Planned Parenthood Exits Federal Family Planning Program Over Abortion Gag Rule

on May 15, 2018 in Chicago, Illinois.
CHICAGO, IL - MAY 18: A sign hangs above a Planned Parenthood clinic on May 18, 2018 in Chicago, Illinois. The Trump administration is expected to announce a plan for massive funding cuts to Planned Parenthood and o... CHICAGO, IL - MAY 18: A sign hangs above a Planned Parenthood clinic on May 18, 2018 in Chicago, Illinois. The Trump administration is expected to announce a plan for massive funding cuts to Planned Parenthood and other taxpayer-backed abortion providers by reinstating a Reagan-era rule that prohibits federal funding from going to clinics that discuss abortion with women or that share space with abortion providers. (Photo by Scott Olson/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Planned Parenthood is leaving the federal government’s Title X program, which funds family planning services for low-income people, due to a new Trump administration rule prohibiting health care providers from making abortion referrals.

The organization announced its exit Monday, after an appeals court on Friday allowed the Trump administration to go forward in implementing the so-called “gag” rule.

“We will not be bullied into withholding abortion information from our patients,” Alexis McGill Johnson, Planned Parenthood Federation of America acting president and CEO, said on a press call Monday.

About four in 10 Title X recipients use Planned Parenthood for health services, McGill Johnson said. She said that many people will be left without any options for reproductive services.

“In places like Utah, where Planned Parenthood is the only Title X grantee, or Minnesota, where Planned Parenthood serves 90 percent of the Title X patients,  it will simply be impossible for other health centers to fill the gap,” she said.

She refused to discuss how much revenue Planned Parenthood affiliates receive through Title X, but according to Los Angeles Times, $60 million of the program’s funding goes to Planned Parenthood clinics.

Others on the call stressed that people of color will be disproportionately affected by the lack of Title X providers, and called on the Senate to adopt government spending legislation passed the House blocking the administration from implementing the rule.

In a prickly statement, HHS noted that the new regulations were in place when the latest Title X grants were announced and that every “grantee had the choice to accept the grant and comply with the program’s regulations or not accept the grant if they did not want to comply.”

HHS went on to suggest that Planned Parenthood was now abandoning its patients.

“Some grantees are now blaming the government for their own actions – having chosen to accept the grant while failing to comply with the regulations that accompany it – and they are abandoning their obligations to serve their patients under the program,” the statement said. “HHS is grateful for the many grantees who continue to serve their patients under the Title X program, and we will work to ensure all patients continue to be served.”

Planned Parenthood affiliates will submit letters by Monday evening with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services notifying the government of the move. Monday was the deadline imposed by the administration for Title X grantees to confirm that they were complying with the gag rule and to lay out an action plan for compliance.

Reproductive advocates have had mixed success at winning courts decisions against the rule. District judges in three separate cases temporarily blocked the administration from moving forward with the policy, but those orders were put on pause by a three-judge panel of the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. On Friday an 11-judge panel of the appeals court declined to reinstate the orders blocking the Trump policy.

The 11-judge panel has scheduled oral arguments for the week of Sept. 23. It is not clear whether those arguments will deal with putting the rule on pause or with the underlying merits of the legality of the Trump administration’s policy, Helene Krasnoff, a vice president at Planned Parenthood, told reporters on the press call.

Latest Livewire
43
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. So the court is granting en banc review of the panel’s decision to lift the stay on the gag rule, and they’re hearing it in a pretty expedited schedule? I don’t see how that bodes well for the gag rule.

    Note that en banc review is different in the 9th Circuit than elsewhere. The 9th has so many judges that an en banc panel means the chief judge (a Clinton appointee) and 10 randomly-selected judges. If I am reading the 9th Circuit’s local rules correctly, the panel doesn’t get selected until after the full court has voted in favor of taking a case to en banc review.

    ETA: Okay, it turns out that the plaintiffs got a terrible draw for the en banc panel:

    Members of En Banc Court : THOMAS, Chief Judge, and LEAVY, WARDLAW, W. FLETCHER, PAEZ, BYBEE, CALLAHAN, M. SMITH, JR., IKUTA, MILLER, AND LEE, Circuit Judges

    That’s four Clinton appointees, one senior-status Reagan guy, four W. Bush appointees, and two Trumpers.

  2. Avatar for nycabj nycabj says:

    You have the en banc procedure right.
    Most important is that woman may well die because cancer screening and other services affecting the health of women - including pregnant women - will have to be curtailed.
    I’m about to increase my contribution to Planned Parenthood.

  3. The lunatic pseudo-Christian right will be after access to contraception next. And the Trumpist “Krazy Kourts” will go along because something, something, sincere religious beliefs, yada, yada. Just watch.

  4. I can’t believe how well this ages.

    “They tell you that there’s a war on women. There is no war on women. There may be a war on what’s inside of women, but there is no war on women in this country.”
    — Dr. “Uncle Sleepy” Ben Carson, noted somnambulist and World Class Asshole

  5. Funny. A baker can refuse to bake a cake for a gay couple, because of their 1st Amendment Rights.

    But a doctor can’t engage in their 1st Amendment Rights to advise a patient about healthcare options.

    Got it.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

37 more replies

Participants

Avatar for discobot Avatar for fess Avatar for silvrfox Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for butlerknights Avatar for epicurus Avatar for carlosfiance Avatar for DuckmanGR Avatar for sparrowhawk Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for docd Avatar for noonm Avatar for castor_troy Avatar for birdford Avatar for tiowally Avatar for cuwrs Avatar for demosthenes59 Avatar for seveneagles Avatar for kjk Avatar for dougsanders Avatar for outis Avatar for txlawyer Avatar for rascal_crone Avatar for Akimbo

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: