SCOTUS Rejects Jack Smith’s Request To Expedite Trump Appeal

WASHINGTON, DC - AUGUST 1: Special Counsel Jack Smith announces indictment of former President Donald Trump during a press conference on August 1, 2023 in Washington, D.C. (Photo by Ricky Carioti/The Washington Post ... WASHINGTON, DC - AUGUST 1: Special Counsel Jack Smith announces indictment of former President Donald Trump during a press conference on August 1, 2023 in Washington, D.C. (Photo by Ricky Carioti/The Washington Post via Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The Supreme Court denied a petition from Special Prosecutor Jack Smith to expedite Donald Trump’s appeal of the presidential immunity issues in his Jan. 6 case.

An order issued by the Supreme Court shows that his ask was denied. No dissents are listed.

Smith had asked the high court to leapfrog the D.C. Circuit after Trump appealed a district court ruling which rejected his motion to dismiss the case on grounds of presidential immunity.

The declination will almost certainly postpone Trump’s March trial date in the D.C. Jan. 6 case. The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals has agreed to hear the case on an expedited schedule; Trump will then have more options to delay the case as it works its way up to a potential Supreme Court showdown.

The questions at the heart of the appeal are untested long shots largely because of Trump’s unprecedented efforts to reverse his loss in the 2020 election. They are: does presidential immunity prevent prosecution for crimes committed while in office? And, can former presidents be prosecuted over acts that, during a Senate impeachment trial, resulted in their acquittal?

It’s now up to the D.C. Circuit to first weigh in on those questions. Oral arguments are scheduled for Jan. 9, a lighting fast timeframe for federal appellate courts.

But for now, proceedings in the Jan. 6 case are frozen until the appeal is resolved, per an order from U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan for the District of Columbia.

Smith had argued to the Supreme Court that allowing the appeal to move along its normal course would likely delay the trial, saying that it was of “imperative public importance” to resolve the case.

“The United States recognizes that this is an extraordinary request,” he wrote. “This is an extraordinary case.”

Trump shot back this week that Smith had no standing to ask for the sped up appeal because he had won at the district level, and peppered the special counsel with accusations that the case was only urgent for “partisan” political reasons.

The Supreme Court did not issue any explanation in its order for why it denied the request.

Smith said in a response filing on Thursday that Trump would still have lots of opportunity to delay the case, even if the special counsel wins quickly at the D.C. Circuit. That includes a 45 day period to request that the full appeals court rehear the case, and 90 days to ask the Supreme Court to take up the matter.

There remain a lot of variables about how the timing of the case will proceed. A lot will depend on if the Supreme Court agrees to take the case after the appeal court rules and on what timetable it sets for considering it.

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for sandi sandi says:


  2. Hmmm, justice delayed is justice denied?

  3. Avatar for sxp151 sxp151 says:

    The Trump lawyers gave the most transparently dishonest possible explanation for why they want this case delayed while the Colorado case should be rushed. And the Supremes are so naked in their abuse of power on his behalf that they didn’t even bother to say why they’re giving him what he wants.

  4. No dissents? Really?

  5. Puzzling to me too.

Continue the discussion at

406 more replies


Avatar for m_paul Avatar for pluckyinky Avatar for bobatkinson Avatar for inversion Avatar for sparrowhawk Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for esva Avatar for musgrove Avatar for leftcoaster Avatar for darrtown Avatar for ted Avatar for pshah Avatar for 21zna9 Avatar for tsp Avatar for edgarant Avatar for kimaanderson Avatar for known_thespian Avatar for noonm Avatar for txlawyer Avatar for trustywoods Avatar for Hatmama Avatar for Scoutmom Avatar for iafixture Avatar for OllieAndDezisDad

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: