With House Veto Override Vote, North Carolina Republicans’ Power Grab Is Complete

The North Carolina House voted on Wednesday to override Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper’s veto on a GOP-backed bill that will strip power from the newly-elected Democratic Gov. Josh Stein and Attorney General Jeff Jackson. The vote total was 72-46. 

Continue reading “With House Veto Override Vote, North Carolina Republicans’ Power Grab Is Complete”

Beware Of Trump’s Coming Purge Of The U.S. Military

A lot of things happened. Here are some of the things. This is TPM’s Morning Memo. Sign up for the email version.

What We Take For Granted

Among the institutional pillars of democracy – a free press, an independent judiciary, robust civic and religious organizations – a nonpartisan professionalized military may be the one we take most for granted and overlook.

Set aside for the moment your concerns about American imperialism, the military-industrial complex, and the deep streak of jingoism that has long infected domestic politics and foreign policy. All legitimate concerns in their own right, but they can mask the U.S. military’s mostly sterling record at staying out of the partisan political fray. That includes developing and sustaining an highly educated officer corps that provides continuity and professional judgment regardless of which party is in the White House.

Like he has with other democratic underpinnings that represent a threat to his power, Trump is promising to remake the military into a compliant, servile, compromised husk of its former self. Trump has surrounded himself with some of the loudest, most extreme right-wing advocates for bringing the military to submission.

Pete Hegseth, Trump’s nominee for Pentagon secretary, emerges from this right-wing subculture. It’s fortuitous that Hegseth is a dim bulb with a sordid personal and professional life that may ultimately scuttle his own nomination. But Hegseth is not alone, and the vision for the military that he represents is shared in Trump’s circle and by Trump himself, who had praised Hitler’s generals because he perceives them (wrongly) to have put personal loyalty to the leader above all else.

Trump’s undermining of the military fits neatly into our matrix of Trump II threats – retribution, corruption, and destruction. Among those, it’s destruction first and foremost, which almost inevitably leads to opportunities for corruption. The retribution element is more nuanced than, say, Trump’s jihad against the Justice Department. But having surrounded himself in his first term by “my generals” – nearly all of whom ended up betraying him in his own mind – Trump’s urge to bring the military to heel isn’t that hard to figure.

All of this comes to mind today because of an important new piece by Don Moynihan, professor of public policy at the University of Michigan, about Trump’s planned military purge. Here’s an excerpt:

In the short run, we should be very worried about what Trump will do with a military repurposed to serve him, and not the constitution. In the long run, the politicization of the American military will undermine its capacity. What happens if every new President distrusts the generals in place because they were selected via a politicized process? They then choose their own, adding to the instability in leadership. Under such circumstances, expect a Putinification of the military, where officers are afraid to tell the President the truth.

It’s worth a read.

Nepotism Watch

Donald Trump Jr.’s fiancée (still?) Kimberly Guilfoyle is President-elect Trump’s pick for ambassador to Greece.

Trump II Clown Show

  • Tom Barrack, the chair of Trump’s 2017 inaugural committee who was acquitted on 2021 charges of illegally lobbying for the United Arab Emirates: ambassador to Turkey.
  • At least three GOP senators are noncommittal about Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.‘s nomination to be HHS secretary.
  • Harmeet Dhillon‘s nomination as assistant attorney general for civil rights prompted outcry from civil rights groups.

GOP Senators To Watch

It’s a fool’s errand to expect Republican senators to save the Republic from a Trump II presidency. Full stop. But there is some subtlety and nuance around some senators some of the time that may help illuminate where the tectonic plate boundaries of the MAGA movement lay. Especially with MAGA leaders promising to defeat any GOP senators who impede Trump, these may be active fault lines for the next four years.

Heritage Action is launching a pressure campaign against these GOP senators to support Trump’s nominees. It’s small, mostly nothingburger effort to allow Heritage Action to tout its pro-Trump bona fides, but it’s a reasonably good proxy for the list of GOP senators to keep an eye on:

  • Senate Majority Leader John Thune (SD)
  • Mitch McConnell (KY)
  • Lisa Murkowski (AK)
  • Susan Collins (ME)
  • Joni Ernst (IA)
  • Bill Cassidy (LA)
  • Thom Tillis (NC)
  • Todd Young (IN)
  • John Curtis (UT)

Corruption Watch

“Eric Trump flew across the world to headline a cryptocurrency conference in the United Arab Emirates this week and told thousands of enthusiastic attendees that he and his father, the U.S. president-elect, were effectively working in tandem to push crypto, a business sector the family is directly invested in.”–NYT

The Last Dregs Of Trump Accountability

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg is still trying to salvage what he can of Trump’s conviction in the hush money case. In a new filing, Bragg offered the trial judge some alternatives to dismissing the case outright, which is what Trump has asked for:

The proposals include freezing the case until Trump is out of office, or agreeing that any future sentence wouldn’t include jail time. Another idea: closing the case with a notation that acknowledges his conviction but says that he was never sentenced and that his appeal wasn’t resolved because of presidential immunity.

In related news, New York Attorney General Letitia James’ office rejected Trump’s request that she agree to vacate the $454 million civil fraud judgment against him.

New Charges In Wisconsin Fake Electors Case

In the fake electors scheme prosecution in Wisconsin, prosecutors have filed 10 new felony charges each against Trump attorneys Kenneth Chesebro and Jim Troupis, and Trump’s director of Election Day operations Mike Roman.

Oops …

“Leak investigations during the Trump administration extended far deeper into Congress than previously known, leading to scrutiny of the records of dozens of staff members, the Justice Department’s inspector general found in what he described as worrisome overreach.”–NYT

Congresswoman Allegedly Assaulted In Rayburn Building

A man was arrested for allegedly assaulting Rep. Nancy Mace on Tuesday in the Rayburn House office building. Few details about the incident were provided by law enforcement, but Mace suggested the assault was related to her anti-trans crusade, which she dubs her “fight to protect women.”

Hate As Official State Policy

This is what Florida’s new state prison policy limiting gender-affirming care for inmates looks like, according to accounts provided to The Marshall Project:

Earlier this fall, Florida officials ordered transgender women in the state’s prisons to submit to breast exams. As part of a new policy for people with gender dysphoria, prison medical staff ranked the women’s breast size using a scale designed for adolescents. Those whose breasts were deemed big enough were allowed to keep their bras. Everyone else had to surrender theirs, along with anything else considered “female,” such as women’s underwear and toiletry items.

Bernie’s Last Term?

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), 83, said his new term starting in January will “probably” be his last in the Senate.

Army Secretary Fires 4-Star General

“Army Secretary Christine Wormuth — in a dramatic and rare move — on Tuesday fired … Gen. Charles Hamilton … after what officials described as a flagrant abuse of authority aimed at securing a leadership role for a subordinate officer who was found unfit for command and had an inappropriate relationship with the general, according to the IG report. The move marks the first time in nearly 20 years an Army four-star general has been outright fired and comes after a Military.com investigation in March detailed how he attempted to intervene on behalf of the subordinate officer.”–Military.com

Shot/Chaser

Do you like Morning Memo? Let us know!

Trump Does Not Have Mandate

This article is part of TPM Cafe, TPM’s home for opinion and news analysis. 

Newspaper headlines have called Donald Trump’s victory “decisive,” “massive,” “resounding,” “historic,” and “sweeping.” Trump himself has described his win as a “landslide.” On election night, he claimed that “America has given us an unprecedented and powerful mandate.” 

None of those things are true. 

Moreover, recent public opinion polls reveal that Trump’s professed policy agenda is very unpopular. 

Trump’s electoral triumph, and the Republicans’ control of both houses of Congress and the Supreme Court, certainly puts them in a position to make significant changes. But in terms of the overall vote, as well as public sentiment, Trump and the GOP have no mandate. If they try to overhaul the government and the economy based on Trump’s campaign pledges, it will cause enormous hardship and suffering, and it may well lead to a major backlash in the 2026 and 2028 elections — provided, of course, that Democrats are able to highlight the ways in which Republicans are hostile to policy ideas most Americans support.

That is the paradox of the 2024 election: that Trump won despite the unpopularity of his and his allies’ agenda. It is a puzzle Democrats will need to solve. But they cannot solve it by understanding Trump’s win to be an embrace of his ideas and a resounding rejection of Democrats’. It is not. 

Americans still do not support Trump’s ideas, nor was Republicans’ victory resounding. 

Let’s start with Trump’s electoral victory. His popular vote margin was one of the tiniest in American history. He won 49.9 percent of the vote compared with Kamala Harris’ 48.3 percent. Trump’s 1.6 percent edge is the third smallest since 1900, not counting 2016, when he lost the popular vote to Hillary Clinton by a 2.1 percent margin. 

Trump didn’t come close to a “landslide” victory. The most lopsided presidential contests have been Lyndon Johnson’s in 1964 (which he won with 61.1 percent of the vote), Franklin Roosevelt’s in 1936 (60.8 percent), Richard Nixon’s in 1972 (60.7 percent), Calvin Coolidge’s in 1920 (60.3 percent), and Ronald Reagan’s in 1984 (58.8 percent). 

Trump won the six battleground states by slim margins. He received 49.7 percent of the vote in both Wisconsin and Michigan, 50.4 percent in Pennsylvania, 50.6 percent in Nevada, 50.7 percent in Georgia, and 52.2 percent in Arizona. 

The partisan shift in Congress is also infinitesimal in historical perspective. 

The Republicans increased the number of Senate seats they hold from 50 to 53, which will give that chamber significant power to act on Trump’s agenda. But in the 33 Senate races in November, the number of Americans who voted for Democrats exceeded the number who voted for Republicans, 55.6 million to 54.2 million.

The Republicans also made no gains in the House. In the next Congress, the Republicans’ margin in the House will be 220 to 215. In other words, exactly the same as it was before the election. (This includes the two empty seats vacated by Democrats and the one empty seat vacated by a Republican that were just filled by candidates from the same party. It assumes that the three House Republicans who Trump has appointed to positions in his administration will be replaced by other Republicans). So much for Republican claims of a significant shift!

This is not to downplay the reality: that the Democrats’ small margins of defeat in a handful of congressional districts will have huge consequences, including a lot of suffering and hardship. But it is to emphasize that, in partisan terms, the United States basically remains a 50-50 country in terms of the popular vote between Republican and Democratic candidates.

Yes, there is a lot to contemplate in the big-picture analyses about the mood of the country, the shifting media environment, some demographic groups’ drift toward Trump, and the debate over whether Harris was too left or too centrist. All that and more will figure in the various diagnoses that will happen in anticipation of the 2026 and 2028 elections. 

But one simple takeaway from these basic facts is that if the Democrats had won three more seats this year, they’d have a 218-217 majority in the House and the ability to neutralize most of Trump’s legislative initiatives. The three Democrats who lost by the narrowest margins (Christina Bohannan in Iowa, Yadira Caraveo in Colorado, and Susan Wild in Pennsylvania), lost by some 7,000 votes, combined. The other four Democrats in very close races — Janelle Stelson and Matt Cartwright in Pennsylvania, Tony Vargas in Nebraska, and Mary Petola in Alaska — lost by a total of 22,180 votes. Yes, a Republican could say the same thing about the slim margins won by a few Democrats, but it was the Democrats who lost 7 of the 11 closest races. A slightly better Democratic GOTV operation in three of those districts would have given the Democrats a majority in the House. 

This is not to downplay the reality: that the Democrats’ small margins of defeat in a handful of congressional districts will have huge consequences, including a lot of suffering and hardship.

But it is to emphasize that, in partisan terms, the United States basically remains a 50-50 country in terms of the popular vote between Republican and Democratic candidates.

When it comes to key policy areas, however, America is not evenly divided. Polls show that a vast majority of Americans depart significantly from Trump’s ideas about where to take the country. Polls have for years shown — and continue to show — that voters are more likely to agree with progressive positions than conservative ones on many key issues. 

The focus by almost all Republicans on divisive social issues and bigotry can obscure views that most Americans share, especially when it comes to such matters as economic fairness, protecting the environment, health care, gun safety, abortion, and the drift toward plutocracy. The vast majority of Americans are liberal or progressive on these and other matters. Even some Trump supporters, Republicans, and people who call themselves “conservatives” have liberal or moderate views on many topics.

Americans are generally upset with widening inequality, the political influence of big business, and declining living standards. Public opinion is generally favorable toward greater government activism to address these and other problems, like climate change and health care.

Most Americans worry that government has been captured by the powerful and wealthy. They want a government that serves the common good. They also want to reform government to make it more responsive and accountable.

The overwhelming majority of Americans reject cutting Social Security and Medicare, though doing so is periodically floated by Republican members of Congress and incoming Trump administration officials, and majorities support raising taxes on the wealthiest Americans. (See the end of this article for a detailed statistical breakdown of Americans’ support for progressive policy ideas.)

All this should be good news for Democrats and liberals. They can take comfort that their ideas are more popular than Trump’s and the GOP’s. 

But public opinion on its own doesn’t translate into public policy. It has to be mobilized during legislative battles, media wars, and election campaigns. For example, even though a vast majority of Americans — and even a majority of gun owners — support background checks for gun purchasers, for decades the National Rifle Association, of which only five percent of all gun owners are members, has been better organized, more passionate and vocal, and has provided more campaign contributions to policymakers than the advocacy groups that support background checks and bans on assault rifles.

That brings us back to the confounding paradox of this election: why a significant number of Americans voted for Trump despite their disagreements with his views. Trump could not have won the election if the only people who voted for him were those who agreed with his stances on most issues. 

For example, according to CNN exit polls, 29% of voters who believe that abortion should be legal voted for Trump anyway. Twelve percent of Americans who think that Trump’s views are too extreme voted for him anyway. 

Trump got 58.5% of the vote in Missouri on the same day that 58% of voters in that state supported a ballot referendum to raise the minimum wage to $13.75 an hour and to require employers to provide paid sick leave — both policies that Trump opposes. In Alaska, where Trump won 54.5% of the vote, 58% of voters got behind a ballot measure to raise the state minimum wage from the current $11.73 an hour to $13 in 2025, $14 in 2026 and $15 in 2027, with annual inflationary adjustments in following years. It, too, will require employers to provide paid sick leave. 

In the recent election, 10 states had abortion-related measures on the ballot. Voters favored protecting abortion access in seven of them, including several states that voted for Trump. 

Missourians passed, with 51.6% of the vote, the Right to Reproductive Freedom Initiative, which establishes a right to reproductive freedom in the state constitution, including the right to make without government interference decisions about abortion, contraception, miscarriage management, prenatal and postpartum care, and respectful birthing conditions. It also protects a right to assist someone exercising their reproductive freedom. The initiative was, of course, only necessary because a majority of the Supreme Court, including three justices picked by Trump, voted to overturn Roe v. Wade. (And lest any voters had the illusion Republicans truly embraced their “leave it to the states” mantra, Missouri state Republicans immediately got to work trying to impose restrictions on abortion that circumvent the newly passed amendment.)

In Nevada, a whopping 64.4% of voters supported an amendment to the state constitution to create a right to abortion until fetal viability or when needed to protect the life or health of a pregnant woman. But Trump, who proudly took credit for appointing those three Supreme Court justices who were crucial to overturning Roe, defeated Harris in Nevada by a slim majority of 50.6%. 

In Arizona, where Trump prevailed with 52.2% of the vote, 61.6% of voters supported Proposition 139, a similar measure that establishes a fundamental right to abortion and prevents the state from restricting abortion prior to viability in most instances (generally 24–26 weeks of pregnancy). It protects access to care after that point if necessary to protect the pregnant person’s life or health (physical or mental). The measure also prohibits any law penalizing a person or entity that assists someone in getting an abortion. Fifty-seven percent of voters in Montana passed the Right to Abortion Initiative that ensures a right to make and carry out pregnancy decisions, including abortion. It prevents the state from hindering the right to abortion before viability (generally 24–26 weeks of pregnancy) and when necessary after that point to protect the pregnant person’s life or physical health. It also protects patients, health care providers or anyone who assists someone in exercising their right to make decisions about their pregnancy. This happened in a state that Trump won with 58.4% of the vote. 

There is a lot here for Democrats to sift through about these apparent policy disconnects, and voters making reactionary choices that cut against their own professed policy preferences is far from a new phenomenon in democratic politics

What’s clear, though, is that — like the exceptional con man he is — Trump persuaded enough voters who don’t agree with him on most issues to vote for him anyway by playing to Americans’ fears and vulnerabilities. He was more effective than Harris in tapping into Americans’ angers and frustrations, while Biden, and then Harris, failed to win credit for their accomplishments on expanding health insurance coverage, creating jobs, and reversing the fiasco of Trump’s mismanagement of the COVID pandemic. Trump was adept at distorting the truth to persuade a sufficient number of voters that the U.S. had the “greatest” economy ever when he was in the White House and that Biden (and then Harris) was responsible for wrecking the economy and for the increasing price of gas, eggs, and rent. He managed to convince enough voters that illegal immigrants were “poisoning” America, stealing Americans’ jobs, and creating a crime wave. Among voters who prioritized those issues, Trump won decisively

These survey findings should compel Democrats running for governor and Congress in the next two years and for president in 2028, to promote a bolder progressive policy agenda. To have credibility with voters, Democratic candidates must be able to explain how these policy ideas translate into improving voters’ lives. 

Few Americans call themselves “progressive.” Few think they share similar views with citizens of social democracies like Canada, Denmark, Norway, and Germany. But on most major issues, Americans lean left. Although Trump, the corporate plutocracy, and MAGA movement may think otherwise, the United States is a more decent and democratic society than we give it credit for.

An Overview Of Americans’ Progressive Positions

The figures cited below come from surveys conducted by Gallup, Pew, and other reputable polling organizations on the key issues facing the nation. 

These are national polls on each topic from the past two years. Each poll is hyperlinked so readers can look at the original sources.

The Economy

  • 74% of Americans think that corporations have too much power in society. (Pew 2024) 
  • 65% think corporations make too much profit. (Pew 2024)
  • 73% of Americans think our economic system “unfairly favors powerful interests.” (Pew 2024)
  • 67% of Americans favor a “billionaire tax” that would increase the tax rate to 23.8% for those with a net wealth either over $1 billion or whose income exceeds $100 million for three consecutive years (about 700 of the wealthiest Americans). This proposal, when polled, garnered the support of 84% of Democrats, 63% of Independents, and 51% of Republicans.

Money in Politics

  • 82% say that the influence of money in politics is a threat to our democracy. (American Promise 2024)
  • 80% say the people who donate money to political campaigns have too much influence on the decisions members of Congress make. (Pew 2023)
  • 73% say lobbyists and special interest groups have too much influence. Large majorities of Republicans and Democrats alike say campaign donors, lobbyists and special interest groups have too much influence. (Pew 2023)
  • 72% say that there should be limits on the amount of money individuals and organizations can spend on political campaigns. (Pew 2023)

Taxes

  • 61% of Americans think some corporations don’t pay their fair share of taxes. (Pew 2023)
  • 60% think some wealthy people don’t pay their fair share of taxes. (Pew 2023)
  • 61% support raising taxes for households with incomes over $400,000. (Pew 2023)
  • 65% support raising taxes for large corporations. (Pew 2023)
  • 77% of registered voters in the seven battleground states in this year’s presidential election like the idea of a billionaires tax to bolster Social Security shortfalls. More than half say they approve of trimming benefits for high-earners, and for taxing wages for Social Security beyond the first $168,600 in earnings, as is done under current policy. (Bloomberg News/Morning Consult 2024) 
  • 92% of voters, including 94% of Republicans, reject cutting Social Security to reduce the national debt.
  • 71% of voters want Congress to protect Social Security by increasing taxes on wealthy Americans.

Minimum Wage

  • 83% of Americans — including 76% of Republicans — favor raising the federal minimum wage to $12 an hour. (Data for Progress 2024) 
  • 66% support increasing the federal minimum wage to $15 per hour, from $7.25 per hour. (YouGov 2024)
  • 64% of Americans — including 45% of Republicans — favor raising the federal minimum wage to $17 an hour. (Data for Progress 2024)
  • 63% of registered voters think the minimum wage should be adjusted each year by the rate of inflation, including majorities of Democrats (80%) and independents (65%), and just under half of Republicans (45%). (University of Maryland 2023) 
  • The federal minimum wage was last raised in 2009 to $7.25 per hour. Since then, consumer prices have increased by 45% — including a 49% increase in medical care prices, a 51% increase in food prices, and a 67% increase in rental housing prices. Nonetheless, the federal minimum wage hasn’t budged in those 15 years.

Workers’ Rights

  • 70% of Americans — including 42% of Republicans — approve of labor unions. This is just one point below the highest level recorded since 1965. (Gallup 2024)
  • 61% of Americans say that unions mostly help the U.S. economy (Gallup 2023) 
  • 65% of Americans support establishing a law that strengthens workers’ ability to bargain collectively. (YouGov 2024)
  • 85% of voters from nine battleground states — including 76% of Republicans — say they support paid parental, family, and medical leave. 
  • 79% of voters support a federal paid leave program, including 92 percent of Democrats, 74 percent of Independents, and 72 percent of Republicans. (Data for Progress 2023)

Health Care

  • 83% say drug company profits are a major contributing factor to prescription drug costs. (KFF, 2023)
  • 73% say there is not enough government regulation when it comes to limiting the price of prescription drugs. (KFF 2023)
  • 85% support having the federal government negotiate the price of prescription medication. (KFF 2023)
  • 65% of voters want to increase Medicare funding while just 2% want to cut it. (Data for Progress 2023)
  • 92% of voters — including overwhelming margins of Democrats, Independents, and Republicans — support expanding Medicare to provide dental, vision, and hearing benefits. (Data for Progress 2024)
  • 57% of Americans believe “it is the federal government’s responsibility to make sure all Americans have health care coverage.” (Gallup 2024) 

Climate Change and the Environment

  • 80% of Americans support imposing tougher penalties on companies causing environmental damage. (YouGov 2024).
  • 74% of Americans support U.S. participation in international efforts to reduce the effects of climate change (Pew 2023), while only 33% think the U.S. should withdraw from the Paris Climate Accords. (YouGov 2024)
  • 67% of Americans say that large businesses and corporations are doing too little to reduce the effects of climate change. (Pew 2023)
  • 67% of Americans support prioritizing the development of renewable energy sources, such as wind and solar, over expanding the production of oil, coal and natural gas. (Pew 2023) 
  • 66% of Americans want the federal government to incentivize wind and solar energy production. Only 21% feel that way about coal mining and only 34% feel that way about gas and oil drilling. (Pew 2023)
  • 63% think the government should require automobiles to meet higher energy efficiency standards. (YouGov 2024) 
  • 61% of Americans think that increases in the Earth’s temperature over the last century are due more to human activities than natural changes in the environment. (Gallup 2024)
  • 58% of Americans favor dramatically reducing the use of fossil fuels such as gas, oil and coal in the U.S. within the next 10 or 20 years, in order to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. (Gallup 2023)

Gun Safety

  • 72% of Americans support requiring a person to obtain a license from a local law enforcement agency before buying a gun.
  • 61% of Americans say it is too easy to legally obtain a gun in this country, according to the June 2023 survey. Far fewer (9%) say it is too hard, while another 30% say it’s about right.
  • 66% of Americans favor banning high-capacity ammunition magazines that hold more than 10 rounds. 
  • 86% of Americans support Congress mandating background checks for all firearm sales and transfers. (McCourtney Institute for Democracy, 2023)
  • 73% support Congress requiring gun owners to take a test, obtain a license and register their firearms, similar to the process of owning an automobile.
  • 63% want to ban the sale and private ownership of semi-automatic firearms referred to as assault weapons.

Abortion and Women’s Health 

  • 64% of Americans — including 86% of Democrats, 67% of independents, and 36% of Republicans — say abortion should be legal in most or all cases; by contrast, 35% of Americans say abortion should be illegal in most or all cases. Just 9% of Americans believe that abortion should be illegal in all cases. (PRRI 2023)
  • 66% of women and 62% of men say abortion should be legal in all or most cases. (PRRI 2023)
  • 62% of white Catholics, 73% of Catholics of color, and 57% of Hispanic Catholics say that abortion should be legal in all or most cases. Majorities of other religious groups share that view, including 93% of Unitarian Universalists, 68% of white non-evangelical Protestants, 81% of Jews, 79% of Buddhists, 71% of Black Protestants, and 60% of Muslims. In contrast, only 27% of white evangelical Protestants, 30% of Latter-day Saints, and 25% of Jehovah’s Witnesses share that view. (PRRI 2023)
  • 68% of Americans — including 79% of Democrats, 71% of independents, and 54% of Republicans — oppose laws that make it illegal to use or receive through the mail FDA-approved drugs for medical abortion, often called abortion pills. (PRRI 2023) 

Same-Sex Marriage and LGBTQ rights

  • 76% of Americans support policies that protect LGBTQ Americans from discrimination in housing, employment, and public accommodation. (PRRI 2023)
  • 69% of Americans support legal same-sex marriage, up from 27% in 1996, 42% in 2004, and 50% in 2011. (Gallup 2024)
  • 78% of those 18-34, 69% of those 35-54, and 63% of those 55 and over support same-sex marriage. (Gallup 2024)
  • 80% of Americans thought that “both Democrats and Republicans should spend less time talking about transgender issues and more time talking about voters’ priority issues like the economy and inflation.” (Data for Progress 2024)
  • Only 38% of voters viewed transgender issues as “extremely” or “very” important to their presidential vote choice. It ranked last among 22 issues, such as the economy, democracy, terrorism, Supreme Court appointments, immigration, education, health care, climate change and other topics. (Gallup 2024) 
  • 58% of voters want the government to be less involved in the lives of transgender people. (Data for Progress 2024)
  • 52% of voters said they would vote for a candidate who supports transgender rights over one who doesn’t, while only 31% of voters would favor a candidate who opposes transgender rights. (Data for Progress 2024)

Education and Child Care

  • 77% of Americans favor the federal government providing free tuition at public universities or colleges for anyone who is academically qualified. (2023)
  • 78% of Americans — including 73% of Republicans and 86% of Democrats — support increasing the federal tax credit to help working parents offset the cost of child care (also known as the Child and Dependent Care Tax Credit). (Public Opinion Strategies 2023)
  • 74% of Americans — including 66% of Republicans and 81% of Democrats — support increasing the Child Tax Credit, a tax benefit for families with children. (Public Opinion Strategies 2023)

Other issues

  • 64% oppose and only 30% support pardoning January 6th protestors. (Scripps Howard/Ipsos 2024) 
  • 72% support, and only 23% oppose, permitting women to participate in military combat. (Scripps Howard/Ipsos 2024)
  • 69% of Americans — including 79% of Democrats, 68% of independents, and 59% of Republicans — believe that Trump’s tariff plans will increase prices. Few Americans — including just 20% of Democrats, 27% of independents, and 51% of Republicans — think that tariffs will have a positive impact on the economy. (Harris 2024) 

Areas of Division

The two most divisive issues are crime and immigration. The majority of Americans are concerned that the police and the criminal justice system doesn’t treat all Americans equally, based on race. And while they are concerned about protecting the border from undocumented immigrants, they oppose a major deportation effort because they recognize that it would separate families and hurt the economy.

Immigration

  • 88% of Americans want to improve security along the country’s borders. (Pew 2024) 
  • Only 34% of Americans, but 59% of Trump supporters, think that illegal immigrants make life in the U.S. worse. (Pew 2024)
  • 56% of Americans — including 88% of Trump supporters and 27% of Harris supporters — think the country should deport immigrants who are living in the U.S. illegally. (Pew 2024)

but…

  • 57% oppose mass deportation of undocumented immigrants if it results in families being separated. (Scripps Howard/Ipsos)
  • 52% oppose mass deportation of undocumented immigrants if it results in higher prices on goods. (Scripps Howard/Ipsos) 
  • 70% support admitting immigrants who can fill labor shortages. (Pew)
  • 69% support a pathway to citizenship for DREAMers — undocumented immigrants brought to the country as children. (Scripps News/Ipsos)
  • 64% of Americans, but 92% of Trump supporters, think illegal immigrants make the crime problem worse. (Pew 2024)
  • 56% of Americans, but 85% of Trump supporters, think illegal immigrants make the economy worse. (Pew 2024)
  • Only 19% of Americans think legal immigrants worsen the economy and 24% think they make the crime problem worse. (Pew 2024)

Criminal Justice

  • Just 39 percent of Americans are confident that the police in this country are adequately trained to avoid the use of excessive force. And just 41 percent are confident the police treat Black and white people equally. Forty-six percent of white people think the police are adequately trained on excessive force, compared with 34 percent of Hispanic people and only 20 percent of Black people. On equal treatment, the gap in perceptions between Black and white people is wider: While 48 percent of white people think the police treat Black and white people equally, just 12 percent of Black people say so. It’s 33 percent among Hispanic people. (Washington Post/ABC News 2023) 
  • Americans are divided over whether the recent killings of Black Americans by police are isolated incidents (48%) or part of a broader pattern of how police treat Black Americans (48%). White Americans (57%) are much more likely than AAPI (48%) and Hispanic Americans (41%) to say that killings of Black Americans by police are isolated incidents rather than part of a pattern of how police treat Black Americans. Just 14% of Black Americans say that the killings are isolated incidents. (PRRI 2023)
  • 69% of Americans report that they are confident in their local police, although there is a significant gap between Black Americans (56%), Hispanic Americans (64%), and white Americans (74%). (Gallup, 2023)
  • At least half of adults say racism is a major problem in the criminal justice system (54%), and policing (51%). (KFF 2024)
  • 67% say they trust the police all or most of the time to do what is right for their community with substantially lower shares among Blacks (45%) and Hispanics (63%) than Asians (62%) and whites (74%). (KFF 2024)

Trump Judge Questions If Airlifts Under Idaho Abortion Ban Are Really About Mother Who ‘Wants To Kill The Baby’

When an appellate court on Tuesday got its hearing of the major emergency room abortion case the Supreme Court sent back down last term, the liberals painted a grim picture of women’s suffering under an anti-abortion regime that the conservatives quickly sought to sanitize. 

Continue reading “Trump Judge Questions If Airlifts Under Idaho Abortion Ban Are Really About Mother Who ‘Wants To Kill The Baby’”

DeSantis’ Approach To Trump II: Getting Humiliated

The Wall Street Journal has new reporting out this week confirming that Donald Trump has, in fact, spoken to Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis about his desire for his daughter-in-law to become the next senator from Florida.

Continue reading “DeSantis’ Approach To Trump II: Getting Humiliated”

The DOGE Asterisk

As I’ve argued in a few different posts, “DOGE” — the grandiosely and absurdly titled “Department of Government Efficiency” — is merely an advisory panel which is probably best understood as a kind of memelord performance art. But there’s one part of this spectacle worth adding to — one separate conversation that is worth having off to the side of this effort while we’re in the midst of rightly trashing it.

Here goes.

Things take far too long to do. Things take too long to build. I saw a statistic recently that New York City used to open multiple new subway stops every year. We’ve opened like two in this century. This wasn’t new to me. It’s something I’ve been wondering about for years. And there are countless examples in your part of the country as well. Some of this is tied to the fact that today we’re more concerned with workers not getting killed on the job or dumping oceans of harmful chemicals into the ground. But it’s not all that. Not even most. There are people who have this as their hobbyhorse and they at least have broad theories of the problem — not so much over-regulation, though there’s that too, but regulatory regimes that give opponents too much power to slow things down, industry regulatory capture, etc. This is adjacent to the broader topic of housing shortages and YIMBY politics. Not the same but related.

Continue reading “The DOGE Asterisk”

About Those Alt-Media Ecosystems

I want to share with you this note from TPM Reader PP. But context is important. I received it on November 7th — two days after the election. So you need to understand it in that moment. But it’s been rattling around my head ever since. I’d actually intended to publish it at the time. I just didn’t find the right moment. What he says doesn’t mean the conversations about new ecosystems are wrong. They’re not at all. That’s not my takeaway. But if you’re serious about building up alternative media that isn’t dominated by right-wing voices and politics-adjacent channels dominated by right-wing ideas, I don’t think you can succeed or even have a plan to succeed without starting with the premises PP is articulating.

I have read TPM for just more than half my life, and the entirety of a 20-year career in political campaigns and consulting that I decided to wind down earlier this year to pursue a very different and unrelated career.

I’m writing now somewhat in response to the broader conversation about Democrats/men/algorithms/media and somewhat in direct response to TPM’s recent article about Democrats adapting to the “new media landscape.”

Continue reading “About Those Alt-Media Ecosystems”

At Risk Of Being Primaried, Joni Ernst Throws Pete Hegseth A Line

A lot of things happened. Here are some of the things. This is TPM’s Morning Memo. Sign up for the email version.

Divide And Conquer

The steady drumbeat of headlines last week – including at Morning Memo – portended a quick and merciless end to Pete Hegseth’s nomination for secretary of defense. But Sen. Joni Ernst (R-IA) seems to have singlehandedly breathed new life into Hegseth’s all-but-dead confirmation prospects.

After meeting with Hegseth Monday on the Hill, Ernst signaled she would not oppose his confirmation, a shift from her position last week after their first meeting. Ernst, a veteran and sexual assault survivor, has been considered a key bellwether for Hegseth, who settled a sexual assault allegation against him and whose own mother has deplored his treatment of women.

