Trump Campaign Makes Good On Threat To Go After Nevada’s Mail-In Ballot Plan

NORTH LAS VEGAS, NEVADA - JUNE 09: A voter drops off a ballot in a ballot box at the Clark County Election Department, which is serving as both a primary election ballot drop-off point and an in-person voting center... NORTH LAS VEGAS, NEVADA - JUNE 09: A voter drops off a ballot in a ballot box at the Clark County Election Department, which is serving as both a primary election ballot drop-off point and an in-person voting center amid the coronavirus pandemic on June 9, 2020 in North Las Vegas, Nevada. This is the first time ballots have been mailed to all registered active voters in Nevada's history as the state holds its first-ever election done almost entirely by mail due to the risk of spreading COVID-19. The Clark County registrar said unofficial results of the election will be reported tonight but, final results will not be available until after the last ballots are counted on June 16 or 17. (Photo by Ethan Miller/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The Trump campaign on Tuesday sued Nevada over a decision to send mail-in ballots to all of the state’s registered voters, delivering on President Donald Trump’s promise earlier this week that he would fight the move, which he sees as unfavorable to him. 

The lawsuit reinforces a months-long effort by the President to cast doubt on the results of the election if Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden is declared the winner.

The complaint states that “the American people must be able to trust that the result is the product of a free and fair election” and makes the claim that Nevada’s newly enacted election legislation “fall short of this standard.” 

The complaint challenges a bill that Gov. Steve Sisolak (D) signed into law Monday afternoon, following a party-line vote to approve the bill on Sunday. The new legislation allows election officials to send absentee ballots to every “active registered voter” in the state. It also extend the deadline for counting mail-in ballots beyond Election Day, so that mailed ballots received by election officials the week after November 3 may still be counted. 

The suit follows a tweet from Trump on Monday whining that the measure would make it “impossible for Republicans to win the state.” The tweet represented a moment of unmistakable clarity about why the President has waged war on mail-in ballots: that they may hurt him politically in swing states like Nevada, and that he will make a case for contesting an election result that does not declare him the winner. 

Trump had also previously rejected mail-in voting in Florida — another swing state– but strategically pivoted on that front Tuesday, tweeting that Florida’s mail-in voting system had been “cleaned up” following revelations that Democrats were leading in mail-in ballot enrollment for that state. On Wednesday, Trump again tweeted, “Florida, send in your Ballots!”

The Trump campaign lawsuit makes the argument that Nevada’s legislation “effectively postpones and prolongs Nevada’s 2020 general election past the Election Day established by Congress” a move that Trump’s campaign states will “dilute the votes of some Nevada voters, thereby infringing their right to vote under the Fourteenth Amendment.” 

There’s a special irony to this line of argument given that the President last week floated the idea of postponing the election.

The complaint further argues that Nevada’s new election legislation goes against federal law by requiring elections officials to accept and count ballots received after Election Day, baselessly claiming that those ballots “lack objective evidence that voters cast them on before Election Day.”  

The lawsuit, filed by the Trump campaign, the Republican National Committee and the Nevada Republican Party, also said that “The RNC has a vital interest in protecting the ability of Republican voters to cast, and Republican candidates to receive, effective votes in Nevada elections and elsewhere.”

But Sisolak said in a tweet Monday that the new set of laws was about protecting the state’s residents and ensuring their ability to “vote safely.” 

“They’re trying to create a scenario here that doesn’t exist,” Sisolak told CNN’s Anderson Cooper with regard to the Trump campaign’s attack on mail-in voting in an interview Tuesday night, adding that Trump and his team were trying to “raise people’s suspicions.” He added, “We have never had any problems.”

Notable Replies

  1. Is there a reason TPM couldn’t include a copy of the complaint?

  2. Trump & Co. and the GOP claim that in person voting is rife with fraud hence the need for stringent voter ID laws. Now those same real Americans claim that mail-in voting is also rife with fraud. The only truly safe system is for Trump to appoint an acting president.

  3. It might have a chance of success if the complaint is that there isn’t enough time to put the system in place in a reliable way. If it’s just an argument that sending ballots to all registered voters is somehow illegitimate, then they’ll have to explain why other states like mine in WA have been doing that with no problems for years. That would be a real Hail Mary pass, and I can’t see it working.

  4. OF COURSE he did…this is Donnie’s modus operandi…he doesn’t LIKE it, he sues, he loses, he INSISTS DAMMIT that he ‘won’ and moves on to the next perceived grievance.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

158 more replies

Participants

Avatar for paulw Avatar for richardinjax Avatar for sysprog Avatar for trnc Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for becca656 Avatar for jimtoday Avatar for daveyjones64 Avatar for lastroth Avatar for unclechris Avatar for califdemdreamer Avatar for mtblaze Avatar for darrtown Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for tena Avatar for massie Avatar for noonm Avatar for castor_troy Avatar for 10c Avatar for txlawyer Avatar for zenicetus Avatar for possum Avatar for rwseattle Avatar for dogselfie

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: