Judge Ho Appoints Former GOP Solicitor General To Help Him Mull DOJ’s Corrupt Adams Deal

TOPSHOT - New York Mayor Eric Adams speaks during his weekly press conference at New York City Hall on November 14, 2023. FBI agents seized the New York mayor's cell phones and other devices, his campaign lawyer said... TOPSHOT - New York Mayor Eric Adams speaks during his weekly press conference at New York City Hall on November 14, 2023. FBI agents seized the New York mayor's cell phones and other devices, his campaign lawyer said 10 November, 2023, in an apparent escalation of a federal investigation into campaign fundraising. The seizure appears to be part of a corruption investigation into whether Eric Adams' 2021 campaign conspired with Turkey's government and others. (Photo by ANGELA WEISS / AFP) (Photo by ANGELA WEISS/AFP via Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

A Manhattan federal judge signaled on Friday that he won’t rubber stamp the Trump DOJ’s effort to drop the prosecution of New York City Mayor Eric Adams, part of an allegedly corrupt quid pro quo acting Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove hammered out to secure Adams’ cooperation with an immigration crackdown in the five boroughs.

U.S. District Judge Dale Ho for the Southern District of New York said in a Friday order that he would wait before ruling on whether to approve a motion to dismiss. Ho appointed an amicus to argue against the government’s and Adams’ position that the case should be dismissed.

That amicus attorney is Paul Clement, a former Bush administration solicitor general and conservative legal maven. He’s a lawyer who brings a tremendous amount of experience arguing at the circuit and Supreme Court level, and who has conservative bona fides that are difficult to match.

For Ho, the decision was either to approve the motion to dismiss the case or to appoint an attorney to oppose both the Trump administration’s and Adams’ defense team’s motions.

As Ho articulated it in the Friday order, Clement is there to argue the opposing side: he’ll “assist with [the court]’s decision-making via an adversarial process.”

It’s a somewhat comical blow to the DOJ and Adams’ defense team that could force them to keep arguing the case for at least several more weeks. Ho adjourned the trial, scheduled for April, in his order, and waived Adams’ requirement to appear at future hearings.

But Ho’s decision sets up a situation in which the Trump DOJ and Adams’ legal team, represented in part by Trump Org ethics adviser Bill Burck, will spend the next several weeks arguing against one of the country’s top GOP lawyers.

After the Trump DOJ moved to dismiss the case, multiple federal prosecutors resigned in protest. Danielle Sassoon, the former acting top federal prosecutor in Manhattan, described the motion to dismiss as appearing to be part of a “quid pro quo” in which Adams would receive temporary relief from prosecution in exchange for cooperating with Trump policies.

The DOJ, represented solely by acting Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove, told Ho in a hearing on Wednesday that that was not the case. Adams had told the judge under oath earlier in the hearing that he had received no threat or inducement to agree with the motion to dismiss without prejudice. The motion would allow the government to refile on the same charges against Adams at a later date.

Ho ordered Clement and his new opponents, the Trump DOJ and Adams’ attorneys, to address a few questions in briefing over the next few weeks. That includes whether Ho can consider documents other than the motion to dismiss in making his ruling, how much latitude he has to consider dismissal, how far he can inquire before ruling, whether he can dismiss with prejudice, and what might happen were he to deny the motion to dismiss.

Latest News
84
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Trump and his brownshirts continue to try to make a mockery of our justice system. So far they have been successful (no jail time or even trail for Trump himself) so why stop now.

    This gang of thugs and knifemen won’t rest until the United States is a full fledged dictatorship.

  2. I guess Eric Holder wasn’t available. :cat:

  3. King Solomon their asses and make them split that baby! Either prosecute or dismiss with prejudice - those are their only two choices.

    1. You don’t have to say “allegedly corrupt.” “Corrupt” is an opinion, not an objectively verifiable statement of fact. Statements of opinion are not capable of being defamatory.

    2. Picking Paul Clement as amicus is sheer genius. It materially improves the chances of sustaining his ruling on appeal, should he decide to deny the dismissal. He and his team are also going to be relentless in developing the evidence showing it’s openly corrupt. (See, that’s an opinion right there.)

  4. Only 39 days until the critical state Supreme Court election in Wisconsin - the first opportunity for Democrats to inflict a humiliating electoral defeat on Trump/Musk/MAGA.

    Consider making a donation to the Wisconsin Democratic Party today:

    https://wisdems.org/

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

78 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for publishermike Avatar for slbinva Avatar for drriddle Avatar for jkrogman Avatar for left_in_washington_state Avatar for thebishop Avatar for billymac Avatar for serendipitoussomnambulist Avatar for magentascat Avatar for dangoodbar Avatar for trueblue Avatar for wintermoon Avatar for known_thespian Avatar for tiowally Avatar for brian512 Avatar for kelaine Avatar for llwillis Avatar for txlawyer Avatar for katet Avatar for lommi Avatar for old_guru Avatar for Scoutmom Avatar for timbomov

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher & Digital Producer:
Senior Developer:
Senior Designer: