The Oath Keepers, a far-right anti-government militia group, has reportedly become a major focus in the FBI’s probe into the deadly storming of the Capitol on Jan. 6.
According to the Washington Post, the Justice Department and the FBI are trying to establish a wider conspiracy indictment against members of the organization. Several Oath Keepers and their affiliates have already been charged with allegedly plotting a coordinated attack on Jan. 6 and/or breaching the Capitol building.
The Post report also confirms the New York Times’ earlier report that the feds are investigating Oath Keepers leader Stewart Rhodes. They are seeking a potential conspiracy case against him and other senior Oath Keepers, sources told the Post.
Prosecutors’ court documents in the criminal cases against the Oath Keepers and their affiliates who have already been indicted show Rhodes, who is identified as “Person One” in the filings, allegedly communicating with those individuals in the run-up to and on the day of the insurrection.
In his alleged texts, Rhodes tells the Oath Keepers that “well equipped QRFs [Quick Reaction Forces]” would be available nearby to provide backup for them, declares during then-President Donald Trump’s “Stop the Steal” rally that preceded the insurrection that “patriots are taking it into their own hands” and sends directions for the Oath Keepers to go to a particular location on the Capitol grounds during the attack.
I’m sure if Rhodes is convicted of any crimes the authorities will have Barney Fife as the lone cop on duty at the courthouse the day of sentencing.
"Who could have predicted this situation would have led to violence?!?!"
After you find what you know you will, how long before you deem them a terrorist organization?
Here’s hoping Roger Stone is in the middle of this investigation.
As others have pointed out, the difference in the way these cases and those concerning persons considered to be involved with ‘Islamic terrorism’ are handled is striking. Just think how a group of ISIL members or sympathizers who took the same actions would be treated. They would all be at least incarcerated and perhaps even the majority on their way to Guantanamo Bay.
WASHINGTON - The January 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol has pumped new life into a long-running discussion among government policy makers over whether the U.S. needs a new domestic terrorism law.
The debate stems from what many see as a yawning gap in the existing law: the absence of a standalone statute that criminalizes domestic terrorism.
While U.S. law makes it a crime to provide “material support” to a foreign terrorist organization, there is no comparable law that makes domestic terrorism a federal crime, even though individual acts committed by domestic terrorists may be illegal.