Ernst has come under intense pressure from MAGA world to back Hegseth or face a primary challenge in 2026, as the NYT reported:

Ms. Ernst stopped short of promising to support Mr. Hegseth, but in sending a strong signal that she was favorably inclined, she appeared to clear away a major potential hurdle to his confirmation. At the same time, her shift suggested that Mr. Trump’s MAGA base was ready, willing and able to bully Republicans into submitting to his desires.

While Hegseth’s confirmation remains imperiled, the bulk of the public reporting from the Hill has noted a sea change since late last week, as exemplified by Punchbowl: “Buoyed by continued support from President-elect Donald Trump, the crisis atmosphere enveloping Hegseth’s nomination has cooled somewhat, although the former Army National Guard officer and Fox News host is still far from a sure thing for confirmation.”

One dynamic here could be that as as long as GOP senators cluster together in an anonymous, undifferentiated herd, they can slow roll or block Trump when its in their interest to do so. But if a senator gets separated from the herd, like Ernst did, they can be picked off by MAGA world’s bullying, threatening, and retribution. Stay tuned.

Trump II Clown Show

  • MAGA culture warrior Harmeet Dhillon is Trump’s pick to oversee the Justice Department Civil Rights Division.
  • Trump is considering Kari Lake for ambassador to Mexico.
  • Clarence Thomas confidante Mark Paoletta is returning to OMB as general counsel. Sharped-eyed readers will recall Paoletta as depicted in this painting that hangs at billionaire GOP donor Harlan Crow’s private resort in the Adirondacks:

A painting that hangs at Camp Topridge shows Crow, far right, and Thomas, second from right, smoking cigars at the resort. They are joined by lawyers Peter Rutledge, Leonard Leo and Mark Paoletta, from left. Credit: Painting by Sharif Tarabay

Nepotism Alert

Lara Trump has stepped down as co-chair of the RNC, and her father-in-law is talking to Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) about appointing her to fill the seat Sen. Marco Rubio (R) will vacate if he’s confirmed as secretary of state. If appointed, she wouldn’t face voters until a 2026 special election.

Bracing For Trump II

  • WaPo: LGBTQ+ Americans stockpile meds and make plans to move after Trump’s win
  • Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Gov. Tony Evers says “we’ll do whatever we can to avoid” mass deportations in Wisconsin
  • WaPo: Colleges scramble to shield programs amid growing hostility from GOP

Mass Deportation Watch

  • AP: Republican-led states are rolling out plans that could aid Trump’s mass deportation effort
  • WLS TV: Incoming border czar Tom Homan promises mass deportation: ‘Going to start right here in Chicago’
  • CNBC: Trump’s mass deportation plan could threaten workforces in industries from agriculture to health care

The Corruption Is Open And Obvious

NBC News’ Jane Timm: “When President-elect Donald Trump returns to the White House next year, he’ll do so with a more sprawling business empire and far fewer promises about how he’ll avoid conflicts of interest.”

Troll-in-Chief

Alito’s Double Standard

With conservative jurists ascendant, Justice Samuel Alito wants to lower the high bar he himself previously set for legal standing (i.e. who has a right to sue), as Chris Geidner points out in this great piece on a new Supreme Court order in which Alito also managed to infuse some anti-trans propaganda:

Noted

The home of a Jewish member of the University of Michigan Board of Regents was vandalized with pro-Palestine graffiti and broken windows Monday:

“We were woken this morning at about 2 a.m. by the sound of crashing glass,” [Jordan] Acker said. “We were really confused. And then the police rang the doorbell, maybe a minute to a minute and a half later, and we saw that our car had been spray painted (with) some messages of threats…They had thrown two mason jars through our front window.”

Acker’s law office was vandalized in June with pro-Palestinian graffiti.

Good Read

The WSJ has the best insta-profile of Luigi Mangione, the private school and Ivy League grad charged with the murder of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson.

Succession In Real Life

Rupert Murdoch and his four oldest children are engaged in a Succession-inspired dispute over who will control his media empire after his death. The NYT has a fabulous writeup on the dispute and the stinging ruling Murdoch and his son Lachlan just received in the family’s ongoing legal battle.

Golden Dukes 2024!

We’re taking nominations for the 2024 Golden Dukes. You know the drill. (If you don’t, here’s how it works.) Get excited!

Do you like Morning Memo? Let us know!

Republicans Want To ‘Throw Out’ Thousands Of Votes In North Carolina Supreme Court Race

As North Carolina Republicans attempt to maintain their party’s uber majority on the state’s Supreme Court, the Democratic incumbent and apparent winner of the state Supreme Court race, Allison Riggs, is calling out the latest Republican stunt as an attempt to “change the election rules after the votes have been cast and counted.”

Continue reading “Republicans Want To ‘Throw Out’ Thousands Of Votes In North Carolina Supreme Court Race”