SCOTUS Denies GOP Plea To Block Redrawing Of PA Congressional Map

WASHINGTON, DC - OCTOBER 03: People hold signs during a rally to call for "An End to Partisan Gerrymandering" at the Supreme Court of the United States on October 3, 2017 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Leigh Vogel/Getty Images)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) — The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday let a court-ordered redrawing of congressional districts in Pennsylvania proceed, denying a plea from Republicans legislative leaders to block it.

Justice Samuel Alito, who handles emergency appeals from Pennsylvania, rejected the request from the GOP leaders and voters that the court put on hold an order from the state Supreme Court that could now produce new congressional districts in the coming two weeks.

The Pennsylvania high court ruled last month that the map of 18 districts violated the state constitution because it unfairly benefited Republicans.

The U.S. Supreme Court typically does not review state court decisions based on a state’s constitution, but the Republicans asked the high court to make an exception.

The decision comes just four days before the Republican-controlled Legislature’s deadline for submitting a replacement map for Democratic Gov. Tom Wolf to consider.

The Democratic-majority state Supreme Court has ruled that if lawmakers and the governor can’t agree to a plan, the court will quickly move to adopt one.

Pennsylvania’s congressional delegation has been 13-5 in favor of Republicans during the three election cycles since the GOP-drawn 2011 map took effect. Democrats have about 800,000 more registered voters than Republicans and hold all three statewide row offices, but Republicans hold solid majorities in both chambers of the Legislature.

Under the process laid out two weeks ago by four of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court justices, all Democrats, the Legislature has until Friday to pass a new map, after which Wolf will have until Thursday, Feb. 15, to decide whether to endorse it and submit it to the justices.

The state Supreme Court said it expected new districts to be in place by Feb. 19, and the new map will be in play for the May 15 congressional primaries.

Republican leaders successfully defended the 2011 plan against a separate lawsuit in federal court and have complained that the state court order did not provide sufficient guidance for them to draw a new map.

A group of voters persuaded all five Democrats on the state’s seven-justice high court that the map violated the state constitution. The Jan. 22 majority order said new districts should be compact and contiguous and only split counties, cities, towns, boroughs, townships or wards when needed to ensure population equality.

The quick turn-around the majority ordered last month caused one of the Democrats on the court, Justice Max Baer, to state he was “concerned that the procedure detailed by the court may not provide the parties with due process moving forward.”

Late last week the two highest-ranking Republican leaders in the General Assembly, Senate President Pro Tempore Joe Scarnati and House Speaker Mike Turzai, sought recusal of one of the Democratic justices, David Wecht. They argued Wecht had made statements critical of gerrymandering during his successful 2015 campaign that they viewed as evidence of bias.

On Monday, Republican Justice Sallie Mundy filed a notice that she had received a $25,000 campaign donation from Scarnati but was confident she could rule fairly in the case.

The U.S. Supreme Court last month delayed a lower-court order that would have produced new congressional districts in North Carolina. The justices are currently considering challenges to Wisconsin’s state legislative districts and a congressional district in Maryland.

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. The end is near, GOP’ers…

  2. Avatar for jwbuho jwbuho says:

    Good to see that Alito didn’t give the state GOP what they clearly hoped he’d give them.

  3. Some good news for once! Hmmm…what do we do now? I’m not sure how to react to it anymore. Do we throw a party? Put on funny hats? Masturbate? What?

  4. Wow – the gerrymandering must be pretty blatant if it was too much for even Alito to stomach.

  5. WTF? Slingin’ Sammy Alito following precedent when he could have overturned it and benefitted his GOP masters?

    I don’t know how to interpret this.

Continue the discussion at

91 more replies


Avatar for pluckyinky Avatar for meri Avatar for sysprog Avatar for grindelwald Avatar for desertrain Avatar for cometboy Avatar for sniffit Avatar for bonvivant Avatar for joelopines Avatar for cd Avatar for stradivarius50t3 Avatar for arc_of_the_universe Avatar for sanni Avatar for eb5 Avatar for ronbyers Avatar for tena Avatar for jonney_5 Avatar for morrigan_2575 Avatar for jtx Avatar for romi Avatar for joriep Avatar for tiowally Avatar for greysea Avatar for maximus

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: