesday night, during his State of the Union address, Trump spent a good amount of time rattling off some of his favorite election lies as a way to make a case for the SAVE America Act — legislation that would make it easier for the administration to exert even more control over states’ rights to administer elections and set their own rules for mail-in ballots, voter registration and more.

Here’s some of the most egregious election-related lies Trump included in his remarks: 

  • “Cheating is rampant in our elections. It’s rampant.”
  • “They [Democrats] have cheated, and their policy is so bad that the only way they can get elected is to cheat.” 
  • “So in my first year of the second term — should be my third term.”

Trump spent a few minutes of his lengthy speech also talking about a non-existent issue and a favorite GOP myth:  non-citizen voting and the need for the SAVE America Act, a voter suppression bill that would, among other things, mandate documentary proof of citizenship for voter registration in federal elections.

“I’m asking you to approve the SAVE America Act,” he said. “It’s very simple. All voters must show voter ID. All voters must show proof of citizenship. No more crooked mail-in ballots, except for illness, disability, military or travel.”

The legislation, as we have reported before, would disenfranchise millions of eligible voters and keep alive the false narrative that non-citizens are voting en masse in our elections. There is zero evidence to suggest that non-citizen voting is happening. It’s also worth mentioning that it is already illegal for noncitizens to vote in federal elections. Despite the lack of evidence, it’s been a particular area of fixation for Republicans for years.   

Earlier this month, the House passed the Save America Act in a 218-213 vote. The legislation is currently dead on arrival in the Senate unless Republican leadership decides to change the filibuster rules in order to pass it, something that Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) has repeatedly said his conference does not currently have the appetite for. 

House Democrats, responding to Trump’s push for the Save America Act, wrote on X on Tuesday night that the legislation is “a federal takeover of state and local elections.”

“Trump and Republicans want to suppress the vote,” they added. “They’re trying to RIG elections, but we won’t let them.”

Democratic Attorneys General Prepare for the Inevitable 

Democratic attorneys general are preparing for the very likely possibility that Trump will interfere in some lawless way in the midterm elections. 

Trump basically said he will insert himself into the election administration process when he issued the brazen call to “nationalize” elections earlier this month. Let’s also not forget that in January the FBI executed a search warrant in a Fulton County election hub related to 2020 election conspiracy theories with an apparent goal of somehow uncovering fraud in a secure election five years later (???). And, of course, as we have been reporting for months now, Trump’s DOJ is demanding sensitive voter data from states across the country. So yes, states are just a little worried about what might happen in the midterms. 

In response, as Politico outlined this week, Democratic attorneys general are, for good reason, preparing for all possible scenarios. 

“[Trump] wants to continue to have his party prevail, seemingly by whatever means necessary,” California Attorney General Rob Bonta told Politico. “So we have to be ready for that, sad and tragic as it is.”

Washington Attorney General Nick Brown described some of Trump’s recent remarks as a “red-alarm fire that people need to take very seriously.”

Democratic Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel said that she fears that a Fulton County like-raid could very well happen in Michigan, too.

“We recognize that what happened in Fulton County could happen in Detroit. Not because there’s any merit to claims that anything wrong happened in Detroit, but because we know that those claims will be made again,” she said. 

And Nevada Attorney General Aaron Ford similarly told Politico that Trump “likes to sow chaos because he thinks it’s going to throw people off their game.”

“But he has met his match when it comes to the Nevada attorney general’s office; he’s met his match when it comes to the Democratic attorneys general,” he added

Around the States: Redistricting 

Maryland

Maryland’s Democratic-led redistricting effort is failing. Tuesday was the unofficial deadline (and the candidate filing deadline) to act on the state’s redistricting proposal ahead of the midterms. 

The Maryland House approved a new congressional map earlier this month, but has faced consistent opposition to the proposal in the Senate. 

Democratic Maryland Governor Wes Moore has not given up on the effort, however. 

“I think that these are artificial deadlines that are put together by politicians, and I think politicians can adjust in any way that they see fit,” Moore told Fox45

Utah

In a win for Democrats, a federal court rejected a Republican effort to block the state’s newly approved Dem-favoring congressional maps.

As a reminder, a Utah judge rejected a new Republican-favoring congressional map in November, instead approving a map that likely secures a Democratic district.

In Other Election News

‘A really really big decision’: The court cases looming over the midterms (Politico)

Georgia State Election Board declines to seize control of Fulton County elections, for now (Georgia Recorder)

Exclusive: State election chiefs are huddling to plan responses to Trump’s expected interference in midterms (Democracy Docket) 

Time for the States to Gear Up for Trump’s Fake Elections Exec Order

The Post has an article today, an exclusive they say, about a draft executive order purportedly being circulated between the White House and various conspiracy theorists and right-wing extremists in its broader circle. The proposed order claims that China has been found to be interfering in U.S. elections — specifically rigged the 2020 election in Joe Biden’s favor — and that as a result of that the president, as commander-in-chief, can and must directly take control of U.S. elections for the midterms and the 2028 presidential elections.

Two points merit saying on this. The first is that these are the rehashed, insane theories that were literally and figuratively laughed out of court in 2020. These are all absurd. Everybody knows they are absurd and false. The legal theory is what demands our attention. The authors of the order believe that if something is an emergency the president can invoke a kind of hidden dictator clause in the Constitution which allows him to assert powers which the Constitution explicitly forbids to him. This is not so. They secondarily believe in what we might call a “because” or “therefore” logic or clause. So because we have found that Threat X exists, the president can do whatever he wants to combat that threat. And as commander-in-chief, he can do anything he wants. This is also not so.

Continue reading “Time for the States to Gear Up for Trump’s Fake Elections Exec Order”

Big Hearing in Nashville Today

I wanted to alert you of something we’re on today. Among other things, it’s the kind of off-the-beaten-path reporting your membership dollars pay for. We sent David Kurtz to Nashville today for a hearing in the Abrego Garcia case. Since we’re a number of ICE murders and false imprisonments down the line at this point, remember that the Justice Department conceded that Abrego Garcia had been erroneously included among those sent last spring to the bespoke dungeon facility in El Salvador. He was brought back to the U.S. only after he was hit with a new indictment. His lawyers have argued to the judge in the case that the charges should be dismissed because this is a case of vindictive prosecution. Normally this is an extremely high bar for the defense to clear. But in this case, the judge replied by saying that he’s inclined to think that the defense is right. Today’s hearing was scheduled to give the government the opportunity to prove that the defense and (mostly) the judge are wrong.

Continue reading “Big Hearing in Nashville Today”